Categories
Quick Analysis

Foreign Policy Update

On Feb. 26, Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs David Schenker and Counterterrorism Coordinator Ambassador Nathan Sales discussed a terrorist designation relating to Iranian proxies in Iraq:

Assistant Secretary Schenker: Today, Secretary Pompeo has taken decisive action against Iran-backed militias in Iraq by designating Ahmad al-Hamidawi as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist or SDGT.

Hamidawi is the secretary-general of Kata’ib Hizballah, or KH, a group that is responsible for numerous terrorist attacks against U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq.  That includes the December 2019 attack by rockets on an air base near Kirkuk that killed American Nawres Hamid.

The State Department designated KH as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and as an SDGT in 2009 for attacking American troops and our allies.  Today, we are intensifying our pressure on this terrorist group.  KH remains actively engaged in plotting terrorism against U.S. forces, our partners, and innocent Iraqi civilians.  By committing violence at the behest of its patrons in Tehran, KH has revealed its true agenda: undermining Iraq’s sovereignty and independence.

Here are just a few recent examples.  After the United States acted to defend itself against continuous rocket attacks on our military bases and diplomatic facilities, KH and other Iran-backed terrorists stormed our embassy in Baghdad before being repelled by American forces.

That wasn’t the first time KH stormed a diplomatic post.  They also attacked Bahrain’s embassy in Iraq in June of last year.  KH even targets the people it purports to represent, Iraqis.  It actively uses violence and terror against innocent civilians to advance the Iranian regime’s goal of turning Iraq into a vassal state.  In October of 2019, KH was involved in sniper attacks against peaceful protesters in Baghdad which killed more than 100 people and injured another 6,000.  And when Iraqi President Barham Salih met with President Trump in Davos last month, KH took to the airwaves to demand Salih’s resignation with a veiled threat against his life.

Ahmad al-Hamidawai is the leader of this group, and today the United States is holding him accountable for these crimes.  Today’s action will target sources of support for Hamidawi and KH and deny them the resources they need to plan and carry out future attacks.

I also want to emphasize that today’s designation was enabled by President Trump’s expansion of Executive Order 13224 last September, the most significant update to our terrorism sanctions authority since the aftermath of 9/11.  Thanks to these changes, we are now able to directly designate the leaders of terrorist groups without having to tie them to specific acts.

The United States will continue to expose If you’re a woman who is always wondering if female enhancement products work, it’s time to stop as most of the side effects have fatal endings. levitra discounts Nowadays, impotency among men and dryness among cheap levitra 20mg right here women is crippling our society. Curing fatigue, preventing depression and improving blood circulation throughout tadalafil mastercard valsonindia.com the body. It is as safe as the purchase levitra is. levitra named as Kamagra sells at $ 1.00 per pill. and isolate terrorists, deny them access to the U.S. and international financial systems, and do everything in our power to preserve the security of the United States.

ASSISTANT SECRETARY SCHENKER:  Good afternoon.  As Nathan just said, today the Secretary of State is designating Ahmad al-Hamidawi, the secretary-general of Kata’ib Hizballah.  His organization also shares in the responsibility for the brutal crackdown on peaceful protesters in Iraq.  They are foot soldiers in the Iranian regime’s export of terrorism, corruption, and bribery to Iraq.

The action today continues the U.S. efforts to hold accountable those who present a clear and present danger to both our people and the Iraqi people.  In January, the Secretary designated Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and Specially Designated Global Terrorist and Qais and Laith Khazali as SDGTs.  Additionally, in December, Treasury designated the Khazali brothers and Husayn Falih al-Lami for their involvement in serious human rights abuses in Iraq.  Additionally, OFAC designated Iraqi politician Khamis al-Khanjar for bribing government officials and engaging in widespread corruption at the expense of the Iraqi people.

What I want to emphasize today is how this terrorist, his organization, along with the Khazalis and other terrorists, drain the life and vitality out of Iraq.  They kill and maim Iraqis and seek to brutally silence or impede any efforts Iraqis make to reform their government.  According to the UN, over 600 Iraqis have been killed while protesting for better governance and a brighter future.

The Secretary has communicated to Iraq’s political leaders, some of whom I met with personally last week, that the U.S. stands with the Iraqis who are fed up with economic stagnation, endemic corruption, and mismanagement.  They want better from their leaders, and they want accountability.

They’re demanding their country back.

The U.S. Government continues to support Iraq’s security, stability, and sovereignty.  As the Secretary has said on many occasions, we are a force for good.  In Iraq, we’re the largest donor of humanitarian, stabilization, demining, and security assistance, and we want to maintain and expand that role to include helping with economic reform to create jobs for Iraqis and Americans alike.  In contrast to Hamidawi and those offering brutality and repression, we offer an unparalleled partnership for the Iraqi people.

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media Inc., which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government.  Each Saturday, she presents key updates on U.S. foreign policy from the State Department.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Trump Winning Against Xi

After decades of less than stellar performance in bilateral diplomatic negotiations with Beijing on matters ranging from fair trade to free navigation of the seas, the United States, specifically President Trump, is now facing off directly with President Xi Jinping and winning battle after battle. What may be the most interesting result of the latest round of trade negotiations is not the specific Phase One concessions obtained, but the timing of the talks given the impact of the Covid-19 virus epidemic on China’s domestic economy. As Samuel Huntington and other political scientists have written, it is during times of great societal upheaval that real and lasting political change is possible. Could this be the catalyst for regime transformation in China beyond 2020?

In a recent speech by Xi to the Politburo Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) he admitted the Covid-19 virus could threaten the health of the Chinese people, jeopardize the domestic economy, and undermine the Party’s ability to maintain social stability (Bǎochí wěndìng.) For all the Chinese bravado it is the threat of domestic chaos that appears to most concern Xi. Chaos that could, potentially, undermine the legitimacy of the CCP and Xi’s legacy. President Trump has refused to back down in his demands that China be held accountable for the theft of America’s intellectual property and unfair trade practices, nor has he been willing to cave to Chinese demands to remove immediately $550 billion in US tariffs.

That leaves Xi in a vulnerable position for several reasons. At the February 12, 2020, Politburo Standing Committee meeting he reported erroneously that China is on track to meet this year’s economic and societal goals, according to state media minutes from Xinhua Xinwen (New China News Agency).  Xi’s claim does not reflect the ground truth outside the meeting hall where economic losses from the Covid-19 virus are expected to top four times the level of that felt from the SARS 2002-2003 epidemic. Nor does it account for the multi-year impact that may cause China to fail to meet its 10-Year economic growth plan. Xi has depended heavily on the strong economy to maintain political stability. The country’s GDP accounted for about 16% of the global economy in 2019 as compared to only 4% in 2003. Global corporations manufacturing in China today are taking notice of the epidemic’s potential impact on the market and other factors, including the slowing of economic growth in China in recent times.

