Tag: Voter fraud

Categories
Quick Analysis

Vote Fraud Evidence Expands

Further evidence of the potential impact voter fraud will have on the 2016 presidential election came to light yesterday.

A leaked memo from left-wing  George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, (OSF) reported in the Daily Caller indicates how the group’s support for open immigration presents “new opportunities” for the billionaire to unduly influence the 2016 campaign.   Earlier this year, OSF transferred funds to organizations that used violence to prevent U.S. citizens from attending Republican events.

Quotes from the leaked memo stress “Our premise for engaging in work related to governance was that…we should also be supporting actors in the field proactively seeking to change the policies, rules, and regulations that govern migration… The organization states it “has had to be selective and opportunistic… in supporting leaders in the field to push thinking on migration and better coordinate advocacy and reform efforts.”

Clinton’s lenient policy towards illegal immigrants contrasts sharply with rival Donald Trump, whose signature primary issue was a promise to build a wall and engage in other measure to stop unlawful entry into the U.S.

The Clinton camp, which engaged in highly questionable activities in its primary fight against Bernie Sanders, continues to maintain that voter fraud is not an issue. It’s a concept which defies both the evidence and past practices.

Realclear politics notes that “One of the biggest voter frauds may be that there is no voter fraud, that laws requiring voters to have a photo identification are just attempts to suppress black voting. Reporter John Fund has written three books on voter fraud and a recent survey by Old Dominion University indicates that there are more than a million registered voters who are not citizens, and who therefore are not legally entitled to vote.”

Former Justice Department Attorney J. Christian Adams, with unique and specialized experience in the topic, provides extraordinary evidence.  Among the examples, as reported by Realclearpolitics:

One of these frauds involved sending out absentee ballots to people who had never asked for them. Then a political operator would show up — uninvited — the day the ballots arrived and “help” the voter to fill them out. Sometimes the intruders simply took the ballots, filled them out and forged the signatures of the voters.These were illegal votes for Democrats…As for race-based “voter suppression,” amid all the political hysteria, how many hard facts have you heard? Probably none that supports that claim. Widely available free photo identification cards mean that poverty is no barrier to voting.Since blacks and whites both have to show photo I.D. for everything from cashing checks to getting on a plane, why has requiring a photo I.D. for voting caused such shrill outcries?”

Numerous examples abound.  Review just a small sample of recent ones:

Brian Anderson, writing for Downtrend recently reported:

“A TV station in Los Angeles has uncovered hundreds of dead people who have cast votes in multiple elections. CBS 2 did an extensive comparison of voter records and death records and discovered that hundreds of people who have passed away still managed to make it to the polls:CBS2 compared millions of voting records from the California Secretary of State’s office with death records from the Social Security Administration and found hundreds of so-called dead voters…The numbers come from state records that show votes were cast in that person’s name after they died. In some cases…they voted year after year…In addition to voter ID laws, democrats also think that purging voter rolls is racist and that’s part of the issue here. In 2002 Congress passed the Help America Vote Act, which mandated a voter registration system that would eliminate ineligible voters. California is the only state that hasn’t complied with this law.”

Among the numerous examples provided by another organization, Discover the networks :

  • “September 2, 2015: Eight Texas Counties List More Voters Than Residents:“We are deeply concerned (that) voter rolls contain substantial numbers of ineligible voters,” True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht stated in a letter to the eight Texas counties.
  • “December 2, 2014: Senator Mary Landrieu’s Chief of Staff Encourages Voter Fraud:A Louisiana mayor whose son is Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu’s chief of staff told voters at a private event to vote twice, speaking to a partisan crowd 24 hours before Election Day last month. Opelousas, Louisiana Mayor Don Cravins Sr.’s Nov. 3 remarks show him telling a crowd in his home town that “if you ‘early voted,’ go vote again tomorrow. One more time’s not going to hurt.”  Louisianans, like Americans in many states, had the option of either voting ‘early’ or showing up on Election Day. Taking advantage of both options would be a crime.And for voters worried about criminal fraud charges, Cravins said he had an insurance policy – the re-election of a Democratic district attorney. “Tomorrow we’re gonna elect Earl Taylor as the D.A. so he won’t prosecute you if you vote twice,” Cravins said.
    Taylor won a fourth term ….
  • “October 30, 2014: Voter Fraud in Maryland (Massive Voting by Non-Citizens) An election integrity watchdog group [Virginia voters Alliance] … discovered massive and ongoing fraudulent voting by non-U.S. citizens in one county. But because of the way that the non-citizens are able to cast votes in elections, the fraud is likely happening in every single county and subdivision across the state. The group believes that the illegal voting has been happening for years.
  • “October 27, 2014: Study Reveals Significant Number of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. Elections: Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races. Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES). … How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 …Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.

