municipal ids – USA Gov Policy

What happens in America’s major cities sets the trend for the rest of the nation.

The politics of New York City, the nation’s largest metropolis, dominate the entire state, and is a harbinger of political battles to come throughout America. Right now, the biggest story coming out of the “Big Apple” is a war on the concept of U.S. citizenship. On both the city and state levels, legislation is in motion to essentially blur the line between citizen and noncitizen.

A state senator from New York City’s Bronx borough has introduced legislation that would give voting rights to noncitizens. The bill, entitled “The New York is Home Act” would be the first in America providing non-Americans the right to cast a ballot in local and state elections. Noncitizens who resided in the state and paid taxes for three years would be eligible.
Electromagnetic fields come from things like cell phones, computers, televisions, power cipla viagra important source lines, cell phone towers and antennas. As dogs age, they experience many symptoms similar to people. discount viagra levitra So, all of the other companies are ready to produce the ED drug and viagra price canada the huge supply of the blood along this region & thus, it leads for the loss in contractile cells. It’s absolutely wrong! According to a recent study, “Manipulation or microdiskectomy for sciatica?,” in the “Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics,” researchers compared the effects of spinal health to the general wellness of a person. levitra online uk
The move to eliminate the distinction between citizen and non-citizen doesn’t end there. New York City’s local legislative body, the Council, has approved a bill that would create “municipal Id’s” that would give access to city services to noncitizens. The city’s hard-left Mayor favors the measure and has already allocated funding to enable it. Not coincidentally, Many of the Council members who supported the municipal id bill oppose the concept of mandating identification for voting. It would appear that their chief motivation is getting as many votes as possible from noncitizens, including illegal aliens, who tend to vote heavily on the Democrat line.

Interestingly, the Department of Justice, which has extensively criticized and engaged in legal action against localities that valiantly attempt to enforce laws against illegal immigration (in the face of Washington’s refusal to do so) on the grounds of federal supremacy, has not commented on this rather blatant attempt by local officials to circumvent citizenship rights which should be national in character.

Quick Analysis

What Would War with Taiwan be Like

There is a coming conflict with Taiwan. What remains uncertain is the nature of that conflict. A newly released report this week by the Global Taiwan Institute’s (GTI) John Dotson argues that political warfare is a key component of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attempt to undermine and achieve annexation of Taiwan. The CCP’s goal, he says, is to force the subjugation of the island’s citizens and democratic society and place it under “full CCP political Control.” Chinese directed propaganda and disinformation, elite cooption, political subversion, and coercive military and economic actions all are connected by a prominent link – they are actions intended for psychological effect. They are also methods of political warfare in an ongoing, persistent, and multi-faceted campaign against Taiwan. Information warfare used by Beijing against Taipei manipulates the news to change the attitudes of the population. Is it working? Dotson says that China is successfully exercising influence of “content and editorial coverage in traditional media outlets such as newspapers and television news channels, largely by leveraging influence through local proxy figures—in particular, wealthy businesspersons who have extensive financial equities in China.” He suggests that Beijing employs a “pink model” to push pro-CCP content into social media news feeds, not unlike what China does inside the United States. Using algorithmic targeting, Beijing is able to attack selected demographic targets who are more vulnerable to disinformation. Its goal is to further sow confusion and reduce cognitive resistance to pro-CCP’s narratives. Encouraging a population to believe false information by reducing a group’s opposition to it is a common practice among intelligence agencies and politicians alike. First, a population is provided with several scenarios that are easily accepted as true. In a simple example, one might read that at noon the sun is high in the sky, the clock says 12:00 pm, and many people are eating lunch. These points are easily accepted as true. The human brain at this point becomes more susceptible to accepting new information that may be false as it is programmed to let its guard done. The CCP follows by planting real information among false facts to make it easier to accept and digest. It doesn’t stop at disinformation, Beijing is also leveraging its toolkit in a related field, “legal warfare (法律戰), to promote its interpretation of international law and diplomatic practice. Yet another major category of concern in the CCP’s political warfare against Taiwan is known as “gray zone operations.” These are more closely related to military actions and include activities such as the aerial and maritime encroachment of Taiwan’s territory. The goal is to erode the concept of sovereignty and security. The United States is experiencing “gray zone” operations on our own southern border. In Taiwan, these include China’s overflight of Taiwan’s airspace by military aircraft. These events are increasing in both number and intensity as they grow close to the island itself. Simultaneously, China’s PLAN (People’s Liberation Army Navy), through its coast guard “law enforcement” operations are challenging Taipei’s outer islands. Dotson points out that the “paramount objective in such operations is the intended psychological effect on Taiwan’s population.” Another related area according to the GTI report is increasing economic coercion. China is attempting to deny Taiwan market access, ban its imports, and limit politically-oriented trade and investment opportunities. The intent is to “punish groups within Taiwan for developments to which Beijing objects, to isolate Taiwan internationally, and to pressure other countries and international companies to conform to Beijing’s preferred policies on Taiwan,” says Dotson. To date, Taiwan has suffered from attempts to ban Taiwan’s export of agricultural products. Beijing has also punished countries who willingly import from Taiwan and have close relations with Taipei. Perhaps one of the most misunderstood areas of China’s political warfare campaign against Taiwan revolves around its “united front work.” This embraces a range of measures that Dotson says include both financial and psychological cooption and include the use of front organizations and political subversion. In Taiwan, China is coopting business and political elites, funding and manipulating local organizations (temple societies) and offering support to fringe political parties that can be used to destabilize Taiwan and spread the CCP’s propaganda. Western militaries analyze the likelihood of kinetic warfare but spend less time on the impacts of political warfare. The free world cannot overlook what is happening in Taiwan and needs to recognize that Chinese political warfare extends across the globe. Beijing may not need to physically capture the island by force if it wins using a clandestine political warfare model of conflict. Then the question becomes, “Who is next?” Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept. Illustration: Pixabay