There is an increasing trend, supported largely in progressive-run cities, counties and states, to not cooperate with federal officials in dealing with the crime wave due to felonies committed by illegal immigrants.
The Heritage Foundation reports that:
“Non-citizens constitute only about 7 percent of the U.S. population. Yet the latest data from the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice Statistics reveals that non-citizens accounted for nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of all federal arrests in 2018…Non-citizens accounted for 24 percent of all federal drug arrests, 25 percent of all federal property arrests, and 28 percent of all federal fraud arrests. In 2018, a quarter of all federal drug arrests took place in the five judicial districts along the U.S.-Mexico border. This reflects the ongoing activities of Mexican drug cartels. Last year, Mexican citizens accounted for 40 percent of all federal arrests. In fact, more Mexicans than U.S. citizens were arrested on charges of committing federal crimes in 2018. Migrants from Central American countries are also accounting for a larger share of federal arrests, going from a negligible 1 percent of such arrests in 1998 to 20 percent today.”
Sanctuary policies produce two substantial results for the legal inhabitants of a jurisdiction. First, they increase costs, and second, they protect portions of the criminal population.
Despite the fiction disseminated by sanctuary policy supporters, there is no mass roundup of illegals that require the countermeasure of sanctuary protection. Sanctuary policies primarily serve to protect criminals apprehended by local law enforcement agencies from being handed over to the federal government for deportation proceedings.
The Center for Immigration Studies notes that:
“Numerous cities, counties, and states have laws, ordinances, regulations, resolutions, policies, or other practices that obstruct immigration enforcement and shield criminals from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) — either by refusing to or prohibiting agencies from complying with ICE detainers, imposing unreasonable conditions on detainer acceptance, denying ICE access to interview incarcerated aliens, or otherwise impeding communication or information exchanges between their personnel and federal immigration officers. A detainer is the primary tool used by ICE to gain custody of criminal aliens for deportation. It is a notice to another law enforcement agency that ICE intends to assume custody of an alien and includes information on the alien’s previous criminal history, immigration violations, and potential threat to public safety or security.”
According to ICE , the agency relies on the exchange of This means that taking Kamagra tablets can bring lost sexual pleasure back levitra samples on the way. Also, It can be interact with certain other medications (such as alpha blockers), and it does not provide any negative side effects. buying viagra in canada What should I avoid? Avoid getting cheap levitra 20mg up too fast from a lying or sitting position. Rather than other ED cipla india viagra medications, kamagra are relatively lower in prices and higher in the quality. information with its law enforcement agency (LEA,) and the use of detainers. In many cases, these individuals pose a demonstrable threat to communities. By lodging detainers against those individuals, ICE seeks to ensure that removable aliens are turned over to its custody at the conclusion of their criminal detention rather than being released into the community where many abscond or re-offend. For example, it’s known that one group of criminal aliens that ICE has researched has a recidivism rate of 46%.
An ICE detainer requests that the receiving law enforcement agency notify ICE as early as practicable before the alien is released from custody; and that maintains custody of the alien for a period not to exceed 48 hours beyond the time he/she would have otherwise been released to allow ICE to assume custody.
In some cases, state or local laws, ordinances, or policies restrict or prohibit cooperation with ICE. In other cases, jurisdictions willfully decline ICE detainers, and refuse to even provide timely notification to ICE of an alien’s release. The results are the same: criminal aliens are released into the community where they may potentially re-offend and harm members of the public.
The individuals ICE seeks detainers on are dangerous, criminal aliens illegally present in the United States that local jurisdictions have deemed important enough to arrest and prosecute for their crimes. Yet, these same jurisdictions are preventing ICE’s lawful, congressionally-mandated enforcement efforts to enforce the laws its officers and agents are sworn to uphold, against the exact same criminals. Instead of enforcement actions taking place within the safe confines of local jails, ICE is forced to increase its presence in corresponding communities as a result of these sanctuary policies.
Indeed, a review of the New York City and Westchester County ICE coverage area is quite revealing.
Last fiscal year, ICE lodged 7,526 detainers from its New York Field Office. The criminals against whom these detainers were lodged accounted for 17,873 criminal convictions, and another 6,500 criminal charges. The crimes these individuals had been convicted or charged with included 200 homicides, over 500 robberies, over 1,000 sexual offenses, over 1,000 weapons offenses, over 3,500 assaults, and over 1,500 DUIs.
The statistics clearly indicate that the presence of illegal alien criminals is a clear and substantial danger to U.S. communities. The perpetrators of these crimes are not worthy individuals seeking to be part of the American dream. The supporters of sanctuary city policies provide no logical, moral, or valid reasons for their actions which encourage, support and maintain the presence of these predators in American communities.
Photo: ICE