If some have acquisition de viagra medical issues they may consume them at least once in 48 hours or so. Patients are getting prescription for viagra http://www.devensec.com/search.html requested not to use anti-inflammatory medications. For this reason, a healthy individual consuming Kamagra for treating your sexual problems. viagra properien devensec.com If buy cialis line you get rid of erectile dysfunction then you can get both capsules and oil from Saffron M Power.
A fascinating note from Snopes: The majority of illegals enter the United States through Mexico. Mexico requires its citizens to have government-sponsored photo ID cards to vote in federal elections.

Categories
Quick Analysis

DOJ Preparing to Tolerate Massive Voter Fraud

Are Americans being desensitized to criminal acts by federal agencies as a prelude to massive cheating in the upcoming presidential election?

The deeply disturbing confirmation that the leadership of the Internal Revenue Service was aware that their agency’s resources were being used to target political opponents of the Obama Administration adds to concerns that there has been a wholesale hijacking of taxpayer funded government agencies for partisan purposes.

The tolerance of these crimes sets up the nation for a potentially explosive altercation in the coming presidential ballot.

The latest revelation, discovered by Judicial Watch through an examination of FBI documents, presents a worrisome picture, particularly when combined with other research and information about the unlawful and biased practices of various federal departments during the Obama Administration.

The incriminating documents were obtained through a federal court order in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) demand.

The FBI papers  show “that top Washington IRS officials, including Lois Lerner and Holly Paz, knew that the agency was specifically targeting ‘Tea Party’ and other conservative organizations two full years before disclosing it to Congress and the public.  An FBI 302 document contains detailed narratives of FBI agent investigations.  The Obama Justice Department and FBI investigations into the Obama IRS scandal resulted in no criminal charges.”

The failure to bring charges against those who have committed criminal acts on behalf of the Obama Administration is emerging as a consistent pattern. The most recent example is the failure to prosecute former Secretary Clinton for obvious and serious national security-related  violations.

According to the released material, notes Judicial Watch, a “Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) 2013 report clearly shows that “Senior IRS officials knew that agents were targeting conservative groups for special scrutiny as early as 2011…The FBI documents also reveal that IRS officials stated that the agency was targeting conservative groups because of their ideology and political affiliation in the summer of 2011. .. IRS senior official Nancy Marks, … stated, “Cincinnati [The IRS center doing the targeting] was categorizing cases based on name and ideology, not just activity…According to the FBI documents, Paz and others were informed in the late spring and summer of 2011 that Cincinnati agents were using ‘BOLO’ (Be On the Look Out) briefing guides that instructed them to be ‘looking at cases using the Tea Party term.’”

In and of itself, the criminal actions of the Internal Revenue Service would be deeply troubling. But a pattern of such behavior across several federal departments is evident, as is the collusion of the Justice Department (DOJ) in its failure to prosecute these transgressions.

Writing for Creators, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano harshly criticized the DOJ in the most recent example of its political bias, the refusal to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her negligent handling of classified material.

You check that site pills cialis might also want to try homeopathy to help treat your irritable bowel syndrome. Keeping these things in mind will certainly help with cialis without rx erectile dysfunction and impotence. After a one year follow http://www.slovak-republic.org/video/ order free viagra up the safety measures in correct way. Milk is a reservoir of nutrients and forms an important ingredient generic viagra without prescriptions of a balanced diet. “Is it worth impairing,” Napolitano asks, “the reputation of the FBI and the Department of Justice to save Hillary Clinton from a deserved criminal prosecution by playing word games? What has become of the rule of law — no one is beneath its protections or above its requirements — when the American public can witness a game of political musical chairs orchestrated by Bill Clinton at an airport in a bizarre ruse to remove the criminal investigation of his wife from those legally responsible for making decisions about it? These are questions that now beg for answers in light of what can only be the politically motivated FBI report …in the past two years, the DOJ has prosecuted a young sailor for sending a single selfie to his girlfriend that inadvertently showed a submarine sonar screen in its background. It also prosecuted a Marine lieutenant who sent his military superiors a single email about the presence of al-Qaida operatives dressed as local police in a U.S. encampment in Afghanistan — but who inadvertently used his Gmail account rather than his secure government account…The criminal case against Mrs. Clinton would have been overwhelming.”

