Categories
Quick Analysis

Obama’s Failed Approach to Terrorism

The New York Analysis of Policy & Government presents a two-part series on how President Obama has fared in the fight against terrorism.

The lessons of the Islamic extremist’s attacks of September 11, 2001 have not been learned by the Obama Administration, or western progressive politicians.

Fifteen years after the most devastating assault on the U.S. homeland in American history, the same errors, misconceptions and failed practices that led to the attack are being repeated, both by the White House as well as by some experts who have published studies of the issue.

The faulty logic of many western leaders ignores reality, including:

  1. Islamic terrorism is not based on western intervention in the Moslem nations

Long before the Crusades, long before the era of European imperialism, and obviously long before America saved Middle Eastern nations from Saddam Hussein’s aggression, Islamic forces invaded Europe and occupied portions of it. Moslem rule of Albania ended as recently as 1912. The allegation that current acts of terror are a response to “historic insults” is sheer nonsense, but one which far too many continue to cling to.

Discussing this issue with your physician is essential to find a solution to headache so that daily activities can be carried out by cialis cheap no prescription http://greyandgrey.com/media/civilians-a-new-wrinkle-in-ground-zero-claims-ny-post-may-2007/ health professionals. The Miami viagra purchase no prescription Children’s Museums not only a museum even it is a glorified playhouse. Safe and sure care for male sexual greyandgrey.com order sildenafil health- It is quite important to know about how long before planned lovemaking session ED medicine should be consumed. Almonds Nutrition These nuts have a truckload of tadalafil pharmacy nutrients. The reality is neither pleasant nor, in the minds of some, politically acceptable to state, but it is a fact.  Extreme Islamists hate the west and will continue to plot to attack it not for what the West does, but for what it is. It is this intolerant trait that fuels the harsh attacks by Islamic extremists not only against Christians and Jews but against fellow Moslems who do not share their harsh take on their religion, and that inspires the religious civil war between Shiites and Sunnis.

  1. The actions of Islamic terrorists constitute warfare, not crimes.

The mindset can best be seen in the fact that the Obama Administration changed the terminology of the conflict from the “Global War on Terror” into the vague “Overseas Contingency Operations.” The President, in 2013, announced that America wasn’t pursuing a War on Terror, but was instead focusing on terrorist leaders in an attempt to dismantle individual terror networks.

The belief that Islamic terrorism can be countered by actions resembling law enforcement, as opposed to warfare, is erroneous. The actions through drone attacks, special forces operations and other means to eliminate or capture terrorists leaders are a necessary part of fighting terror, but only a small part.  Demands that captured terrorists should be given a trial or a fixed prison sentences ignores the reality that a true war exits. Most importantly, the concept that law enforcement through prisons or executions as a way to deter future crimes hasn’t worked. Bin Laden is dead, but his work goes on. Terrorists freed from Guantanamo re-enter the fray with distressing regularity. In his 2015 State of the Union Address, Mr. Obama stated that “The Shadow of the Crisis of Terrorism has passed.” There was not a shred of evidence to support his statement, not then, not before, and not since. It is not inconceivable that he based his comments on the fact that some key leaders, such as Bin Laden, had been killed.  A failure to realize the true nature of the threat has led to exceptionally serious policy errors, including the premature withdrawal of American troops from Iraq, which allowed ISIS to thrive and grow.  ISIS’s rise to a self-proclaimed “Caliphate” controlling more territory than ever by a terrorist organization indicates the true nature of the crisis.  Islamic terrorism isn’t a criminal justice issue, it’s a national security challenge.

Fighting a war requires constant vigilance and decisive action, but in the mindset of both President Clinton, whose missteps allowed Bin Laden to survive after his first attack on the World Trade Center, and President Obama, who changed the nature of America’s mindset from fighting a war to dealing with crimes, the problem is more akin to a criminal prosecution that can be engaged in with slow deliberation.

The Report concludes tomorrow