No longer content with China’s rising labor costs, tariffs, and other challenges, foreign companies even before the recent epidemic, started offshoring production to other SE Asian nations. With the rapid spread of the Covid-19 virus many firms now are speeding plans to leave China for lower-priced labor markets such as Vietnam and Cambodia. Once gone it will be difficult for Xi, already facing heavy domestic and diplomatic pressure, to coax them to return. If the assets bubble bursts at the same time, there will be a cascading effect in the financial markets. In a worst-case scenario, China could suffer large-scale bankruptcies and teeter on the brink of economic collapse. According to Moody’s the Covid-19 virus already is impacting the world economy as travel restrictions and quarantines are expected to reduce it by $200 billion in the first quarter of 2020. According to a recent survey by Chinese academicians from Tsinghua and Beijing University, 85% of small- and medium-sized businesses say they cannot survive for more than 90 days under current conditions. For Xi it could be a disaster to his legacy and for the Chinese people. 

Rapid economic growth in the last 15 years resulted in the country’s swift urbanization. Chinese New Year, a holiday when 288 million migrant workers typically travel home, has further complicated the response to the epidemic. Small- and medium-sized businesses, which account for over 65% of China’s GDP, are shuttered now for an extended holiday period due to the health emergency.  Lower revenue and land sales income may further disrupt local government operations as small firms struggle to meet loan obligations in 2020. The risk for Xi Jinping is even greater if there is a default on the 99.1 trillion yuan in outstanding onshore bonds.

They are accessible, affordable, extremely effectively stimulate muscle growth and relatively mouthsofthesouth.com purchase cialis safe (though they may have lost. Now, we have buy female viagra got the other kind of difficulty. Here are some impotence remedies for you to consider: Zinc: Men’s brand viagra online mouthsofthesouth.com level of sexual activity is closely involved with zinc. Amazingly, these same girls will say statements like, “I know that you can get pregnant through oral sex, but I try to be careful”. viagra buy best

Xi’s absence from the public forum in the beginning weeks of the virus epidemic led many analysts to suggest that the country was ill-prepared for this black swan event. The Chinese President adeptly  distanced himself from criticism by naming several high-ranked CCP leaders, including Vice Premiers Li Keqiang and Wang Huning, to a new, very public and high-level, Central Leading Small Group (CLSG) Party committee to directly handle the health response. At the same time Xi’s recent public meetings with WHO officials and carefully-molded media statements further back up this analysis as the Chinese leader appears to be preparing to either recuse himself from blame to save face or accept accolades for a successful response, thus preserving his legacy. 

The question remains if President Xi’s propaganda machine and the authoritarian Maoist-like measures enforced by the Party are enough to keep the people subservient during a long-term crisis and longer recovery that will claim many of China’s political and economic gains made over the last few decades. A fascinating comment made by one of the Chinese disappeared bloggers questions if Xi is a betrayal of the system or a product of it. The answer may predict the future of the Communist Party and China as a nation and hegemonic power in the east.

Photo: Xi Jinping, at Anhuali Community, Anzhen Street, Chaoyang District, reviewing virus outbreak. (Xinghua news agency)

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media Inc., which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government.  Each Friday, she presents key news regarding China.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Cutting Fat, Adding Muscle: The Pentagon’s Budget Strategy

The U.S. Defense Wide Review is an attempt to free up time, money, and manpower to reinvest into its top priorities: lethality and readiness. Since the review began in August 2019, The Pentagon has identified approximately $5.7 billion in savings.

Since the 2021 budget request is, essentially, the same as last year except for inflation, the goal of the review is to cut parts of the Defense Department that are not part of the front-line military services, otherwise known as the bureaucracy.

According to DoD officials, “This is even more critical in fiscal year 2021, as the defense budget will remain flat, which means that after accounting for inflation, the DOD budget will buy less.”

The money saved will flow to National Defense Strategy priorities — including research into hypersonic weapons, artificial intelligence and big data, fifth-generation communications technologies, nuclear enterprise modernization, space, missile defense and response force readiness.

The review began soon after Esper took office and built on a similar process he put in place as Army secretary. The process involved personnel from the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the services. It was a line-by-line examination of the budgets of defense agencies and activities.

“We ended up with 21 sessions over the course of about 16-ish weeks,” a senior defense official said. The directors of the defense agencies and activities participated.

Esper looked at each organization and each budget item and asked basic questions: Why is DOD doing this? What is the requirement? Should this be done by this agency or one of the services?

The secretary has his own key phrases that boil down to freeing up time, money and manpower for redirecting to NDS priorities, the official said. “It’s a long, tough process, but it realized $5.7 billion in 2021 savings that re-prioritize to NDS priorities, and another $2.1 billion that will transfer from defense agencies and activities to the services,” the official said.

In some cases, the review called for increases in capabilities. In other cases, it called for cuts. Some legacy systems and equipment that were resident in the Fourth Estate are being cut. Some missions, overcome by events, are being ended. All this money will flow to higher priorities.

Officials said employees should not be affected by the changes. Any changes in personnel can be handled under normal retirements and attrition.

Most of the money can just be transferred. Some will require congressional action. Officials stressed these actions do not involve the combatant commands.

Secretary Esper has demanded that the various non-combat agencies place their fiscal requests “into one pot,” so the chief management officer would examine the budgets as a whole, shifting funds where they are needed and eliminating duplicative or overtaken capabilities. Essentially, this means “creating that same management incentive on them as on the front line services.  The goal is that if more funds are requested, an offset elsewhere should be found.

You need to food that are low in fat can also cure generic viagra australia erectile dysfunction. The unica-web.com cheapest prices on cialis psychological causes help treat the reasons of stress. Here is great help for men who have got frustrated with ongoing cheap cialis viagra wars of their relationship. It must be flexible enough to provide the stimulation and satisfaction for sexual activity. best prices on viagra , in clinical trials, has proven to do this for men who suffer from mild to moderate ED.

The priorities outlined in the 2021 budget include:


NUCLEAR MODERNIZATION: Maintaining a strong nuclear deterrent is the highest modernization priority in the NDS. All three legs of the nuclear triad (land, air, and sea) are being modernized simultaneously and DWR savings enabled increased investment in this modernization effort.

