Category: TV Program

TV Program

Weak Foreign Policy’s Dangers

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date April 25, 2024

Cameron Hamilton, a former Navy SEAL and Republican Congressional Candidate for Virginia’s 7th district, describes how the Biden administration’s weak leadership has promoted instability and conflict around the world. Another fascination conversation follows as author Jason Morgan describes the perilous situation in the Indo-Pacific. If your missed the program on your local TV station, watch it at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sIo2JVHjF6_hPQzr6CVrMegRF_7YxSnp/view?ts=66295e0a

TV Program

Israel, Ukraine and American Divisiveness

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date April 17, 2024

The fight for Ukraine and Israel’s security is vital not just for those nations, but for America as well. Retired Marine Lt. Col. Hunter “Rip” Rawlings, who has served in the affected regions, explains why. Author Brent Hamachek describes what has caused the extreme divisiveness in America today. If you missed the program on your local TV station, watch it here: https://rumble.com/v4q11ni-the-american-political-zone-april-16-2024.html

Photo: Pentagon Press Secretary Air Force Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder conducts a news briefing at the Pentagon, April 15, 2024.

TV Program

Lawfare and Divisiveness

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date April 10, 2024

Judge John Wilson (ret.), author of The Making of A Martyr, reveals how a biased Justice Dept. has abused its powers to interfere in the 2024 election. Project 21’s Horace Cooper delivers the news that President Biden is losing the support of Black Americans. If you missed the program on your local station, watch here:

TV Program

How to Destroy an Economy

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date April 4, 2024

Reiner Zitelmann reports that Germany had one of the world’s strongest economies, but adopting the socialist policies that progressives seek to employ in the U.S. ended that. That’s a fact, but do facts and history count any longer? Lee Habeeb discusses that vital issue. if you missed the program on your local channel, watch it here:

TV Program

Threats to Security, Threats to Freedom

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date March 28, 2024

On this week’s program, Col. John Mills (ret.) describes how China has infiltrated sensitive areas within the U.S., and the increasing weakness of America’s military. Larry Schweikart describes the growing threat “globalism” poses to U.S. freedom and sovereignty.

If you missed the show on your local channel, tune in at

https://rumble.com/v4lwplu-the-american-political-zone-march-26-2024.html

TV Program

America Doesn’t Realize it’s Already at War

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date March 21, 2024

On this week’s program:

Republicans and Conservatives are right to worry about Biden’s open border but wrong about holding up aide to Ukraine because of it. Jason Jones, president of the Human Rights Education and Relief organization notes.

Kenneth Abramowitz, author of Multifront War: Defending America from Political Islam, China, Russia, Pandemics, and Racial strife, explains that America is fighting a multi front war but doesn’t realize it

If you missed the show on your local station, watch it here:

TV Program

Illegal Immigration, Artificial Intelligence and More

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date March 14, 2024

Are the rights of American citizens being diminished under the tidal wave of illegal immigration? Richard C. Lyons discusses the disturbing answer to that question. Carl Gould provides a frank analysis of the impact of AI on business. Watch both fascinating conversations at

TV Program

America’s Dangerous Lack of Domestic Pharmaceuticals

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date March 6, 2024

America gets most of its medicine from China, an adversary nation. Dr. Shawn Roland, founder of Jase Medicine, reveals the imminent danger this poses. If you missed the show on broadcast TV, watch it here

https://rumble.com/v4hndp6-the-american-political-zone-march-5-2024.html

TV Program

Realism in Foreign and Domestic Policy

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 29, 2024

Andrew Langet, President of the Institute for Liberty, and John Hulsman, author of The Last Best Hope, a History of American Realism, have a blunt and probing discussion about what has gone wrong–and how to fix- America’s foreign and domestic policies. I you missed it on your local stations, watch at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cduUMJ9mnkTW_z0VvM__LA_eZUYDLHu9/view?ts=65df966f

TV Program

America’s Key Challenges

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 22, 2024

America’s defense challenges are extraordinary. Jeffrey Schloesser, former commanding general of the 101st Airborne Division and current executive vice president of Strategic Pursuits, outlines the hard facts. Project 21’s Emery McClendon discusses the detrimental impact of policies such as illegal immigration on black Americans. Watch at https://rumble.com/v4evor3-the-american-political-zone-february-20-2024.html

