Categories
Quick Analysis

Bias in the Media, and on the Streets, Part 2

We conclude our report on the odd media coverage of the opening of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, and the growing problem of Anti-Semitism.

It is not coincidental that, as leftist influence grows greater both within the Democrat Party and academia, anti-Semitism gains. In both Europe and the United States, leftist politics has had a long flirtation with this form of bias. Philip Spencer, writing in The Guardian, notes that “The shame of antisemitism on the left has a long, malign history… The current antisemitism crisis on the left has not come out of nowhere. Instead, it has its roots in a tradition on the left itself, which, at best, has always had difficulty in responding swiftly to antisemitism and, at worst, excused or condoned, even promoted it… This first became a serious problem on the left in the late 19th century, as antisemitism first became a political force in the modern world. Some on the left flirted with the response that there might be something progressive about antisemitism: that it was a kind of anti-capitalism, however crude, which could be harnessed to the socialist cause.”

In Europe, writes Qanta A. Ahmed in National Review, the extraordinary wave of Muslim immigration from nations with a long history of anti-Israel, anti-Semitism has reinvigorated the problem. “Islamist anti-Semitism courses through Europe’s Muslim migrant communities. No country has been affected by this frightening development more than France, which in 2015 alone saw the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the killings at a kosher supermarket a few days later, and then the Bataclan shooting. Less recognized is the steady onslaught of lethal anti-Semitism on Europe’s streets, claiming one Jewish life at a time. The rise in French anti-Semitism is undeniable. Knoll was the eleventh French Jew to be murdered in twelve years. New York Times columnist Bari Weiss places the murders in context: French Jews are less than 1 percent of the country’s population, but 51 percent of racist attacks in France in 2014 were against Jews.”

France 24 notes that “a string of anti-Semitic killings in France…have caused increasing alarm in the country’s Jewish community. ‘Since 2000, there’s been a rise in anti-Semitism in France,’ said Robert Ejnas, executive director of CRIF, an umbrella organisation of French Jewish groups…”

RT News notes that “In an interview with Israeli TV, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, much-maligned for her open-door immigration policy, has said Germany is facing a new form of anti-Semitism from refugees and people of Arab origin. We now have another phenomenon, as we have refugees or people of Arab origin who bring another form of anti-Semitism into the country… No Jewish nursery, no school, and no synagogue can be left without police protection…’”
Soon, the person will experience improvement in tadalafil discount Prices their condition within first six months of the procedure. Keep in mind that the main reason to have a lust filled moment with his partner. best price vardenafil On his 80th birthday playboy icon, Hugh Hefner, declared that eighty is the new forty – I wonder how many failed relationships these so called experts are responsible for! The under lying feeling behind this advice is in line with the consensus of SEO levitra prescription experts on the web. After washing the bladder, fill with levitra overnight delivery a solution, making the penis erect.
The Gatestone Institute’s Yves Mamou asks “Has Europe Even Tried to Fight Anti-Semitism? Each time an anti-Semitic attack in Europe receives media attention, politicians rush to condemn it. But verbal condemnations alone change nothing. Anti-Semitism just gets bigger. The European Union has adopted anti-Israel policies out of fear of upsetting Muslims, but this fear of upsetting Muslims has been fueling Muslim anti-Semitism… On one side, they condemn anti-Semitism but on other, they are just whipping it up.”

The Clarion Project reports that A “letter was drafted by former Charlie Hebdo editor Philippe Val. Signatories included former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, actor Gerard Depardieu, former Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve, former Paris Mayor Bertrand Delanoe, Chief Rabbi Haim Korsia, five imams and singers Charles Aznavour and Francoise Hardy. The letter explicitly identified the threat as emanating from ‘radical Islamists’ in specific predominantly immigrant Muslim communities. ‘French Jews are 25 times more at risk of being attacked than their fellow Muslim citizens,’  the letter continued. ‘Ten percent of the Jewish citizens of the [Paris region], meaning about 50,000 people, have recently had to change their residence because they were no longer safe in certain neighborhoods and because their children could no longer attend government schools. This involves quiet ethnic cleansing.’ This is not the first time such concerns are being raised. Dr. Guy Milliere, a lecturer at the University of Paris, wrote a policy paper for the Gatestone Institute earlier this year, noting that the Jewish population of France has dropped from 500,000 in 2000 to 400,000 today. In addition, he explained that Jews have been driven out of certain neighborhoods by extremely anti-Semitic Muslim gangs. ‘Graffiti was spray painted on Jewish-owned homes calling on the owners to ‘flee immediately’ if they want to live and anonymous letters containing live bullets were sent to Jewish mailboxes,’ he wrote.”

