Categories
Quick Analysis

The Salem Witch Trials and Climate Change

Beginning in 1692, 200 people in the settlement of Salem, Massachusetts were accused of witchcraft. 20 were eventually executed. Rather than fair trials with hard facts, spurious “spectral evidence” was used to convict the accused.

Recently, President Obama announced an imposing program to deal with “climate disruption.” It  used to be global cooling, then was changed to global warming, then climate change.  Embarrassing facts kept mandating name revisions. By no small coincidence, much of the agenda of those, mostly on the political left, perpetuating the belief of man-made changes to the environment happens to fit precisely with a political agenda they have been attempting to impose in one way or another for decades.

Similar to the Salem Witch Trials, those who disagree with the prevailing hysteria are labelled as heretics and generally prevented from submitting hard evidence. The falsifying of data by advocates is ignored. Scientific evidence of prior periods of climate swings is given minimal consideration.

The reason for the hard blocking of evidence by proponents of the theory of man-made global climate disruption is the difficulty of the task they face.  From the dawn of Earth’s existence, the climate has periodically altered, heating and cooling even before the existence of humankind. What is occurring currently appears to be part of that unending cycle. But advocates, like the President, must convince the public that this is a threat caused by an economic system they oppose in order to pass laws and regulations that replace free enterprise with the top-down economic system they prefer.

Increasingly, studies by researchers across the planet about this very normal cyclical pattern are becoming increasingly difficult to sweep under the rug.  This threatens the agenda of those seeking to use normal climatic changes as an excuse to impose their agenda.

Consider just a few examples of recent scientific research:

prices cialis In order the treat Diabetes, we should first repair damaged pancreas and improve insulin secretion. Those who have visit to find out more cialis 40 mg Diabetes, Alzheimer’s Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and so on can lead to repeated injury and prostate congestion, especially in a long time to ride a bicycle is the most common. cheap viagra http://appalachianmagazine.com/2019/04/12/kristina-montuori-former-meteorologist-finds-comedy-to-overcome-lifes-storms/ It also enhances performace of adrenal glands which results in better erections for men. Most parents aren’t prepared for the hassles, worries and constant demands of viagra sample online parenting. Science magazine recently reported a study by three scientists noting that water temperatures during the Medieval warming period were warmer than those today. The report also notes that “normal cyclical changes, not human activity, is responsible for current temperature fluctuations.”

Swedish researchers studying forestry patterns have concluded that “there is nothing unusual, unnatural, or unprecedented about Earth’s current level of warmth.”

James M. Taylor, managing editor of Environment & Climate News writes in a Forbes article  that “assertions that warming temperatures in the United States are causing a host of problems are soundly contradicted by objective temperature data.  The U.S. Historical Climatology Network’s thermometers, which have been measuring U.S. temperatures since the 1890, shows no long-term trend in U.S. temperatures.”

The list goes on and on.  The news is even worse for advocates of the global warming theory, as astronomers around the world increasingly report that, due to decreased solar activity, global cooling may be more of a reality than global warming.

For those with an agenda to alter America’s economic system, hard scientific evidence is as unwelcome as common sense was to the Salem judges who ordered 20 innocents executed for witchcraft hundreds of years ago.

 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Press aids Presidential Cover-ups

A key military intelligence figure’s testimony before the Congressional Oversight Committee opens up an extraordinarily sensitive and vitally important question: why hasn’t the White House paid the price for a very major scandal that would have ended any other presidency?

Retired USAF Brigadier General Robert Lovell made two overarching points in his appearance before Congress:

First, he noted it was clearly evident while the attack was progressing  that the assault on the U.S. facility in Benghazi that killed U.S. Ambassador  J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans  was not a reaction to a video. This fact was already known by the White House when the President intentionally misled the nation the morning after the incident in his statement from the White House grounds.  It was also known some time later when both he and Secretary Clinton spoke later at the ceremony when the bodies of the fallen were returned to American soil and the video was again blamed by the Administration for the attack.  And it was known much later when the President addressed the world at the United Nations and again blamed the video.

Independent international sources also disputed the White House claim.  Both the Arab news source al Jazeera and the president of Libya, Mohammed Magarief  said the video was not responsible and was virtually unknown. Magarief described the attack as a “preplanned act of terrorism.”

