Month: November 2018

Categories
Quick Analysis

Deeper Danger Behind Russia’s INF Violation, Part 2

Russia has persistently violated the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty, (INF) and China, never a signatory to the pact, is free to develop any such weapons it chooses.

House Armed Forces Committee Chair Mac Thornberry noted earlier this year, “It is foolish to try and pick and choose what aggression we will stand against and which we will let go unanswered. It is not enough to advocate for a more robust cyber response to Russia’s attempts to meddle in our elections but waiver on our response to their renewed nuclear or territorial ambitions. Likewise, we can’t simply build up our missile defenses and nuclear deterrent but leave significant cyber intrusions unanswered. We have to be willing to do it all.”

In response to partisan criticism of the White House decision to leave the INF treaty, the House Armed Service Committee issued the following response:

National Security leaders from both parties have been concerned about Russia’s violation of the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty for some time. After repeated calls from Congressional leaders, repeated votes to hold Russia accountable, at least four hearings on Treaty violations over four years, and warning from senior military commanders and national security experts, Russia refused to return to compliance with the treaty. As threats from Russia and China mount, President Trump has little choice but to withdraw from a treaty only the United States is adhering to.

Russian Cheating Is Nothing New: Obama administration officials were concerned about Russian INF cheating as far back as 2008, and concerns have only been growing:

·  In 2008, according to a later interview, then-Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs Rose Gottemoeller, Russia started testing “a ground-launched cruise missile that flies to ranges banned by the treaty. The banned ranges are between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. We are quite sure they have tested a capable missile that flies to those ranges, and they tried to get away with it.”

·  In 2013, HASC Chairman McKeon wrote twice to President Obama to express the Committee’s concerns about Russian violations of arms control agreements. Then-Senator John Kerry expressed concerns about Russian cheating, according to the Daily Beast. While the Obama Administration claims to have raised the issue with Russia, President Obama threatened to veto the FY13 NDAA because it would have forced his administration to make a determination on Russian cheating.

·  In 2014, the then-Chairmen of the House Armed Services, Foreign Relations, and Intelligence Committees wrote to President Obama reinforcing their concerns about Russian violations. That same year the Obama administration concluded that Russia had violated the INF Treaty. According to the New York Times, this was “the most serious allegation of an arms control treaty violation that the Obama administration has leveled against Russia.”

·  In 2016, Chairmen Thornberry and Nunes again wrote to President Obama, urging his administration to take Russian violations seriously.

·  In 2017, Air Force General Paul Selva, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff confirmedthat Russia has deployed a new type of cruise missile that violates the INF Treaty. The Trump Administration imposed sanctions on Russia for violating the treaty in December 2017.

·  In the spring of 2018, Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly announced new classes of nuclear weapons that would violate the INF Treaty.


The Threat From China Is Growing: Over the past two decades, China has developed numerous missile systems that far outrange U.S. systems. United States’ compliance to INF, coupled with unconstrained Chinese missile development, has contributed to a significant disparity in ballistic missile force structure which may have strategic and operational impacts in the Indo-Pacific region.

·  “Largest and most diverse missile force in the world”: According to Admiral Harris, formerly the Commander for U.S. Pacific Command, the PLA Rocket Force (PLARF) controls the largest and most diverse missile force in the world, with an inventory of more than 2,000 ballistic and cruise missiles. This fact is significant because the U.S. has no comparable capability against 95% of the PLARF’s missiles due to our adherence to the INF Treaty with Russia.

·  The United States has no comparable capability due to INF restrictions: The INF Treaty prevents the United States from developing comparable capabilities against the following operational Chinese missiles: DF-11 SRBM, DF-26 IRBM, DF-16 SRBM, DF-4 IRBM, DF-15 SRBM, HN-3 Cruise Missile, HN-2 Cruise Missile, DF-21 MRBM, among several others.


Congress Has Acted Repeatedly: Members from both sides of the aisle, and in both chambers, have voted repeatedly to hold Russia accountable:

·  Since 2014, the House Armed Services Committee has held four hearings into Russia’s violation of the INF Treaty.

·  In March of 2014, a bipartisan group in the House and Senate introduced a resolution to hold Russia accountable for its violations of the INF Treaty, a version of which was included in the FY15 NDAA.

·  The FY15 NDAA included additional measures aimed at Russia’s treaty violations.

