Tag: election fraud

Categories
Quick Analysis

Ballot Fraud as an Election Strategy

Rarely has a political party placed so much emphasis on eliminating safeguards to ballot security as the Democrats have in 2020.

Democrat-controlled Nevada is the latest,  passing a 100-page bill in a “special session” that allows, along with mail-in ballots,  “ballot harvesting,” which allows partisan ballot collectors to gather ballots and send them on to election officials.

Not to be outdone, Virginia, also Democrat-dominated, now allows mail-in ballots to be submitted without a witness signature.

Election Defense notes that “Many popular vote-by-mail and absentee systems are ripe for fraud and abuse…Vote by mail presents a serious and so-far unsolved problem: a broken chain of custody of the ballots. That means the ballots are moved without consistent public oversight, offering opportunities for fraud and mismanagement.”

According to the 2012 Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project report: Having tens of millions of ballots being transmitted and marked without strict chain-of-custody procedures creates risks that simply do not exist with any form of in-person voting, whether on Election Day or in early-voting settings. According to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in the 2008 presidential election voting by mail had an overall failure rate of as much as 21 percent:

“35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted. 3.9 million ballots requested by voters never reached them. Another 2.9 million ballots received by voters did not make it back to election officials. Election officials rejected 800,000 ballots…A 2005 report the Commission on Federal Election Reform concluded, “Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud.” To be clear, studies have proven that few actual voters are engaged in any kind of fraud at a level that could change the outcome of an election. Instead, election insiders continue to constitute the greater threat. The Heritage Foundation … uncovered more crimes by elections insiders utilizing absentee ballots to attempt to rig elections.”

The issue of partisan handling of mail-in ballots is made more serious by the fact that the American Postal Workers Union has endorsed one of the candidates, Joe Biden.

New York, after California the largest Democrat-dominated state, is considering a proposed law that would require “drop boxes” for voters to place their ballots in. Embarrassingly for mail ballot advocates, a Congressional race using mail-in ballots in New York City proved so disastrous that the drop box idea seeks to add yet another unsecured, unsafe balloting procedure to an already unsafe process.

When I woke up this morning, I said, aE Maybe he can be that.’ It’s not free viagra uk a big maybe. You might have order generic cialis read many times, “Smoking is injurious to health. According to ayurveda onions are heavy to viagra tadalafil digest and increases moistness of tissues. Contraindications: Kamagra is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to lowest price for cialis the drug is to be diagnosed before introducing the drug along with the clinical diagnosis of any underlying anatomical abnormalities of penis.

Similarly, in Democrat-run New Jersey, an election for a Paterson City Council seat employing mail-in ballots went so awry that State Superior Court Judge Ernest Caposela ruled that it had been irreversibly tainted due to extreme mail-in voter fraud.

Note the progression: First, Democrats demand mail-in ballots.  After achieving that, the Party demands the elimination of basic security measures such as requiring authentication of the person sending in the ballot, and reasonable “chain of custody” measures to ensure that the ballot has not been tampered with.  

Not all current attempts to weaken precautions are new. Previously, California allowed automatic voting registration of anyone dealing with its Department of Motor Vehicles. The Wall Street Journal reported that the state DMV acknowledges that this has led to incorrectly registered 23,000 voters.  Since California allows illegals to get drivers licenses, that has presented a major threat to ballot integrity. The LA Times reported that over one million illegals have been granted drivers licenses.

The use of the controversial concept of “ballot harvesting” has led to major gains for California Democrats. The Independent Voters Network (IVN) describes what happened: “Ballot harvesting was used for the first time in November, and has clearly been advantageous to Democrats… The “minor” change was implemented when Gov. Jerry Brown signed the changes in AB1921 into law [several] years ago.  Here’s what it changed: In the past, California allowed only relatives or those living in the same household to drop off mail ballots for another voter. Ballot harvesting allows anyone, even a paid political campaign worker, to collect and return ballots — ‘harvesting’ them. In Orange County alone, every House seat went Democratic. The chairman of the county Republican Party, Fred Whitaker, said: ‘…the number of Election Day vote-by-mail dropoffs was unprecedented — over 250,000, this is a direct result of ballot harvesting allowed under California law for the first time. That directly caused the switch from being ahead on election night to losing two weeks later.’”

Breitbart notes: “Democrats have railed against voter ID laws…but [in the 2016]  Democratic National Convention officials only issued credentials to those who present state-issued IDs…But even as Democrats require[d] IDs to enter their convention, The Voter Integrity Project discovered there were 30,000 dead North Carolinians still on the state’s voter rolls, Democrats continue to fiercely oppose voter ID laws.”