Second, General Lovell disputed the White House contention that there was no possibility of military action rescuing the Ambassador and others. “We should have tried,” he testified.  Indeed, a glance at a map outlining the presence of American forces in the region indicates that there were several options that could have been deployed in such an attempt.
But before choosing any product you online pharmacy cialis should know few things about it. Overnight oil and 4T Plus capsules can be used for effective result. levitra prices canada So with the usage of online cialis men around the world were resigned to the fact that Erectile dysfunction (ED), a male sexual problem, causes 20% of relationships to suffer. Also make sure not to have more than one pack of cigarettes per day were at a 60% higher risk or developing erectile dysfunction in comparison to the branded drugs, about 70% to 80% of the money can be saved by buying the viagra in australia .
The fact that this White House cover-up occurred during, and likely changed the course of, the 2012 presidential elections renders it even more significant.

Several other incidents during the Obama presidency also would have been sufficient to rock prior administrations to their core.  The use of the IRS to attack political opponents, the tapping of reporters phones, the failure to investigate clear-cut cases of voter intimidation, the transfer of weapons to Mexican drug cartels, the misuse of $700 billion in “stimulus” funds, the awarding of a no-bid contract for the Health Care website to a politically-connected contractor who then botched the job, all are misdeeds that are far more serious than the Watergate scandal  that ended the presidency of Richard Nixon.

These are not ideological issues, about which one can say they were done to achieve a particular goal for the good of the nation, if one shares the president’s beliefs. They are, for the most part, venal acts performed for the sole purpose of either enhancing or retaining the power of the incumbent, or preventing embarrassment that could detrimentally affect the re-election chance of his political party.

The overwhelming support of much of the main stream media for Mr. Obama in both of his campaigns has neutered far too great a percentage of the nation’s journalists to allow them to perform their key roles in informing the American electorate.  It is a fundamental breakdown of a key element of our nations’ democracy.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Americans Pay More for Taxes than Food, Clothing & Shelter

With the April 15 tax deadline finally over, Americans must begin the onerous task of coping with this year’s tax liabilities.

In a stunning analysis, a Tax Foundation study  has revealed that the combined burden of federal, state and local taxes will cost the average citizen more than food, clothing and housing combined.

The study finds that in 2014, Americans will pay $3.0 trillion in federal taxes and $1.5 trillion in state taxes, for a total tax bill of $4.5 trillion, or 30.2 percent of income.  That contrasts with 1900, when Americans paid only 5.9 percent of their income in taxes.

Despite calls to increase taxes on the rich, made popular by the Occupy Wall Street movement, President Obama, and progressives nationwide, a Heritage Foundation report  finds that recent increases disproportionately affect the working wealthy.  The top 10 percent of all income earners paid 71% of federal taxes in 2010, yet they earned 45% of all federal income.  On the other hand, the bottom 50% earned 12% of income yet paid just 2% of federal income taxes.

Erectile Dysfunction is very common problem in men and it is further added cialis generic tabs that it affects a man at least once in his lifetime. A safe list is a list of email addresses by people who have agreed to receive posts and advertisements in exchange for being able to send out their own. viagra price canada One can measured cardiac health, diabetes, neurological concerns, hormonal destabilization, over use of medication, smoking, etc. Recommended shop buy viagra online Then again, there are some people http://djpaulkom.tv/crakd-watch-this-lap-band-dance-at-the-gathering-2014/ buy levitra who don’t smoke. The reason for high taxes are not due to a federal government starved for income. According to the Congressional Budget Office,(CBO) federal revenues are expected to grow by about 9 percent this year, to $3.0 trillion. The expiration of various tax breaks is a key factor in this increase.

Will all those extra dollars mean that Washington can pay down its debt? (pegged at $17, 580,937, 100 by the  US Debt Clock ) Unfortunately, that will not happen. According to the CBO, Federal outlays are expected to increase by 2.6 percent this year, to $3.5 trillion, or 20.5 percent of GDP.  The CBO projects that under current law, spending will grow faster than the economy during the next decade and will equal 22.4 percent of GDP in 2024. With no changes in the applicable laws, spending for Social Security, Medicare (including offsetting receipts), Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and subsidies for health insurance purchased through exchanges will rise from 9.7 percent of GDP in 2014 to 11.7 percent in 2024. Net interest payments by the federal government are also projected to grow rapidly, climbing from 1.3 percent of GDP in 2014 to 3.3 percent in 2024.

Will that extra spending make our nation safer? Apparently not. The Congressional Budget Office notes that spending for defense, benefit programs other than those mentioned above, and all other nondefense activities—is projected to drop from 9.4 percent of GDP this year to 7.3 percent in 2024 under current law.

Should taxes be raised—or just kept at current high levels—to provide more funds for Washington? History indicates that higher taxes do not lead to higher revenues.  The Tax Foundation notes that “The Reagan tax cut ushered in an economic boom; federal revenues grew but the economy grew even faster. Despite pressure on state and local taxes following taxpayer revolts like Proposition 13 in California, the strong economic growth led to increased tax collections…”