Categories
Quick Analysis

Stealing the Law

A disturbing agenda can be discerned in this month’s Texas primary results for district attorneys.

Jolie McCullough, writing in The Texas Tribune reported that “Six of 12 sitting Texas district attorneys who faced 2018 primary challengers lost their races. Whether that’s normal turnover or part of a larger focus on criminal justice reform, several experts say it’s no longer safe to be an incumbent prosecutor.”

Those who lost tended to be more conservative. McCoullagh notes: “Most notably, liberal billionaire George Soros has set his sights on transforming the American criminal justice system one local prosecutor at a time. His money largely funds candidates running on reformist issues.”

Political action committees (pacs) funded by Soros spent millions in what normally would be considered lackluster district attorney races. A Soros pac  gave almost $1 million to an obscure DA primary  candidate, the leftist Joe Gonzalez.  As a result, he defeated his opponent,  Nico LaHood,  by almost 20%, who, McCoullogh notes, “was targeted because of his outspoken Christian faith and opposition to illegal immigration. Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, both Republicans, also criticized Soros’ involvement in the race last week…’ He’s trying to change the fabric of this country,’ LaHood said. “If there’s a DA that does not have the agenda that he does, then he wants to get them out.’”

The election results of 2010–2016 were devastating to the Progressive Left.  Eventually, The White House, the Senate, the House of Representatives, most Governorships, and most state legislatures were won by Republicans. Left wing activists have decided to do an end-run around that by using state attorneys general, local district attorneys, and the highly partisan Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to

It is a plastic tube, which fits around the cialis de prescription penile region. A blend of these herbs cialis generic 10mg is processed in the brain. On inspection of the results, comparing the 2 groups: One group with a high sat-fat / high cholesterol diet and The other group with a low sat-fat and low cholesterol diet reduced the risk of buy cialis line heart disease. The FDA approved this drug after analyzing its clinical efficacy and safety. generic cheap cialis http://www.learningworksca.org/about/sponsors/ As the New York Analysis of Policy and Government has previously noted, the concept of elected and appointed officials exercising their office with complete impartiality is a basic tenet of fair government.  While the absolute perfection of this ideal is rarely achieved, the past eight years have seen an unprecedented abandonment of the goal. Agencies such as the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service were extensively misused by the Obama Administration for partisan purposes. With the regime change following the 2016 elections, the center of gravity for using public office to benefit party or ideological interests shifted to some state attorneys general and district attorney races.

Martin Morse Wooster, writing for the Capital Research Center  notes that “Aiming to reshape society, state attorneys general wield ever-expanding powers over private corporations, foundations and nonprofits. Their activities–too often motivated by ideology and politics–frequently undermine the very institutions they are supposed to protect.”

Alan Greenblatt writing in Governing magazine reports that “’Democratic attorneys general are going to be very active, suing a number of regulatory agencies,’ says Paul Nolette, a political scientist at Marquette University. ‘They will be prepared to use a kitchen sink strategy against everything coming out of the EPA…’ The number of Democratic attorneys general has ticked down with recent Republican successes at the state level. But there are still 21 of them — more than the number of Democratic governors or legislatures…And it isn’t really the number of Democratic AGs that matters. A single activist attorney general such as Eric Schneiderman of New York or Xavier Becerra of California can command a small army of lawyers.…But with prominent Democratic AGs threatening to challenge Trump … it’s clear that legal briefs will be among the most powerful weapons progressives will be able to deploy against him.”

As was the case in Texas’ Gonzalez race, the issue that has gathered the most headlines in the battle between partisan attorneys generals and candidates for local district attorneys and their opponents is immigration. California’s Xavier Becerra plays a significant role in California’s attempt to ignore federal law regarding illegal aliens.