Quick Analysis

Judge Juan Merchan Must Recuse Himself from Hearing the Case of Donald Trump

Judge Juan Merchan Must Recuse Himself from Hearing the Case of Donald Trump By John H. Wilson In April and May of 2023, we discussed several of the weaknesses of the criminal case brought against former President Donald Trump. In particular, we described the legal insufficiency of the indictment, which does not “asserts facts supporting every element of the offense charged and the defendant`s…commission thereof with sufficient precision to clearly apprise the defendant…of the conduct which is the subject of the accusation.” We also noted that the majority of the charges brought against Trump are most likely time-barred by New York’s Statute of Limitations. https://www.usagovpolicy.com/is-trumps-indictment-beyond-the-statute-of-limitations/ In both articles, we also noted that the Judge assigned to hear the case against the former President, Juan Merchan, had previously donated small sums to several anti-Trump organizations, and was unlikely to dismiss the charges on either of these grounds. According to the New York Post, Merchan “donated $35 to Democratic causes in 2020, including $15 to President Biden’s campaign and $10 to a group dedicated to ‘resisting … Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.’ Federal Election Commission records show Merchan made three small-dollar donations within the span of two days in July 2020 through ActBlue, the Democratic Party’s preferred online fundraising platform. The veteran judge contributed $15 earmarked for the ‘Biden for President’ campaign on July 26, 2020, and then the following day made $10 contributions to the Progressive Turnout Project and Stop Republicans” . Given the small amounts involved, no one seriously argued that Judge Merchan should be removed from the case after having made these contributions, even though “FEC records show that Merchan listed his occupation as ‘judge’ on the donation form, and his employer as the New York State Office of Court Administration.” This is, however, an issue of some seriousness. Under Rule 100.5(A)(1) of the Rules of the Chief Administrative Judge for the State of New York, “[n]either a sitting judge nor a candidate for public election to judicial office shall directly or indirectly engage in any political activity except (i) as otherwise authorized by this section or by law, (ii) to vote and to identify himself or herself as a member of a political party, and (iii) on behalf of measures to improve the law, the legal system or the administration of justice. Prohibited political activity shall include…(h) soliciting funds for, paying an assessment to, or making a contribution to a political organization or candidate. (Emphasis added.) This means that despite the modest sums donated by Judge Merchan, he is prohibited from making ANY contribution, in ANY amount, to the Biden campaign, or any other political organization. It’s not as if Judge Merchan wouldn’t be aware of these rules. According to CNN, “Merchan launched his legal career in 1994…as an assistant district attorney in the trial division in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office…[i]n 2006, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg…appointed Merchan to Family Court in the Bronx, and Democratic Gov. David Paterson appointed him to the New York State Court of Claims in 2009, the same year he began serving as an acting New York Supreme Court judge.” With more than 23 years of experience as a judge, Juan Merchan would certainly know he is prohibited from making contributions in any amount to political campaigns and organizations. But he did it anyway. Further, under Rule 100.3(E)(1) “[a] judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Making campaign contributions to the current President, and then hearing the case of that President’s opponent in this year’s election would certainly qualify as a reasonable question regarding Merchan’s impartiality. But this is only one basis under which Judge Merchan’s removal from the Trump case is both appropriate and necessary. There is more substantial basis for this matter to be taken away from Judge Merchan. Rule 100.3(E)(1) continues as follows; “[a] judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where… (d) the judge knows that the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person known by the judge to be within the sixth degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person…(iii) has an interest that could be substantially affected by the proceeding.” According to the website Living DNA, a First Degree of Relationship is a Parent to a Child, while a Sixth Degree is a second cousin. In between are Grandparents and grandchildren, great-grandparents and great-grandchildren, Aunts, Uncles, Nieces, Nephews and First Cousins. It stands to reason, then, that if Judge Merchan had a cousin, or a nephew, or a grandchild who was known to the Judge, and that person had “an interest that could be substantially affected” by a proceeding over which Judge Merchan was presiding, he would have to legally and ethically recuse himself from the handling of that matter. But what if that person is of the first degree of relationship, that is, a child of the Judge? Meet Loren Merchan, who is, according to the New York Post, “president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump’s first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser…Schiff’s campaign for US Senate scored an eye-popping $20 million in aid since he began soliciting donations off the presumptive GOP presidential front-runner’s unprecedented 34-count indictment last April, according to Federal Election Commission records…The Senate Majority political action committee, which supports Democratic Senate campaigns, pocketed $73.6 million since it also began firing off fundraising emails following the ex-president’s indictment…The super PAC has done more than $15 million in business with Authentic since 2019, including email fundraising and branding assistance, while Schiff’s Senate campaign paid Authentic more than $10 million for digital advertising and other consulting services the past year, records show.” Let us understand what the New York Post has revealed here. Loren Merchan is the president of an organization that has been paid ten million dollars by the Senate Majority PAC, which has earned the money to pay Loren’s company by fundraising that is, at least, […]

Our Latest Television Program

Weak Foreign Policy’s Dangers