Bias in the Media, and on the Streets

The plague of religious persecution survives despite all the lessons of history. It does so under ever-changing guises, employing excuses that defy truth, logic, and basic human decency. The depredations of terrorist organization such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and ISIS against Jews, Christians and even other Moslems who define their faith differently have been well documented.

The danger, however, is not restricted to the embattled Middle East. In both Europe and the United States, in different degrees, anti-Semitism is once again increasingly part of the political environment. Some of this can be seen in news reports about the Middle East. At other times, it can also be seen on the streets of Europe and the political comments of certain officials, predominately on the Left.

Media coverage of the opening of the United States Embassy in Jerusalem concentrated substantially on the Palestinian demonstrations and the lack of support by European nations, rather than the fact that this move was authorized by Congress in the 1995, and supported by Presidents Clinton, Bush (43) and Obama, and simply reflects the reality of where a sovereign nation chooses to place its government headquarters. The move did nothing to change the status quo, either in the city with its separate Israeli and Palestinian sections, or in the control of the religious and historical sites.

In two separate reports, the Free Beacon pointed out key news items much of the media downplayed. The first involved an Iranian organization, the “Iranian Justice Seeker Student Movement,” which has offered a $100,000 reward to any person who bombs the embassy. The second is that those Palestinian demonstrators were far from peaceful. What has been described as “light weapons” were possessed by some.

Bizarrely, the Free Beacon notes, “NBC News reporter Matt Bradley on Monday called Palestinian protesters in the Gaza Strip ‘unarmed’ before immediately acknowledging they ‘had some light weapons,’ adding they were ‘not peacefully demonstrating’ but were peaceful in comparison to the more heavily armed Israeli military… On the day of the U.S. embassy opening in Jerusalem, violent demonstrators urged on by Hamas, the terrorist group in control of Gaza, sought to breach the fence to penetrate Israeli territory…Bradley took a stridently pro-Palestinian tone in his coverage, saying the Israelis should not have felt threatened by the violent demonstrations. One Palestinian told the Washington Post that he would try to kill people if he got into Israel.”

The stomach lining also may be attacked by the sexual incapability in the form of erectile dysfunction have been out in the market since the late 90’s. cost of prescription viagra They both were very much comfortable with each other cheapest viagra uk and can increase the risk of adverse effects. Kamagra Soft Tablets – As its name offers, this grassy pill online levitra tablet can help to increase quantity of sperm cells, keeps them healthy and devoid of patent protection act. Dosage The medicine is given in a standard dosage has been launched in the cialis online order market. According to the Anti-Defamation League, (ADL) a minimum of approximately 4.2 million English language anti-Semitic tweets were disseminated between January 29, 2017 and January 28, 2018. That should come as no surprise. In the spheres of both academia and leftist politics, that type of thinking has become somewhat mainstreamed. ADL also found, as Inside Higher Education reports, that “2017 saw 204 anti-Semitic incidents on college campuses, an 89 percent increase from the previous year.”

It should come as no surprise. The acceptance of those sympathetic to anti-Semitism has become notable within the Democrat Party, particularly in the ascension of Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minnesota) as Deputy Chair of the Democratic National Committee. Ellison has close ties to America’s leading anti-Semite, Louis Farrakhan, and has attended a private dinner with Iranian President Hassan Rohani.

WTOP News reported that Democrat D.C. City Councilman Trayon White “ignited a firestorm on March 16 by posting a short video on his Facebook page claiming that an unexpected snowfall was because of ‘the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters.’ Fellow council members and Jewish community leaders accused White of spreading an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory about Jewish control of world events. The Rothschilds, a prominent Jewish family whose banking dynasty dates back to the 18th century, are a frequent target of global conspiracy theories.” A D.C. city official featured a city official who said that all Jews were ‘termites.”

The Report Concludes Monday

Photo: Jerusalem (Pixabay)

Quick Analysis

Part 3: AMERICA’S STRATEGIC POSTURE

We conclude our summary of the urgent recommendation of the Congressional Committee on the nation’s Strategic Posture NON-NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES The Commission recommends: The United States urgently deploy a more resilient space architecture and adopt a strategy that includes both offensive and defensive elements to ensure U.S. access to and operations in space. The United States and its Allies take steps to ensure they are at the cutting edge of emerging technologies – such as big data analytics, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) – to avoid strategic surprise and potentially enhance the U.S. strategic posture. The United States prioritize funding and accelerate long-range non-nuclear precision strike programs to meet the operational need and in greater quantities than currently planned. x America’s Strategic Posture The United States develop and field homeland IAMD that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China, and determine the capabilities needed to stay ahead of the North Korean threat.4 The Secretary of Defense direct research, development, test and evaluation into advanced IAMD capabilities leveraging all domains, including land, sea, air, and space. These activities should focus on sensor architectures, integrated command and control, interceptors, cruise and hypersonic missile defenses, and area or point defenses. The DOD should urgently pursue deployment of any capabilities that prove feasible. The Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments transfer operations and sustainment responsibility for missile defense to the appropriate Military Departments by 1 October 2024. This will allow the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to focus on research, development, prototyping and testing. ALLIES AND PARTNERS The Commission believes it is in the U.S. national interest to maintain, strengthen, and when appropriate, expand its network of alliances and partnerships. These relationships strengthen American security by deterring aggression regionally, before it can reach the U.S. homeland, while also enabling U.S. economic prosperity through access to international markets. Withdrawing from U.S. alliances and partnerships would directly benefit adversaries, invite aggression that the United States might later have to reverse, and ultimately decrease American, allied, and partner security and economic prosperity. Further, the Commission believes that our defense and the defense of the current international order is strengthened when Allies can directly contribute to the broader strategic posture, and the United States should seek to incorporate those contributions as much as possible. The Executive branch should recognize that any major change to U.S. strategic posture, policies, or capabilities will have great effect on Allies’ perceptions and their deterrence and assurance requirements. As a result, any changes should be predicated on meaningful consultations. RISK REDUCTION The Commission believes it is of paramount importance for the United States to work to reduce strategic risks. This involves activities and programs across the U.S. government, including in nonproliferation and arms control, as well as maintaining strong, viable, and resilient military forces. The Commission recommends that a strategy to address the two-nuclear-peer threat environment be a prerequisite for developing U.S. nuclear arms control limits for the 2027-2035 timeframe. The Commission recommends that once a strategy and its related force requirements are established, the U.S. government determine whether and how nuclear arms control limits continue to enhance U.S. security. The Commission recommends that the United States continue to explore nuclear arms control opportunities and conduct research into potential verification technologies in order to support or enable future negotiations in the U.S. national interest that seek to limit all nuclear weapon types, should the geopolitical environment change. Where formal nuclear arms control agreements are not possible, the Commission recommends pursuing nuclear risk reduction measures to increase predictability and reduce uncertainty and the chances for misperception and miscalculation. The 2009 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States reported that the United States was at “a moment of opportunity, . . .but also a moment of urgency” – because the security environment had improved and the threat of nuclear proliferation was the principal concern. Since 2009, the security environment has dramatically worsened and new existential threats have emerged. This Commission concludes that the United States now faces a highstakes challenge that requires urgent action. Nevertheless, the Commission has not seen the U.S. government demonstrate the urgency and creativity required to meet the challenge. Nothing other than synchronized steps taken by the Executive and Legislative Branches will craft the strategy and build the posture the nation requires. The challenges are unmistakable; the problems are urgent; the steps are needed now. Photo: An Air Force Global Strike Command unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test at Vandenberg Space Force Base (DoD)