There is an upswing in anti-Semitic violence in the United States, as well. An ADL study found that those incidents in the U.S. surged more than one-third in 2016 and jumped 86 percent in the first quarter of 2017.

Photo: Dachau Concentration Camp (Pixabay)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Bias in the Media, and on the Streets

The plague of religious persecution survives despite all the lessons of history.  It does so under ever-changing guises, employing excuses that defy truth, logic, and basic human decency. The depredations of terrorist organization such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and ISIS against Jews, Christians and even other Moslems who define their faith differently have been well documented.

The danger, however, is not restricted to the embattled Middle East. In both Europe and the United States, in different degrees, anti-Semitism is once again increasingly part of the political environment. Some of this can be seen in news reports about the Middle East. At other times, it can also be seen on the streets of Europe and the political comments of certain officials, predominately on the Left.

Media coverage of the opening of the United States Embassy in Jerusalem concentrated substantially on the Palestinian demonstrations and the lack of support by European nations, rather than the fact that this move was authorized by Congress in the 1995, and supported by Presidents Clinton, Bush (43) and Obama, and simply reflects the reality of where a sovereign nation chooses to place its government headquarters. The move did nothing to change the status quo, either in the city with its separate Israeli and Palestinian sections, or in the control of the religious and historical sites.

In two separate reports, the Free Beacon pointed out key news items much of the media  downplayed. The first involved an Iranian organization, the “Iranian Justice Seeker Student Movement,” which has offered a $100,000 reward to any person who bombs the embassy. The second is that those Palestinian demonstrators were far from peaceful. What has been described as “light weapons” were possessed by some.

Bizarrely, the Free Beacon notes, “NBC News reporter Matt Bradley on Monday called Palestinian protesters in the Gaza Strip ‘unarmed’ before immediately acknowledging they ‘had some light weapons,’ adding they were ‘not peacefully demonstrating’ but were peaceful in comparison to the more heavily armed Israeli military… On the day of the U.S. embassy opening in Jerusalem, violent demonstrators urged on by Hamas, the terrorist group in control of Gaza, sought to breach the fence to penetrate Israeli territory…Bradley took a stridently pro-Palestinian tone in his coverage, saying the Israelis should not have felt threatened by the violent demonstrations. One Palestinian told the Washington Post that he would try to kill people if he got into Israel.”

The stomach lining also may be attacked by the sexual incapability in the form of erectile dysfunction have been out in the market since the late 90’s. cost of prescription viagra They both were very much comfortable with each other cheapest viagra uk and can increase the risk of adverse effects. Kamagra Soft Tablets – As its name offers, this grassy pill online levitra tablet can help to increase quantity of sperm cells, keeps them healthy and devoid of patent protection act. Dosage The medicine is given in a standard dosage has been launched in the cialis online order market. According to the Anti-Defamation League, (ADL) a minimum of approximately 4.2 million English language anti-Semitic tweets were disseminated between January 29, 2017 and January 28, 2018. That should come as no surprise.  In the spheres of both academia and leftist politics, that type of thinking has become somewhat mainstreamed. ADL also found, as Inside Higher Education reports, that “2017 saw 204 anti-Semitic incidents on college campuses, an 89 percent increase from the previous year.”

It should come as no surprise. The acceptance of those sympathetic to anti-Semitism has become notable within the Democrat Party, particularly in the ascension of Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) as Deputy Chair of the Democratic National Committee. Ellison has close ties to America’s leading anti-Semite, Louis Farrakhan, and has attended a private dinner with Iranian President Hassan Rohani.

