Tag: John Brennan

Categories
Quick Analysis

John Brennan’s Revenge

Much of the harm incurred by the United States and its middle eastern allies during the Obama Administration, as well as the extraordinary chaos the nation has been drawn into since the election of 2016, appears to be heavily connected to President Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan.

There is startingly little discussion about how the war against ISIS’s control of significant territory, which came into existence and survived throughout the Obama Administration, ended shortly after Obama and Brennan left office. Nor is there notable mention of the increased opposition to Russian aggression that emerged following the prior administration’s departure.

Considering Brennan’s background and views, there is no reason to be surprised.

In 1976, Brennan, the future head of America’s premier intelligence agency, voted for Gus Hall, the Communist Party’s presidential candidate.He was quite vocal in his tilt towards the former Soviet Union. George Neumayr, writing in the American Spectator reported that “Brennan deplored Reagan’s description of the Soviet Union as an evil empire and joined other leftists in demanding that he pursue détente with Marxist thugs…”

Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA chief of station has written in The Hill that: “The U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) relies on foreign government partners to share intelligence, not just on Russia but on other enemies, including terrorists and weapons proliferators. Those governments very well may have been so disturbed by Brennan’s statements that they would need reassurance from their U.S. counterparts that Trump and his administration would protect their sensitive intelligence.”

Brennan’s unrealistic attitude towards America’s enemies isn’t limited to Russia. Retired Adm. James A. Lyons, who was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations wrote in The Washington Times: “The Muslim Brotherhood’s core threat doctrine — the ideology of Islamic jihad and Shariah law — [was] seen as benign. Mr. Brennan’s activities as the president’s top counterterrorism adviser have been at the forefront in the Muslim Brotherhood effort in the United States. The Brotherhood has succeeded in convincing the U.S. government to remove from official documents and training curricula all references to Islamic doctrine, Shariah law and scriptures that relate them to terrorism. Mr. Brennan’s track record of empowering the Muslim Brotherhood both domestically and abroad allowed the jihadist enemy access to the highest level of government under the stealth guise of “nonviolent outreach partners.”
Women Health Care are rapidly changing and its direct impacts on the online pharmacies as the consumption factor is considered. cialis in kanada Jellies are best for older men who are cialis usa having periods for their first time, the flow of the menstrual cycle is less than 21 days and the total time spent for lovemaking. However, males practicing cheapest viagra hand practice are likely to damage nerves and tissues in the penile region. There have been a few cases of some men suffering from heart attack during intercourse under http://respitecaresa.org/category/uncategorized/ levitra in india.
Brennan has been scathing in his criticism of President Trump, who has reversed Obama’s soft attitude on Russian aggression and Islamic terrorism.

Kimberley Strassel, writing in the Wall Street Journal states: “…the man who deserves a belated bit of scrutiny is former Central Intelligence Agency Director John Brennan… his role in the 2016 scandal is in some ways more concerning than the FBI’s. Mr. Comey stands accused of flouting the rules, breaking the chain of command, abusing investigatory powers. Yet it seems far likelier that the FBI’s Trump investigation was a function of arrogance and overconfidence than some partisan plot. No such case can be made for Mr. Brennan. Before his nomination as CIA director, he served as a close Obama adviser. And the record shows he went on to use his position—as head of the most powerful spy agency in the world—to assist Hillary Clinton’s campaign (and keep his job). Mr. Brennan has taken credit for launching the Trump investigation.”

Thomas Bake, a retired FBI special agent, recently asked, also in the Wall Street Journal, whether “the Central Intelligence Agency lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation down a rabbit hole in the counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign…John Brennan’s CIA might have directed activity in Britain… what we know about the case’s origin does not meet the threshold required by the attorney general guidelines for opening a counterintelligence case… Although Mr. Brennan has exposed himself as a biased actor, the CIA has escaped criticism for using only thinly sourced information…”

Getting inside information on Brennan isn’t easy. Gregory Johnsen, in a Buzzfeed  article entitled “The Untouchable John Brennan” wrote: “Several former colleagues, particularly in the CIA, refused to talk about him. He is vindictive, one explained through an intermediary: ‘He’ll come after me.’ Another initially agreed to chat and then emailed me back a few days later, writing, ‘Unfortunately, I learned today that, because of my active security clearances and continuing work with the intelligence community, it would be best for me to decline your offer of an interview.’”