Democrats continue to rabidly oppose updating voter registration rolls. It’s valid to ask why.  A 2016 Pew Center on the States study found “millions of voter registration records nationwide that are either inaccurate or no longer valid…based on data [indicating] a voter died, moved, or had been inactive from 2004 to March 2011.”  The study revealed that 2,758,578 individuals were registered to vote in more than one state.  In addition, “12.7 million records nationwide…appear to be out of date and no longer reflect the voter’s current information, more than 1.8 million records for people who are no longer living, but have active registrations on voter rolls, and 12 million records with incorrect addresses…once duplicates among categories are eliminated, approximately 24 million registration records, or nearly 13% of the national total, are estimated to be inaccurate or no longer valid.”

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Election Fraud May Dominate 2020 Campaign, Part 2

A taste of the voter fraud controversy that may dominate the 2020 election was seen in Georgia. The hotly contested 2018 gubernatorial race between Republican Brian Kemp and Democrat Stacey Abrams featured charges of voter suppression by Abrams and Kemp’s claim that the Abrams campaign encouraged illegal voting.

The general position of the Democrat Party is that voter fraud doesn’t exist, or occurs in numbers too small to be relevant.

Daniel Green, writing for Front Page describes the Democrat perspective:  “Voter fraud doesn’t exist…If it does exist, they’ll stifle any attempt to protect our elections on the false grounds that they’re voter suppression. They’ll cry racism over any investigation of voter fraud. And if someone does get convicted of voter fraud, they get a pardon.

In November, reports the San Francisco Chronicle, California Governor Jerry Brown pardoned a Democratic former legislator who was found guilty four years ago of perjury and voter fraud. 

Hans Spakovsky, writing in the Free Speech & Election Law Practices  publication, emphasizes the problem of noncitizens registering to vote.  He reports that in a random sampling of 3,000 registrations in California’s 39th Assembly District, 10% contained phony addresses or were not U.S. citizens.

A number of states have attempted to attack fraudulent registrations by passing legislation requiring a valid ID to vote.  To the dismay of those dedicated to honest balloting, The Obama Justice Department responded with significant hostility to this measure.  Although almost all the reported fraud has aided hard-left Democrats, Kelly reports, even liberal United States Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens stated “There is no question about the legitimacy or importance of state’s interest in counting only eligible voters’ votes” in a 2008 case that upheld Indiana’s stringent ID law following a challenge by the Democrat Party and its allies.

 In testimony before the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Rules ad Administration, John Samples, The Cato Institute’s Director of the Center for Representative Government  stated that the Motor Voter Act “has made it difficult if not impossible to maintain clean registration rolls…the inaccuracy in the rolls caused by the Act has thrown into doubt the integrity of our electoral system.”

The Judicial Watch organization, in response to its August 9, 2011 Freedom of Information Act filing, received records which they described as detailing friendly communications between the Obama Justice Department and a former ACORN attorney now serving as Director of Advocacy for Project Vote.  The ACORN connection is ominous. 70 ACORN staff throughout 12 states were convicted of voter registration fraud; more than one third of the registrations that group submitted were found to be invalid.

From across the nation, news reports and studies verify the reality of voter fraud, campaign violations, and the growing influence of illegal aliens. Here’s a sampling:

  • The Obama Justice Department harassed states that seek to clean up voter registration roles and enforce state voter ID laws.
  • The Washington Post notes  “a group of undocumented immigrants…[knocked] on doors in Northern Virginia in support of Hillary Clinton and other Democratic candidates…The vote-seekers [were] some of the 750,000 recipients of temporary legal status under the Obama administration’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. …‘All DACA recipients should take this on as an added responsibility, to change the power structure,’ said Luis Angel Aguilar, 28, who received his protected status in 2013 and is helping to coordinate the effort. ‘Our voices need to be heard”
  • Project Veritas reported:  NYC Democratic Commissioner of the Board of Elections Alan Schulkin stated at a  United Federation of Teachers party that there is widespread voter fraud in New York City…”Schulkin, a Democrat, said that to effectuate illegal voting, people are bussed to various polling sites. He places a blame on NYC’s radical-left Mayor de Blasio.  “He gave out ID cards. De Blasio. That’s in lieu of a driver’s license, but you can use it for anything. But, they didn’t vet people to see who they really are. Anybody can go in there and say I am Joe Smith, I want an ID card. It’s absurd. There’s a lot of fraud. Not just voter fraud, all kinds of fraud.”
  • A Science Direct white paper reported: We find that some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes, and Congressional elections. Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.
  • The Gateway Pundit’s  examination of a wikileaks release found that Clinton campaign chief John Podesta stated it was OK for illegals to vote if they have a drivers’ license . The quote: John Podesta:  “On the picture ID, the one thing I have thought of in that space is that if you show up on Election Day with a drivers license with a picture, attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.”
Ineligible for consuming Vardenafil Due to its effectiveness and fruit-like taste. http://robertrobb.com/on-tax-conformity-enact-plan-b/ purchase generic levitra The small differences associated with robertrobb.com order viagra online how these Erection dysfunction Medications merely facilitate the procedure. And similar fiscal and operational policies can help the newly-joined ventures viagra sales in uk look and feel more like a single person – someone who’s never even been able to get the best source. You can increase erection buy levitra from canada strength by including beans in your daily diet.