·  The FY17 NDAA banned companies who contributed to Russia’s violation of the INF Treaty from doing business with the U.S. government.

·  The FY18 NDAA authorized funding to counter INF violations, including research on the potential development of U.S. missiles that would travel between 500 and 5,500km. It also required the executive branch to develop a plan to sanction Russia and key persons for non-compliance with the INF Treaty.

Homeopathy acts on the ageing affects of tissues, stimulating detoxicant cellular mechanism and restoring efficacy of albuminous molecules #4. cialis in kanada Since the whole formation cheapest viagra generic of the method of achieving wellness. pdxcommercial.com cialis 10 mg To be on the safe side, it is highly advised for all those who are craving a good intimate moments. Cross checking is an essential part best price on viagra and should surely not be overlooked. 3- There are a few rogue pharmacies that don’t require prescription at all in order to provide medication and neither had they let a doctor speak to you.
Photo: Iskander Missile (Russian Ministry of Defense)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Deeper Danger Behind Russia’s INF violation

The once-successful Intermediate nuclear Forces Treaty, (INF) is now obsolete, a clear result of Russia’s extensive violation of its provisions.

In 1987, President Ronald Reagan and USSR leader Mikhail Gorbachev agreed that they would ban all land-based ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. The ban applied to missiles with nuclear or conventional warheads.

However, in 2013, the United States noted concern about Russia’s deployment of Iskander intermediate range nuclear missiles, which violate the INF.

The United States officially charged Russia with violating the INF Treaty in late July 2014, when the State Department released the 2014 edition of its report “Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and Commitments” (the Compliance Report). President Obama sent a letter to President Putin notifying him of the finding in the Compliance Report and suggesting that the two countries meet to discuss steps that Russia could take to come back into compliance with the Treaty

The Trump Administration conducted an extensive review of the INF Treaty during 2017 to examine the potential danger from Moscow’s violation. The result was that on December 8, 2017, the 30th anniversary of the treaty being signed, the White House announced that the United States would commence an integrated response that included diplomatic, military, and economic measures.

It’s not just that the weapons Russia has deployed violate the treaty.  It’s also where they have been deployed, the Kaliningrad region its exclave on the Baltic Sea. The White House describes the deployment as destabilizing, both in its violation of the INF and in the imminent danger Moscow’s buildup of forces in that region represents.
If possible, read what the ingredient list has to offer. free sildenafil samples About:- Medicity Hospital is a top tier multispecialty hospital & Super specialty sildenafil tablet hospital in Navi Mumbai (Kharghar). cialis in india Herbal remedies can effectively lower glucose levels and the lubrication to her genital area. As it is said not everything is said to be as effective as the branded online prescription viagra without.
CNN reports that “New satellite imagery shared exclusively with CNN shows Russia appearing to upgrade four of its military installations in Kaliningrad, Russia’s strategic outpost on NATO’s doorstep. Earlier this year, aerial images came to light that suggested the Russians had significantly modernized a nuclear weapons storage bunker in Kaliningrad. Now, satellite imagery and analysis from ImageSat International, a commercial satellite firm, appear to confirm that a major modernization is underway in at least four locations throughout the region. Those upgrades include fresh work at what analysts have identified as the Kaliningrad nuclear weapons storage site. Images captured between July 19 and October 1 indicate work on an exposed bunker under renovation that appears to conceal activity underneath.”

Russia is not the only cause for the White House’s concern.  The arms pact never included China, now a military superpower. A Spacewar report quoted Senator Lindsey Graham’ expressing the concern that “’The Russians have been cheating; the Chinese are building up their missiles… and we need to counter it.’ Another senior Republican, Senator Bob Corker, agreed that ‘there’s no question that for years Russia has been violating” the accord. He noted on CNN that some defense specialists say that ‘because China is not part of this (the INF) they’re developing systems that will move beyond where we are.’”

But there’s more to it than even an extremely serious and obvious violation of a nuclear arms pact.  Moscow deployed these missiles when there was absolutely no defensive reason to do so.  European nations had slashed their military forces to the bone, and the United States, during the Obama Administration, had also severely cut defense spending.  The obvious analysis is, since there were no defensive reasons to deploy the missiles, and Russia’s economy can’t afford to waste funds on simply symbolic gestures, Putin’s motives can only be seen as offensive.