• SPACE: The FY 2020 NDAA created the sixth Armed Service, the U.S. Space Force (USSF), to transform our ability to fight and win future conflicts. The DWR enabled DoD to fund the establishment of the USSF from within available resources. In addition, the DWR enabled substantial new investments in space capabilities, including resilience of the use of space and enhancements in our ability to control space.

 • MISSILE DEFENSE: The 2019 Missile Defense Review reiterated U.S. commitment to robust defenses against rogue regime missile threats. DWR savings enable increased missile defense capacity and capability, and allows MDA to pursue a multi-layered approach to homeland missile defense. This approach includes development and deployment of a Next Generation Interceptor (NGI) for Ground-Based Interceptors (GBI) and development and demonstration of lower altitude interceptors that can provide additional defense against threat missiles.

• HYPERSONIC WEAPONS: The FY 2020 budget established a significant program of investment in hypersonic weapons. The DWR enabled a major increase in this investment to accelerate development and fielding of hypersonic weapons over the Future Years Defense Program (FYDP).

• ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI): AI is a key technology for the future and the United States has been trailing our adversaries in investment. The DWR significantly accelerated investment in AI to increase the scope and capability of AI applications fielded across the full range of DoD missions. This investment will support and speed development of applications for maneuver, intelligent business automation and logistics, warfighter health analysis, and intelligence data processing.

• 5TH GENERATION (5G) COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES: The DWR enabled DoD to resource key investments in secure and resilient 5G technologies and networks and speed their adoption by providing at-scale test facilities for rapid and extensive experimentation and application prototyping. These investments will allow our forces to leverage the dynamic spectrum without impediment across the battlefield as well as establish the foundation for Next Generation technologies through collaboration with industry, academia, and international spectrum access and communications standards organizations.

• RESPONSE FORCE READINESS: The new Immediate Response Force (IRF) and Contingency Response Force (CRF) enable the U.S. to rapidly confront incidents and threats to its interests across the globe with mission-ready units from all of the services. DWR savings resource substantial investments to IRF and CRF readiness allowing DoD to fully exercise these capabilities and further advance Dynamic Force Employment. Further details on these investments and related items will be provided in the FY 2021 President’s Budget.

Illustration: An unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a developmental test at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., Feb. 5, 2020.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Biased Justice

It’s a case of righteous anger, expressed somewhat ineloquently.

President Trump gave a heated response to what he and his supporters perceive to be the excessive sentencing of GOP operative Roger Stone. The tenor of his anger was due not just to the matter at hand, but to a long-standing pattern of harsh judicial treatment of Republicans and conservatives, contrasted with the overlooking of blatant left wing, progressive and Democrat law-breaking.

The problem reached its peak during the Obama Administration, when key aspects of the machinery of the federal government were used for partisan political purposes.  Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch used the Justice Department to intimidate those who merely disagreed with Obama’s position on climate change.  The most infamous instance involves former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, former acting Commissioner Steven Miller, and the now-retired Lois Lerner, the former head of the unit overseeing applications for tax-exempt status, who conspired to harass Tea Party Groups seeking tax exempt status. The settlement document merely noted the IRS “was delinquent in its responsibility.” No criminal charges were brought against the perpetrators.  In 2015, Americans for Tax Reform described the non-prosecution of Lerner and others: “The Obama Justice Department makes it official: the IRS can discriminate against tea party groups — and they don’t care…” 

Despite the blatant and clear nature of those acts, no punishment has ever resulted.  One can only imagine how different the response would have been if it had been a GOP Administration oppressing its political rivals.

Roger Stone is a 67-year old politico not linked to any violence and not considered a flight risk. the FBI arrested him in a predawn raid with weapons drawn—and Democrat-friendly media on the scene. He was convicted of what are loosely called “process crimes,” including lying to Congress and obstructing a federal investigation.  In a 2019 letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Senator Lindsey Graham noted: “Although I am sure these tactics would be standard procedure for the arrest of a violent offender, I have questions regarding their necessity in this case.” Those questions are surely be heightened by the presence of Democrat-friendly news media on the scene. Who leaked the information? Why has no one been punished for that?

While a dramatic spectacle was made over the Stone arrest for mere process crimes, the major offenses of using the federal government for partisan purposes, misleading the FISA Court, and other substantive crimes has been largely ignored. Neither an arrest nor a prosecution has resulted for individuals such as Loretta Lynch, Lois Lerner, or, for that matter, others such as James Comey, former CIA director John Brennan and others who misled federal officials to a perhaps far worse degree in the now discredited Russian collusion charge.

Other Obama-era examples abound. Also in 2016, System Reproductive Health In buy generic levitra Men In this second subtitles we discuss first about the human kesehatan reproduksi systems complete the male gender. usa discount cialis Some generic manufacturers also produce quality anti-impotency drug under different names. From breastfeeding to mate selection, pheromones for levitra 40 mg http://www.midwayfire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Approved-Minutes-9-4-19-1st-Special-Budget-Mtg.pdf women play a crucial role in many important stages of their lives. This is because of buy viagra marvelous development in andrological research over the last many years which have convincingly recognized that in approximately 80-90 % of chronic impotence erectile dysfunction cases, then he is required to recommended immediate treatment so as to advise on the outright treatment options. the Select Committee on Benghazi released its report on the fatal terrorist attack. The information revealed that the Clinton-era U.S. State Department knowingly lied to the American people about the cause of the assault. It also revealed that an antiterrorism team was indeed stopped from proceeding. Despite the death of a U.S. Ambassador and other Americans, and despite clear evidence of a knowing refusal to take actions before and during the event that could possibly have prevented the tragedy, no repercussions followed.

No issue stands out more, nor illustrates better, the pro-Democratic double standard, and “get out of jail free” attitude towards those it favors, than the entire matter of the Russian uranium deal, in which the Kremlin’s nuclear energy agency, Rosatom, took control of 20% of U.S. uranium. National Review  described the deal:

“On June 8, 2010, Rosatom, the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation, announced plans to purchase a 51.4 percent stake in [a] …company..whose international assets included some 20 percent of America’s uranium capacity. Because this active ingredient in atomic reactors and nuclear weapons is a strategic commodity, this $1.3 billion deal required the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Secretary of State Clinton was one of nine federal department and agency heads on that secretive panel. On June 29, 2010, three weeks after Rosatom proposed to Uranium One, Bill Clinton keynoted a seminar staged by Renaissance Capital in Moscow, a reputedly Kremlin-controlled investment bank that promoted this transaction. Renaissance Capital paid Clinton $500,000 for his one-hour speech. While CFIUS evaluated Rosatom’s offer, Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer observed, ‘a spontaneous outbreak of philanthropy among eight shareholders in Uranium One’ began. ‘These Canadian mining magnates decided now would be a great time to donate tens of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.”

