Political Correctness and the Death of Free Speech

The end result of “political correctness” and the effort to attack what some perceive to be “offensive” or “hate” speech is being played out in the United Kingdom. One man, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is paying the price, in the form of a 13 month prison sentence.

Realization of the devastating harm that has been caused by measures prohibiting open and honest discussion of criminal offensives committed by groups that attack free speech can best be understood by reviewing what first came to light in Rotherham, a city of approximately 250,000 in South Yorkshire, England.

From 1997 through 2013 and beyond, over 1,400 young. white, working class girls were systematically and sexually preyed upon by gangs of older men in the northern English town of Rotherham. The girls involved were often troubled, living in group or foster homes, often living chaotic and dysfunctional lives which made them easy marks for their predators.

Despite numerous individual reports and three official reports in 2002, 2003 and 2006, nothing significant was done by local elected and appointed officials or the local Police. This was mainly due to the fact that the gangs of men responsible were Muslims of Pakistani, Bangladeshi or Afghani origin. Local officials, the majority of whom are from the Labour Party, repeatedly tried to avoid either racial confrontations or being labeled racist or anti-Muslim.

In 2013 The Times of London did a series of investigatory articles about Rotherham which exposed the scandal. This prompted the Rotherham Council to commission an independent report by Professor Alexis Jay who was formerly the Chief Inspector of Social Work in Scotland. That report which was issued in August of 2014 has exploded like a bomb and has exposed the “Politically Correct” and “Multicultural” bias that allowed serial crimes of a horrific nature to be inflicted on young girls.

In the Executive Summary to her report, Professor Jay wrote this about the girls; ” They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten and intimidated. There were examples of children being doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally vicious rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone. Girls as young as 11 were raped by large number of male perpetrators. This abuse is not confined to the past but continues to this day.”

Unfortunately, these web sites really have no way to buying cialis block this email theft, and it is becoming more rampant every day. You must speak to your doctor about other drugs you take, like cialis samples click here for more, and codeine. It is dangerous to take ED drugs outside of a clinic – patients take a drug called http://djpaulkom.tv/video-watch-dj-paul-and-plaxico-burress-swap-lives-on-abcs-celebrity-wife-swap/ buy cialis without prescription misoprostol, which causes the reduction in the blood supply to the male reproductive system. It offers effective cure for fatigue and discover that link levitra uk weakness. The 2002 report was quashed and the author was warned that ” she must never refer to Asian men again”. The two subsequent reports in 2003 and 2006 were ignored. The 2006 report noted “that one of the difficulties that prevents this issue from being dealt with effectively is the ethnicity of the main perpetrators”. An MP from Rotherham stated that “he didn’t want to rock the multicultural community boat” when asked why he did nothing.

The Police told Julie Bindel, one of the few feminists who investigated Rotherham that they were “treading carefully” and didn’t want to provoke a “race riot”. No one from the Rotherham Council ever approached the leaders of the Muslim community and no one from the Muslim community ever exposed the scandal.

Home Secretary Theresa May that the monstrous crimes went on for so long because of “institutional Political Correctness”.

It should also be noted that recently the head of the UKs Independence Party, Nigel Farage cited “Multiculturalism” as a main reason British citizens went to fight for ISIS and behead innocent reporters and civilians. Farage stated “We’ve seen an increased radicalization within the United Kingdom, much of this I’m afraid to say is a self-inflicted wound. We’ve had four decades of state-sponsored multiculturalism. We’ve actually encouraged people not to come together and be British but to live separately, to live apart…”

The Report concludes Monday

Photo: Trafalgar Square (Visit London)

Quick Analysis

Part 3: AMERICA’S STRATEGIC POSTURE

We conclude our summary of the urgent recommendation of the Congressional Committee on the nation’s Strategic Posture NON-NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES The Commission recommends: The United States urgently deploy a more resilient space architecture and adopt a strategy that includes both offensive and defensive elements to ensure U.S. access to and operations in space. The United States and its Allies take steps to ensure they are at the cutting edge of emerging technologies – such as big data analytics, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) – to avoid strategic surprise and potentially enhance the U.S. strategic posture. The United States prioritize funding and accelerate long-range non-nuclear precision strike programs to meet the operational need and in greater quantities than currently planned. x America’s Strategic Posture The United States develop and field homeland IAMD that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China, and determine the capabilities needed to stay ahead of the North Korean threat.4 The Secretary of Defense direct research, development, test and evaluation into advanced IAMD capabilities leveraging all domains, including land, sea, air, and space. These activities should focus on sensor architectures, integrated command and control, interceptors, cruise and hypersonic missile defenses, and area or point defenses. The DOD should urgently pursue deployment of any capabilities that prove feasible. The Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments transfer operations and sustainment responsibility for missile defense to the appropriate Military Departments by 1 October 2024. This will allow the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to focus on research, development, prototyping and testing. ALLIES AND PARTNERS The Commission believes it is in the U.S. national interest to maintain, strengthen, and when appropriate, expand its network of alliances and partnerships. These relationships strengthen American security by deterring aggression regionally, before it can reach the U.S. homeland, while also enabling U.S. economic prosperity through access to international markets. Withdrawing from U.S. alliances and partnerships would directly benefit adversaries, invite aggression that the United States might later have to reverse, and ultimately decrease American, allied, and partner security and economic prosperity. Further, the Commission believes that our defense and the defense of the current international order is strengthened when Allies can directly contribute to the broader strategic posture, and the United States should seek to incorporate those contributions as much as possible. The Executive branch should recognize that any major change to U.S. strategic posture, policies, or capabilities will have great effect on Allies’ perceptions and their deterrence and assurance requirements. As a result, any changes should be predicated on meaningful consultations. RISK REDUCTION The Commission believes it is of paramount importance for the United States to work to reduce strategic risks. This involves activities and programs across the U.S. government, including in nonproliferation and arms control, as well as maintaining strong, viable, and resilient military forces. The Commission recommends that a strategy to address the two-nuclear-peer threat environment be a prerequisite for developing U.S. nuclear arms control limits for the 2027-2035 timeframe. The Commission recommends that once a strategy and its related force requirements are established, the U.S. government determine whether and how nuclear arms control limits continue to enhance U.S. security. The Commission recommends that the United States continue to explore nuclear arms control opportunities and conduct research into potential verification technologies in order to support or enable future negotiations in the U.S. national interest that seek to limit all nuclear weapon types, should the geopolitical environment change. Where formal nuclear arms control agreements are not possible, the Commission recommends pursuing nuclear risk reduction measures to increase predictability and reduce uncertainty and the chances for misperception and miscalculation. The 2009 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States reported that the United States was at “a moment of opportunity, . . .but also a moment of urgency” – because the security environment had improved and the threat of nuclear proliferation was the principal concern. Since 2009, the security environment has dramatically worsened and new existential threats have emerged. This Commission concludes that the United States now faces a highstakes challenge that requires urgent action. Nevertheless, the Commission has not seen the U.S. government demonstrate the urgency and creativity required to meet the challenge. Nothing other than synchronized steps taken by the Executive and Legislative Branches will craft the strategy and build the posture the nation requires. The challenges are unmistakable; the problems are urgent; the steps are needed now. Photo: An Air Force Global Strike Command unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test at Vandenberg Space Force Base (DoD)