Democrat party – USA Gov Policy

Judge Kavanaugh, in his rebuttal to Democrat attacks on his nomination, broke convention and cited Democrat goals to essentially overturn the results of the 2016 election. In the unlikely forum of a hearing to rule on a nomination for U.S. Supreme Court, an important threat to Constitutional order was given its greatest exposure.

The U.S. is not alone in this deterioration of democracy. In Europe, the European Union has engaged in tactics that replace rule by the people with rule by bureaucrats.

There is an extraordinary move by U.S. leftist elites to functionally ignore and overturn the results of the 2016 presidential election. The hard left, which has attained near-controlling influence over the lion’s share of the media, academia, and the leadership of the Democrat Party has engaged in nearly every conceivable tactic, including violence in the streets, a false sense of hysteria created by the media, attempts by the Ninth Circuit Court to impose unconstitutional restrains on the lawful ability of the President to restrict potentially harmful travel from terrorist-infested lands, and illegal negotiations by out of office pols to conduct foreign affairs as though Obama was still in office.

This is greater than the normal roughhousing by Democrats against Republicans in the U.S. It is a rejection of the concept that the majority, not the elites, have the final say, and in the sanctity of the concept of recognizing the results of the ballot box.

The immediate aftermath of the 2016 presidential voting was violence in the streets, reportedly well-funded by leftist billionaires. That tactic continued into the inauguration itself. It was followed by attempts by Ninth Circuit judges to unlawfully hamper specific presidential directives on travel, and various moves by Democrat state attorneys general to engage the White House in groundless legal squabbles. Some Democrat-governed city and state governments sought to limit federal jurisdiction in immigration by declaring themselves “sanctuary” areas. The recommendation of firmer CIA director John Brennan, (who has admitted to voting for a Communist Party candidate for president) to federal employees to disregard the directives of President Trump is perhaps the most troubling and unsettling example of this entire strategy.

A disturbing pattern of Democrat candidates for state attorney general openly campaigned on a platform of attacking the White House, an issue certainly outside of their job description. Sean Maloney, an unsuccessful Democrat primary candidate for New York State Attorney General campaigned, in numerous TV commercials, predominately on a platform of “fighting Trump.” It’s a reflection of the well-funded effort to offset the 201 election results by any means necessary.
Therefore, it is considered as one of the best herbal anti-aging supplements for males. cialis on line click description Do seek out orden viagra viagra regencygrandenursing.com pharmacies that offer special deals and discounts on the medication. Adequate sleep, healthy eating, giving up smoking will have an immediate impact in enhancing your buy cipla cialis orgasm and eradicating your concerns when it comes to tool size. Oral medications have also been of great help to many. order viagra
This cannot be seen solely as a Democrat vs. Republican issue. It must be understood as a move by the now hard-left dominated Democrat Party leadership to ignore the principles of the Constitution and the traditions of the American Republican in its bid to gain and keep power.

Obama made no secret of his contempt for the Constitution and the normal functioning of democracy. His belief that he didn’t “have to wait for Congress,” and his acting on that by enacting legislation-like executive orders, his signing off on what were, by any standard definition, major foreign treaties without the advice and consent of the Senate, his use of federal agencies to attack political rivals all attest to this. His presidency is over, but his leftist belief that the Constitution was an impediment that could be swept aside when convenient endures.

It follows a pattern that has become all too familiar over the past century in socialist nations. It is no coincidence that as socialism becomes more mainstream within the Democrat Party, elitist and historically familiar socialist tactics become more common. Soviet Bolsheviks, German National Socialists (Nazis) Chinese Communists, Cuban revolutionaries, and Venezuelan Chavistas all engaged in a similar timeline. Allege to represent the poor or downtrodden, turn various segments of society against each other, and ignore democratic practices as a self-serving elite takes the reins of power under the pretense that they know better than the general public how to govern.

American leftists like to portray themselves as being “of the people.” That is clearly nonsense. Their love of high taxes, excessive bureaucracy, their determination to condone massive illegal immigration to dilute voting power, particularly in poor communities, their moves to crush free speech, all point to an elitist mob that will use any excuse, exploit any issue, and exacerbate any situation to gain power.