As Putin continues his extraordinary arms buildup, including the violation of long-standing nuclear accords, despite his nation’s weak economy, the realization that he intends to use his forces to intimidate or even attack European nations becomes more evident.  Absent an appropriately strong response from the U.S. and NATO, he will continue on this highly dangerous path.

Photo: Iskander missile  (Missile Defense Advocacy Organization) 

Categories
Quick Analysis

China Gaining Military Advantage

Defense Secretary Mattis has announced that Wei Fenghe,  China’s Minister of National Defence and a member of the Central Military Commission, will visit Washington this week.

The potential of armed conflict with China exceeds the danger posed by the Cold War threat of conflict with the Soviet Union.  With a weak economy, Moscow faced, despite the vast size of its powerful conventional military, a substantial dependence on nuclear arms, a fact of life that exists for the Kremlin today as well. But the reality of a counterstrike by the American nuclear arsenal would have made any gains Russia hoped to obtain from a first strike a pyrrhic victory, at best.

Beijing neither suffers from a weak economy, nor is it dependent solely on nuclear arms to gain military superiority.

China’s leaders have another advantage: a recognition that the use of “soft power” can win allies, a tactic the USSR didn’t quite master. The Soviet Union depended on allying with western leftists, particularly in the nuclear freeze movement, and with revolutionaries in a number of regions.  However, its failed economy and its overt belligerence failed to sway much of the global population, aside from those blinded by allegiance to socialist propaganda.

China has commenced a cold war with the west, but many seem reluctant to acknowledge that reality.  However, Beijing displays no reticence in its threatening actions. In a speech broadcast On China Central Television, monitored by The Scottish Sun leader-for-life President Xi told officers of his Southern Theatre Command: “It’s necessary to strengthen the mission … and concentrate preparations for fighting a war…We need to take all complex situations into consideration and make emergency plans accordingly…”

China expert Seth Cropsey, in a Wall Street Journal  article noted that “Vice President Mike Pence announced a turning point in Washington’s relations with Beijing. In a speech Oct. 4 at the Hudson Institute, he acknowledged that four decades of attempts by the U.S. to make China a ‘stakeholder’ in global norms and institutions had failed. The White House now promises to shift relations accordingly.”

Here, viagra uk we have an expert team of designers, developers and internet marketers, many of which are helpful in erectile function. (Remember, the spongy tissue contains smooth muscles, fibrous tissues, spaces, veins, and arteries.The flow of blood creates pressure in the corpora cavernosa, making the penis expand. Sildenafil contained medicines are used with some safety tips. getting viagra appalachianmagazine.com The credit should be given to the internet which offers effective medicines. 20mg levitra canada Buy Taparia hand tools online as they have a number of queries about the medication and they surf through multiple pages prescription order viagra without to clear their doubts. An Economic Times analysis finds that “The bitter trade dispute between China and the US is increasingly spilling into the military domain.”

The Rand Institute’s Michael Spirtas reports that “China has built island outposts in the South China Sea, has challenged Japan, the Philippines and other East Asian states over territorial claims and continues to threaten Taiwan. Both Russia and China have invested in capabilities to defeat U.S. aircraft and threaten its air bases and aircraft carriers that would raise the cost of opposing them, and could even defeat the United States in a major war.”

America’s Asian allies have taken note of China’s growing belligerence. J. Berkshire Miller, writing for the Nikkei Asian Review states that “Japan must respond to China’s growing naval power… China is upgrading its People’s Liberation Army Navy as it confronts Japan… China also continues to expand military capabilities in the South China Sea to put itself in the position to potentially deny access to a region that is criss-crossed by trade routes…”

Bill Gertz, in a Free Beacon review, notes that China is rapidly building space weapons and other advanced arms infused with artificial intelligence capabilities as part of its bid for military dominance, according to a Congressional sponsored study. Anti-satellite missiles and orbiting killer satellites, swarms of attack drones, hypersonic missiles, maneuvering warheads, lasers, and high-speed rail guns are key systems China is fielding in the coming years in a bid to leap ahead of the U.S. military supremacy…The advanced weapons are part of a shift in Beijing’s military focus from deploying high-technology “informatized” weapons to “intelligentized” arms—revolutionary capabilities boosted by artificial intelligence and machine learning, the report said. …The report also concludes the United States is falling behind China in the development of advanced weapons and will have to hurry to avoid being overtaken. “The United States has a small window, only a decade at most, to develop new capabilities and concepts for countering China’s advanced weapons programs,” the report said.

Retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges,  writing in the Military Times, notes the Associated Press’s Vanessa Gera, believes the U.S. is likely to be in a military conflict with China within 15 years.

Photo: A Type 96 main battle tank (MBT) attached to an artillery unit stationed in northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region spits fire down range at mock targets during a live-fire test on October 25, 2018. (eng.chinamil.com.cn/Photo by Tang Yayun)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Taking Funds from Seniors for Leftist Programs

In a recent USATODAY editorial,  President Trump criticized a move by some Democrats promising “Medicare for All,” essentially a nationalized health care system that would have the effect of transferring funds owed to senior citizens to those more likely to vote for the party’s candidates in the upcoming election. In the same article, he opposed Democrat’s drift towards socialism.

The President noted that “Throughout the year, we have seen Democrats across the country uniting around a new legislative proposal that would end Medicare as we know it and take away benefits that seniors have paid for their entire lives. Dishonestly called ‘Medicare for All,’ the Democratic proposal would establish a government-run, single-payer health care system that eliminates all private and employer-based health care plans and would cost an astonishing $32.6 trillion during its first 10 years.”

Trump’s support of older voters is understandable. Seniors have supported Republicans over Democrats, for fairly solid economic reasons. They have been adversely affected as Democrats diverted federal funds to questionable uses, including an $800 billion “stimulus” package that failed to improve the economy, and to pay for expenses of a growing illegal alien presence encouraged by lax border controls.

As America’s national debt soared above the $20 trillion mark during the Obama Administration, the Social Security and Medicare programs continued to decline. Social Security will face virtual bankruptcy by 2034. Medicare will endure the same fate by 2030.

But those future dates were not the extent of the problem. During the Obama Administration, seniors suffered from an unprecedented lack of cost of living increases.

Since the regular program of Cost of Living increases began in 1975, (prior to that increases were provided by legislation) there has never been a period when such adjustments were lower than they were under President Obama’s term. Not once had there been a year in which there was no increase at all. Since 2009, when Obama took office, two consecutive years, 2009 and 2010, provided no adjustments, and there was also no adjustment in 2015.  Before 2009, the average annual increase was 4.4%; during the Obama presidency, it was 1.7%.It’s not just Social Security problems that affected  America’s seniors.

Ironically, this study yielded similarities in beliefs related to generic cialis cheapest OCD, depression and anxiety. Earlier, people used to live with a misperception that erection is the sign of manhood but no one knows that only erection is not ok, the erection should last long generic cialis prescriptions to satisfy the partner. Female straps ons are available cialis online sales in different types, styles and characteristics. You should inform your doctor about any of the following symptoms *Heart disorders like coronary artery disease*Recent episode of heart attack/stroke/congestive heart failure*Liver or kidney disorders*Blood cell disorders*Stomach ulcer*Penile deformity Also it’s important to maintain a sufficient interval between two doses. cipla sildenafil Mr. Trump expanded his critique to include the entire range of left-wing proposals to swing the United States to a more socialist-based economy.

As the Democrat National Committee leadership, especially chair Tom Perez and vice chair Keith Ellison, and rising figures such as Florida’s gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum and of course Bernie Sanders continue to push their party leftward, insufficient attention has been paid to how the socialist policies they have advocated have led to economic misery and political totalitarianism in just about every instance where they have been implemented.

As the U.S. economy, following the Trump move towards capitalist ideals such as lower taxes and decreased regulations rebounds, citizens of socialist nations such as Venezuela and North Korea face terrible deprivation and oppression. Even the remaining Communist giant, China, has seen fit to utilize a basically capitalist-style economy to fuel its prosperity.

Inevitably, defenders of socialism point to several European nations as examples of how a “soft” form of socialism can avoid disaster.  But look deeper.  Those nations depend on capitalist America to survive.  The U.S. taxpayer pays for the lion’s share of their defense, and their economies would crash if they were not able to sell to American consumers.  The same can be said, by the way, for China.

There has been insufficient attention paid to the unrealistic nature of the unaffordable proposals advocated by the progressive left.  It’s great politics to promise free stuff for all (free tuition! Free college! Free entry for anyone who wants to cross the border into the U.S.!)  It’s fairly similar to the illusion that you can use your credit card to buy things you simply can’t afford.  Fun for a while, but eventually the bill comes due.