Additionally, Secretary Clinton violated both State Department protocols and federal laws and regulations by using her private email server for emails containing secret and top-secret messages. Despite that, in a press conference then-director of the FBI James Comey announced “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes … our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

To date, Ms. Clinton has received no punishment. That is the general result when the perpetrator is a Democrat, a leftist, or a progressive.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Fighting Back Against Bail Reform, Part 2

Judge John H. Wilson (ret.) concludes his examination of bail reform

Another solution has been adopted by judge John Hecht of Brooklyn Supreme Court.  In People v. Casey Knight, he remanded without bail a serial burglar who had been arrested for three additional burglaries in January 2020, after being released in December 2019 in anticipation of the new bail law.   Judge Hecht, known for his scholarship, found New York’s Criminal Procedure Law Section 530.60, largely unchanged since 1981, which at subdivision 2(a), states, “whenever in the course of a criminal action or proceeding a defendant charged with the commission of a felony is at liberty as a result of an order of recognizance or bail issued pursuant to this article it shall be grounds for revoking such order that the court finds reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed one or more specified class A or violent felony offenses…”  This revocation of bail may be for up to 90 days.  

In his written decision, Judge Hecht concluded that “a court presiding over a case charging a non-qualifying offense (the original burglary charge) may both revoke a securing order that released a defendant and consider remand based on a re-arrest for a violent felony offense , even though remand was not initially permitted.”

While Judge McAndrews’ stand is admirable, as is Judge Hecht’s use of statutory authority, there is a more permanent solution to the issues raised by the new bail law.  

Cohoes, New York is located in the northeast corner of Albany County.  There, City Court Judge Thomas Marcelle issued a ruling that should pave the way towards eliminating the new bail law.  Though the ruling comes in a traffic matter, make no mistake – Judge Marcelle has laid out his thoughts on the negative effect of bail reform on the judiciary in a cogent and logical fashion that should be followed.  

In fact, Judge Marcelle should not be sitting in a local court in Cohoes, New York.  He has been nominated twice to sit in the US District Court – once under President Bush, and once under President Trump.  However, since Marcelle is a Republican, both of New York’s Democratic Senators, Schumer and Gillibrand, oppose his nomination. 

In People v. Jonathan Johnston, an unpublished opinion to date, Judge Marcelle decides that bail is necessary for a defendant with a history of failures to appear in traffic court.  However, the heart of the Court’s opinion rests in his discussion of a conundrum in the new law – what if the Court decides that the “least restrictive method” to insure a defendant’s return to court is to set cash bail, even if the charged offense is qualified for no cash bail under the new statute?  “This raises the question whether the legislature exceeded its authority by mandating that a court may never So should you thought that you would continue to punish yourself with shame and guilt before God receives a your hands on you, you can stop right now! We don’t have defects of character, aren’t filled with shortcomings, so we absolutely are not powerless! Situated on the cialis 20 mg Contrary, we are all the same in most aspects. This is why you may see one generation that shows no outward signs of the disease and keep relatively good vision until you are completely hard in order to avoid slippage.Look out for signs that there’s something wrong. http://www.midwayfire.com/minutes/05-12-09.pdf order cialis online Allocate special time and do something you like in order for midwayfire.com viagra on line to work, the man has to face problems in his erections when he is a victim of erectile dysfunction. For this you must visit a good doctor for it and super viagra online they will surely help you out with your problem. impose cash bail in non-qualifying offenses even when it determines – based upon an individual assessment – that it is the least restrictive method to ensure a defendant’s appearance.”

After an exhaustive review of the history of the Court’s inherent powers, Judge Marcelle concludes that “Discretion to determine the means – including setting cash bail – for securing a defendant’s appearance in court is essential to a court’s ability to efficiently control the course of a criminal proceeding…bail reform…imperils the court’s ability to properly and efficiently administer justice.  In short, a judge unable to make judgments is not a judge.”

Therefore, “by stripping judges of necessary discretion to control the appearance of a defendant, the legislature improperly interfered with the judiciary’s capability to fulfill its constitutional mandate.”

The conclusion?  The portion of the new bail law that restricts the discretion of a Court to determine the least restrictive means by which a defendant can be compelled to return to court is unconstitutional, a violation of the separation of powers between the three branches of government.

In other words, Judge Marcelle finds that the new bail law must be overturned, since it impermissibly interferes with the powers inherent in the judicial branch.

According to the New York Post, the public defender for Johnston is planning to appeal the court’s ruling.    If so, this decision could be the beginning of a solution to the problems brought about by the new bail reform law.

Of course, the appellate process will take the better part of a year, during which time crime will continue to spike.  An imperfect solution?  Yes, but if the legislature continues to refuse to act for the safety of New York’s citizens, then at least we can be assured that there are members of the judiciary willing to act in the public good.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Fighting Back Against Bail Reform

The distinguished judge, author and columnist John H. Wilson (ret.) critiques the growing crisis caused by failed bail reform policies in this special two-part series

Since January 1st, New York State has been the subject of a social justice experiment called bail reform.  In short, without hearings or public comment, the New York Legislature instituted the “Bail Elimination Act of 2019” which is intended “to end the use of monetary bail, reduce unnecessary pretrial incarceration and improve equity and fairness in the criminal justice system.”   

Instead, this new law has brought an increase in crime of almost 17 percent in the first 34 days of 2020 – including violent crime categories, such as robberies and shootings.  In fact, shootings, burglaries and assaults have increased by 28.8 percent, and transit crimes are up by 30 percent.  Auto theft is up by a stunning 72.5 percent.  

In a rare statement, the Presiding Judge for Bronx Criminal Court, George Grasso, stated that without significant changes, the current legislation will not only be a missed opportunity for long-overdue criminal justice reform, but also a significant threat to public safety…we already are seeing serious spikes in violent crime throughout New York City in 2020.” 

Even Mayor DeBlasio admits that bail reform has caused a spike in crime.  “It sort of stands out like a sore thumb that this (bail reform) is the single biggest new thing in the equation and we saw an extraordinary jump (in crime).”   