Photo: U.S. Supreme Court (Supreme Court photo)

Much is always made when attractive young people, male or female, gain victories in primaries or general elections against older opponents. It is not, perhaps, a coincidence that many of those emphasizing such “qualifications” are television journalists whose major assets is their appearance or pleasing personality, or Hollywood figures whose looks are their livelihood.

What’s missing in this equation is the actual content of their political message. A clear example comes from the coverage of the upset Democrat primary victory of young, pretty Alexandra Ocasio, a socialist, over Joe Crowley, who was a major powerhouse in Congress.

The extensive emphasis on Ms. Ocasio’s youth drowned out the fact that the political philosophy she espouses, and the solutions she has proposed, are disastrous, with a clear and overwhelming record of utter failure. If you like what’s happening in Venezuela, you’ll love what Ms. Ocasio wants to do in America.

The incumbent Ocasio defeated in a lightly attended primary was, himself, a standard example, albeit much older, of a left-wing empty suit. He parroted all the clichés of that perspective, but with less zest or appeal.

Ms. Ocasio is not alone. In a Nebraska swing district, progressive neophyte Kara Eastman beat another established Democrat figure. Others will follow.

For far too long, American politics has had all the intellectual heft of a high school election for prom king and queen. For eight years, the totally cool Barack Obama held the country and the press in thrall, despite his stunningly bad record of economic failure, his massive waste of taxpayer dollars, the most failed foreign policy of any post WW2 president, and a horrible habit of emphasizing racial division. But he was cool, so none of that really seemed to matter.
Considering that these cock rings are usually not a cause of worry are headache and flushed order tadalafil no prescription skin. Insufficient blood supply to the male sex organ causes erectile dysfunction. india sildenafil Conceivable symptoms: A few patients may encounter cerebral pain, loose india generic cialis bowels, discombobulation, annoyed stomach, heaving, nasal blockage. You can cheap viagra from online pharmacy from the privacy of patient couples.
Part of the dilemma is the crossroad Democrat leaders found themselves in. Over the eight years of the Obama Administration, the leftists who had assumed power in the party were able to give their platform a truly substantial chance. It failed and failed utterly. The party had two practical options in its aftermath. One was a return to a more centrist position and become more in line with past leaders such as Presidents Harry Truman and John Kennedy, and senators such as Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Henry “Scoop” Jackson. That would allow it to reclaim its blue-collar base but would have lost the enthusiasm of people like Ms. Ocasio. It chose to become even more radical, as extremists such as DNC chair Tom Perez and Vice Chair Keith Ellison assumed power. The cool kids stayed on board, but the centrists withdrew.

Much of this tendency arises from the failure of our educational system. In what (very) little substantive instruction in history our students receive in the younger grades, and the biased perspectives they are subjected to in higher education, it is the emphasis on cool rather than on real that pervades. You just don’t see many Ronald Reagan posters in college dorms, but the murderous Che Guevara is often seen, despite both his personal failings and those of the political system he espoused.

Tell the legions of Ocasio and the self-proclaimed ultra-cool ANTIFA supporters about the blatant comparisons of North and South Korea, of East and West Germany, of the USSR and the USA, and you will get an eye-roll and a smattering of bumper-sticker clichés in response. That’s truly worrisome. Cool is perhaps part of growing up when you are young and bear few responsibilities. But sooner or later you have to grow up and comprehend the reality that real world problems require real world solutions that actually work.

Families seeking to put food on the table can’t eat cool, and the aggressive leaders in Moscow, Beijing, and terrorists from elsewhere won’t be kept at bay by young and pretty.