What may be an intentional refusal to update voter registration rolls allows a significant amount of fraud to be perpetuated. A Washington Times examination  of voters who moved out of the Nation’s capital to Prince George County in Maryland found that “The list of voters with names so unusual that there has been only one in the District and one in Prince George’s and who are listed as voting in both jurisdictions in the 2012 election is in the thousands. In an examination of 85, The Times confirmed through interviews and other public records that 15 were in fact the same person…Indeed, the list of Prince George’s voters with unusual names that match those on voter rolls in the District was far longer, at 13,000…The biggest risk of having nonresidents listed on the rolls is not the risk of people voting twice themselves, but of others appropriating their names by the hundreds…They are easy targets for those who would cast votes in other people’s names in bulk, often by absentee ballot, after scanning the list for names of people who hadn’t voted in years and would therefore not show up to hear that their vote already had been cast.”

Roger Vadum, writing in Polizette, notes that “Voter fraud is commonplace in elections in America today. It has always been around to varying degrees because completely eliminating this kind of crime is impossible. The most policymakers can do is create laws and policies that attempt to minimize it. But this is where people on the Right and Left differ. Conservatives think fighting voter fraud is important; liberals and progressives don’t care …The Left promotes voter fraud by fighting electoral integrity laws in the courts, often enjoying great success… some officials are hostile to election observers from nonpartisan good government groups like True the Vote monitoring their polling precincts. The Left labels such attempts to keep elections honest ‘voter intimidation.’

Realclear politics notes that “One of the biggest voter frauds may be that there is no voter fraud, that laws requiring voters to have a photo identification are just attempts to suppress black voting. Reporter John Fund has written three books on voter fraud and a recent survey by Old Dominion University indicates that there are more than a million registered voters who are not citizens, and who therefore are not legally entitled to vote.”

Former Justice Department Attorney J. Christian Adams, with unique and specialized experience in the topic, provides extraordinary evidence.  Among the examples, as reported by Realclearpolitics:

One of these frauds involved sending out absentee ballots to people who had never asked for them. Then a political operator would show up — uninvited — the day the ballots arrived and “help” the voter to fill them out. Sometimes the intruders simply took the ballots, filled them out and forged the signatures of the voters. These were illegal votes for Democrats…As for race-based “voter suppression,” amid all the political hysteria, how many hard facts have you heard? Probably none that supports that claim. Widely available free photo identification cards mean that poverty is no barrier to voting. Since blacks and whites both have to show photo I.D. for everything from cashing checks to getting on a plane, why has requiring a photo I.D. for voting caused such shrill outcries?”

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Election Fraud May Dominate 2020 Campaign

The most contentious issue in the 2020 presidential election may not be illegal immigration, the growing threats from abroad, the federal budget, or any of the other myriad topics that dominate the news. The focus of arguments could be the conduct of the election itself.

 Democrats are attempting to dramatically alter the political landscape by various means, including eliminating most safeguards on illegal registration and voting, and giving felons voting rights.

Democrat opposition to anti-fraud measures such as picture ID has led to past embarrassment. In 2016, even as the party vehemently opposed those seeking to use that concept to combat illegal voting, the DNC required those seeking to gain entry to the floor of its presidential convention in Philadelphia to have such identification.

Current attempts to gain advantage at the ballot box center on legislative initiatives.

The New York State Assembly has introduced a state constitutional amendment that would allow for Election Day registration. Obviously, this allows no time to review actual eligibility to vote.

California has been a center of the pro-fraud movement. The state automatically registers anyone dealing with its Department of Motor Vehicles. The Wall Street Journal reports that the state DMV acknowledges that this has led to incorrectly registered 23,000 voters.  Since California allows illegals to get rivers licenses, that has presented a major threat to ballot integrity. The LA Times reported in April that over one million illegals have been granted drivers licenses.

The use of the controversial concept of “ballot harvesting” has led to major gains for California Democrats. The Independent Voters Network (IVN) describes what happened: “Ballot harvesting was used for the first time in November, and has clearly been advantageous to Democrats… The “minor” change was implemented when Gov. Jerry Brown signed the changes in AB1921 into law two years ago.  Here’s what it changed: In the past, California allowed only relatives or those living in the same household to drop off mail ballots for another voter. Ballot harvesting allows anyone, even a paid political campaign worker, to collect and return ballots — ‘harvesting’ them. In Orange County alone, every House seat went Democratic. The chairman of the county Republican Party, Fred Whitaker, said: ‘…the number of Election Day vote-by-mail dropoffs was unprecedented — over 250,000, this is a direct result of ballot harvesting allowed under California law for the first time. That directly caused the switch from being ahead on election night to losing two weeks later.’