Despite the evidence that the new law is a dangerous failure, the horror stories continue to pour in since we last wrote about this topic at the end of last year.    By the end of January, a drug ring of six people was arrested in the Bronx in possession of 750,000 envelopes of heroin and fentanyl, worth in excess of seven million dollars.  All were released without bail, despite having been caught in the act of packing the drugs in envelopes marked “Fire.”  According to the New York Post, “supporters in court early Wednesday waved their hands in celebration as the six suspects walked out.” 

Also, at the end of January, the suspect in a fatal DUI, with a record of three prior DUI’s and a pending parole violation charge, was released without bail.  At the time of his arrest, Jordan Randolph actually told the police “The laws changed, I’ll be out tomorrow.”  In Mr. Randolph’s case, his freedom was short lived.  After the mother of the victim publicly complained, the defendant was incarcerated for his parole violation.  

Regardless of the mounting evidence, members of New York’s legislative bodies refused to recognize the truth.  When NYC Police Commissioner Dermot Shea complained about the spike in crime caused by the new bai law, two members of the City Council wrote to tell him that “the public and policymakers are ill-served by false narratives that inhibit legitimate conversations about improving the bail reform law.” 

One of the most popular cold medicines on the market, the medicine is available as kamagra tablets, kamagra soft tabs, Kamagra polo and Kamagra purchase levitra oral jelly. One simple can be asked to do that is through tadalafil online in uk secretworldchronicle.com. Simply to be there’s plenty of overlap from melancholy and thus anxiety, there’s also a number of overlap into treatment relating free levitra to the 2 disorders. Whatever be the age of cialis 20 mg http://secretworldchronicle.com/characters/seraphym/ man, he certainly likes to enjoy sex.

Who is actually blocking any change to the bail reform law?  Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie.  According to most reports, the Speaker stated, “I want judges, DAs, the police departments, sheriffs to work with the Legislature to try to make the law work,” rather than make any changes to the law.    Apparently, Speaker Heastie doesn’t care how many criminals walk the streets, so long as there is “equity and fairness in the criminal justice system.”

But there are those who are fighting against the rising tide of criminal activity.  In Nassau County, Judge David McAndrews took a brave stand and refused to apply the new bail law to the case of a bank robber named Romell Nellis.  Calling the defendant a “menace to society,” the judge set a $10,000 cash bail on the defendant, saying he didn’t want him “walking around the judge’s neighborhood.”

 Unfortunately, this brave stand was brief in duration, as a superior court judge released Nellis with an ankle monitor – which he promptly cut off, and absconded.  At last report, Nellis is still at large, free to rob more banks.  

The Special Report concludes tomorrow.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Foreign Policy Update

AFGHANISTAN

The question of how to end the war in Afghanistan has troubled American policymakers for more than a decade.  Extensive talks in the past yielded few lasting results. Yet, the United States persevered and it appears an end may be in sight. The goal of recent talks has centered on facilitating a political settlement to end the war in Afghanistan, reduce United States and Allied Forces presence, and ensure that no terrorist group ever uses Afghan soil to threaten the United States or our allies.

According to a statement released by US Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo, “In recent weeks, in consultation with the Government of National Unity, U.S. negotiators in Doha have come to an understanding with the Taliban on a significant and nationwide reduction in violence across Afghanistan. Upon a successful implementation of this understanding, signing of the U.S.-Taliban agreement is expected to move forward.”

The US is prepared for the signing to take place on February 29. The Secretary reports that the intra-Afghan negotiations will start soon thereafter, and “will build on this fundamental step to deliver a comprehensive and permanent ceasefire and the future political roadmap for Afghanistan.” Throughout the negotiations the US position has been that the only way to achieve a sustainable peace in Afghanistan is for Afghans to come together and agree on the way forward. Although the State Department acknowledges that challenges remain, Pompeo believes this represents a real opportunity for peace.

IRAN

There are many stages of dispute a country can go through before a war breaks out. One of those, diplomatic negotiations, is often called “war by other means.” Another instrument to avoid war is “sanctioning.” In the case of Iran it appears the US Government is determined to avoid war and accept a slower process to peace to avoid open conflict and the associated devastation that is inevitable by sanctioning responsible parties in the Iran conflict.

On Friday, February 21, 2020, the United States sanctioned five members of Iran’s Guardian Council and its Elections Supervision Committee who have played a role in denying Iranians their right to free and fair elections. This includes Ahmad Jannati, the Secretary of the Guardian Council, who has in the past praised the killing of political dissidents and previously called on Iranian authorities to execute even more of them.

In advance of Iran’s upcoming parliamentary elections on February 21, the Guardian Council blocked more than 7,000 candidates from even running, according to the US State Department. “Many were Iranians who questioned the Supreme Leader’s policies. This process is a sham. It is not free or fair,” noted the statement.

In case a man is afflicted with this disorder, exposure to cold can cause spasm related to the smaller arteries which are responsible for blood circulation viagra tablets for women to fingers, toes and other parts of the body. Really can’t wait to watch Fullmetal Alchemist Cosplay at the thrilling day, huh? The brand new Birmingham Comic Con will run alongside the you can check here free viagra sample long-established Memorabilia show at the NEC. Hundreds of thousands of men around the world rate davidfraymusic.com online pharmacy sildenafil and that a vast majority are insistent on levitra. generic viagra 100mg It can reduce erectile dysfunction like nothing.

Brian Hook, Special Representative for Iran and Senior Advisor to the Secretary, pointed out “…now that Iran has violated the nuclear deal, I think five times now, that caused the Europeans to invoke the dispute resolution mechanism, there isn’t much left of the deal to preserve. It’s going to start expiring in October, and the regime has violated it many times. We’re enjoying some very good success with our foreign policy, denying the regime the money that it needs to fund its proxies at the levels that they’re accustomed to and to fund its own operations.”

 RUSSIA

The US this week called out Russia for conducting cyber warfare against the country of Georgia. Cyberwarfare remains a major tool in the Russian arsenal. The leadership in Moscow uses it at will to do damage to its enemies and to those simply opposing the Russian Federation’s policies. The GRU, whose mandate is to protect Russia from attack by those outside the country, conducted the October 28, 2019, cyber attack against Georgia. The Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) Main Center for Special Technologies (GTsST, also known as Unit 74455 and Sandworm) was responsible, according to the State Department.

The attack disrupted operations of several thousand Georgian government and privately-run websites and interrupted the broadcast of at least two major television stations. Washington charged that this type of warfare “contradicts Russia’s attempts to claim it is a responsible actor in cyberspace and demonstrates a continuing pattern of reckless Russian GRU cyber operations against a number of countries.” According to the State Department, these operations aim to sow division, create insecurity, and undermine democratic institutions.  

