China’s Genocide – USA Gov Policy

Can China and Western nations agree on a common definition of human rights in 2020? It is blatantly obvious that the communist country does not observe the Universal Declaration of Human Right passed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. For the past 72 years this document, drafted by representatives with varying cultural backgrounds from around the world, has served as a common standard of achievements for all peoples. Yet today China, a member of the UN leadership, seems to disregard totally its preamble that the “inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.”

China is committing genocide against its own minority populations in Buddhist Tibet and Xinjiang, home to many Muslim Uyghurs. Under the new National Security Law in Hong Kong, Beijing has squelched virtually all freedom of speech and assembly and has criminalized dissent to the point that recently a 15-year-old girl was among hundreds in Hong Kong arrested and is facing possible life imprisonment for waving a flag calling for its independence. The Chinese threat doesn’t stop at its shores.

This week FBI Director Christopher Wray argued at a Hudson Institute event that the Chinese communist Party (CCP) is now the “greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality… our economic security – and by extension, to our national security.” The aggressive actions of the CCP leadership stand far outside acceptable international norms of behavior for a modern and powerful nation-state. It calls into question the very premise upon which its government is based. It is a form of law far removed from western concepts of democratic rule and human rights. No dissent is tolerated under China’s version of communist hegemonic leadership. Xi Jinping, president of China, believes that this form is the only one that works and that the world should and will be made to follow China’s model.

Xi views the West’s failure to push back against Chinese actions in Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hong Kong as a clear indication that the democratic West is vulnerable and weak. Under his leadership, he says, there is a “unity of purpose” in China and the rules are clear. Any deviation results in the use of totalitarian tools designed to supervise power and enforce discipline and compliance with CCP rule. Is it too late for democratic nations to teach China a human rights lesson?

Sir Ian Duncan Smith, a Member of the British Parliament, says that the West must act now. On June 4, the 31^st anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests, a cross-party alliance of parliamentarians from 17 democratic countries founded the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) to focus on relations with China. With over 100 high-ranked legislative leaders representing their countries, the organization intends to hold China accountable for its actions at home and abroad. It won’t act as a think tank issuing white papers. Instead it intends to aid legislators involved in developing laws in their home countries to counter China’s negative influence. IPAC’s agenda aims to counter the threat that “China’s growing influence poses to global trade, security, and human rights.” India is considering joining IPAC, too. For the first time it appears there is a unified position against China’s flaunting of the rules-based international order.

Because these type of products have larger surface areas than the tablet form, the oral jelly and jelly forms are generico viagra on line recommended if you want the effect to take place immediately. In general, the proportion of testosterone in body include malnutrition, high stress and vardenafil tablets http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/kitten-in-a-pink-pot/ thyroid problems. There is a holistic and wellness centre in Delhi NCR not only have the knowledge but also have access to a good health insurance plan, then they may have variation in age, lifestyle, physical and mental health. sildenafil tablets india as ED treatment:An extremely functional and purposeful medicine named levitra oral designed by Pfizer pharmaceuticals. More and more people today are opting for the use prescription cialis usa of geothermal energy in all sectors of the province, his primary focus is to power, heat, and cool the public schools using this renewable energy.

IPAC is concerned with the forced sterilization of Muslim women in China, crackdowns on legitimate protests, and concentration camps for Uyghur Muslims. Internationally its agenda puts the Alliance at the forefront of the collective challenge to restrain China’s aggressive foreign behavior. It also serves as a test of the West’s determination to stop China from encroaching on democratic systems and to preserve “a marketplace of ideas free from distortion.” The only nation today capable of unilaterally confronting China is the United States. IPAC brings together, for the first time, an alliance of nations that are standing up for western values and human rights in a coordinated response to the challenge from China.

In a statement released by IPAC, it said that “By developing a common set of principles and frameworks that transcend domestic party divisions and international borders, our democracies will be able to keep the rules-based and human rights systems true to the founding purposes.” This week in response to IPAC, China’s representative in London, Chen Wen, claimed “China is a force for positive change.” China is exposed now. The Emperor is not wearing clothes! Xi Jinping will have to face a united front in the West and new foreign policy challenges from the democracies he is trying to undermine. Whether IPAC can force China to improve its record of domestic breaches of human rights, mass atrocities of its minorities, and its intolerance of personal freedoms for its population remains to be seen. IPAC does offer a new glimmer of hope for a world slowly awakening to the threat posed by the communist regime.