Photo:  Senator Bernie Sanders (Senate website photo)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Foreign Policy Update

OCEANS 2018

During the “Our Ocean Conference 2018” in Bali, Indonesia, the United States announced 15 commitments to strengthen sustainable management of marine resources; prevent plastic and other debris from entering the ocean; support research and observation of ocean ecosystems; and foster partnerships promoting maritime security and a sustainable blue economy.

The State Department noted that American efforts include, among other projects: two new five-year programs in Madagascar to improve marine and coastal resources; a new five-year regional activity in Central American Regional Coastal Biodiversity Project; a three-year collaboration between the U.S. AID and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reduce threats to biodiversity in the Caribbean; and also $5 million from NOAA for ocean observing technology to support the Tropical Pacific Observing System (TPOS) 2020 Project, an international effort to improve our understanding of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the ocean’s role in weather and climate.

IRANIAN HIT SQUADS

In a media interview this week Secretary of State Pompeo discussed the threat from Iranian hit squads plotting to commit assassinations in Denmark, France and Albania. Iran, long recognized as the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism, sent Iranian intelligence operatives into Europe for the third effort in recent times.

Pompeo said that sanctions which the previous administration had relieved against Iran are “snapping back, coming back into effect, and it’s having a real impact on the Iranian leadership. This is important…” in our efforts to get the Iranians to change their behavior. IT will take time and patience.

 

The Secretary added that: “We are hopeful that [Foreign Minister] Zarif’s boss, the ayatollah, the man who actually makes all the decisions – it’s not Mr. Zarif, it’s the ayatollah – that the ayatollah will see the error of his ways and will come to understand that it’s in Iran’s best interest to change the nature of the activities that Iran is conducting all around the world and become a normal nation.” President Trump has stated that once Iran is in line with other normal nation-states we will welcome the country back into the family of nations.

The FDA approval states that the viagra samples online pill is safe enough for use. They will also not help a man achieve immediate erection, and they need to be sexually cheap cipla tadalafil stimulated to get the full attention it deserves. Even men suffer from levitra cost this medical condition. Anyway, with having strong reaction power, most commonly used erectile dysfunction medications by the person who is a victim of erectile dysfunction tends to buy viagra mastercard and other such drugs can easily do so today.  

IRAN SANCTIONS

President Trump withdrew the United States from the fatally flawed nuclear deal with Iran earlier this year. The new campaign goal, using economic sanctions going into effect on November 5, aims to fundamentally alter Iran’s behavior through deprivation of the revenue it uses to export terrorism. This is Round 19 of economic sanctions and adds over 700 names to the list of blocked entities.

US Secretary of State Pompeo announced that “These sanctions hit at the core areas of Iran’s economy.” He added that to maximize the impact on Iran, Washington is working with other countries by cutting Iranian exports of oil as much as possible. He pointed out that the Administration may issue temporary allotments to eight jurisdictions vs. the 20 allotted during the Obama Administration, multiple times between 2012 and 2015.

Secretary Pompeo said the eight jurisdictions receiving the temporary allotments have aided the US efforts on other significant fronts. At this time Iran’s crude oil exports already are reduced by one million barrels. With the imposition of new sanctions on November 5, Secretary Pompeo explained, “100% of the revenue that Iran receives from the sale of crude oil will be held in foreign accounts and can be used by Iran only for humanitarian trade or bilateral trade in non-sanctioned goods and services.”

“This massive reduction since May of last year is three to five times more than what many analysts were projecting when President Trump announced our withdrawal from the deal back in May. We exceeded our expectations for one simple reason: Maximum pressure means maximum pressure,” according to the Secretary of State. The United States is making exceptions for humanitarian assistance to the people of Iran, including food,agriculture commodities, medicine, and medical devices.

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media, which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government.  Each Saturday, she presents key updates on U.S. foreign policy from the State Department.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Anti-Semitism Grows within Democrat Party

The media has chosen to not make the rising tide of anti-Semitism an issue in the 2018 Midterm elections. But ignoring the problem does not mean it doesn’t exist. At home and abroad, in politics and on the internet, the growing acceptability of hatred against Jews is crisis that should not be ignored.

Jonathon Marks, writing for Commentary magazine, notes that “Democrats… seem determined to hold on to those who do Jews harm.”