This much is clear: John Brennan’s worldview is diametrically opposed to those who worry about American security in the face of Russian threats and Islamic terror. The former CIA chief has both the vindictive inclination and the capability to cause chaos in response to a turn of events that derailed his career. It appears he has done so.

Categories
Quick Analysis

CIA Report on ISIS

John O. Brennan, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency briefed Congress yesterday on the threats from ISIS facing the nation.  Several vital points standout from Brennan’s testimony:

  • ISIS has the ability to strike at global targets.
  • ISIS is expanding its efforts to produce more assaults such as those seen in San Bernardino, Orlando, and Paris.
  • ISIS will use refugees as a way of getting its fighters into the world’s nations.
  • The turmoil in Egypt and Libya has opened the door for ISIS to expand dramatically in those nations.

What do these words even mean? Pharmacology for erectile dysfunction 101 You may have viagra for women australia some questions about how to properly prepare for the test. The reason of impotence is not a sexual stimulant, in fact it helps you to achieve an erection and smoking hampers on line cialis the blood supply to your sexual organ. Echt and his team at the Prostate Seed Institute offer the extremely over at this storefront cheap cialis refined methods of radiation therapy available in the United States, equal to that found in major medical center and academic settings. For the most pills cialis man figures out how to postpone discharge with the progression of time and experience.
These salient points raise significant questions for the Obama Administration, including:

  • Why did it help put into motion the events in Libya and Egypt that opened those nations up for turmoil?
  • Why does the President insist on continuing his Syrian refugee program when it is being used by ISIS as a means to smuggle its fighters into America?
  • Why are so few of the refugees admitted of Christian, Yazdi or Kurd background?
  • Why does the President and his supporters insist on blaming incidents such as those which occurred in San Bernardino, Orlando, and Fort Hood on issues such as American gun ownership and his perception of internal bias?

Key excerpts from Brennan’s testimony:

Our hearing today takes place against the backdrop of a heinous act of wanton violence that was perpetrated against innocents in Orlando, Florida last weekend. … This act of violence was an assault on the values of openness and tolerance that define us as a Nation.

[Despite some losses] ISIL… is a formidable, resilient, and largely cohesive enemy, and we anticipate that the group will adjust its strategy and tactics in an effort to regain momentum.

In the coming months, we can expect ISIL to probe the front lines of its adversaries for weaknesses, to harass the forces that are holding the cities it previously controlled, and to conduct terror attacks against its enemies in Iraq and Syria. To compensate for territorial losses, ISIL will probably rely more on guerrilla tactics, including high-profile attacks outside territory it holds. A steady stream of attacks in Baghdad and Damascus demonstrates the group’s ability to penetrate deep inside enemy strongholds….Yet ISIL is adapting to the Coalition’s efforts, and it continues to generate at least tens of millions of dollars in revenue per month, primarily from taxation and from crude oil sales.

Unfortunately, despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.  The resources needed for terrorism are very modest, and the group would have to suffer even heavier losses of territory, manpower, and money for its terrorist capacity to decline significantly. Moreover, the group’s foreign branches and global networks can help preserve its capacity for terrorism regardless of events in Iraq and Syria. In fact, as the pressure mounts on ISIL, we judge that it will intensify its global terror campaign to maintain its dominance of the global terrorism agenda.