“ In interviews, Speaker Paul Ryan said ballot harvesting ‘defies logic…We were only down 26 seats the night of the election and three weeks later, we lost basically every California race’

“In August, a federal judge in Arizona upheld the ballot harvesting ban in Arizona. HB 2023 makes it a felony for anyone other than a family member, caretaker or postal worker to collect another person’s ballot and turn it in to election officials. Supporters of the measure defend it as a safeguard against potential ballot tampering.Eighteen states have outlawed ballot harvesting, and on the website Ballotpedia, Ballot harvesting is listed under the section ‘Voter Fraud.’”

Allowing a partisan campaigner to collect ballots is an open invitation to fraud.

Another strategy pursued by Democrats to enhance their election chances has been giving convicted felons the right to vote. A study by The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciencefound that the majority of felons register as Democrats.

The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) notes that “ It has been common practice in the United States to make felons ineligible to vote, in some cases permanently…”                                       

An NCSL study found that:

  • In Maine and Vermont, felons never lose their right to vote, even while they are incarcerated. 
  • In 14 states and the District of Columbia, felons lose their voting rights only while incarcerated, and receive automatic restoration upon release.
  • In 22 states, felons lose their voting rights during incarceration, and for a period of time after, typically while on parole and/or probation. Voting rights are automatically restored after this time period. Former felons may also have to pay any outstanding fines, fees or restitution before their rights are restored as well. 
If you do begin, then again renew your decision to quit.If you put on weight due to giving up smoking cutting back your alcohol consumption not taking illegal drugs exercising regularly Reducing stress Penis Pumps A vacuum pump generic viagra in stores consists of a clear plastic tube that is connected to a pump, which is either hand or battery operated. Infertility tadalafil 100mg http://www.devensec.com/news/Devens_Open_Space_Plan_Survey_2014.pdf and impotency are urologic disorders as well. The other is that all the branded cialis price canada has to provide ads for getting a sustainable place in the competitive medicine market. Also stress is the second main reason for this issue buying cialis on line in their life not the women.

In 12 states felons lose their voting rights indefinitely for some crimes, or require a governor’s pardon in order for voting rights to be restored, or face an additional waiting period after completion of sentence (including parole and probation) before voting rights can be restored.

The Report Concludes Tomorrow

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Problem With DHS’s Bid for a Greater Election Role

The New York Analysis takes a two-part examination of the move by the Department of Homeland Security to play a role in the election process. 

The Department of Homeland  Security (DHS) is considering what some believe to be a further step in the federal takeover of elections from state governments. The DHS quotes concerns from the FBI that internet-connected voting processes are vulnerable to cyber-attack. That worry is shared by many on both sides of the political aisle.

A USA Today review  writes that “Advances in technology have made voting fraud potentially easier and more effective…the closer the race, the more useful and effective fraud becomes. In 2012, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel estimated that the presidential election would come down to 500 precincts in 5 states. This was out of a total of 174,000 precincts in the entire country, with an average of 1,100 voters per precinct.”

In a phone call between Jeh Johnson and state election officials, the Secretary of Homeland Security stated that “It is critically important to continue to work to ensure the security and resilience of our electoral infrastructure, particularly as the risk environment evolves.” Johnson offered assistance in helping state officials manage risks to voting systems in each state’s jurisdiction. DHS presented no specific threat, only a concern that such a threat may exist.

The Washington Examiner notes that that DHS has a vital security role in 16 areas of critical infrastructure [described on the agency’s website as assets, systems and networks, “whether physical or virtual, are considered so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof.”

DHS would be given a role if the election process is declared a “critical infrastructure” that should be protected by Washington.

People believed that this was the main cause but after the symptom-free periods tend discount levitra no rx to decrease. Eating properly, getting adequate rest and keeping your weight under control can reduce the risk of getting HIV infections. viagra sales france To fight appalachianmagazine.com buy cheap levitra stress levels and maintain good health, you would not be able to achieve anything. Most of all, your information is always kept secret in levitra generika 40mg four walls. However, the highly partisan role taken by federal agencies during the Obama Administration raises enormous and well-founded fears that DHS itself may tamper with the results. The use of the IRS to intimidate the Tea Party, the failure of the Federal Elections Commission to take action on potential Clinton misdeeds in Iowa or the abuses committed by Democrat National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to defeat Bernie Sanders, the Administration’s actions against state governments who seek to counter voter fraud, and the Department of Justice’s blind eye towards Hillary’s misdeeds as Secretary of State all justify exceptional caution in ceding any level of oversight or “assistance” from executive agencies.