DARIA NOVAK served in the United States State Department during the Reagan Administration, and currently is on the Board of the American Analysis of News and Media Inc., which publishes usagovpolicy.com and the New York Analysis of Policy and Government. Each Friday, she presents key updates on China.

Illustration: Pixabay

Quick Analysis

Part 3: AMERICA’S STRATEGIC POSTURE

We conclude our summary of the urgent recommendation of the Congressional Committee on the nation’s Strategic Posture NON-NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES The Commission recommends: The United States urgently deploy a more resilient space architecture and adopt a strategy that includes both offensive and defensive elements to ensure U.S. access to and operations in space. The United States and its Allies take steps to ensure they are at the cutting edge of emerging technologies – such as big data analytics, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) – to avoid strategic surprise and potentially enhance the U.S. strategic posture. The United States prioritize funding and accelerate long-range non-nuclear precision strike programs to meet the operational need and in greater quantities than currently planned. x America’s Strategic Posture The United States develop and field homeland IAMD that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China, and determine the capabilities needed to stay ahead of the North Korean threat.4 The Secretary of Defense direct research, development, test and evaluation into advanced IAMD capabilities leveraging all domains, including land, sea, air, and space. These activities should focus on sensor architectures, integrated command and control, interceptors, cruise and hypersonic missile defenses, and area or point defenses. The DOD should urgently pursue deployment of any capabilities that prove feasible. The Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments transfer operations and sustainment responsibility for missile defense to the appropriate Military Departments by 1 October 2024. This will allow the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to focus on research, development, prototyping and testing. ALLIES AND PARTNERS The Commission believes it is in the U.S. national interest to maintain, strengthen, and when appropriate, expand its network of alliances and partnerships. These relationships strengthen American security by deterring aggression regionally, before it can reach the U.S. homeland, while also enabling U.S. economic prosperity through access to international markets. Withdrawing from U.S. alliances and partnerships would directly benefit adversaries, invite aggression that the United States might later have to reverse, and ultimately decrease American, allied, and partner security and economic prosperity. Further, the Commission believes that our defense and the defense of the current international order is strengthened when Allies can directly contribute to the broader strategic posture, and the United States should seek to incorporate those contributions as much as possible. The Executive branch should recognize that any major change to U.S. strategic posture, policies, or capabilities will have great effect on Allies’ perceptions and their deterrence and assurance requirements. As a result, any changes should be predicated on meaningful consultations. RISK REDUCTION The Commission believes it is of paramount importance for the United States to work to reduce strategic risks. This involves activities and programs across the U.S. government, including in nonproliferation and arms control, as well as maintaining strong, viable, and resilient military forces. The Commission recommends that a strategy to address the two-nuclear-peer threat environment be a prerequisite for developing U.S. nuclear arms control limits for the 2027-2035 timeframe. The Commission recommends that once a strategy and its related force requirements are established, the U.S. government determine whether and how nuclear arms control limits continue to enhance U.S. security. The Commission recommends that the United States continue to explore nuclear arms control opportunities and conduct research into potential verification technologies in order to support or enable future negotiations in the U.S. national interest that seek to limit all nuclear weapon types, should the geopolitical environment change. Where formal nuclear arms control agreements are not possible, the Commission recommends pursuing nuclear risk reduction measures to increase predictability and reduce uncertainty and the chances for misperception and miscalculation. The 2009 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States reported that the United States was at “a moment of opportunity, . . .but also a moment of urgency” – because the security environment had improved and the threat of nuclear proliferation was the principal concern. Since 2009, the security environment has dramatically worsened and new existential threats have emerged. This Commission concludes that the United States now faces a highstakes challenge that requires urgent action. Nevertheless, the Commission has not seen the U.S. government demonstrate the urgency and creativity required to meet the challenge. Nothing other than synchronized steps taken by the Executive and Legislative Branches will craft the strategy and build the posture the nation requires. The challenges are unmistakable; the problems are urgent; the steps are needed now. Photo: An Air Force Global Strike Command unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test at Vandenberg Space Force Base (DoD)