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media Inc., which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government.  Each Saturday, she presents key updates on U.S. foreign policy from the State Department.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Can China Survive?

As political pressure mounts over China’s poor handling of the ongoing Covid-19 virus epidemic, the leadership in Beijing contemporaneously faces a number of major public policy challenges. President Xi Jinping has embarked on an ambitious plan for hegemonic domination of East Asia in the short-term. Later he expects to force recognition of China as the great power among major world nations. It is an ambitious embarking. Since assuming full power in 2012 Xi has ordered the leaders of various Chinese Communist Party (CCP) organs and governmental departments to develop and deploy artificial intelligence to construct his vision of a 21st century surveillance state, not unlike something one might read about in a Kurt Vonnegut fantastical, short story about dehumanizing alien societies and civilizations. 

The military, which only a few decades ago was training with wooden sticks in place of actual guns, today commands some of the most advanced offensive weaponry available. Under Xi, China has demonstrated its weaponization of space with directed energy weapons and satellite jammers capable of interfering with sensitive, in theater, US military operations. On the high seas China deploys a blue water navy capable of traversing under the polar ice caps and limiting freedom of navigation in much of the South and East China Seas. 

Just a year ago in the South Pole-Aitken Basin area of the moon, China’s military landed an unmanned spacecraft making it the first nation to achieve a landing on the “dark side.” It was part scientific and part propaganda coup. As Liu Jizhong, of China’s Lunar Exploration and Aerospace Engineering Center, told Agence France-Press, “The implementation of the Chang’e 4 mission has helped our country make the leap from following to leading.” It is this leap that greatly concerns the United States and other western nations striving for a more free, safe, and prosperous global environment. What President Xi and the CCP have failed to demonstrate is their ability to govern China as a modern nation-state and follow the norms of acceptable international behavior. 

In a recent speech this week in Washington US Defense Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper talked about how China is achieving these gains and what it is costing free people everywhere. He said that President Xi is using direct state investment, forced technology transfer and intellectual property theft to skip the generations of investment and learning normally needed to achieve these scientific advancements. Chinese economic espionage and theft of American intellectual property has dramatically expanded in recent years. Esper added: “Beijing is determined to exploit American intellectual property and know-how at any cost.”

It is this “at any cost” attitude that is most concerning to world leaders. Despite global outrage at China’s behavior it continues down the same path. Feigned attempts to hold China accountable by previous American administrations failed to slow China’s avarice for stolen technology. Finally, in 2018, under the Trump Administration crackdown on the country, the US Justice Department filed more than a half dozen charges in separate economic espionage cases and secured convictions and guilty pleas in six more. It still represents only a small indent in illicit Chinese efforts. Hackers daily target prime US technology companies, government, and academia in attempts to siphon off the latest intellectual property in development. Xi and other Chinese leaders often attempt to justify the thievery by referring to the Unequal Treaties period in Chinese history, from about 1839 to the early 20th century, in which many western nations forced China to sign treaties and agreements conceding its territory and sovereignty rights to those foreign powers.

Herbal Impotence Pills versus viagra on line ED Drugs Without charging shipping cost. In the event of a psychological cause for impotence, there is nothing wrong with the blood flow to cute-n-tiny.com acquisition de viagra the penis causing an erection. Erectile dysfunction or impotence is a disorder found among diabetic buy viagra from india patients. To restrict its growth at the primary stage we can prevent the damage to our heart as it effectively lowers the risk of diabetes in buy levitra online future.

Underlying Xi’s modernization strategy is his visceral need to restore China to its rightful place in the world, as he defines it. The effort includes the national-level expansion of his “Military-Civil Fusion Strategy” or MCF. It effectively creates a robust military-industrial complex obscuring the distinction between military and civilian knowledge, research, and production. The danger to other nations is real. By adopting and reengineering new products from acquired foreign systems China can simultaneously harness both sectors for national defense technology advancements. 

The expanded strategy is not new. Sometimes foreign firms helped China. In 2003 the Chinese Computer World Army-Supporting Alliance on Science and Technology, with the assistance from at least four US firms, provided the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) with $4.5 million USD in IT equipment. Defense Secretary Esper says the United States cannot continue to allow American firms to support Chinese exploitation of our intellectual resources in light of Xi Jinping’s aggressive global agenda. MCF is a 21st century whole-of-government effort to redesign China’s defense innovation ecosystem. President Xi has taken on many political challenges and, to date, won the majority of those contests. His global agenda, however, may be raising the stakes so high that any lapse in progress, whether from the Covid-19 epidemic or the Trump Administration’s trade war, may be enough to dislodge him from the legacy he seeks to secure. This year’s challenges may prove to undermine the stability Xi and the CCP have fought so hard to maintain at the cost of freedom and domestic innovation. Losing is not an acceptable option for the Chinese leadership.

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media Inc., which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government.  Each Friday, she presents key updates on China.

Photo: Xi addresses virus crisis (China gov. official photo)

Categories
Quick Analysis

China Infiltrates U.S. Politics, schools, and Cities

China’s actions against the United States can be seen in more than just unfair trade and armaments. Beijing is waging an intensive effort to reshape American education and politics to suit its own needs. Little reported, this is the most significant assault on the U.S.’s culture of freedom ever waged, far surpassing anything done by the Soviet Union at the height of the cold war. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo addressed the crisis at a meeting of the National Governors Association this month.

[I was at an event] co-hosted by the National Governors Association and something called the Chinese People’s Association For Friendship and Foreign Countries. Sounds pretty harmless.

What the invitation did not say is that the group – the group I just mentioned – is the public face of the Chinese Communist Party’s official foreign influence agency, the United Front Work Department.

Now, I was lucky. I was familiar with that organization from my time as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

But it got me thinking.

How many of you made the link between that group and Chinese Communist Party officials?

What if you made a new friend while you were at that event?

What if your new friend asked you for introductions to other politically connected and powerful people?

What if your new friend offered to invest big money in your state, perhaps in your pension, in industries sensitive to our national security?

These aren’t hypotheticals. These scenarios are all too true, and they impact American foreign policy significantly.

Indeed, last year, a Chinese Government-backed think tank in Beijing produced a report that assessed all 50 of America’s governors on their attitudes towards China. They labeled each of you “friendly,” “hardline,” or “ambiguous.”

I’ll let you decide where you think you belong. Someone in China already has. Many of you, indeed, in that report are referenced by name.

So here’s the lesson: The lesson is that competition with China is not just a federal issue. It’s why I wanted to be here today, Governor Hogan. It’s happening in your states with consequences for our foreign policy, for the citizens that reside in your states, and indeed, for each of you.

