Categories
Quick Analysis

Democrat support for Sanctuary Cities based on electoral issues

The successful move by Senate Democrats to block the “Stop Sanctuary Policies and Protect Americans Act” indicates how deeply the battle lines have been drawn on issues relating to illegal immigration.

Sen. David Vitter, (R-Louisiana) who sponsored the legislation, pointed to the extraordinary danger posed by criminal aliens. Taxpayers in those cities have complained also of the unmanageable costs of providing education and other basic services to illegals.  Congressional legislation occurred in the wake of the nationally reported murder of a young woman, Kathryn Steinle in San Francisco, allegedly by an illegal who had already been deported five times. The bill would have made it unlawful for cities to refuse federal requests for notification before releasing illegals, and the stopping of federal funds to localities that violate the law.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies, “Across the U.S., there are 340 cities, counties, and states that are considered “sanctuary cities”. These jurisdictions protect criminal aliens from deportation by refusing to comply with ICE detainers or otherwise impede open communication and information exchanges between their employees or officers and federal immigration agents… This has resulted in the release by local authorities of approximately 1,000 criminal aliens per month. According to an updated report prepared by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for Congress, between January 1 and September 30, 2014, local sanctuaries released 9,295 alien offenders that ICE was seeking to deport. More than 600 people were released at least twice.

“Out of these, 5,947 of the criminal aliens (62 percent) had significant prior criminal histories or other public safety concerns even before the arrest that led to a detainer. Fifty-eight percent of those with a prior history of concern had prior felony charges or convictions; 37 percent had serious prior misdemeanor charges, and 5 percent had multiple prior misdemeanors. An alarming number — 2,320 — of the total number of released offenders were subsequently arrested within the time period studied for new crimes after they were released by the sanctuaries…Of the 6,460 criminal aliens who were still at large during the time period studied, 3,802 (58 percent) had prior felonies or violent misdemeanors.”

The Democrats position on the issue at first seems contrary to two core groups of their supporters.  Many of the programs that Democrats favor are already short of funds.  Adding additional residents who require help strains state and local resources to the limit.  Illegals also harm job prospects for Americans at the lower end of the pay scale, particularly young blacks who have suffered extraordinary rates of unemployment.

What may seem, at first impression, to be a position counter to the Democrats own key interests comes into focus when seen through the prism of politics on a national scale.
In this article, you will get an prescription for cialis idea regarding the dedicated service that the expert doctors offer. You would very rarely come across an Extenze customer review that would not recommend you to take raindogscine.com lowest price for cialis, please make sure to follow his recommendations.Influence of levitra on posterity According to the studies conducted by the company Pfizer, order cheap levitra do not influence the lungs but also influence reproductive health. This liquid form of drug is later on dissolved in the blood to levitra sales online perform the effect on an individual’s body. You may have think that this cheap medicine may not free tadalafil sample work so much for it is not carefully made.
Politico Notes that immigrants, “along with other noncitizens without the right to vote—may pick the 2016 presidential winner. Thanks to the unique math undergirding the Electoral College, the mere presence of 11-12 million illegal immigrants and other noncitizens here legally may enable them to swing the election from Republicans to Democrats.”

A National Review  study concurs.

“President Obama’s recent executive orders granting provisional legal status to an estimated 5 million illegal aliens will likely allow an indeterminate number of them to cast ballots in elections across the United States — and it’s hard to see how it won’t affect the outcome of some number of close elections. Amnestied illegal aliens are now eligible to receive Social Security numbers and, in many cases, drivers’ licenses. Since the vast majority of states don’t require individuals to present proof of citizenship to either register or vote, and given the Obama administration’s zealous promotion of motor-voter registration and declared refusal to enforce Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (ensuring that only eligible individuals vote), it’s certain that appreciable numbers of amnestied illegal aliens will be able to vote. Furthermore, testimony last week before the House Judiciary Committee revealed that under Obama’s amnesty some illegal aliens will receive advance-parole status — a glide path to citizenship and full voting rights, though not for some time. This should be of grave concern to lawmakers and all Americans who care about the rule of law and election integrity.”

Fox Latino  reports that “More than 500K driver’s licenses [have been]  issued to undocumented immigrants in California.” This presents an opportunity, under motor voter, for illegals to unlawfully register to vote.

The White House, through the Department of Justice, has attacked states that seek to address the challenge through voter ID laws.  Opposition by Democrats to attempts by states to insure the accuracy of voter registration rolls has been substantial.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s Illegal Immigration Priority

President Obama wants to allow a large number of illegal immigrants to stay within America,  but the recent election gives the public opinion edge to those who prioritize securing the border first. The President not only appears unwilling to compromise, but seeks to accomplish his goal through constitutionally questionable executive action.  Why does he adhere to such a hard position in light of the extraordinary defeat handed to his party—which supports his immigration policies?

The answer has everything to do with election vulnerability. Beset by high unemployment, a federal budget strained to the breaking point caused in part by spending aimed more at winning votes than in meeting national needs, a foreign policy in complete disarray, numerous serious scandals, and a suite of strategies on domestic issues that the voters clearly reject including divisive tactics on racial and gender issues, the Obama-left knows that its popularity is rapidly disintegrating.  It’s only hope lies, quite bluntly, in stuffing the ballot box, particularly in key precincts, with the substantial numbers of unlawful votes that the Democrat Party will wring from the illegals.

The tactic goes hand-in-hand with the White House’s vehement objection to voter id laws.  There is no substantive evidence that requiring picture id to insure honest balloting in any way, shape, manner or form has any harmful side effects, and particularly none regarding any racial bias.  There is, however, a massive body of evidence that the election process has been highly tainted by a panoply of fraudulent tactics, including false registrations, voting several times, altered voting machines, and voting by illegal aliens. By an overwhelming percentage, the chief beneficiary of these illegal practices has been the Democrat Party.
It is not just their price that makes men able to browse around my pharmacy store buy levitra online attain erection during sexual stimulation. This lowest cost of viagra issue is some thing that ought to not be under estimated as he is the 1 who knows greatest on how to take care of reproductive health. Prescription or Over the Counter viagra soft is an FDA approved drug for the ED treatment. Absence levitra without prescription http://valsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/VIL-DIV-2017-2018.pdf of which makes our free from all worries.
The President’s push for allowing illegal aliens to stay has nothing to do with compassion, and everything to do with fraud.

In its drive to stuff the ballot box, the President has willingly suspended appropriate Constitutional procedure. There is no legal basis for the President to enact legislative-like measures simply because “Congress refuses to act” on a Presidential priority. The White House contention that prior presidents also acted unilaterally on amnesty just doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.  Reagan acted in response to the 1986 Immigration and Reform Control Act. The Bush (41) Administration revised technical aspects.  Neither engaged in any wide-scale, legislative like action similar to the current Obama attempt.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Three Pillars of Election Fraud

The news that a Cook County, Illinois election machine automatically transformed votes cast for Republicans into votes cast for Democrats this week should come as no surprise. It’s time America had a very candid conversation about the rapidly growing epidemic of election fraud.

At this point in most discussions about the crisis, it’s customary to say that both parties engage in balloting shenanigans. But in reality, it is the Democrat Party that is, by far, the greatest offender.

There are three pillars in the Democrats’ efforts to unlawfully alter results at the polls:

Election Day antics. From tampering with balloting machines and technologies, some of which were developed under questionable circumstances, to stuffing ballot boxes, to intimidating Republican voters, the Democrats have done it all. Examples are legion. In the 2008 election, Republican voters in one section of Philadelphia were openly intimidated, but Eric Holder’s Justice Department declined to take action.

Consider the Republican congressman from California who lost when numerous votes were cast by individuals ineligible to do so. According to a City Journal article written by John Fund, who has extensively studied the topic,

“…4,023 illegal voters possibly cast ballots in the disputed election between Republican Robert Dornan and Democrat Loretta Sanchez. Dornan lost by fewer than 1,000 votes. In 2002, Dean Gardner, a losing GOP candidate for California’s state legislature, sent out a survey to 14,000 first-time voters. A total of 1,691 surveys came back. The results were startling: 76 people admitted that they weren’t citizens but had voted, while 49 claimed not to have registered at their correct residence, as the law requires. Gardner lost by only 266 votes.”

In the 2012 presidential contest, President Obama somehow received 100% of the vote in 21 Cleveland districts.
Having said that, it can also be a technique to get away female viagra from ED. Pills are common discount cialis and it is cheaper that all other types. Considerations and Precautions It india viagra online view to find out more is suggested to avoid Kamagra, if you are sensitive to to Sildenafil or any other element of the drug that gives the required action. tadalafil india cialis Kamagra is found in all types of forms like oral pills.
Registration fraud. In a study, the Pew Center on the States found “millions of voter registration records nationwide that are either inaccurate or no longer valid…based on data [indicating] a voter died, moved, or had been inactive from 2004 to March 2011.” The study revealed that 2,758,578 individuals were registered to vote in more than one state. In addition, “12.7 million records nationwide…appear to be out of date and no longer reflect the voter’s current information, more than 1.8 million records for people who are no longer living, but have active registrations on voter rolls, and 12 million records with incorrect addresses…once duplicates among categories are eliminated, approximately 24 million registration records, or nearly 13% of the national total, are estimated to be inaccurate or no longer valid.”

Townhall reports that one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio’s Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio’s 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious.

Voter Registration fraud is made far easier by practices such as motor voter, internet registration, and election day registration, all concepts vigorously supported by the Democrat Party.

Opposition to voter ID. The Democrats vehemently oppose voter identification, just as they oppose stricter border controls. There is a pragmatic motivation for that. According to the Pew Research Center these new illegal arrivals are overwhelmingly favorable to the Democrat party. “In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans…Democratic candidates have garnered a greater share of the Hispanic vote than Republican candidates in every election over the past three decades…”

Illegal immigrants, overwhelmingly supportive of Democrats, cast unlawful ballots with relative ease. Writing in the Huffington Post, Howard Foster notes that “Only two states actually require proof of citizenship in order to register (Arizona and Kansas). The others merely require the applicant to sign a sworn statement attesting to the fact that he or she is a citizen…It stands to reason that illegal immigrants who are illegally registered to vote would have a very real stake in seeing to it that Republicans do not come to power with their…ideas about requiring proof of citizenship to vote (which has been required since the founding of the Republic)… There is a huge problem with voter fraud…it is proven by the vehemence of the Democrats, the beneficiaries of the fraud, toward enforcement of our laws.”

The evidence concerning the Democrat Party’s culpability in voting fraud is clear and abundant.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Court OKs Voter ID

Opponents of measures to avoid fraudulent voting have received bad news in Wisconsin and North Carolina.

The Judicial Watch organization  has opposed the drive by the U.S. Justice Department to overturn state efforts to require voters to show photo ID at the polls. The group also has also sought to bring to light the role illegal immigration plays in expanding the numbers of unlawful voters.

Attorney General Eric Holder contends that’s photo ID requirements discourage participation by black voters. But research by Judicial Watch indicates that after the implementation of photo ID, “black turnout increased in 2014 by every meaningful measure. Black share of the total electorate increased. The percentage of black registered voters voting increased. Using Census Bureau estimates, “[there was] an increase in turnout among blacks of voting age. Finally, while turnout increased across the board in May 2014, and while white turnout increased by 13.7%, black turnout increased much faster – by an astonishing 29.5%.”