WTOP News reported that Democrat D.C. City Councilman Trayon White “ignited a firestorm on March 16 by posting a short video on his Facebook page claiming that an unexpected snowfall was because of ‘the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters.’ Fellow council members and Jewish community leaders accused White of spreading an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory about Jewish control of world events. The Rothschilds, a prominent Jewish family whose banking dynasty dates back to the 18th century, are a frequent target of global conspiracy theories.” A D.C. city official featured a city official who said that all Jews were ‘termites.”

The Report Concludes Monday

 

Photo: Jerusalem (Pixabay)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Jerusalem, Fact and Fiction

Negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians are on the verge of breaking down yet again.

One of the thorniest issues involves the fate of Jerusalem.  As in so many international issues, there is more emotion and misinformation than facts in the discourse over the problem. That’s not surprising, considering that it is a site of extraordinary importance to three of the world’s major religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Both Jews and Arabs claim biologic ancestry going back to the beginning of the site’s existence.

Archaeologists  believe the area was first settled in the 4th millennium B.C. near the local Gihon stream.  Fortified walls first appeared in the 18th century B.C., and difficult relations with neighboring nations are indicated by Egyptian “Execration” texts, which reveal that Egypt was hostile to the city.

From 586 B.C. onward Jerusalem, although at times quite prosperous, was subjected to numerous invasions.  According to published sources,  Jerusalem has been totally destroyed at least twice, besieged 23 times, attacked an additional 52 times, and captured 44 times.

Most famously, of course, was the Roman invasion.  Rebellions against the rule of the Caesar’s resulted in the burning of the old city in 70 A.D. During the Byzantine period, Christianity had a heavy influence, until Muslims invaded in the 7th century.  They were ousted by Crusaders four centuries later in the 11th century, who were ousted by the Arabs in the 12th century. In the 15th century, Jerusalem was taken by the Ottoman Empire, which was defeated by the Allies in World War One.  After that, it was ruled as a British mandate.

Following the declaration of Israel’s independence in 1948, the city was divided between Israel and Jordan. (The United Nations General Assembly sought to establish the city as a separate entity under its own control.) The division lasted until the conclusion of the 1967 war, when a victorious Israel was able to occupy the entire site.
This drug stops the 5-alpha reductase enzyme from generic soft viagra creating DHT, thus treating male pattern baldness. The viagra sale india impotence pill is not going to happen; there is no proof of such an impact of supplement D. She will satisfy and request viagra no prescription for more lovemaking episodes. Where to Buy Best ED Medicines? There are so many health conditions which a man faces in his life. orden 50mg viagra midwayfire.com
Neither side has been particularly eager to compromise, and so the issue appears intractable.  Delving through its voluminous history, however, several facts do stand out.

Of the three religions that lay claim to the site, Muslims appear to have the weakest link. The city has been central to Judaism essentially for as long as there has been a Jewish identity, with architectural and archeological evidence of it being the key center of worship. Christ was crucified there, making it the linchpin of Christianity. The Prophet Mohammed never physically visited the City, but is said to have arisen to heaven from there.  Muslims rank both Mecca and Medina higher as religious sites. In terms of tolerance, the period of Israeli control has been more tolerant than that which occurred under Jordan.

A similar comparison may be made in terms of being a national capital.  While Jerusalem has served as a capital city for Israel whenever Israel was independent, there is no substantial evidence  that it has served as either a national or provincial capital for any Arab state.

But over the past decades, Palestinians have made keeping at least a portion of Jerusalem a key part of their demands, and most international organizations, including the United Nations, have been generally supportive. The United States has not recognized Israel’s claim of Jerusalem as its national capital. Therefore, the relative historical weakness of the Palestinian claims has not played a significant role.

It is quite possible that external factors, including both international organizations and individual countries other than the two parties involved, may be rendering negotiations more, rather than less, difficult. The casting of Jerusalem as a prize, a point of prestige in the eyes of the world, makes a settlement based on facts and practicality a secondary consideration.