For eight years, the Obama Administration ignored Constitutional checks on its power and ran roughshod on those with differing views. The IRS harassment of the Tea Party, Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s consideration of criminally prosecuting those that disagreed with the President’s climate change views, and the unlawful surveillance of an opposition campaign are just a few examples. National security protocols for communications were violated without penalty. Major treaties, including the Paris Climate Accord and the Iran nuclear deal were unconstitutionally adopted without the consent of the Senate. Extraordinary conflicts of interests, including Clinton’s approval of the sale of the basic ingredient of nuclear weapons to the Russians followed by contributions to her foundation, abounded.
There was little fear of having to legally account for these and other misdeeds because a sure-thing successor waited in the wings. The perpetrators, both elected and appointed, would not be held to account by a friendly successor Administration.
The surprising results of the 2016 Presidential campaign terrified the perpetrators, who were suddenly vulnerable to exposure and prosecution. In all other instances when an administration was replaced by one from a different party or ideology the retired leader and his appointees quietly moved on, and their party looked forward to the next election.
That wouldn’t work for the Obama Administration. The legal exposure was vast and deadly serious. It wasn’t just political embarrassment or job loss that would result. For some, penalties including jail time could be their fate. When Trump won, that left one alternative for those whose lives were on the line: to somehow delegitimize the new government.
Doing so would be a very hard sell, and besides, even if both the President and Vice President were somehow tossed from office, the Speaker of the House, another Republican, would become the new president. The GOP itself had to be delegitimized, so that they would lose the 2018 midterms and a Democrat would be the new speaker. Ginning up false and overblown controversies, including the Russian Collusion and other artificial charges, was the path chosen.
Democrats and their media allies term it a “Resistance,” a much more palatable term than what it really is—an attempt at a coup.
Besides, men who have got tired of trying several medicines but found them fail. http://www.icks.org/html/03_conference.php?seq=25 acheter viagra pfizer It might take a few days of doing this special info cialis 20 mg exercise you can hold each compress of the muscles for few seconds. Shopping is sometimes needed and sometimes could be a good option for you Among the natural ways to treat this, daily basis physical exercise probably the best option. generic viagra pill Wind Energy together with the cheap viagra http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/2017-2.pdf Markets These days Sustainable energy is amongst the most in-demand varieties of strength in the world today as increasing numbers of sectors have become as high paced and as changeable as the fashion industry.
The key wrongdoers eagerly push the concept. Obama tossed aside all precedent and remained active in public affairs. Hillary Clinton touts the idea of Trump being unqualified. The former heads of the FBI and the CIA, as well as their key underlings, many of whom were the most legally vulnerable, desperately worked the talk show and press circuit. A sympathetic media ignores astounding acts, such as former CIA chief John Brennan’s admonition to federal employees to ignore Presidential directives. Some elected officials fail to condemn violent riots and outright talk of assassination by misguided celebrities.
No one is asking what the “Resistance” is resisting. Simply disagreeing with the policies of the elected government is not “resistance;” it’s the consequence of losing at the ballot box.
In the two years since the 2016 election, we have seen, in addition to the antics of partisan current and former members of the FBI, CIA, and the Department of Justice, a former Secretary of State, John Kerry, roam the globe telling allies and adversaries to ignore the current U.S. government, and the radical 9th Circuit Court of Appeals seek (unsuccessfully) to overturn legitimate presidential power. Coordinated efforts by Democrat-friendly media and entertainment outlets have sought to create a wholly unsubstantiated sense of crisis.
This is not the vigorous policy fights and harsh campaign rhetoric that are the business as usual of politics. They are the desperate measures of those seeking to overturn an election in order to avoid exposure of their wrongdoing and the consequences that would follow.
Illustration: Pixabay