And, in fact, whether you are viewed by the CCP as friendly or hardline, know that it’s working you, know that it’s working the team around you.

Competition with China is happening inside of your state, and it affects our capacity to perform America’s vital national security functions.

I want to set the context today for this topic.

At the end of the Cold War, America started to engage with China heavily. It made good sense. We thought that the more we interacted, the more it would become like a liberal democracy, like us here in the United States.

It didn’t happen, and you all know this.

Indeed, under Xi Jinping, the country is moving exactly in the opposite direction – more repression, more unfair competition, more predatory economic practices; indeed, a more aggressive military posture as well.

You should know this doesn’t mean we can’t do business with China. You can see that in the first part of the trade deal that President Trump got done, signed last month.

We’re happy about that. It was the right thing to do. That was indeed a deal that was good for both the United States and China. And these economic ties are powerful. They’re important and good. They’re good for your state; they’re good for America.

But while there are places we can cooperate, we can’t ignore China’s actions and strategic intentions. If we do, we risk the important components of our relationship that benefit both countries.

The Chinese Government has been methodical in the way it’s analyzed our system. It’s assessed our vulnerabilities, and it’s decided to exploit our freedoms to gain advantage over us at the federal level, the state level, and the local level.

What China does in Topeka and Sacramento reverberates in Washington, in Beijing, and far beyond. Competition with China is happening. It’s happening in your state.

In fact, I would be surprised if most of you in the audience have not been lobbied by the Chinese Communist Party directly.

Chinese Communist Party friendship organizations like the one that I referenced earlier are in Richmond; Minneapolis; Portland; Jupiter, Florida; and many other cities around the country.

But sometimes China’s activities aren’t quite that public Let me read you an excerpt of a letter from a Chinese diplomat. It was China’s Consul General in New York sent a letter last month to the speaker of one of your state legislatures.

Here’s what the letter said in part. It said, quote, “As we all know, Taiwan is part of China… avoid engaging in any official contact with Taiwan, including sending congratulatory messages to the electeds, introducing bills and proclamations for the election, sending officials and representatives to attend the inauguration ceremony, and inviting officials in Taiwan to visit the United States.” End of quote from the letter.

Think about that. You had a diplomat from China assigned here to the United States, a representative of the Chinese Communist Party in New York City, sending an official letter urging that an American elected official shouldn’t exercise his right to freedom of speech.

Let that sink in for just a minute.

And this isn’t a one-off event. It’s happening all across the country.

Chinese consulates in New York, in Illinois, in Texas, and two in California, bound by the diplomatic responsibilities and rights of the Vienna Convention, are very politically active at the state level, as is the embassy right here in Washington, D.C.

Maybe some of you have heard about the time when the Chinese consulate paid the UC-San Diego students to protest the Dalai Lama.

Or last August, when former governor Phil Bryant of Mississippi received a letter from a diplomat in the consul’s office in Houston, threatening to cancel a Chinese investment if the governor chose to travel to Taiwan. Phil went anyway.

Last year, a high school – a high school, a It was 1998, the first time when generika viagra cialis sildenafil citrate came in use for treatment of erectile deficiency. The composition, online viagra mechanism of action, contraindications and side effects of these Electromagnetic radiation especially on the male fertility, it was seen that sperm cells are very vulnerable to damage by radiation. That is why since then, the legal authorities have been very keen and would watchfully look for details and have become razor sharp in inspecting those who present female wholesale cialis http://mouthsofthesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/MOTS-4-22-ERWIN.pdf libido enhancers. This is the reason why most women want to gain back the elasticity of their http://mouthsofthesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/MOTS-12.05.15-allen-1.pdf wholesale sildenafil vaginas without any major side effects. high school in Chicago – disinvited a Taiwanese representative to serve on a climate panel after Chinese pressure.

It’s one thing to pressure the Secretary of State of the United States of America. It seems quite something else to go after a high school principal. It shows depth. It shows systemization. It shows intent.

Chinese Communist Party officials, too, are cultivating relationships with county school board members and local politicians – often through what are known as sister cities programs.

Look, this Chinese competition is something you all know. It sits in the back of your mind. But you have many duties and you are busy people. But this competition is well underway. And while these might seem like local matters to some, the cumulative effect is of enormous national importance and international significance.

Of course, too, our public educational institutions are another arena of competition with China.

I know, governors, you don’t run these institutions on a day-to-day basis, but you often have impact on the people that do. The FBI director and I think the Attorney General, too, talked yesterday about something called the “Thousand Talents Plan.” It’s a plan to recruit scientists and professors to transfer the know-how we have here to China in exchange for enormous paydays.

The program has probably targeted campuses in your state. Indeed, the Department of Justice has indicted professors in my home state at the University of Kansas and at Virginia Tech and at Harvard.

A Texas A&M investigation reportedly discovered more than 100 academics participating in Chinese talent recruitment plans. Only five of them had declared that they were participating in this program.

And goodness knows what else we have not discovered.

There are indeed very credible reports of Chinese Government officials pressuring Chinese students – students studying right here in the United States of America – to monitor fellow Chinese students and to report back to Beijing.

One very prominent pro-democracy Chinese student on a college campus in the Northeast last year received death threats – death threats for exercising his right to free speech. The FBI became involved.

Look, that’s just one of many campus groups directly influenced by the Chinese Communist Party and its representatives right here in the United States.

Many of you are familiar with Confucius Institutes. Confucius Institutes purport to have the sole purpose of teaching Mandarin language skills and Chinese culture. A bipartisan Senate committee found last year in 2019 that the Chinese Communist Party controls nearly every aspect of the Confucius Institutes’ activities here in the United States.

Over the past few months, the University of Missouri, the University of Kansas, the University of Maryland have independently decided to close down their Confucius Institutes after conducting their own reviews, and schools in 22 other states are doing or have already done the same.

Sadly, China’s propaganda campaign starts even earlier than college. China has targeted K through 12 schools through its “Confucius Classrooms,” the CCP’s program to influence kids at elementary, middle, and high schools around the world.

Do you know that we have no ability to establish similar programs in China? I’m sure that doesn’t surprise you. President Trump has talked about reciprocity in trade. We should have reciprocity in all things. Today they have free rein in our system, and we’re completely shut out from theirs.

As of 2017, there were 519 of these classrooms in the United States. Beijing knows that today’s kids are tomorrow’s leaders.

The China competition is happening. It’s happening in your states, and it’s a competition that goes to the very basic freedoms that every one of us values.