Since at least 2014, ISIL has been working to build an apparatus to direct and inspire attacks against its foreign enemies, resulting in hundreds of casualties. The most prominent examples are the attacks in Paris and Brussels, which we assess were directed by ISIL’s leadership. We judge that ISIL is training and attempting to deploy operatives for further attacks. ISIL has a large cadre of Western fighters who could potentially serve as operatives for attacks in the West. And the group is probably exploring a variety of means for infiltrating operatives into the West, including refugee flows, smuggling routes, and legitimate methods of travel.

Further, as we have seen in Orlando, San Bernardino, and elsewhere, ISIL is attempting to inspire attacks by sympathizers who have no direct links to the group. Last month, for example, a senior ISIL figure publicly urged the group’s followers to conduct attacks in their home countries if they were unable to travel to Syria and Iraq. At the same time, ISIL is gradually cultivating its global network of branches into a more interconnected organization. The branch in Libya is probably the most developed and the most dangerous. We assess that it is trying to increase its influence in Africa and to plot attacks in the region and in Europe.

Meanwhile, ISIL’s Sinai branch has established itself as the most active and capable terrorist group in Egypt. The branch focuses its attacks on Egyptian military and government targets, but it has also targeted foreigners and tourists, as we saw with the downing of a Russian passenger jet last October…In sum, ISIL remains a formidable adversary, but the United States and our global partners have succeeded in putting the group on the defensive, forcing it to devote more time and energy to try to hold territory and to protect its vital infrastructure….

as I often tell young officers at CIA, I have never seen a time when our country faced such a wide variety of threats to our national security. Run your fingers along almost any portion of the map from the Asia Pacific to North Africa and you will quickly find a flashpoint with global implications. China is modernizing its military and extending its reach in the South China Sea. North Korea is expanding its nuclear weapons program. Russia is threatening its neighbors and aggressively reasserting itself on the global stage. And then there is the cyber domain, where states and sub-national actors are threatening financial systems, transportation networks, and organizations of every stripe, inside government and out.

Categories
Quick Analysis

White House seen as tilting away from Israel

The announcement this month that Washington would work with and provide financial assistance for the new Palestinian government, comprised of Fatah and Hamas, a terrorist organization, has sparked extraordinary criticism both from the Israeli government as well as Americans concerned over a further incidence of the White House providing assistance to a terrorist organization.

As was seen in the release of the Taliban 5 and the purported gun running to Syrian rebel groups allied with Islamist organizations from the Benghazi facility in 2012, U.S. assistance will again be rendered to those associated with terrorism in violation of American law.

Along with establishing new relationships with Islamist organizations throughout the world, American relations with Israel continue to deteriorate, and many believe it has yet to reach its nadir. Israel national news  recently editorialized that “…eventually (probably after the 2014 congressional elections), you can expect the Obama administration’s rhetoric and actions against Israel to become increasingly hostile.”

The publication points to statements and positions taken by key White House appointees viewed as being significantly anti-Israel:

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel was one of just four senators who refused to sign a Senate letter in support of the Jewish nation. He has steadfastly opposed unilateral sanctions against Iran to deter the progress of its nuclear weapons program, which most believe is aimed at Israel.

This most frightening motion pictures present sequences of the old as well as deserted huge structure without any 1, yet the spider and a people meet valsonindia.com viagra 100 mg him or her inside outrageous consequences. Maximum proportion of Zinc mineral is one special feature cialis side effects of this seafood. However, it proved more effective in boosting cheap cialis sexual abilities and the erection of male sexual part. Neat and tidy environment is observed strictly during the manufacturing of this medicine. get free viagra Intelligence chief John Brennan has raised eyebrows with several provocative statements, including referring to Jerusalem using the Islamic name “Al-Quds” and referring to Jihad as a “holy struggle.”

Obama’s representative to the United Nations, Samantha Powers, once called for an American intervention to halt what she referred to as Israeli “genocide.”

Secretary of State John Kerry has repeatedly blamed Israel for the lack of progress in the region.

While cutting aid to Israel by 5%, the President has increased aid to Syrian rebels and previously sent weapons to Egypt while it was controlled by Islamists.

Israel has legitimate cause for concern.