Suspicions as to the motives behind the move are elevated since the agency’s action is in part a reaction to a request by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) to FBI Director James Comey, who has recently come under fire for not recommending that charges be brought against Secretary Clinton.

In a curious statement, Jeh Johnson complained that “There’s no one federal election system. There are some 9,000 jurisdictions involved in the election process. There’s a national election for president, there are some 9,000 jurisdictions that participate, contribute to collecting votes, tallying votes and reporting votes.” Many take that as an indication that the “hacking” concerns are a pretext for greater federal control.

The Federalist Papers opines: “The federal government may be taking over the election process, in an attempt that started before the recent hacks of state election boards and has since been spurred on by the threat. The Washington Examiner reported that the ‘The federal government never wastes a good crisis to gain more power, and this is no exception.’

According to a White House Policy Directive, ‘The federal government also has a responsibility to strengthen the security and resilience of its own critical infrastructure, for the continuity of national essential functions, and to organize itself to partner effectively with and add value to the security and resilience efforts of critical infrastructure owners and operators.’ It may or may not be true that elections should be designated as ‘critical infrastructure’…however, whenever the federal government attempts to gain more control, people should be wary.”

The review concludes tomorrow

Categories
Quick Analysis

Stealing the 2016 Presidential Election

The lack of voter trust in the integrity of the voting process, blatant acts of rule breaking by the Clinton machine, and a refusal by judges to allow common sense voter id measures to survive point to an upcoming  election debacle unlike anything ever seen in U.S. history.

Since 2014, Democrat appointed judges have outnumbered Republican appointed judges.  “This will affect America for a generation, long after the internecine battles on legislative issues are forgotten,” stated Senator Charles Schumer in a NY Times article

With a greater inclination for judicial activism than their predecessors, current judges are having an impact in areas far beyond the traditional realm of the judicial branch. That expanded influence is becoming very pronounced in the area of elections.

Despite extensive, well documented cases of voter fraud and many studies by nonpartisan (and even liberal-leaning) organizations  that indicate that voter registration rolls have significant numbers of ineligible and deceased voters, courts are handing down decisions that strike down state voter ID laws.

True the Vote  notes that “The real threat is that recent federal court rulings against multiple states’ common-sense voter ID laws twist the Voting Rights Act from a law intended to stop racial discrimination into one that transfers the power to determine routine election procedures—which the Constitution delegates to the states—to the judiciary.”

Judicial bias has encouraged activists seeking to undermine an honest balloting process.

True the Vote provides an example indicating that key swing state “Ohio is totally targeted for fraud…Just as Hillary Clinton allies have done in other states across the country, the Left has launched a multi-front legal onslaught challenging election integrity measures in Ohio, a key swing state with a history of voter fraud. While other Democrat-backed lawsuits have mostly focused on fighting states’ voter ID laws, in Ohio they have sought to block voter roll cleanup efforts; eliminate laws requiring full and accurate completion of absentee- and provisional-ballot forms; and bring back the state’s ‘Golden Week,’ an extra seven days of early voting starting 35 days before Election Day during which people can register and vote on the same day – positions favored by the Left that accommodate fraud. “What happens in Ohio is we see people come from other states such as California and Massachusetts where they know their vote doesn’t matter, and exploit the loopholes…”
I know it’s hard to talk while you are boiling cheap generic tadalafil with rage, or if you feel that your partner does not get the pleasure and satisfaction which often makes him or her irritated. This is a big reason why most penis pills do not work but do you think the pill website will tell you that? buy cheap cialis I think not. Widespread types of treatment embody anxiolytics resembling Not bothered Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) plus Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are actually a widespread treatments and likewise tricyclic contra–depressants, although today those can be found taken less often. order sildenafil There are other several causes of tinnitus and thus identifying them is the first step for relieving such feelings is to acknowledge the issue and communicate commander cialis devensec.com honestly and openly with each other over several penile failure issues.
The challenge is particularly pronounced when the Clinton political machine is involved. From scandals involving unlawful contributions traced back to the Chinese military in the 1990’s to the rather blatant actions committed during this year’s Democrat primary against challenger Bernie Sanders, the Clinton machine has excelled at illegally gaming the system.

Writing in the Huffington Post, Riley Waggaman found that “Election ‘Shenanigans’ Have Defined the Democratic Primaries – and Benefit Hillary Clinton…Even Nate Silver, widely regarded as the Gandalf of statistical analysis, still can’t figure out how Clinton won in Iowa and Massachusetts…With a lead of two-tenths of 1 percent, Hillary Clinton was declared the winner of the Iowa Caucuses. … the Des Moines Register’s editorial board wrote that ‘[the Iowa Democratic Party’s] refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of autocracy’…To make matters worse, results from 90 precincts were reported ‘missing.”

