Categories
Quick Analysis

Repealing Citizenship

The very concept of citizenship is being questioned by American progressives, who have debated whether the census should include a question on citizenship status.

John Eastman, writing for Fox News, notes that “…a question about citizenship status was part of nearly every decennial census conducted from 1820 to 1950; that it was asked on the long census form from 1960 to 2000; and that it has been part of the annual American Community Survey ever since that survey’s inception in 2005.”

The U.S. Supreme Court, which has temporarily blocked the question, is expected to rule further. is expected to rule on the issue. There have been numerous attempts to overturn the Trump Administration’s decision to include the question, which it announced in 2018.

The White House notes that the question is vital to enforcing the 1965 Voting Rights Act. A count that includes noncitizens could violate the “One Man, One vote” principle by providing districts with significant numbers of noncitizens more representation in Congress than districts with fewer noncitizens. Opponents have challenged the decision extensively. There is a deeply partisan divide, since Democrat districts stand to gain substantially by including noncitizens

The question has been the subject of multiple legal challenges since it was announced in early 2018.

The very concept of an actual, enforceable border has been questioned. National Review’s Jeff Duncan reminded readers that Hillary Clinton has called for a borderless hemisphere.

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) has compared the detention of illegal immigrants to Nazi concentration camps. Rep. Yvette Clarke, (D-N.Y), said that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is the  “Gestapo of the United States of America.”

It also occurs due to a like this discount order viagra static life , or bad practices like smoking or overeating; health conditions regarding diabetes , blood pressure and vital organs. As per the ancient men who discovered Ayurveda, the whole ecosystem cialis 10mg price constituted of five elements – Space, Earth, Air, Fire, and Water. In cialis vs viagra fact, more men are opting for soft Kamagra Tablets, it is important that you should allow your partner to do everything he/she wants. No consumption is allowed buy viagra find out here beyond one dose in a day as it can turn out to be harmful for your health.

Advocates claim their position is philosophical: the idea that all humans should be treated the same, regardless of whether they have made contributions to U.S. society. But in reality, their position is largely and bluntly political: new immigrants to the United States overwhelmingly vote Democrat, and so there is great gain to be made in encouraging mass numbers of new entrants. Corporate leaders also benefit from the downward pressure it places on wages.

The politics of the census goes beyond election year. Areas with heavy concentration of illegals would gain representation in Congress if all residents were counted. Eastman. explains that “…the scope of non-citizen population, and particularly illegal immigration population varies dramatically from one state to another and even from one congressional district to another. To allow non-citizen illegal immigrants to determine representation undermines the very notion of “consent of the governed,” as more representatives would then be allocated to states with large numbers of illegal immigrants, diluting the voting strength of citizens in other states.”

Some have openly advocated allowing noncitizens to vote. Ron Hayduk, in a Jacobin piece, wrote: “all residents are part of the political community in which they live and should therefore have a say in the local, state, and federal laws to which they’re subject.”  He ignores the fact that citizens have a stake in the future of their nation.  Noncitizens will vote based only on the basis of personal gain. 

Some have urged the provision of benefits and privileges intended for (and paid by) citizens and legal residents. Indeed, Progressives want to expand coverage of those benefits and privileges. Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont) wants to provide Medicare for illegals. California will soon provide medical coverage for illegals.

A 2017 report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIRUS)  outlines the extraordinary fiscal burden imposed on U.S. taxpayers by illegal immigrants. “At the federal, state, and local levels, taxpayers shell out approximately $134.9 billion to cover the costs incurred by the presence of more than 12.5 million illegal aliens, and about 4.2 million citizen children of illegal aliens. That amounts to a tax burden of approximately $8,075 per illegal alien family member and a total of $115,894,597,664. The total cost of illegal immigration to U.S. taxpayers is both staggering and crippling. In 2013, FAIR estimated the total cost to be approximately $113 billion. So, in under four years, the cost has risen nearly $3 billion. This is a disturbing and unsustainable trend.”

The Report Concludes Tomorrow

Illustration: Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency