News & features affiliated with the New York Analysis of Policy & Government

Category: TV Program

TV Program

Realism in Foreign and Domestic Policy

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 29, 2024

Andrew Langet, President of the Institute for Liberty, and John Hulsman, author of The Last Best Hope, a History of American Realism, have a blunt and probing discussion about what has gone wrong–and how to fix- America’s foreign and domestic policies. I you missed it on your local stations, watch at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cduUMJ9mnkTW_z0VvM__LA_eZUYDLHu9/view?ts=65df966f

TV Program

America’s Key Challenges

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 22, 2024

America’s defense challenges are extraordinary. Jeffrey Schloesser, former commanding general of the 101st Airborne Division and current executive vice president of Strategic Pursuits, outlines the hard facts. Project 21’s Emery McClendon discusses the detrimental impact of policies such as illegal immigration on black Americans. Watch at https://rumble.com/v4evor3-the-american-political-zone-february-20-2024.html

TV Program

Dangers, Expense of Open Border

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 16, 2024

Author Lord Conrad Black and former federal prosecutor Will Scharf reveal the extraordinary danger resulting from Biden’s open border. If your local station doesn’t carry our program, watch it at https://rumble.com/v4dfbet-the-american-political-zone-february-13-2024.html

TV Program

America Invaded!

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 8, 2024

“America Invaded!” proclaims documentary film maker Namrata Singh Gujral. During our interview with her, Ms. Gujral, a Democrat, outlines the danger the U.S. faces both now and in the future from Biden’s open borders. If you missed it on your local station, watch it at https://rumble.com/v4c1bec-the-american-political-zone-february-7-2024.html

TV Program

Will the Dollar be Crushed by Overspending?

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date February 4, 2024

On this week’s program, we speak with financial guru Edward Dowd, who finds the real U.S. economy is contracting. Author Dani Katz discusses how culture wars and identity politics harm the nation. If you missed the program on your local station, watch here: https://rumble.com/v4ajydr-the-american-political-zone-january-30-2024.html

TV Program

In a World at War, Are America’s Intelligence Services Reliable?

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 24, 2024

Are we heading towards World War III? Col. Joseph Buccino (ret.) discusses the volatile world situation. Dr. J. Michael Waller examines what has happened to the once respected but now politicized CIA and FBI. If you missed the show on your local station, watch it at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KTRMdOiUhMMbFmSJwastEapuqFasOQTe/view

TV Program

The Making of a Martyr?

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 18, 2024

There is little doubt that the extraordinary collection of legal actions against former President Donald Trump constitute a unique chapter in American political history. Judge John Wilson (ret.) provides unique and extraordinary insights, on this week’s program. If you missed it on your local station, watch it here https://rumble.com/v47lvtc-the-american-political-zone-january-16-2024.html

TV Program

American’s Freedom Under Attack

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 11, 2024

What will be the fate of American Democracy, as progressives take aim at U.S. sovereignty and individual right? Our guest Richard Lyons reviews that key question. Is the Second Amendment and the ability to defend against violent crime under attack? Renowned expert Dr. John Lott explains. If you didn’t catch our program on your local TV station, watch here:

TV Program

Pandering to Iran, Punishing Heroes

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 4, 2024

Why does the Biden Administration continue to pander to Iran? Author Brandon Weichert discusses the shocking details. Hero veteran Jason Nelson tells about his run-in with sex traffickers. Watch at https://rumble.com/v44y0ji-the-american-political-zone-january-2-2024.html

TV Program

Which Threats are Real, and Which may be a Hoax

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date December 29, 2023

Why, and how, has socialist influence gained so substantially in recent years? Our guest Julie Behling explains. Are climate change concerns based on fact or politics? Geologist Gregory Wrightstone reveals surprising facts. Watch at https://rumble.com/v43ogak-the-american-political-zone-december-26-2023.html

Part 3: AMERICA’S STRATEGIC POSTURE

We conclude our summary of the urgent recommendation of the Congressional Committee on the nation’s Strategic Posture NON-NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES The Commission recommends: The United States urgently deploy a more resilient space architecture and adopt a strategy that includes both offensive and defensive elements to ensure U.S. access to and operations in space. The United States and its Allies take steps to ensure they are at the cutting edge of emerging technologies – such as big data analytics, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) – to avoid strategic surprise and potentially enhance the U.S. strategic posture. The United States prioritize funding and accelerate long-range non-nuclear precision strike programs to meet the operational need and in greater quantities than currently planned. x America’s Strategic Posture The United States develop and field homeland IAMD that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China, and determine the capabilities needed to stay ahead of the North Korean threat.4 The Secretary of Defense direct research, development, test and evaluation into advanced IAMD capabilities leveraging all domains, including land, sea, air, and space. These activities should focus on sensor architectures, integrated command and control, interceptors, cruise and hypersonic missile defenses, and area or point defenses. The DOD should urgently pursue deployment of any capabilities that prove feasible. The Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments transfer operations and sustainment responsibility for missile defense to the appropriate Military Departments by 1 October 2024. This will allow the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to focus on research, development, prototyping and testing. ALLIES AND PARTNERS The Commission believes it is in the U.S. national interest to maintain, strengthen, and when appropriate, expand its network of alliances and partnerships. These relationships strengthen American security by deterring aggression regionally, before it can reach the U.S. homeland, while also enabling U.S. economic prosperity through access to international markets. Withdrawing from U.S. alliances and partnerships would directly benefit adversaries, invite aggression that the United States might later have to reverse, and ultimately decrease American, allied, and partner security and economic prosperity. Further, the Commission believes that our defense and the defense of the current international order is strengthened when Allies can directly contribute to the broader strategic posture, and the United States should seek to incorporate those contributions as much as possible. The Executive branch should recognize that any major change to U.S. strategic posture, policies, or capabilities will have great effect on Allies’ perceptions and their deterrence and assurance requirements. As a result, any changes should be predicated on meaningful consultations. RISK REDUCTION The Commission believes it is of paramount importance for the United States to work to reduce strategic risks. This involves activities and programs across the U.S. government, including in nonproliferation and arms control, as well as maintaining strong, viable, and resilient military forces. The Commission recommends that a strategy to address the two-nuclear-peer threat environment be a prerequisite for developing U.S. nuclear arms control limits for the 2027-2035 timeframe. The Commission recommends that once a strategy and its related force requirements are established, the U.S. government determine whether and how nuclear arms control limits continue to enhance U.S. security. The Commission recommends that the United States continue to explore nuclear arms control opportunities and conduct research into potential verification technologies in order to support or enable future negotiations in the U.S. national interest that seek to limit all nuclear weapon types, should the geopolitical environment change. Where formal nuclear arms control agreements are not possible, the Commission recommends pursuing nuclear risk reduction measures to increase predictability and reduce uncertainty and the chances for misperception and miscalculation. The 2009 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States reported that the United States was at “a moment of opportunity, . . .but also a moment of urgency” – because the security environment had improved and the threat of nuclear proliferation was the principal concern. Since 2009, the security environment has dramatically worsened and new existential threats have emerged. This Commission concludes that the United States now faces a highstakes challenge that requires urgent action. Nevertheless, the Commission has not seen the U.S. government demonstrate the urgency and creativity required to meet the challenge. Nothing other than synchronized steps taken by the Executive and Legislative Branches will craft the strategy and build the posture the nation requires. The challenges are unmistakable; the problems are urgent; the steps are needed now. Photo: An Air Force Global Strike Command unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test at Vandenberg Space Force Base (DoD)