Leftist ideas – USA Gov Policy

This article was contributed by the distinguished jurist, Judge John Wilson (ret.)

For a brief moment, the country stood united. No one of good will watched the video of Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin kneeling on the neck of George Floyd and believed that the officer’s actions were appropriate. No one has seriously argued that Officer Chauvin should not be charged with one degree or another of murder. No one can seriously argue that the authorities in Minneapolis did not handle this matter quickly and effectively.

And yet, despite this unity, there are those who found their opportunity to divide us once again, and put forth the most ludicrous and unreasonable methods of dealing with the alleged epidemic of police brutality.

In fact, there is no increase in police violence. According to John Hirschauer in National Review, “last year, according to the Washington Post’s database of police-involved shootings, nine unarmed black people were shot and killed by the police, compared to 19 unarmed white people. Assuming that the use of lethal force was unjustified in each of those nine cases — not always a safe assumption — the resulting deaths are no less tragic for being so statistically improbable.”

This is not to say that those who believe there is a disparity between the treatment of whites and blacks by police officers are utterly wrong. According to the National Violent Death Reporting System, “victims were majority white (52%) but disproportionately black (32%) with a fatality rate 2.8 times higher among blacks than whites. Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims.”

On this statistical basis alone, people who wish to highlight this difference between the treatment of blacks and whites by law enforcement and seek redress are not unreasonable. However, reasonable discourse and practical solutions regarding this issue have been hijacked by extremism and its enablers among legislators.

generic viagra wholesale why not try this out At the same time several effective and reliable options are available to alleviate its adverse effects. Blood flow problems see for more levitra sale to the vagina and clitoris may also affect lubrication and arousal. A very small sample of tissue is harvested that might not even require slovak-republic.org cialis discount canada any stitches, which usually will be collected from your abdominal, thigh, or buttock area. Most common side-effects that patient taking this medicine do get affected are- diarrhea, changes in vision, heart disease, breathing problems, stroke, ringing in ears, chest pain, nausea, blood pressure problems (low/high), and cost viagra online headache.

In response to the death of George Floyd, 9 of the 13 members of the Minneapolis City Council have decided to “defund” their police force. “‘We committed to dismantling policing as we know it in the city of Minneapolis and to rebuild with our community a new model of public safety that actually keeps our community safe,’ Council President Lisa Bender told CNN.” One of the leaders of the “defund the police” movement in the Minneapolis City Council is Jeremiah Ellison – the son of Minneapolis Attorney General Keith Ellison, who happens to be prosecuting Officer Derek Chauvin for the murder of George Floyd.

Both father and son have expressed extreme radical views in the past. Keith Ellison was associated with the Nation of Islam in his youth, and was a strong defender of its leader, Louis Farrakhan. According to CNN, “in one scathing column from 1990 unearthed by CNN’s KFile, Ellison accused the president (of the University of Minnesota) of chilling the free expression of black students by openly criticizing a controversial speaker invited to speak on campus by the Africana Student Cultural Center. That speaker, Kwame Ture (also known as Stokely Carmichael), had publicly claimed that Zionists had collaborated with the Nazis in World War II and has been quoted as saying ‘Zionism must be destroyed.'”

His son Jeremiah, has publicly expressed his support for ANTIFA, stating “Unless someone can prove to me ANTIFA is behind the burning of black and immigrant owned businesses in my ward, I’ll keep focusing on stopping the white power terrorist THE ARE ACTUALLY ATTACKING US!” His father, while deputy chief of the DNC, also expressed his own support for ANTIFA by endorsing a handbook for the group.

The Report concludes tomorrow

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

What Would War with Taiwan be Like

There is a coming conflict with Taiwan. What remains uncertain is the nature of that conflict. A newly released report this week by the Global Taiwan Institute’s (GTI) John Dotson argues that political warfare is a key component of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) attempt to undermine and achieve annexation of Taiwan. The CCP’s goal, he says, is to force the subjugation of the island’s citizens and democratic society and place it under “full CCP political Control.” Chinese directed propaganda and disinformation, elite cooption, political subversion, and coercive military and economic actions all are connected by a prominent link – they are actions intended for psychological effect. They are also methods of political warfare in an ongoing, persistent, and multi-faceted campaign against Taiwan. Information warfare used by Beijing against Taipei manipulates the news to change the attitudes of the population. Is it working? Dotson says that China is successfully exercising influence of “content and editorial coverage in traditional media outlets such as newspapers and television news channels, largely by leveraging influence through local proxy figures—in particular, wealthy businesspersons who have extensive financial equities in China.” He suggests that Beijing employs a “pink model” to push pro-CCP content into social media news feeds, not unlike what China does inside the United States. Using algorithmic targeting, Beijing is able to attack selected demographic targets who are more vulnerable to disinformation. Its goal is to further sow confusion and reduce cognitive resistance to pro-CCP’s narratives. Encouraging a population to believe false information by reducing a group’s opposition to it is a common practice among intelligence agencies and politicians alike. First, a population is provided with several scenarios that are easily accepted as true. In a simple example, one might read that at noon the sun is high in the sky, the clock says 12:00 pm, and many people are eating lunch. These points are easily accepted as true. The human brain at this point becomes more susceptible to accepting new information that may be false as it is programmed to let its guard done. The CCP follows by planting real information among false facts to make it easier to accept and digest. It doesn’t stop at disinformation, Beijing is also leveraging its toolkit in a related field, “legal warfare (法律戰), to promote its interpretation of international law and diplomatic practice. Yet another major category of concern in the CCP’s political warfare against Taiwan is known as “gray zone operations.” These are more closely related to military actions and include activities such as the aerial and maritime encroachment of Taiwan’s territory. The goal is to erode the concept of sovereignty and security. The United States is experiencing “gray zone” operations on our own southern border. In Taiwan, these include China’s overflight of Taiwan’s airspace by military aircraft. These events are increasing in both number and intensity as they grow close to the island itself. Simultaneously, China’s PLAN (People’s Liberation Army Navy), through its coast guard “law enforcement” operations are challenging Taipei’s outer islands. Dotson points out that the “paramount objective in such operations is the intended psychological effect on Taiwan’s population.” Another related area according to the GTI report is increasing economic coercion. China is attempting to deny Taiwan market access, ban its imports, and limit politically-oriented trade and investment opportunities. The intent is to “punish groups within Taiwan for developments to which Beijing objects, to isolate Taiwan internationally, and to pressure other countries and international companies to conform to Beijing’s preferred policies on Taiwan,” says Dotson. To date, Taiwan has suffered from attempts to ban Taiwan’s export of agricultural products. Beijing has also punished countries who willingly import from Taiwan and have close relations with Taipei. Perhaps one of the most misunderstood areas of China’s political warfare campaign against Taiwan revolves around its “united front work.” This embraces a range of measures that Dotson says include both financial and psychological cooption and include the use of front organizations and political subversion. In Taiwan, China is coopting business and political elites, funding and manipulating local organizations (temple societies) and offering support to fringe political parties that can be used to destabilize Taiwan and spread the CCP’s propaganda. Western militaries analyze the likelihood of kinetic warfare but spend less time on the impacts of political warfare. The free world cannot overlook what is happening in Taiwan and needs to recognize that Chinese political warfare extends across the globe. Beijing may not need to physically capture the island by force if it wins using a clandestine political warfare model of conflict. Then the question becomes, “Who is next?” Daria Novak served in the U.S. State Dept. Illustration: Pixabay