This article was provided exclusively to the New York Analysis of Policy and Government by the distinguished retired Judge John H. Wilson
In an extensive article published by Tablet, PhD candidate Zach Golberg discusses the “woke” phenomenon prevalent among white liberals in particular. Being “woke” is a term that derived from African-American culture (an issue which, if considered more than momentarily, would leads us down the rabbit hole of cultural appropriation, if we allow it to), and is broadly defined as “being aware of social justice issues” (it should be noted that the term is also defined by the Urban Dictionary as “self righteousness masquerading as enlightment.”)
While Goldberg’s article is mainly addressed to the paternalism of white liberals towards minority Americans, it is a must-read for anyone wishing to understand the behavior of these same white liberals when it comes to their support for climate change, and why they allow for no dissent on this, and many other issues.
According to Goldberg’s research, “White liberals make up 20-24% of the general population but, for a multitude of reasons, exert an outsize political and cultural influence. They are more likely to consider themselves activists, are more active on social media, and, significantly, they are one of the most affluent groups in the country… ‘woke’ white activists…have had their perceptions distorted by social media-tinted caricatures that obscure more objective measures of reality… these moral emotions become hyperactive and detached from objective reality; when they motivate the division of society into ‘allies’ and enemies; and when they generate a level of sanctimonious outrage and judgment that places all political dissent beyond the pale.”
Goldberg’s insightful analysis continues: “For the woke and their allies, these rapid changes are heralded as signs of progress, leading at times to harsh criticism of anyone who would stand in their way. This ideological stridency and triumphalist attitude can be powerful weapons against political opponents but are alienating—perhaps deliberately so—to moderates and conservatives…The woke elite act like white saviors who must lead the rest of the country…to a vision of justice the less enlightened groups would not choose for themselves.” (emphasis added)
Your partner’s preferences as well might play a role buy viagra without rx unica-web.com in your treatment choices. You must be aroused for KAMAGRA to work This pill usually works in about 10-15 minutes This drug works for 4-6 hours, so you can buy viagra for women order them without any barriers. Nevertheless, it is always essential that generika levitra 20mg a patient reveal all health concerns or medications to a physician prior to consuming them. When it comes to cure some disorder we really need to be very unica-web.com purchase cheap viagra careful with it.Goldberg supports his interpretation with a host of data, including a 2018 survey conducted by the American National Elections Studies. But another one of his conclusions explains the divide between climate change believers, who tend to be liberal, and climate change deniers, who tend to be more conservative:
“Due at least in part to digital media, white liberal attitudes that more or less endured for decades have been drastically overturned in the space of months or single years. In contrast, the attitudes of white conservatives—and conservatives in general—have moved at a more glacial pace, if at all. For liberals, the lack of awareness of how fast and far their attitudes have shifted fosters an illusion of conservative extremism. In reality, the conservatives of today are not all that different from the conservatives of years past. And it’s the frustration with white conservatives’ inability or reluctance to keep pace with liberals on the path to enlightenment that is intensifying our political divide.”
Again, Goldberg’s analysis is intended to explain white liberal attitudes to issues of racial justice. But his conclusions can be applied to assist in understanding the truly obnoxious attitude of climate change true believers, and their unwillingness to countenance any questioning of their orthodoxy.
Much like the child who now leads them, the Church of Climate Change cannot countenance any questioning of their sacred beliefs, and will tolerate no opposition to their efforts to save humanity from itself. Is there any answer to dealing with such inflexibility? To paraphrase Professor Farnsworth from Futurama – “Only Science can help us now!”
Illustration: Pixabay