Both of these examples have served to desensitize the public about official misconduct, particularly when it comes to tampering with the election process. IRS harassment of opposition political groups, and the get-out-of-jail free card handed to presidential candidate Clinton both serve as precursors to the looming attack on a fair election process.

Numerous extensively well-credentialed researchers, including former DOJ veterans, have detailed the failure, indeed, the refusal, of the DOJ to prosecute overt and serious election misdeeds during the Obama years. J. Christian Adams, to cite just example, has written an entire book on the subject; his points have also been made by others as well. Both left and right oriented organizations (Pew, Heritage) have written about inaccurate voter registration rolls.

Hans A. von Spakovsky, writing for Heritage, has noted that one portion of the Voting Rights Act has been turned from its original purpose into a “political weapon.” He writes that “This cynical manipulation of federal power to benefit one political party over another … all-too-common … during Democratic administrations — underscores that the only real source of refuge from these political machinations is the Supreme Court.”

All of which leads to what will be the greatest challenge of the 2016 campaign, the potential for large-scale voter fraud resulting from the DOJ, at the behest of the Obama Administration, to oppose any attempt at insuring that only qualified voters registered in the place in which they are casting their ballot, actually vote.

The hypocrisy of Democrat opposition to voter ID was front and center at their recently concluded convention in Philadelphia.  Breitbart notes:

“Democrats have railed against voter ID laws…but Democratic National Convention officials will only issue credentials to those who present state-issued IDs. The DNC’s website says that ‘all pickup persons must have a state-issued ID that matches the name submitted’ to receive credentials. Media members attending the DNC have to present photo IDs at multiple checkpoints. But even as Democrats require IDs to enter their convention and The Voter Integrity Project discovered there were 30,000 dead North Carolinians still on the state’s voter rolls, Democrats continue to fiercely oppose voter ID laws.”

According to Ballotpedia, ” As of July 2016, only 18 states required voters to present photo identification… In some states, a voter who is unable to present valid identification may still be permitted to vote without casting a provisional ballot.”

A 2015 report by the Washington Times noted “President Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty will make it easier for illegal immigrants to improperly register and vote in elections, state elections officials testified to Congress …saying that the driver’s licenses and Social Security numbers they will be granted create a major voting loophole…secretaries of state from Ohio and Kansas said they won’t have the tools to sniff out illegal immigrants who register anyway…”

The failure of the DOJ to take appropriate action in the IRS and Clinton Server scandals, and the agency’s refusal to prosecute clear-cut cases of voting-related misconduct in the past provide the groundwork for its tolerance of wide-spread and significant fraud in the 2016 presidential balloting.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Fraudulent Voting Threat Expands

Serious questions concerning potential voter fraud in the Iowa Democrat caucus have reinvigorated claims of ballot and registration misdeeds across the nation. Examples of significant problems with accurate voter registration issues, including the registration of illegal aliens, abound from coast to coast.

From California’s Motor Voter Act, signed into law last year, which automatically registers drivers when they get or renew their license, to New York’s proposed legislation which would actually give illegal aliens in New York City the right to vote in local elections, measures are being planned and emplaced that would allow illegal aliens to vote in numbers that could alter the outcome of the 2016 presidential contest. Last June, Hillary Clinton called for universal automatic voter registration. (Capital Research notes that “The nation’s original motor-voter law was the National Voter Registration Act that President Bill Clinton signed into law a few months after his inauguration in 1993.”)

A Townhall reporter “found 94 illegally registered voters in one small region using one narrow verification method. If you extrapolate his number over Florida’s 67 counties, that’s nearly 6,300 people.”

True the Vote (TTV) has released a report on its recent discovery of thousands of duplicate voter registrations in North Carolina’s ten largest counties and the coordinated attempts by left-leaning political organizations to threaten the NC counties with new litigation and hostile document demands in a failed effort to stall lawful maintenance efforts.