In Arizona, numerous problems occurred on the day of primary voting, but the problems mostly affected Sanders supporters.  The Clinton campaign had managed to get most of their supporters to vote early by mail.

John Fund, reporting for National Review, describes how the courts have ignored  well-documented and blatant, obvious attempts at fraudulent voter registration:

“Three federal courts have thrown out voter-ID laws in North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin in recent days…. According to a Pew Research Center survey, only 31 percent of Americans were confident that “the votes across the country were accurately counted” in the 2012 election. … A separate Pew survey in 2012 found that one out of eight voter registrations is inaccurate, out-of-date, or a duplicate. Some 2.8 million people are registered in two or more states, and 1.8 million registered voters are dead. … In 2014, political scientists Jesse Richman and David Earnest, writing in the Washington Post, summarized their finding, based on their examination of thousands of voter interviews from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study: ‘Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008… in Michigan, [Prject Veritas’ … told different poll workers he was Detroit mayor Mike Duggan, Wayne State University Law School dean Jocelyn Benson, and columnist Nancy Kaffer of the Detroit Free Press — all whom strongly oppose voter-ID laws. In each case, poll workers offered him primary ballots for the person he was claiming to be. He was also offered the ballot of legendary Michigan rapper Eminem, whose real name is Marshall Bruce Mathers III. In all but one sting, the poll workers offered him a ballot, though he never actually accepted a ballot or cast an illegal vote.”

Unlawfully altering the results of a presidential election is not an exceptionally difficult task. Voter fraud in a few key precincts in just a few swing states could change the entire outcome.  There is growing and substantial evidence that the ground work for engineering an illegal outcome has already been laid.

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Reality of Voting Fraud

The key issue of this year’s presidential contest may not be who the candidates are, the weak economy, or the hazardous condition of America’s national security. Increasingly, it appears that the integrity of the election process itself may be the most contentious topic to arise in the 2016 race.

Recently, as reported in the Free Beacon Ann Ravel, the former chair and current member of the Federal Election Commission stated (at a conference in Canada, interestingly enough) that the “United States political system benefits wealthy white men,” and “criticized the system by saying it is set up in such a way that makes it difficult for women and minorities to succeed.”

FEC member Ravel’s comments are not isolated words. They are part of an overall strategy to create a smokescreen for attempts to alter election results through a combination of election day antics, registration fraud, and opposition to voter id. Commissioner Ravel’s comments are designed to give cover to a bevy of approaches that seek to overcome the advantage Republicans have demonstrated in recent elections, and that the GOP is expected to have in response to anger over the dismal results of the Obama Administration’s policies at home and abroad, as well as (if Hillary is the candidate) dismay over rampant ethical issues or (if Sanders is the candidate) a rejection of a blatant socialist message.

Many factors in illegal voting and registration are in play, particularly with the increase in illegal immigration, allowing noncitizens to obtain driver’s licenses and “motor voter” rules in many states that offer voter registration when applying for a license.

The NOLO legal website notes:

“Due to the Motor Vehicle Act of 1993 (also known as the ‘Motor Voter Act’), states are required to provide people with the opportunity to register to vote when they apply for or renew their driver’s licenses. However, while a minority of states ask for proof of citizenship at the time of voter registration, employees in most states may not inquire about citizenship status before asking noncitizens if they desire to register to vote… some noncitizens are misinformed about their eligibility to vote. For example, a campaign worker may tell you that permanent residents (green card holders) may register to vote, even when they are not eligible, or a canvasser may knock on your door to ask you to register and give you incorrect information.”

Legitimate questions continue to go unanswered. Some proficiency in English is required for citizenship, but some states print ballots in numerous languages. Why?
Thus, it executes only order generic viagra when a male body has sexual arousal. Trimex group looks to value addition phase of its generic cialis viagra operations with Titanium dioxide extraction. Don’t take this option around more substantial as well as littler quantities as well as in excess of prescribed. cialis canada cheap is typically obtained simply if demanded, half-hour for you to 1 preceding hr intimate action. But depending upon a case to case basis certain remedies can always be worked out to effectively manage the side effects and with option like online viagra, Kamagra, viagra and their easy availability online will certainly help you to pick the relevant herbal of your problem.
Intelligentuspolitics.com reports:

“Dozens of lawsuits have been filed by the Obama Justice Department, the Democrat Party, the Clinton campaign and various other groups … Their primary and continuing objective has been to convince the electorate that there is no voter fraud, an objective with which they have had moderate success. To understand the magnitude of this effort, perform a Google exact-match search for the phrase ‘voter fraud is a myth.’ Google has 3,940 articles in their index that use that exact phrase. What are the odds? That is a great deal of content with the exact same phrase and message.

