DOJ corruption – USA Gov Policy

During Mueller’s leadership at the FBI, reports The Wall Street Journal’s Devlin Barrett, the political organization of Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, “an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use…The Virginia Democratic Party, over which Mr. McAuliffe exerts considerable control, donated an additional $207,788 worth of support to Dr. McCabe’s campaign in the form of mailers, according to the records. That adds up to slightly more than $675,000…”

The information that has been ascertained provides a disturbing picture of the Clinton campaign utilizing highly partisan research of very dubious veracity from individuals colluding with Russia to prompt surveillance from officials of the Obama Administration, which itself had obtained a significant reputation of misusing federal agencies such as the IRS and the Justice Department for partisan purposes. Yet there is not yet even of hint from Mueller about examining those very important facts.

When a special counsel vigorously pursues one side of the political divide based on evidence that is highly speculative and derived from demonstrably biased sources, but rather pointedly ignores any and all evidence of a far more substantive nature on the other side, there is ample cause for concern.

There may be a very substantial reason for Mueller’s reluctance. When the FBI was doing its partisan best to affect the Presidential election, ignoring Hillary Clinton’s misdeeds in regards to email security but moving forward with the Trump investigation, Mueller was head of the FBI, remaining in that position until September 4, 2013. While much of the FBI/FISA application activity occurred afterwards, the investigations didn’t suddenly spring to life. They were, doubtless, the end product of work begun while Mueller ran the FBI, just as much of time when the agency engaged in a partisan refusal to prosecute Hillary Clinton for her email and Uranium trade misdeeds. A Harvard-CAPS poll reported by The Hill’s Jonathon Easley revealed that “A majority of polled voters say special counsel Robert Mueller has a conflict of interest because of his past ties to former FBI Director James Comey, according to the latest Harvard CAPS-Harris survey.When asked if Mueller has a conflict of interest “as the former head of the FBI and a friend of James Comey,” 54 percent responded that the “relationship” between the two amounts to a conflict of interest, including 70 percent of Republicans, 53 percent of independents and 40 percent of Democrats…the two have been described as “brothers in arms”…”

Some in the media have begun to pay attention to Mueller’s conflict of interest. Glenn Harlan Reynolds, in a USATODAY opinion column, stated that “Special Counsel Robert Mueller has a problem: He has a disqualifying conflict of interest regarding a large part of his work. It involves a choice between investigating or relying on former FBI director James Comey, a longtime close friend of Mueller’s. Ideally, he’ll recognize that and resign. But if he doesn’t resign, Attorney General Jeff Sessions should appoint another special counsel to take over the obstruction-of-justice part of the investigation, where Mueller is disqualified… Mueller is too close to Comey to be impartial, and that violates Justice Department conflict of interest rules.”
The effects of this pill last for up to 72 hours, and this combined with no side effects involved but sleepiness, mouth dryness and sildenafil 100mg viagra constipation might happen. Make sure that you follow the dosage pattern which is been advised is having the viagra online browse around content pill an hour before they make love. Generic medications and brand name medications are completely identical apart from Dosage and Prices viagra professional 100mg their color and shape. These factors then lead to incomplete sexual satisfaction and can bet the big triggers on lowering sexual desire.Kamagra is a form of viagra generika that works best in treating male erectile problems.
Mueller is not alone in being under a cloud of suspicion. A Rasmussen report points out that “Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Jim Baker, Rod Rosenstein, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. These are just some of the names on the growing list of senior DOJ and FBI officials that, according to the House and Senate Intel Committees, may have illegally conspired to exonerate Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing in her handling of classified information on a personal server while Secretary of State and to destroy President Trump.”

In a sign of desperation, Mueller, according to Jonathan Swan in an Axios report, “is subpoenaing all communications — meaning emails, texts, handwritten notes, etc. — that a witness sent and received” from Carter Page, Corey Lewandowski, Donald J. Trump, Hope Hicks, Keith Schiller, Michael Cohen, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Roger Stone, and Steve Bannon, from November 1, 2015 to the present. It’s a classic fishing expedition move by an investigator in search of a crime.

Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) believes that a second special counsel is necessary to investigate the Department of Justice.

Mueller, indeed, should be on the receiving end of an investigation into political corruption. Instead, he is running one.

DOJ photo

There is a problem pundits face when writing about political scandals. A journalist should describe the alleged crimes in a thorough, complete and impartial manner. Given the nature of politics, however, it is important to also question the motivations of the accusers and those investigating the issue.

For the most part, the media has utterly failed to do so in the ongoing investigation of the alleged collusion with the Russians on the part of the Trump campaign in 2016.

Since Robert Mueller was appointed Special Counsel ten months ago, he has failed to produce any substantive evidence pointing to “Russian collusion” with the Trump campaign. He has, indeed, failed to do so despite oppressive and highly questionable tactics employed against some individuals who were close to or part of the campaign. Andrew McCarthy, writing for National Review, notes that, rather inadvertently, the recently released Democrat memo reveals that the “FBI and the DOJ relied heavily on uncorroborated, third-hand, anonymous sources in their FISA application… Another major takeaway … is that the FBI and the DOJ withheld from the FISA court the fact that [the information used to authorize the surveillance of the Trump campaign, which is the basis for Mueller’s investigation] was a project of the Clinton campaign.”

Robert Barnes, writing in Law and Crime asks “when will Mueller indict Christopher Steele, FusionGPS, PerkinsCoie, the DNC and the Clinton Campaign?… three things make the Clinton Campaign a potential target: it knew Steele [a former British secret agent] was a foreign citizen; it knew, and paid, Steele to influence an election; and it knew, and facilitated, Steele neither registering as a foreign agent nor reporting his funding from the Clinton campaign to the Federal Election Commission, by disguising its funding of payments to Steele laundered through a law firm as a ‘legal expense.’ Don’t expect such an indictment.”
There are three identical worship services on the weekends. viagra canada deliver deeprootsmag.org Hence these ingredients and methods must alleviate vata and balance all three doshas. lowest prices for cialis The drug not only helps to achieve and maintain solid erection in minutes. buy cheap levitra Learning proper breathing techniques is essential for maintaining a healthy core and healthy body. viagra best prices http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/05/18/isnt-lovely-thing/
Sally Persons reported in the Washington Times that “Reps. Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows plan on launching an investigation into the Obama administration to find out what they knew about the dossier that forms the basis of the investigation… ‘The Clinton campaign paid for the dossier. The Democrat National Committee paid for the dossier. And if a Russian oligarch was paying the author of the dossier at the same time, that is unbelievable,’ Mr. Jordan, Ohio Republican, said on Fox News.”

Why isn’t Mueller also investigating this?

Bill Gertz, writing in the Washington Times, describes the long-standing immunity the Clintons seem to have when it comes to conspiring with enemy nations. In 1997, Beijing illegally funneled millions of dollars in cash into President Bill Clinton’s 1996 re-election campaign. “The Chinese were backing a president who had allowed American companies to sell high-technology goods to China that ended up boosting Beijing’s missile, warhead and other advanced weapons programs. The investigation into Chinese illegal campaign influence was triggered by reports in early 1997 that the FBI had intercepted communications from the Chinese Embassy outlining a multiyear campaign known as ‘The Plan’ to change U.S. policy, including helping Mr. Clinton’s reelection by funneling cash to Beijing-linked group Asian Americans for the Democratic National Committee.”

Clinton rewarded Beijing by authorizing the sale of Cray super computers to Beijing, which allowed their military to catch up on decades of military research, and, shortly before he left office, gave China major trade concessions which placed a vast number of American factory workers unemployed. During her tenure as Secretary of State, Ms. Clinton played a significant role in authorizing the sale of American uranium, the basic ingredient of nuclear weapons, to Russia. Large donations to the Clinton Foundation and other cash considerations followed.

The FBI, under Mueller’s tenure, didn’t take action.

The Report Concludes Tomorrow.