In response to True the Votes efforts, those organizations, according to TTV, attempted to stall or prevent counties from cleaning voter records in accordance with state and federal requirements. TTV founder Catherine Engelbrecht has stated “For generations, leftist political organizations…have bullied our county election offices in order to engineer partisan election outcomes. It should come as no surprise that the same groups who would block simple maintenance efforts are also outspoken critics of North Carolina’s voter ID law. True the Vote holds election integrity above political advantage. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for these groups.” True the Vote is scheduled to release the results of similar research efforts in other battleground states in the coming weeks.
The sildenafil citrate has been used as a online cialis prescriptions http://www.learningworksca.org/resources/equity-education/ natural remedy for infertility in men. pharmacy australia cialis Kamagra tablets have proven to treat erectile dysfunction effectively. Some medicine, such as BP medication, heart medication, peptic ulcer medication, antidepressant medication generic cialis overnight and sleeping pills. Ayurvedic approach for the treatment of cialis professional cipla high blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, May 2001.
The Heritage Foundation notes that 24 million registrations are inaccurate, out of date, or duplicative; 2.8 million people are registered in two or more states, and 1.8 million registered voters are deceased.  Heritage’s figures don’t include the many, perhaps millions, of illegal aliens who are registered to vote.

Heritage also outlines historical nature of the issue.  “Examples abound, from the 135 percent of the eligible voters who turned out for an 1844 election in New York to the infamous Ballot Box 13 in Lyndon Johnson’s 1948 Senate election. The 1997 Miami mayor’s race was overturned because of more than 5,000 fraudulent absentee ballots. A mayoral election in East Chicago, Indiana, in 2003 and a state senate race in Tennessee in 2005 were also overturned because of voter fraud. In 2013, four individuals in Indiana were convicted of forging signatures on the ballot petitions that qualified Barack Obama for the state’s May 2008 primary election. As the Supreme Court of the United States recognized when it upheld the constitutionality of Indiana’s voter identification law in 2008, flagrant examples of voter fraud ‘have been documented throughout this Nation’s history by respected historians and journalists.’ Those examples ‘demonstrate that not only is the risk of voter fraud real but that it could affect the outcome of a close election.”

Judicial Watch adds: “The sad truth is that our nation’s recent history consists of far too many elections which have been called into question due to allegations of incompetence and outright misconduct.  Most notable have been the abuses by ACORN and its state organizations, which in 2008 were implicated in at least 35 well-documented election fraud schemes in 17 states, leading to multiple convictions, fines, and even prison.  And while ACORN activities have become so nefarious it was forced to disband (though, in reality, spinoff groups have survived) Project Vote, an affiliate of ACORN, remains very active…”

National Review reports that “Several well-funded organizations — including the League of Women Voters and the NAACP — are fighting efforts to prevent non-citizens from voting illegally in the upcoming presidential election. And the United States Department of Justice, under the direction of Attorney General Loretta Lynch, is helping them.  On February 12, these groups filed a lawsuit in D.C. federal court seeking to reverse a recent decision by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). The Commission’s decision allows Kansas and other states, including Arizona and Georgia, to enforce state laws ensuring that only citizens register to vote when they use a federally designed registration form.”
A Congressional Research Service study noted that “The Help America Vote Act requires that certain voters who had registered by mail present a form of identification from a list specified in the act. States vary greatly in what identification they require voters to present, ranging from nothing beyond the federal requirement to photographic identification for all voters. A number of states enacted laws in recent years to require photo ID to vote, which resulted in a series of state court challenges and rulings. In the 109th Congress, the House passed legislation to require photo identification and proof of citizenship when voting in federal elections, but no further action followed. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld an Indiana statute requiring photo identification for voting…Given the problems some states have had, the increase in new-voter registration in recent elections, and recent closely contested presidential elections, issues associated with voter registration systems have become more prominent. Among them are questions about the integrity and accuracy of the statewide systems, the validity of new registrations, concerns about various kinds of fraud and abuse, and the impacts of attempts to challenge the validity of voters’ registrations at polling places.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

The Reality of Voting Fraud

The key issue of this year’s presidential contest may not be who the candidates are, the weak economy, or the hazardous condition of America’s national security. Increasingly, it appears that the integrity of the election process itself may be the most contentious topic to arise in the 2016 race.

Recently, as reported in the Free Beacon Ann Ravel, the former chair and current member of the Federal Election Commission stated (at a conference in Canada, interestingly enough) that the “United States political system benefits wealthy white men,” and “criticized the system by saying it is set up in such a way that makes it difficult for women and minorities to succeed.”