Their secondary goal has been to convince voters that voting rules of any kind constitute Republican voter suppression… Again looking at search trends, in the last eight years, ‘Republican voter suppression’ produces 11,500 exact-match Google search results and ‘GOP voter suppression’ produces 15,100 exact-match search results. Their most aggressive efforts are dedicated to opposing maintenance of voter registration rolls and opposing voter ID laws. These initiatives pose a very real threat to successful voter fraud. Democrats combine media bombardment with a mind boggling assortment of frivolous lawsuits to oppose voter ID laws.”

Reason.comreports:

“In a 2015 study that is currently under review, Lindsay Nielson—a political scientist at the University of San Diego—parses the effects of stricter voter ID laws on the voting patterns of the young, the elderly, the poor, and racial minorities [in general elections]. …Nielson finds that “there is little evidence that racial minorities are less likely than whites to vote when states institute voter identification requirements.” … There is also “no statistically significant gap in estimated turnout [between high-income and low-income voter] when the identification law becomes stricter.”

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2008 upholding of the constitutionality of Indiana’s voter identification law, stated that obvious examples of voter fraud exist throughout U.S, history.  The Heritage Foundation notes that the “Nonpartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, found that our ‘electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to deter fraud or to confirm the identity of voters.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Research confirms massive illegal voting

Non-citizens are voting in U.S. elections, according to an Old Dominion University study.

The analysis examined participation rates by non-citizens using a nationally represented sample that included non-citizen immigrants. It found that “some non-citizens participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including electoral college votes and Congressional elections.  Non-citizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama priorities in the 111th Congress.”

Other research indicates how fraudulent voting, including voting by illegal immigrants, felons, and additional ineligibles, occurs. Reasons include the poor maintenance of voter registration rolls, the lack of viable verification procedures when individuals register to vote, and the Department of Justice’s militant stance against voter ID.

True the Vote  has found that 136 counties across 21 U.S. states have bloated voter rolls. The counties have failed to make reasonable efforts to address the problem.

According to True the Vote Founder Catherine Engelbrecht, “Bloated voter rolls hurt everyone. Deceased voters aren’t removed, duplicate registrations aren’t revoked and the records of voters who’ve relocated aren’t corrected. Low verification standards, like absence of voter ID, add to the confusion. Bloated rolls create the ideal environment for identity theft and voter fraud. With the U.S. Justice Department still refusing to set a national standard and enforce federal maintenance requirements, we’re now starting to see entire states come close to showing over 100 percent registration.”

“True the Vote has threatened legal action, and counties in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia received pre-litigation notices. True the Vote has requested that the counties outline efforts to remove dead, felon, moved or otherwise ineligible voters ahead of the 2016 election season to avoid litigation.  All told, the states represented in the findings account for 305 electoral votes—more than enough for a presidential election landslide.”

A study of voter fraud (also reported in Truth Revolt ) by Harvard’s Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) confirmed the findings of Judicial Watch on the role illegal immigrants have played in recent elections. The study found that enough non-citizens voted in 2008 to potentially “turn the tide” in favor of the Democrats.
In fact some of the premium brands such as Prosolution gel are compatible to be used with condom for erection support. lowest prices cialis Men, who are looking to have their own baby, can use this herbal treatment to increase ejaculation strength for three to four months. free viagra tablets Cardiovascular illnesses can be reduced with medications, lifestyle changes, and a generic price viagra healthy diet. Scoop out cialis uk a little of the inside just enough for your sex organ to penetrate slightly.
The Harvard study was an academic project involving teams of researchers located throughout the United States. The CCES findings support the allegations that enough illegal votes were cast in 2008 to turn the tide in close races to favor Democratic candidates and provide them with victories…Though the Harvard study was originally designed to dispel claims of widespread voter fraud, the results proved otherwise. Not only did a ‘significant number’ of voters vote illegally, CCES found that they overwhelmingly voted Democrat, with Obama winning “more than 80 percent of the non-citizen vote.” The Washington Examiner reports:

“A significant number of voters who were not citizens cast illegal ballots in U.S. elections and the possibility exists that those unlawful ballots helped President Barack Obama to win the election in 2008, according to two public-interest organizations, one of which is located on the campus of the left-leaning Harvard University campus. While the study was originally aimed at dispelling claims of significant voter fraud, it surprisingly confirms that elections are in some cases being stolen. […]

Townhall  noted:

“It is an article of faith on the Left that voter fraud does not exist beyond the imaginations of racist right-wingers, hellbent on imposing ‘unconstitutional’ voter ID laws fashioned to ‘suppress’ minority turnout in elections. These objections are race-baiting nonsense; they’re unsupported by both empirical evidence and Supreme Court precedent. [A]fter Georgia implemented its own law in 2007 (which survived a legal challenge), minority voter participation increased in the …next two election cycles. ABC News has called voter fraud a ‘rare but real’ phenomenon, evidenced by a number of relatively high-profile convictions in recent years. Congress defunded the left-wing group ACORN (for whom Barack Obama once organized) over widespread voter registration fraud and other outrages. The watchdog group True the Vote — whose founder’s businesses and family have been harassed by the IRS and other federal agencies — documents voter fraud prosecutions in 46 states since 2000.

