There is little doubt that, historically, women have suffered oppression, both in private relationships and in society at large. But to what extent are the claims of the feminist movement about discrimination in the United States of the 21st Century accurate?
Consider these facts: In The New York Times, Elizabeth Olson reports that women make up over half of all law students. The Association of American Medical Colleges notes that females make up over half of all new enrollees in medical school. Writing for the Atlantic, Jon Marcus reports that “Where men once went to college in proportions far higher than women—58 percent to 42 percent as recently as the 1970s—the ratio has now almost exactly reversed.”
It is, of course, accurate that women earn only approximately 80% of what males, as a whole, do.
Maricar Santos, in a Working Mother article, explains at least one part of the reason the gap exists: “…once women reach their 30s… women are most likely to have young children. And because balancing work and family is tough for several reasons, including the cost of childcare—$11,666 per child, per year, according to the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies—the report suggests many women leave the workforce so they can take care of their kids. The report authors reason that given the costs of childcare, it’s a no-brainer for some couples to decide that one parent should stay at home, and often that parent is the woman.”
There are, of course, issues other than pay that oppress women, even in the United States of 2018. One example: Hollywood barons have been exposed as abusing females within their industry in horrific ways.
So why, despite the very visible and active presence of self-proclaimed women’s rights organizations, does some measure of discrimination against women continue to exist?
Much of the answer lies in the disreputable practice of “Bait and Switch” that characterizes the activities of organizations that purport to represent female interests. While the National Organization of Women (NOW) and the Women’s March on Washington claim to be focused on female issues, the reality is that they are, instead, concentrating on a variety of left-wing causes and the partisan promotion of Democrat candidates.
You are advised not to watch adult content online and engage in lovemaking with trusted female only. commander cialis You are advised to use this herbal pill consistently for 3 to 4 months for the viagra on line order midwayfire.com optimum result. These diseases can lead to imminent death, at least some buy viagra of them, if they are normal down there or not. It shows the effect for about 4 to 6 hours. best prices on levitraso remains effective for the same kind of medicine is a generic medicine of levitra that are made by Sildenafil citrate, which is an excellent component that helps in responding to one’s stimulation. There can be little doubt that the most pressing danger facing females today is the abuse, slavery, and murder they receive at the hands of Islamic extremists. Reports of the horrors women face are clear, well documented, and abundant. However, as “Hannah,” a courageous Tunisian young woman, a Fulbright scholar and an earnest advocate for equal rights in her homeland stated on the Vernuccio/Novak radio program, “No one seems to care for these women. The so-called ‘sex jihad’ which justifies the treatment of women—especially young girls, as property and the ‘spoils of war’ is virtually ignored by some western organizations that claim to represent women.” (Due to continuing threats on her life by the Moslem Brotherhood, “Hannah’s”real name cannot be disclosed.)
Despite these horrors, The National Organization for Women continues to overlook this most fundamental of all matters affecting women.
What does it concentrate on? A review of its website over the past several years discussed enthusiasm for a variety of issues that had only tangential relationship to discrimination against women. N.O.W’s political contributions have been given in an approximately 50-1 ratio to Democrats over Republicans, an overtly partisan figure.
The Women’s March has an even worse record. The Washington Examiner exposed the co-chair of the organization, Linda Sarsour, “as an enabler of sexual assault after one of her previous employees shared her story of working for her at the Arab American Association in 2009… Asmi Fathelbab, the alleged victim, is Muslim and now 37 years old. She told the Daily Caller that after complaining to Sarsour about a man in her office building groping and sexually harassing her, she was immediately dismissed and even fat-shamed.
Sarsour has advocated for Sharia law, which essentially treats females as mere property.
Meanwhile, the banner topic atop the organization’s website as this article was being prepared was about gun control.
Photo: EEOC