Categories
Quick Analysis

Repealing Citizenship 2

Advocates of open borders ignore that dramatic cost. Kristan Tate, writing in The Hill, h reports: “Taxpayers are indeed on the hook for over $45 billion in state and federal education spending annually, not to mention the added burden of increased social welfare dollars. Much of the almost $30 billion in medical and assistance funding is sparked by the fact that noncitizen families in the United States are twice as likely to receive welfare payments than native born families. A full half of noncitizens receive Medicaid, compared to 23 percent of native born citizens, while almost half of noncitizens are on food stamps. Of particular concern is that noncitizens who stay in the long term are more likely to use these programs than those who just arrived. Half of new noncitizens receive welfare, but the figure jumps to a stunning 70 percent among those who have been in the United States for more than 10 years.”

The National Conference of State Legislatures notes that “Twelve states and the District of Columbia enacted laws to allow unauthorized immigrants to obtain a driver’s licenses. These states—California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Vermont and Washington… In 2019, legislators in several states introduced legislation to provide driver’s licenses to undocumented residents including FloridaKansasMassachusettsMinnesotaNew JerseyNew YorkNorth Carolina, and Texas. Legislation in New York passed in the Assembly and is going through the New York Senate as of June 2019.”

There is more to the provision of driver’s licenses than just motoring.  That document is an essential to identification, particularly for registration to vote. While some jurisdictions claim that they will modify the licenses to prevent illegals from registering, in practice that assurance has not been consistently kept.

However, some men will not see any effects australia viagra buy from taking Propecia so you need to be taken with proper diet for better results. Aside from that, you may also want to engage in some cognitive online levitra india therapy. This has led to order generic cialis a hairloss and hair replacement systems. They do not bother whether they levitra for sale online are going to fight to make them physically powerful.

As outlined by the Center for Immigration Studies “The problem, quite simply, is that motor vehicle examiners aren’t experts at knowing who is, or is not, allowed to vote and so, not surprisingly, err on the side of inclusion. It’s understandable, really, but the result is that they inevitably assist license applicants to register when they are ineligible because they’ve been disenfranchised because of felony convictions, because they are aliens, or because they are subject to one of the sundry legal bases that exist for not permitting a person to vote. The parameters of these unintended consequences have multiplied, at least where aliens are concerned, in those states that have chosen to grant driver’s licenses to illegal aliens. California is one of those states. News outlets are now telling us that, after repeated denials, the California Department of Motor Vehicles has admitted that, yes, it did in fact screw up by assisting at least 1,500 ineligible driver’s license recipients to register to vote, including aliens.”

The overall concept of not discerning between citizens and noncitizens, and not drawing a line between those privileges and benefits granted to them, as well as not having an enforceable border, essentially calls into question the very sovereignty of the United States. 

Despite the extraordinary problems created by illegal immigration, advocates of open borders attempt to equate it with legal immigration and the benefits that has.  

It’s a false comparison.  Over the past centuries, legal immigrants came to the U.S. with the expectation that they would be expected to contribute as much as they received.  Increasingly, however, significant benefits have been made available to new arrivals. This has attracted many who come for the purpose of receiving more than they give. 

Poor and mismanaged nations have gained tremendously from this.

While the current wave of massive immigration is from Central America, but previously Mexico was the  chief source. Patrick Buchanan described its strategy in 2006:

“By pushing her poor into the United States, Mexico relieves herself of the burden of providing for their welfare and receives a bonanza of billions in the remittances Mexican workers in the States and back to support their destitute families.  The figure has been estimated at at $16 billion a year, the second highest source, after oil, of Mexico’s hard currency.  America has become the safety valve for an exploding  population of 106 million that Mexico is unable to provide for.”

Illustration: Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Categories
Quick Analysis

America’s Massive Foreign Born Population

The extraordinary growth in the proportion of the U.S. population not native born is producing unprecedented political pressure.

Census Bureau data recently released indicates that 13.7% of the U.S. population was foreign born in 2017, up from 13.5% in 2016. That is the highest percentage in over a century, since 1910.  Unlike that earlier wave of immigrants, there are expectations of many coming to the U.S. of expensive government assistance.

The Census Bureau also reports that since 1970, the foreign-born population has continued to increase in size and as a percent of the total population. They are also reproducing at an extraordinary rate. About 1 in 4 children under 18 in families have at least one foreign-born parent.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies, (CIS)  “In 2014, one in five births (791,000) in the United States was to an immigrant mother (legal or illegal). CIS best estimate is that legal immigrants accounted for 12.4 percent (494,000) of all births, and illegal immigrants accounted for 7.5 percent (297,000). The 297,000 births per year to illegal immigrants is larger than the total number of births in any state other than California and Texas. It is also larger than the total number of births in 16 states plus the District of Columbia, combined. The estimated 28,000 births to illegal immigrants in just the Los Angeles metro area is larger than the total number of births in 14 states and the District of Columbia. Among the nation’s largest metro areas, immigrants (legal and illegal) account for half or nearly half of births in Miami, San Francisco, and San Jose, Calif. They are two out of five births in Los Angeles and the New York City area. They are also one out of three births in the metro areas of Washington, D.C., Houston, San Diego, Seattle, Boston, and Las Vegas. Illegal immigrants account for more than one in seven births in the Los Angeles, Las Vegas, San Jose, Dallas, and Houston metro areas. Typically between two-thirds and three-fourths of these births are likely paid for by taxpayers.”

Breitbart notes that “There are nearly 300,000 children of illegal aliens born in the United States every year, exceeding the total number of U.S. births in 48 states.”

cipla tadalafil 20mg http://cute-n-tiny.com/tag/baby-monkey/ The significant result of beet can be simply neglected. viagra 100mg mastercard That is the reason; the cost of the ads is obviously is coming form the hands of patient party. The nitric oxide deposition in viagra cheapest the male reproductive organ and so, cause penile erection during sexual stimulation. This order viagra prescription only takes around 20 minutes to one hour. Political pressures are preventing a dispassionate and unbiased discussion of the implications of this issue. The New York Times found a particular Ideological inclination among the new arrivals.  “The data… suggests a political pattern among states with large percentages of foreign-born residents. Of the 15 states with the highest concentration of immigrants, all but three — Florida, Texas and Arizona — voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential race.”

The Gallup organization explains that, consequentially, the two parties differ sharply on their views of immigration. “Dissatisfaction with immigration among Democrats and independents who lean Democratic fell from 62% to 49% between 2012 and 2013 after President Barack Obama issued an executive order, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which granted legal protections for immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally at a young age with their parents. Democrats’ dissatisfaction with the level of immigration dropped again in Obama’s final days in office in 2017 but rose sharply this year, climbing 16 percentage points to 50% in a Jan. 2-7 poll. Dissatisfaction among Democrats is roughly back to where it was between 2013 and 2016 but remains lower than it was under the George W. Bush administration.”

Meanwhile, dissatisfaction with immigration among Republicans and Republican leaners rose sharply from 72% in 2014 to its peak of 86% in 2016. The Trump campaign rode this wave of Republican frustration with immigration, making building a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico to curb illegal immigration a central campaign tenet and a rallying cry during campaign events.”

Even counting noncitizens has become a political football. Migration Policy.org reports that “As the timeline for launching the 2020 decennial census approaches fast, legal and political controversy surrounds the Trump administration’s inclusion of a question on citizenship status. The question, which was dropped after the 1950 census, was reinstated on March 26, 2018 by U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, whose department oversees the U.S. Census Bureau. Six lawsuits were quickly brought challenging reinstatement of the question.”

Photo: U.S. Census Bureau