FEC member Ravel’s comments are not isolated words. They are part of an overall strategy to create a smokescreen for attempts to alter election results through a combination of election day antics, registration fraud, and opposition to voter id. Commissioner Ravel’s comments are designed to give cover to a bevy of approaches that seek to overcome the advantage Republicans have demonstrated in recent elections, and that the GOP is expected to have in response to anger over the dismal results of the Obama Administration’s policies at home and abroad, as well as (if Hillary is the candidate) dismay over rampant ethical issues or (if Sanders is the candidate) a rejection of a blatant socialist message.

Many factors in illegal voting and registration are in play, particularly with the increase in illegal immigration, allowing noncitizens to obtain driver’s licenses and “motor voter” rules in many states that offer voter registration when applying for a license.

The NOLO legal website notes:

“Due to the Motor Vehicle Act of 1993 (also known as the ‘Motor Voter Act’), states are required to provide people with the opportunity to register to vote when they apply for or renew their driver’s licenses. However, while a minority of states ask for proof of citizenship at the time of voter registration, employees in most states may not inquire about citizenship status before asking noncitizens if they desire to register to vote… some noncitizens are misinformed about their eligibility to vote. For example, a campaign worker may tell you that permanent residents (green card holders) may register to vote, even when they are not eligible, or a canvasser may knock on your door to ask you to register and give you incorrect information.”

Legitimate questions continue to go unanswered. Some proficiency in English is required for citizenship, but some states print ballots in numerous languages. Why?
Thus, it executes only order generic viagra when a male body has sexual arousal. Trimex group looks to value addition phase of its generic cialis viagra operations with Titanium dioxide extraction. Don’t take this option around more substantial as well as littler quantities as well as in excess of prescribed. cialis canada cheap is typically obtained simply if demanded, half-hour for you to 1 preceding hr intimate action. But depending upon a case to case basis certain remedies can always be worked out to effectively manage the side effects and with option like online viagra, Kamagra, viagra and their easy availability online will certainly help you to pick the relevant herbal of your problem.
Intelligentuspolitics.com reports:

“Dozens of lawsuits have been filed by the Obama Justice Department, the Democrat Party, the Clinton campaign and various other groups … Their primary and continuing objective has been to convince the electorate that there is no voter fraud, an objective with which they have had moderate success. To understand the magnitude of this effort, perform a Google exact-match search for the phrase ‘voter fraud is a myth.’ Google has 3,940 articles in their index that use that exact phrase. What are the odds? That is a great deal of content with the exact same phrase and message.

Their secondary goal has been to convince voters that voting rules of any kind constitute Republican voter suppression… Again looking at search trends, in the last eight years, ‘Republican voter suppression’ produces 11,500 exact-match Google search results and ‘GOP voter suppression’ produces 15,100 exact-match search results. Their most aggressive efforts are dedicated to opposing maintenance of voter registration rolls and opposing voter ID laws. These initiatives pose a very real threat to successful voter fraud. Democrats combine media bombardment with a mind boggling assortment of frivolous lawsuits to oppose voter ID laws.”

Reason.comreports:

“In a 2015 study that is currently under review, Lindsay Nielson—a political scientist at the University of San Diego—parses the effects of stricter voter ID laws on the voting patterns of the young, the elderly, the poor, and racial minorities [in general elections]. …Nielson finds that “there is little evidence that racial minorities are less likely than whites to vote when states institute voter identification requirements.” … There is also “no statistically significant gap in estimated turnout [between high-income and low-income voter] when the identification law becomes stricter.”

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2008 upholding of the constitutionality of Indiana’s voter identification law, stated that obvious examples of voter fraud exist throughout U.S, history.  The Heritage Foundation notes that the “Nonpartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, chaired by former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, found that our ‘electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to deter fraud or to confirm the identity of voters.”

Categories
NY Analysis

Preventing voter fraud is not a discriminatory act

Speaking at a commemoration of  the 1965“Bloody Sunday” civil rights struggle in Selma, President Obama stated that “”Right now, in 2015, fifty years after Selma, there are laws across this country designed to make it harder for people to vote.”

The President was incorrect. Laws currently on the books as well as those being proposed are designed to combat voter fraud, an issue that disenfranchises black and, indeed, all voters.