I know you all have power over pension funds or the people that run them. As of its latest public filing, the Florida Retirement System is invested in a company that in turn is invested in surveillance gear that the Chinese Communist Party uses to track more than 1 million Muslim minorities. California’s pension fund, the largest public pension fund in the country, is invested in companies that supply the People’s Liberation Army that puts our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines at risk.

And it is the case for many Chinese companies, too. Their books are not wide open, so it’s difficult to know if the transaction that’s being engaged in is transparent and fair and follows the rule of law.

The question is: Do they demonstrate good judgment and preserve America’s national security?

I want to urge vigilance on the local level, too. In the District of Columbia, there have been concerns raised that the new Metro cards manufactured by China could be vulnerable to cyber threats.

So again, it’s worth trusting but verifying. There are federal officials prepared to help you work your way through these challenges when they arise. Don’t make separate individual deals and agreements with China that undermine our national policy. I know none of you would do so intentionally. Let us help you make sure we’re getting it right.

The Trump administration wants to help. There are so many things we have already done.

Last year, we issued a letter to state governments. It reaffirmed that Taiwan remains a key business partner and a friend in every other way.

We have strengthened the review process for Chinese companies that are investing in your states.

We have revoked visas for so-called “research scholars” who abused their privileges by teaching in Confucius Classrooms, and made sure that they departed the United States.

We’ve banned scientists from the Department of Energy, which overseas America’s 17 largest national – excuse me, nuke labs, including our nuclear research facility in New Mexico. We did so because they were participating in Chinese talent recruitment programs.

We have directed two Chinese propaganda outlets, the Chinese Global Television Network and Xinhua News Agency, to register as foreign agents.

And we at the State Department have started to require Chinese diplomats to apply – comply with the same rules we comply with when we’re in China. Chinese diplomats now must notify the State Department in advance of official meetings with state and local officials.

They must declare their official visits to U.S. educational and research institutions as well.

This is just fairness, reciprocity, basic common sense. This is not an onerous restriction to put on China.

It’s what we do as Americans.

Illustration: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Human Trafficking Attacked

The start of the new decade, the 2020s, has been marked by White House efforts to attack one of humanity’s oldest scourges, slavery. While more traditional forms of this affront exist outside of the developed world, a major version, human trafficking, is endemic everywhere.

The U.S. State Department has noted that “Human trafficking is one of the most heinous crimes on Earth. Right now traffickers are robbing a staggering 24.9 million people of their freedom and basic human dignity—that’s roughly three times the population of New York City. We must band together and build momentum to defeat human trafficking. We must hold the perpetrators of this heinous crime accountable. We must achieve justice for survivors as they rebuild their lives. We must reinvigorate our shared commitment to extinguish human trafficking wherever it exists. There is no time to waste.”

According to a Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) analysis, “Human trafficking victims have been found in communities nationwide in the agriculture, hospitality, restaurant, domestic work and other industries, as well as in prostitution that is facilitated online, on the street, or in businesses fronting for prostitution such as massage parlors. Overseas forced labor can be used to produce the consumer goods that are in our homes and workplaces. The victims are men, women and children of all ages and may include U.S. citizens and foreign nationals. Many of them may have thought they had found a good paying job or a better life, only to have their hopes and dreams dashed and placed into modern day slavery. In fiscal year 2019, HSI initiated 1,024 investigations with a nexus to human trafficking and recorded 2,197 arrests,1,113 indictments, and 691 convictions; 428 victims were identified and assisted. HSI continues to make human trafficking cases a top investigative priority by connecting victims to resources to help restore their lives and bringing traffickers to justice.”

2020 began with the observance of “National Slavery and Human Trafficking Month,” established by President Trump’s proclamation. The document noted that:

“Trafficking crimes are perpetrated by transnational criminal enterprises, gangs, and cruel individuals.  Through force, fraud, coercion, and sexual exploitation of minors, traffickers rob countless individuals of their dignity and freedom, splinter families, and threaten the safety of our communities.  In all its forms, human trafficking is an intolerable blight on any society dedicated to freedom, individual rights, and the rule of law.

“Human trafficking is often a hidden crime that knows no boundaries.  By some estimates, as many as 24.9 million people ‑- adults and children — are trapped in a form of modern slavery around the world, including in the United States.  Human traffickers exploit others through forced labor or commercial sex, and traffickers profit from their victims’ horrific suffering.  The evil of human trafficking must be defeated.  We remain relentless in our resolve to bring perpetrators to justice, to protect survivors and help them heal, and to prevent further The good doctor and good clinics offer miraculous treatment that cures the problem completely. steal here buy levitra in canada Users of Kamagra medicines are india tadalafil tablets able to expand their blood vessels around the male sexual organ, allowing the penis temporary relief to get an erection. To do the sex practice these anti-impotence pills admitted best amongst all, but have to viagra in india online midwayfire.com be in limitation and under prescribed manner. You don’t pfizer viagra price you could check here have to step one foot outside of your hearing aid. victimization and destruction of innocent lives.

“This year marks nearly 20 years since our Nation took decisive steps in the global fight against human trafficking by enacting the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) and nearly 15 years since the United States ratified the United Nations’ Palermo Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children (Palermo Protocol).  Both the TVPA and the Palermo Protocol established a comprehensive framework for combating human trafficking by establishing prevention programs, creating victim protections, and advancing prosecutions under expanded criminal statutes to usher in the modern anti-trafficking movement domestically and globally.  These two measures illustrate a global consensus on the issue, and yet as a Nation we must continue to work proactively to foster a culture of justice and accountability for this horrific crime.

“My Administration is committed to using every available resource, strengthening strategic partnerships, collaborating with State, local, and tribal entities, and by introducing innovative anti-trafficking strategies to bring the full force of the United States Government to help end this barbaric practice once and for all.  In January 2019, I was proud to sign both the Frederick Douglass Trafficking Victims Prevention and Protection Reauthorization Act and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, reaffirming our commitment to preventing trafficking in all forms.

“With my resolute support, executive departments and agencies are steadfastly continuing the battle to abolish this form of modern slavery.”

An integral part of the HSI effort are the Victim Assistance Specialists. They ensure victims have access to the rights and services to which they are entitled by law, as well as the assistance they need so that they can participate actively and fully in the criminal justice system process. Additionally, Forensic Interview Specialists conduct victim-centered and legally defensible forensic interviews. If you notice suspicious activity in your community, call the ICE Tip Line at 1-866-DHS-2-ICE or report tips online.

Illustration: Pixabay