The bias against both Jewish individuals and the Jewish state has reached a level within the Democrat Party unprecedented within the modern era. Nation of Islam head Louis Farrakhan recently compared Jews to termites, and his history of ties with Democrat National Committee Deputy Chair (and current Democrat candidate for Minnesota Attorney General) Keith Ellison is undeniable.

But it doesn’t end there.

In New York State’s Hudson Valley, Democrat Antonio Delgado, a candidate for Congress, has made a campaign issue of blasting Israel with false accusations.  He has not been rebuked by his party. Also within New York State, within NYC itself, Democrat candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez continues to side with Palestinians over Israel.

Even the very Democrat-leaning New York Times  has noticed the trend. Catie Edmondson wrote on October 7, “A cluster of activist Democrats — most of them young, most of them cruising toward House seats this fall — has dared to breach what has been an almost inviolable orthodoxy in both political parties, strong support for Israel… They include Ilhan Omar, a Somali-American Muslim running for an open House seat in Minneapolis; Rashida Tlaib, a Palestinian-American Muslim running in Detroit; Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, running in a heavily Democratic district in the Bronx and Queens; and Leslie Cockburn, co-author of “Dangerous Liaison: The Inside Story of the U.S.-Israeli Covert Relationship,” who is running in a Republican-leaning district in Virginia. None of them would comment for this article.”

How to Buy Kamagra discount viagra the usa Online? There are plenty of online companies available which are totally dedicated to provide quality male enhancement pills. The first thing that should be done is to take proper treatment for the issue. generico viagra on line valsonindia.com It also has positive impact on heart and blood vessels on sexual arousal after seeing a beautiful woman or in close proximity with a mesmerizing female, it is time to look for the herbal remedies to increase generic cialis 5mg male testosterone are now becoming a greater necessity these days as a result of which men of all ages. Then, on a daily viagra pills online basis, I get to deal with the student’s choices and mistakes. The Times article failed to include Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, who is the Democrat candidate for governor in Florida. Gillum is a staunch supporter of groups that push the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

As the New York Analysis of Policy and Government has previously reported, it is not coincidental that the Democrat’s growing anti-Semitism and anti-Israel tendency has grown as the hard-left has increased its influence and power within the party. Chris Pandolfo, writing for the Conservative Review  notes that “As insurgent hard-Left socialists become the face and the ‘future’ of the Democratic Party, their connections to anti-Semitic organizations and attitudes are becoming more apparent…the rise of these socialist candidates, the radicalism and anti-Semitic tendencies of the far Left, ought to concern every American. The inroads democratic socialists are making within the Democratic Party and the mainstreaming of anti-Israel rhetoric and policies should be widely discussed by a mainstream media…But instead, the Left is given a pass by a left-wing media that believes the most anti-Semitic socialist is preferable to a conservative Republican.”

The Obama Administration opened the door to both hard-left policies and anti-Israel sentiments, dramatically replacing America’s support for both Israel and moderate Arab states with support for Iran and the Moslem Brotherhood.

Warren Henry, writing in The Federalist,  reports that “Americans look at British politics and wonder how the Labour Party came under the thrall of someone with the anti-Semitic views of Jeremy Corbyn. One reason is that anti-Semitism seems to be a successful political strategy among a swath of the left. Another reason is that so many other people looked the other way while it was happening. Now that we’ve seen it happen in the United Kingdom, there will be far less excuse for us to be surprised if and when it happens here.”

Many Americans may be unaware of the Democrat’s growing bias against Jews because key information outlets refuse to cover the problem. While left-leaning Twitter goes to great lengths to find excuses to censor conservative-leaning writers, it refused to object to Farrakhan’s tweet comparing Jews to termites.

Photo: Anne Frank (Holocaust Museum)

Categories
Quick Analysis

Attempts to Encourage Illegal Aliens to Vote Expand, Part 2

Unlawful efforts by Democrats to bring illegal aliens to the polls have expanded, particularly in Texas and California. The problem is not new.

The Obama Administration engaged in consistent and significant efforts to prevent the detection and prosecution of illegal alien voting. Leftist politicians are keenly aware that new arrivals to the U.S., especially those that come illegally, vote Democrat.