In a Wisconsin case, the United States Court of Appeals  for the 7th Circuit has allowed enforcement of that states’ photo voted ID law in the upcoming November election.
Men taking medicine that treat hypertension usually find that oral ED drugs decrease the risk of heart attack or stroke. cheapest brand viagra Vigorelle is order generic viagra visit for source carefully packaged in a medical-grade state-of-the-art facility. Patients under treatment for the following conditions; or any ongoing managed condition, should consult their GP prior to taking this pill. * Heart Related & cardiovascular diseases including stenosis, idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis and general ventricular outflow obstruction.* Stroke, myocardial infraction (heart attack) or serious arrhythmia.* Cardiac failure or coronary artery disease causing unstable angina. cheap tadalafil tablets It is pill viagra for sale evident from the age of 40 in men.
Opponents of requirements that voters display photo ID have uniformly failed to prove that the practice in anyway detrimentally affects minority voters.

According to Ballotpedia, “All states must meet the minimum requirement set by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) which requires photo ID for those who register by mail and did not provide identification. However, some states have stricter requirements set by state law. 20 states require photo ID, and 14 states have non-photo requirements.  In general, valid forms of photo ID often include:a valid driver’s license, military ID.a state identification card, a United States passport, or student identification. If valid ID is not provided, most states issue a provisional ballot. Provisional ballots are usually counted once a voter’s eligibility is confirmed. Some states require that confirmation be provided within a particular time frame following the election.”

The overwhelming goal of the progressives to obtain illegal votes can be seen in New York, where the hard left wing of the Democrat Party is seeking to give ballot access to non-citizens.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Illegal Immigration, Power Politics, and Voter ID

The generally lax attitude towards the tidal wave of illegal immigration seems counter-intuitive.

There are dramatically increased costs to government at all levels.  The unlawful arrivals will require taxpayer-funded medical treatment, education for their young, and a host of other services. They bring with them contagious diseases, increased levels of crime, connections to drug cartels, and the threat of terrorism. Lawful residents will compete with them for jobs in a depressed economy, and find that these rivals are willing to accept lesser wages and the absence of benefits.

Despite all that, the President refuses to take the steps truly necessary to effectively control the border, the Senate supports him in that failure, and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, while objecting, does not, for the most part, truly make the issue a top priority.

There are several reasons for the apparent lack of enthusiasm.  Most often cited is the fear that concentration on the issue will alienate the increasingly important Latino vote. Major corporate backers like the idea of having a large pool of cheap labor.

Initially a dosage of online viagra prescription 25 mg is usually recommended. This helps CBT experts in offering better counseling and suggesting the apt therapy or program for long term levitra prices effects. This particular click for source levitra sale myth is getting true day by day and achieving success in all sectors. The first phase was designed to give managers click that drugshop cheap levitra a theoretical understanding of the new concepts. 2. While leaders in both parties have not pursued the issue diligently, it is the Democrats who have been most reluctant to bolster border security.  The reason is deeply and basely political. According to the Pew Research Center these new arrivals are overwhelmingly favorable to the Democrat party. “In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans…Democratic candidates have garnered a greater share of the Hispanic vote than Republican candidates in every election over the past three decades…”

The reasons are not difficult to comprehend.  The illegals hope for access to the types of social safety net programs largely emphasized by Democrat incumbents and candidates.

There is, however, a much more underhanded reason as well, and this may well be the most significant. Illegal immigrants are illegally voting, and they are voting mostly for Democrats. It’s not difficult to do. Writing in the Huffington Post, attorney Howard Foster notes that “Only two states actually require proof of citizenship in order to register (Arizona and Kansas). The others merely require the applicant sign a sworn statement attesting to the fact that he or she is a citizen…It stands to reason that illegal immigrants who are illegally registered to vote would have a very real stake in seeing to it that Republicans do not come to power with their…ideas about requiring proof of citizenship to vote (which has been required since the founding of the Republic)… There is a huge problem with voter fraud…it is proven by the vehemence of the Democrats, the beneficiaries of the fraud, toward enforcement of our laws.”

The significant cost to the taxpayers, and the threat to our national health and safety, render illegal immigration a major threat. It is unacceptable for politicians to turn a blind eye towards the crisis for partisan gain.