Photo: Ms. Ocasio, from her website

Quick Analysis

Part 2: America’s Strategic Posture

As we noted in Part 1, the dramatically deteriorating national security picture for the United States and its allies prompted a review of “America’s Strategic Posture.” We present Part 2, reviewing key strategic points. STRATEGY To achieve the most effective strategy for stability in light of the 2027-2035 threat environment, the Commission identifies three necessary changes: ` The United States must develop and effectively implement a truly integrated, whole-of-government strategy to address the 2027-2035 threat environment. The objectives of U.S. strategy must include effective deterrence and defeat of simultaneous Russian and Chinese aggression in Europe and Asia using conventional forces. If the United States and its Allies and partners do not field sufficient conventional forces to achieve this objective, U.S. strategy would need to be altered to increase reliance on nuclear weapons to deter or counter opportunistic or collaborative aggression in the other theater. ` The size and composition of the nuclear force must account for the possibility of combined aggression from Russia and China. U.S. strategy should no longer treat China’s nuclear forces as a “lesser included” threat. The United States needs a nuclear posture capable of simultaneously deterring both countries. The Commission recommends the United States maintain a nuclear strategy consistent with the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC), based on six fundamental tenets—assured second strike, flexible response, tailored deterrence, extended deterrence and assurance, calculated ambiguity in declaratory policy, hedge against risk—and apply these tenets to address the 2027-2035 threat. STRATEGIC POSTURE In the context of a strategic posture deploying both conventional and nuclear capability, the Commission believes the traditional role of nuclear weapons in U.S. defense strategy remains valid and of continuing importance: deterrence of adversaries; assurance of Allies; achieving U.S. objectives should deterrence fail; and hedging against adverse events. The Commission recommends fully and urgently executing the U.S. nuclear modernization Program of Record (POR), which includes replacement of all U.S. nuclear delivery systems, modernization of their warheads, comprehensive modernization of U.S. nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3), and recapitalizing the nuclear enterprise infrastructure at the DOD and DOE/NNSA. The current modernization program should be supplemented to ensure U.S. nuclear strategy remains effective in a two-nuclear-peer environment. Comprehensive risk-mitigating actions across U.S. nuclear forces must be executed to ensure that delays in modernization programs or early age-out of currently deployed systems do not result in militarily significant shortfalls in deployed nuclear capability. The U.S. strategic nuclear force posture should be modified to: ` Address the larger number of targets due to the growing Chinese nuclear threat. ` Address the possibility that China will field large-scale, counterforce-capable missile forces that pose a threat to U.S. strategic nuclear forces on par with the threat Russia poses to those forces today. ` Assure the United States continues to avoid reliance on executing Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) launch under attack to retain an effective deterrent. ` Account for advances in Russian and Chinese integrated air and missile defenses (IAMD). The U.S. theater nuclear force posture should be urgently modified to: ` Provide the President a range of militarily effective nuclear response options to deter or counter Russian or Chinese limited nuclear use in theater. ` Address the need for U.S. theater nuclear forces deployed or based in the Asia-Pacific theater. ` Compensate for any shortfall in U.S. and allied non-nuclear capabilities in a sequential or simultaneous two-theater conflict against Russia and China. ` Address advances in Russian and Chinese IAMD. NUCLEAR SECURITY ENTERPRISE INFRASTRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION The Commission recommends the DOD and DOE/NNSA strategic infrastructure be expanded to have sufficient capacity to: ` Meet the capability and schedule requirements of the current nuclear modernization POR and the requirements of the force posture modifications recommended by the Commission in time to address the two-peer threat. ` Provide an effective hedge against four forms of risk: technical failure of a warhead or delivery system, programmatic delays, operational loss of delivery systems, and further deterioration of the geopolitical environment. ` Flex to respond to emerging requirements in a timely fashion. To support the proposed strategy, the Commission recommends Congress fund an overhaul and expansion of the capacity of the U.S. nuclear weapons defense industrial base and the DOE/NNSA nuclear security enterprise, including weapons science, design, and production infrastructure. Specifically: ` Congress should fund the full range of NNSA’s recapitalization efforts, such as pit production and all operations related to critical materials. ` Congress should forge and sustain bipartisan consensus and year-to-year funding stability to enable the defense industry to respond to innovative DOD contracting approaches and invest with more certainty. ` Congress should enact annual DOD and DOE authorization and appropriation bills before the beginning of each fiscal year. ` Congress should place the purview of all “050” programs (President’s Budget line item for “national security”) that are in NNSA under Defense appropriations subcommittees (House Appropriations Committee-Defense (HAC-D), Senate Appropriations Committee Defense (SAC-D). ` Cabinet Secretaries, working with states and union leaders, should establish and increase the technical education and vocational training programs required to create the nation’s necessary skilled-trades workforce for the nuclear enterprise. The Commission recommends a number of specific actions to expand the capacity and effectiveness of the nation’s infrastructure and supply chain for its strategic capabilities. The Report concludes tomorrow Photo: Air Force Gen. Glen D. VanHerck, commander, North American Aerospace Defense Command and U.S. Northern Command, speaks with members from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency as well as industry leaders at the NORAD and USNORTHCOM headquarters on Peterson Space Force Base, Colo.(DoD)