China’s Excessive Influence

Forty years ago, the phrase “China Club” was common jargon bantered about by officials at the State Department in Washington. Many believed that senior Foreign Service Officers assigned to work on China policy had “constituentitis.” Theywere more concerned with representing Beijing’s position on the issues than the national security interests of the United States, according to some officials who worked with them. What was then a minor concern about being too soft on China has today grown into an obvious threat that stretches well beyond the walls of the main State Department building and into the highest levels of the US Government and American high-tech firms. There are serious questions remaining from last year about connections the Biden family and some Congressional Members have with the Communist Party of China. The security issue was raised again this past week as the Administration’s actions toward Beijing appear different than the rhetoric coming out of Washington.

It was less than a year ago when US Congressman Eric Swalwell (D-CA) was found to have close ties to a beautiful Chinese spy named Christine Fang (also known as Fang Fang). After the Chinese influence operation was exposed Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, put Swalwell back on the House Committee on Homeland Security within a month. This week Chris Sanders, writing for Reuters, reported that President Biden suggested in recent meetings with Chinese officials that we “meet China halfway” when it comes to advanced technology transfers.

The reality is Chinese companies operating in the US are aiding the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in obtaining foreign technology related to nuclear and ballistic missile programs. There should be no “half-way” when it comes to the national security interests of this nation. This week alone “eight Chinese firms were “listed [by the US Commerce Department] to prevent US technology being used to help China develop quantum computing applications for its military,” according to Sanders. At first glance it sounds like the US Government is stepping up and protecting Americans from the proliferation of advanced US technology. However, the Commerce Department’s entity list absolutely does not prohibit the firms from obtaining advanced US technology. It only means that the US suppliers to those eight Chinese PLA-linked companies on the entity list now will need to apply for a license before they can sell to them.

In an admission from Washington this week, the Biden Administration admitted quietly that China-based Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, Quantum CTek and Shanghai Quantum CTeck Co Ltd were added to the “entity list” by the Commerce Department because they already have been “acquiring and attempting to acquire US-origin items in support of military applications” for the PLA. The Biden Administration has not explained why it did not impose a total ban on the sale of advanced US technology with military applications to these companies. Part of the equipment the PLA was trying to obtain dealt with the development of counter-stealth technology and unbreakable encryption. Sanders says the Commerce Department wants to stop the Chinese military from developing its technology, which “could include equipment like advanced radars, and counter-submarine applications such as undersea sensors.”

The most common sexual disorders in commander levitra men are erectile dysfunction(ED), premature ejaculation (PE) and inhibited sexual desire. Some people have a chain reaction, such as a decrease in sex drive. regencygrandenursing.com generico viagra on line viagra sans prescription canada One can enjoy their sexual relation still 4 to 5 hours without any threats and complications. What should I do? Coach! You can, of course, at the time of the impact of buying viagra in italy regencygrandenursing.com this medication.

This occurs at a time when China has announced a number of advances in military technology that surpass those of the United States and its communist partner Russia is starting full-scale production of its new hypersonic missile. According to James Palmer, writing in Foreign Policy, “the Biden administration has been sitting on these and other possible sanctions for a while, but it held off until after COP26 and the summit between Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping.” What advanced military technology the PLA can’t indigenously develop or buy from Russia it is obtaining from the United States and other Western countries. The more it buys, steals, or reverse engineers, the less safe the American people will be in the near future. The Biden Administration is taking only small, tepid steps toward closing the pipeline.

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media Inc., which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government.

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

America’s Terrorists in Training

When students, trained and equipped by Hamas and its financial backers, occupy campuses and threaten Jews and anyone who disagrees with them, it is neither a peaceful protest nor an exercise of free speech. It is a terrorist attack. Those students are not peaceful protestors. They are terrorists in training. It has been reported that many of those arrested are not even students, but individuals with ties to terrorists or anti-American activities. Their mission is not to protest, not to persuade, but to force institutions to bend to their will. Their targets are two-fold: First, in adherence to Hamas’ anti-Semitism, an attack on not just Israelis but Jews everywhere. Second, to weaken America’s influence in the crucial Middle Eastern region. But students do make up the majority of those involved. The blatant ignorance of so many protestors did not occur spontaneously or recently. Years of preparation went into it. Radical extremists infiltrated the educational system, from kindergarten through graduate school, for decades with the purpose of destroying pride in America and imposing a leftist agenda. On-air interviews of involved students have been revealing. Beyond chanted slogans, the students appear to have little knowledge of the actual dynamics of the Middle Eastern conflict that they appear to be so passionate about. What did come clearly though was a hair trigger response to condemn America and American institutions. That is the intentional result of many years of academic indoctrination. History has been taught through the prism of anti-Americanism. The extraordinary accomplishments in human freedom, the enormous good done by the nation have been obscured, while faults, even though they were corrected, are magnified. The Federalist notes that “America’s academic leaders seem powerless only because they’ve spent decades promoting the ideologies now on such brutal and ugly display… many administrators claim to be stunned. Yet those of us who’ve been following the disastrous decline of American higher education have been warning for years about the inevitable. America’s academic leaders seem powerless only because they’ve spent decades promoting the ideologies now on such brutal and ugly display. Years ago, America’s most prestigious academics made a conscious choice to elevate indoctrination over education. Training activists became their highest goal. Radical ideologies that began in Ethnic and Gender Studies swallowed once-proud social science and humanities disciplines. Their influence surged into administration, as new DEI offices redefined diversity, equity, and inclusion to mean their opposites, then spread their toxin throughout university operations. Wildly generous foreign money — with Qatar and China in the lead — anchored this noxious brew in place. The American Enterprise Institute found that “The 1619 Project and its companion resources have spread to thousands of schools (and counting) in all 50 states, priming students to reject America’s founding principles and even literally black out the Declaration of Independence. Meanwhile, tales of politically radical K–12 instruction seem to break into the news almost daily.” The Discovery Institute notes that “ teacher unions, rather than modeling positive social behavior, instead promote indoctrination of students on partisan political viewpoints…. Today, leaders holding high government offices at the federal and state levels are quickly exploiting an underlying principle: The less educated our citizens are regarding civics, the more pliable they are to the acceptance of radical philosophies and agenda, and the more government power can grow. The end result will be a loss of the American Dream — life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Don’t believe this? Take a look at the citizens of today’s socialist and communist countries around the world. According to Ben Shapiro, “while advocates of Marxism today disown the Stalinists and the Maoists and the Castro regime and Venezuela and North Korea, all of those nations thought they were fulfilling Marx’s dream, too.” A Manhattan Institute review reports that “Results of a representative survey of more than 1,500 Americans aged 18 to 20 suggest that Critical Race Theory (CRT) and radical gender ideology, together known as Critical Social Justice (CSJ), is widespread in American schools. Ninety-three percent of American 18- to 20-year-olds said that they had heard about at least one of eight CSJ concepts from a teacher or other adult at school, including “white privilege,” “systemic racism,” “patriarchy,” or the idea that gender is a choice unrelated to biological sex. Additionally, 90% of respondents had heard about at least one CRT concept and 74% about at least one radical gender concept. The campus protests are a window of what’s in store for the nation if the influence of anti-American educators continue.