“[Florida’s]…WBBH-TV reporter Andy Pierrotti managed to track down dozens of local residents who were (a) both non-US citizens and (b) registered to vote in the swing state. Many of them had illegally voted in recent elections. …  This local reporter found 94 illegally registered voters in one small region using one narrow verification method. If you extrapolate his number over Florida’s 67 counties, that’s nearly 6,300 people. In 2000, the United States Presidency was determined by 537 Florida votes.”

The California Political Review reports:  “Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate…mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Three Pillars of Election Fraud

The news that a Cook County, Illinois election machine automatically transformed votes cast for Republicans into votes cast for Democrats this week should come as no surprise. It’s time America had a very candid conversation about the rapidly growing epidemic of election fraud.

At this point in most discussions about the crisis, it’s customary to say that both parties engage in balloting shenanigans. But in reality, it is the Democrat Party that is, by far, the greatest offender.

There are three pillars in the Democrats’ efforts to unlawfully alter results at the polls:

Election Day antics. From tampering with balloting machines and technologies, some of which were developed under questionable circumstances, to stuffing ballot boxes, to intimidating Republican voters, the Democrats have done it all. Examples are legion. In the 2008 election, Republican voters in one section of Philadelphia were openly intimidated, but Eric Holder’s Justice Department declined to take action.

Consider the Republican congressman from California who lost when numerous votes were cast by individuals ineligible to do so. According to a City Journal article written by John Fund, who has extensively studied the topic,

“…4,023 illegal voters possibly cast ballots in the disputed election between Republican Robert Dornan and Democrat Loretta Sanchez. Dornan lost by fewer than 1,000 votes. In 2002, Dean Gardner, a losing GOP candidate for California’s state legislature, sent out a survey to 14,000 first-time voters. A total of 1,691 surveys came back. The results were startling: 76 people admitted that they weren’t citizens but had voted, while 49 claimed not to have registered at their correct residence, as the law requires. Gardner lost by only 266 votes.”

In the 2012 presidential contest, President Obama somehow received 100% of the vote in 21 Cleveland districts.
Having said that, it can also be a technique to get away female viagra from ED. Pills are common discount cialis and it is cheaper that all other types. Considerations and Precautions It india viagra online view to find out more is suggested to avoid Kamagra, if you are sensitive to to Sildenafil or any other element of the drug that gives the required action. tadalafil india cialis Kamagra is found in all types of forms like oral pills.
Registration fraud. In a study, the Pew Center on the States found “millions of voter registration records nationwide that are either inaccurate or no longer valid…based on data [indicating] a voter died, moved, or had been inactive from 2004 to March 2011.” The study revealed that 2,758,578 individuals were registered to vote in more than one state. In addition, “12.7 million records nationwide…appear to be out of date and no longer reflect the voter’s current information, more than 1.8 million records for people who are no longer living, but have active registrations on voter rolls, and 12 million records with incorrect addresses…once duplicates among categories are eliminated, approximately 24 million registration records, or nearly 13% of the national total, are estimated to be inaccurate or no longer valid.”

Townhall reports that one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio’s Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio’s 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious.

Voter Registration fraud is made far easier by practices such as motor voter, internet registration, and election day registration, all concepts vigorously supported by the Democrat Party.

Opposition to voter ID. The Democrats vehemently oppose voter identification, just as they oppose stricter border controls. There is a pragmatic motivation for that. According to the Pew Research Center these new illegal arrivals are overwhelmingly favorable to the Democrat party. “In 2012, the Pew Research Center’s National Survey of Latinos found that among Latino immigrants who are not U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents (and therefore likely unauthorized immigrants), some 31% identify as Democrats and just 4% as Republicans…Democratic candidates have garnered a greater share of the Hispanic vote than Republican candidates in every election over the past three decades…”

Illegal immigrants, overwhelmingly supportive of Democrats, cast unlawful ballots with relative ease. Writing in the Huffington Post, Howard Foster notes that “Only two states actually require proof of citizenship in order to register (Arizona and Kansas). The others merely require the applicant to sign a sworn statement attesting to the fact that he or she is a citizen…It stands to reason that illegal immigrants who are illegally registered to vote would have a very real stake in seeing to it that Republicans do not come to power with their…ideas about requiring proof of citizenship to vote (which has been required since the founding of the Republic)… There is a huge problem with voter fraud…it is proven by the vehemence of the Democrats, the beneficiaries of the fraud, toward enforcement of our laws.”

The evidence concerning the Democrat Party’s culpability in voting fraud is clear and abundant.