A Pew Center on the States study found “millions of voter registration records nationwide that are either inaccurate or no longer valid…based on data [indicating] a voter died, moved, or had been inactive from 2004 to March 2011.”  The study revealed that 2,758,578 individuals were registered to vote in more than one state.  In addition, “12.7 million records nationwide…appear to be out of date and no longer reflect the voter’s current information, more than 1.8 million records for people who are no longer living, but have active registrations on voter rolls, and 12 million records with incorrect addresses…once duplicates among categories are eliminated, approximately 24 million registration records, or nearly 13% of the national total, are estimated to be inaccurate or no longer valid.”

There are further concerns that “motor voter” registrations and similar efforts to expand participation in elections may open the door to massive voting fraud.

 Interestingly, some media sources such as the NY Times  ave sought to minimize or deny the crisis.

Will fraudulent voting practices, as well as inaccurate voter registration, have an impact on the upcoming presidential election? Numerous studies from across the nation document brazen attempts to destroy or misplace ballots, and allow ineligible individuals to vote, or register to vote. Americans are increasingly concerned.  The refusal of the Justice Department to prosecute a clear case of voter intimidation  in the city of Philadelphia by the New Black Panther Party in the 2008 presidential election has been partially responsible.

 John Fund, who has extensively studied election fraud, reports that “nearly 10% of Americans…believe that the election system doesn’t count their votes accurately.”  He documents significant misdeeds from the 2000 presidential election, in which over 15,000 ballots in Florida’s Palm Beach County were warped in an attempt to invalidate Bush votes. Also in the 2000 elections, Philadelphia had more registered voters than actual citizens. Similarly, in 2007, Indianapolis/Marion County had more registered voters than adult citizens.

According to published reports, an internal Wikileaks memo documents abuses in the 2008 election including foreign contributions from Russia going to the Obama campaign, as well as accounts of ballot box stuffing in Pennsylvania and Ohio also on behalf of the Obama campaign.

 Presidential election fraud is not restricted to the general election.  Several years ago, the chairman of the Indiana Democratic Party resigned in the wake of a scandal involving the 2008 Democrat presidential primary, in which claims of unlawful practices by the Obama campaign continue to surface.

What differentiates traditional–but still illegal–election misdeeds from current concerns is both the involvement of the Department of Justice and the impact of legislation such as motor voter.

This is where the online pharmacies make it easier for them to consult a doctor online generico levitra on line midwayfire.com and buy the prescribed medicines online. The open minded and open buying viagra canada eyed persons will see that their looks will get to be affected and they will buy only branded variations regardless of the price. You get cialis online midwayfire.com may have often heard of the term diabetic ulcer and may have encountered such a situation yourself. Many people have suffered breakups and divorce due cheap canadian viagra to porn addiction. “Motor voter” is actually the popular name of the 1993 National Voter Registration Act.   The legislation mandated state motor vehicle departments as well as other state agencies to offer voter registration forms and register those who came to their offices.  Inexplicably, it forbade employees of those offices from checking IDs of those it registered.  This not only made fraud possible; it essentially invited it.

Jack Kelly, wrote in the Pittsburg Post-Gazette, notes that there have been recent investigations, indictments, or convictions for vote fraud in California, Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina and Maryland.

 Hans Spakovsky, writing in the Free Speech & Election Law Practices  publication, emphasizes the problem of noncitizens registering to vote.  He reports that in a random sampling of 3,000 registrations in California’s 39th Assembly District, 10% contained phony addresses or were not U.S. citizens.

A number of states have attempted to attack fraudulent registrations by passing legislation requiring a valid ID to vote.  To the dismay of those dedicated to honest balloting, The Obama Justice Department has responded with significant hostility to this measure.  Although almost all the reported fraud has aided hard-left Democrats, Kelly reports, even liberal United States Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens stated “There is no question about the legitimacy or importance of  state’s interest in counting only eligible voters’ votes” in a 2008 case that upheld Indiana’s stringent ID law following a challenge by the Democrat Party and its allies.

 In testimony before the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Rules ad Administration, John Samples, The Cato Institute’s Director of the Center for Representative Government  stated that the Motor Voter Act “has made it difficult if not impossible to maintain clean registration rolls…the inaccuracy in the rolls caused by the Act has thrown into doubt the integrity of our electoral system.”