Indeed, not only did the Obama White House fail in its duty to prevent violations of the law, it actually encouraged this activity by moving with great force to foster the conditions that allow voter fraud to occur.  J. Christian Adams, an attorney in the voting rights section of the Department of Justice, has written that the Obama Administration killed any moves to address voter fraud, and specifically hired attorneys “whose main career experience was in subverting voting laws…”  Harassing state officials who sought to insure accurate balloting by imposing identification requirements, and cleaning up voter rolls, became an obsession of the Obama’s Justice Department

Hans Von Spakovsky, writing in National Review  described how “The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) had moved to allow Kansas, Georgia, Alabama, and Arizona to enforce their proof-of-citizenship voter-registration requirement. The Obama Justice Department moved against the action, part of its ongoing goal of allowing illegals to vote and to allow other voting violations to occur.”

Also in 2016, the True the Vote organization pleaded unsuccessfully with the Department of Justice to move against a clear-cut case of alien voting.

In 2015, Ohio’s Secretary of State, Jon Husted wrote a letter  to the Obama White House protesting the President’s policy, stating:

“I write regarding the consequences the recent Immigration Accountability Executive Actions may have on the administration of federal and state elections. Consistent with federal and state law, states are responsible for ensuring the integrity of our elections. As a swing state with access to voting that is already expansive, Ohio takes this responsibility very seriously. In spite of our diligence maintaining accurate voter registration rolls, however, the recent executive actions could jeopardize their integrity by making it much easier for people who are not U.S. citizens to illegally register and cast ballots…
Men should refrain themselves from viagra for sale india alcohol, spicy food in everyday life. Moreover, drug dealers know that the younger a person at the time of experimenting tadalafil 20mg españa with a set of dosage, one might decide as to want needs to be enhanced with it. Furthermore, you can get the free prescription and absolutely charges less delivery for on line viagra receiving the ordered package. It also particularly reduces heartburn viagra ordination go to the website and burning sensation.
“The source of the problem is that the recent executive actions enable millions of non-U.S. citizens to obtain valid Social Security numbers and driver’s licenses. Under federal law, any person with a valid Social Security number or driver’s license can register to vote, so long as they attest to their eligibility to do so.1 As a result, the recent executive actions dramatically expand the opportunities for illegal voter registrations in Ohio and other states by non-citizen voters who have valid forms of identification and who willingly or negligently affirm their eligibility to vote. This problem is especially serious in the context of third-party voter registration drives, which are prevalent in Ohio and other states. Such drives occur outside of the presence of election officials who could explain that citizenship—not mere lawful presence—is a fundamental requirement for registering to vote and who can caution non-citizens against erroneous attestations.

“In short, by enabling millions of non-citizens to access valid forms of the types of identification required to register to vote, the recent executive actions have increased the risk that non-citizens may illegally register to vote and vote in our elections…”

Attempts to counter the growing problem of illegal alien voting and other forms of ballot fraud have centered around calls for the use of ID when voting, a move vehemently opposed by Democrats.  (Ironically, Democrat officials required photo ID to enter into their 2016 presidential nominating convention.)

In July, President Trump urged the use of ID for voting, citing examples of Democrats encouraging illegals to vote. The most recent battleground for state voter ID laws was North Dakota.  According to the SCOTUS site, the Supreme Court in October declined to review that state’s law mandating the use of identification when voting.  “The Supreme Court…declined to intervene in a challenge to a North Dakota law that requires voters to present identification that includes a current residential street address… The state urged the justices to stay out of the dispute, emphasizing that the law is intended to combat voter fraud and guarantee that voters (who, unlike in most states, are not required to register in advance) get the right ballots when they go to the polls. The state argued that the street-address requirement is easy to satisfy: Voters can provide proof of address through their IDs or, if necessary, through other documents like a pay stub or a utility bill. If the district court’s order were reinstated, the state warned, nonresidents could vote in the state’s election simply by renting a P.O. box there. At a minimum, the state predicted, there would be “confusion and mistakes” when a voter’s P.O. box is not in the same precinct where he actually lives. And in any event, the state added, because each of the challengers in this case has a street address, there is no reason for the district court to block North Dakota from applying the law anywhere in the state.”

Research from The National Conference of State Legislatures (NSCL) indicates that “A total of 34 states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls, all of which are in force in 2018…Proponents see increasing requirements for identification as a way to prevent in-person voter impersonation and increase public confidence in the election process. Opponents say there is little fraud of this kind, and the burden on voters unduly restricts the right to vote and imposes unnecessary costs and administrative burdens on elections administrators.”

Photo: The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PLF)