Quick Analysis

“Innocent Explanations” for Biden’s Willful Retention of Classified Materials?

“Down is up, up is down. Good is Wicked, Wicked is Good. The times are changing. This is what Oz has come to.” Danielle Paige, Wicked As we have discussed, the Report issued by Special Counsel Robert Hur states “[o]ur investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen.” Nonetheless, Hur concludes that “the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” In our last article, we examined one of the grounds for Hur’s decision not to recommend prosecution of Joe Biden; his finding that “at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him – by then a former president well into his eighties – of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.” Today, we analyze Hur’s decision to exonerate Biden despite the evidence for the President’s willful retention of classified materials while not in office. As described in Chapter 11 of the Report, “[i]n a recorded conversation on February 16, 2017, at Mr. Biden’s rental home in Virginia, Mr. Biden told Mark Zwonitzer (a writer working with Biden) that Mr. Biden had ‘just found all the classified stuff downstairs.’ According to what Mr. Biden told Zwonitzer, ‘all the classified stuff’ related to President Obama’s 2009 decision to surge American troops to Afghanistan, and to a pivotal moment when Mr. Biden sent President Obama his handwritten Thanksgiving memo opposing the troop surge. Photos of the Virginia home show that the lowest level ‘downstairs’-where Mr. Biden told Zwonitzer he had ‘just found all the classified stuff’-included rooms that Mr. Biden used as work and storage spaces.” (Citations omitted.) Hur goes on to claim that “Mr. Biden could have found the classified Afghanistan documents at the Virginia home in 2017 and then forgotten about them soon after.” Hur justifies this amazing assertion with his finding that “Mr. Biden’s memory…appeared to have significant limitations…[i]n his interview with our office, Mr. Biden…did not remember when he was vice president [and forgot]…when his son Beau died.” Hur admits that the “best case for charges would rely on Mr. Biden’s possession of the Afghanistan documents in his Virginia home in February 2017. when he was a private citizen and when he told his ghostwriter he had just found classified material.” However, in addition to the ludicrous “maybe he forgot” defense, Hur finds further reasons to decline to prosecute Biden for this allegation. According to Hur, “[w]hen Mr. Biden told his ghostwriter about finding ”all the classified stuff downstairs,’ his tone was matter-of-fact. For a person who had viewed classified documents nearly every day for eight years as vice president, including regularly in his home, finding classified documents at home less than a month after leaving office could have been an unremarkable and forgettable event.” Hur continues in this nonsensical vein; “Another viable defense is that Mr. Biden might not have retained the classified Afghanistan documents in his Virginia home at all. They could have been stored, by mistake and without his knowledge, at his Delaware home since the time he was vice president, as were other classified documents recovered during our investigation. This would rebut charges that he willfully retained the documents in Virginia.” But didn’t Biden himself say to Zwonitzer that he found the “classified stuff” in the basement of that same Virginia home? Hur has a preposterous answer for that question; “[J]urors may hesitate to place too much evidentiary weight on a single eight-word utterance to his ghostwriter about finding classified documents in Virginia, in the absence of other, more direct evidence…no witness, photo, email, text message, or any other evidence conclusively places the Afghanistan documents at the Virginia home in 2017.” As if this analysis wasn’t incredible enough, Hur adds that “[i]n addition to this shortage of evidence, there are other innocent explanations for the documents that we cannot refute. When Mr. Biden told his ghostwriter he ‘just found all the classified stuff downstairs,’ he could have been referring to something other than the Afghanistan documents.” The report concludes tomorrow Illustration: Pixabay

Our Latest Television Program

Weak Foreign Policy’s Dangers

Cameron Hamilton, a former Navy SEAL and Republican Congressional Candidate for Virginia’s 7th district, describes how the Biden administration’s weak leadership has promoted instability and conflict around the world. Another fascination conversation follows as author Jason Morgan describes the perilous situation in the Indo-Pacific. If your missed the program on your local TV station, watch it at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1sIo2JVHjF6_hPQzr6CVrMegRF_7YxSnp/view?ts=66295e0a