The Judicial Watch organization, in response to its August 9, 2011 Freedom of Information Act filing, has received records which they describe as detailing friendly communications between the Justice Department and a former ACORN attorney now serving as Director of Advocacy for Project Vote.  The ACORN connection is ominous. 70 ACORN staff throughout 12 states were convicted of voter registration fraud; more than one third of the registrations that group submitted were found to be invalid.

 Project Vote is described by Judicial Watch as a group that actively threatened lawsuits under the Motor Voter law in an effort to force election officials to increase the registration of individuals receiving public assistance-a prime source of Democrat support. According to Judicial Watch, “Project Vote was besieged with charges of corruption and fraud.”  Despite that checkered reputation, Judicial Watch found that Project Vote and the Justice Department worked in tandem, producing results that contained heavy amounts of invalid voter registration forms. Project vote also sought to allow individuals without any state identification to register to vote online.  The Judicial Watch investigation indicates that “it becomes clear that Project Vote and the Justice Department have implemented a ‘joint litigation strategy’ in the run-up to the 2012 elections.

J. Christian Adams is an attorney who served five years in the Voting Section of the Department of Justice. He has documented extensive accounts of that agency’s improprieties and partisanship in matters relating not only to its refusal to prosecute illegal election activities, but to actually encourage and abet such unlawful practices.

 Citing little or no evidence, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. defends the Department of Justice actions by maintaining that attempts to properly identify voters is somehow discriminatory against minorities.  Jack Kelly’s research indicates otherwise.  He cites the work of researchers at the universities of Delaware and Nebraska, who found no chilling effect of ID requirements on minorities.  In fact, in Georgia, following the passage of a photo ID requirement, African American participation in elections increased from 42.9% to 50.4%.  Similar results were noted in Indiana and Mississippi.

 The tolerance of unlawful election practices, and the complicity of government agencies in those practices, is a truly existential threat to American freedom. President Obama’s statement that equates the prevention of fraud with discrimination against African Americans is an insult to the heroism of those who fought to end the terrible practice of discrimination against black voters.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Court OKs Voter ID

Opponents of measures to avoid fraudulent voting have received bad news in Wisconsin and North Carolina.

The Judicial Watch organization  has opposed the drive by the U.S. Justice Department to overturn state efforts to require voters to show photo ID at the polls. The group also has also sought to bring to light the role illegal immigration plays in expanding the numbers of unlawful voters.

Attorney General Eric Holder contends that’s photo ID requirements discourage participation by black voters. But research by Judicial Watch indicates that after the implementation of photo ID, “black turnout increased in 2014 by every meaningful measure. Black share of the total electorate increased. The percentage of black registered voters voting increased. Using Census Bureau estimates, “[there was] an increase in turnout among blacks of voting age. Finally, while turnout increased across the board in May 2014, and while white turnout increased by 13.7%, black turnout increased much faster – by an astonishing 29.5%.”

In a Wisconsin case, the United States Court of Appeals  for the 7th Circuit has allowed enforcement of that states’ photo voted ID law in the upcoming November election.
Men taking medicine that treat hypertension usually find that oral ED drugs decrease the risk of heart attack or stroke. cheapest brand viagra Vigorelle is order generic viagra visit for source carefully packaged in a medical-grade state-of-the-art facility. Patients under treatment for the following conditions; or any ongoing managed condition, should consult their GP prior to taking this pill. * Heart Related & cardiovascular diseases including stenosis, idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis and general ventricular outflow obstruction.* Stroke, myocardial infraction (heart attack) or serious arrhythmia.* Cardiac failure or coronary artery disease causing unstable angina. cheap tadalafil tablets It is pill viagra for sale evident from the age of 40 in men.
Opponents of requirements that voters display photo ID have uniformly failed to prove that the practice in anyway detrimentally affects minority voters.

According to Ballotpedia, “All states must meet the minimum requirement set by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) which requires photo ID for those who register by mail and did not provide identification. However, some states have stricter requirements set by state law. 20 states require photo ID, and 14 states have non-photo requirements.  In general, valid forms of photo ID often include:a valid driver’s license, military ID.a state identification card, a United States passport, or student identification. If valid ID is not provided, most states issue a provisional ballot. Provisional ballots are usually counted once a voter’s eligibility is confirmed. Some states require that confirmation be provided within a particular time frame following the election.”

The overwhelming goal of the progressives to obtain illegal votes can be seen in New York, where the hard left wing of the Democrat Party is seeking to give ballot access to non-citizens.