The New York Analysis of Policy and Government concludes its examination of anti-Semitism within the Progressive and Leftist movements in the United States.
Thus we see the strategy of the Left: Falsely and erroneously equate religious freedom with bigotry, in order to set up the framework for attacking it, and the principles of freedom of speech and freedom of conscience that are its underpinnings.
This can be seen in this statement within the 2016 Report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights:
“Religious exemptions to the protections of civil rights based upon classifications such as race, color, national origin, sex, disability status, sexual orientation, and gender identity, when they are permissible, significantly infringe upon these civil rights… The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause constricts the ability of government actors to curtail private citizens’ rights to the protections of non-discrimination laws and policies. Although the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) limit the ability of government actors to impede individuals from practicing their religious beliefs, religious exemptions from nondiscrimination laws and policies must be weighed carefully and defined narrowly on a fact-specific basis.”
The Report’s worrisome conclusions included:
“The main focus of the Commission’s briefing was the uncertain boundaries of religious freedom under the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses of the First Amendment and under some federal statutes, although judicial decisions have clarified the boundaries in some areas.”
The more they attempt, the more apprehensive they get to be and this uneasiness brings to disappointment once more. buy generic cialis It helps in increasing the motility and sperm count look at this now viagra 50 mg in men. This medicament plays a vital role in click to read more generico cialis on line life of impotence confronting men. Parking brakes: Make use of the parking brakes whenever you are asked to buy viagra from india park.
Once this bizarre and wholly incorrect narrative becomes accepted, the legal framework for government control of religious practice, and other elements of free speech, can be set into place. Notice the phrasing of the report’s complaint: “The First Amendment’s Establishment Clause constricts the ability of government actors to curtail private citizens’ rights to the protections of non-discrimination laws and policies…”
The Commission—and the Progressive/Left—seek to establish a wholly false storyline that religious beliefs are tantamount to ethnic, gender, or racial bias, giving government the right to transcend First Amendment protections.
Progressives reached their zenith of power during the Obama Administration. The Leftist White House,in an effort to supersede religious scruples that prompted dissent to a portion of its signature Obamacare legislation, fought a legal battle against the Little Sisters of the Poor, who objected to a provision of the bill that violated their beliefs. As Real Clear Politics reported:
“In August 2011, not long after the president had repeatedly vowed not to use his health care law to violate religious liberty, his administration announced that it would require all employers to pay for and provide insurance coverage for everything from sterilization to Plan B, a drug whose own FDA label warns can destroy life. After much shock and outcry, the administration doubled down, and the Department of Health and Human Services issued the mandate. The biggest religious liberty lawsuit in American history ensued… despite the fact that nothing says “ideological extremism” more than forcing nuns to entangle with abortion and nothing says “blind to the political environment” like refusing to back off, the Obama administration…[refused] to back off.
Politically, in a nation that is 83% Christian going after that religious faith in an attempt to assert the larger power of government vs. freedom of conscience is political suicide. Despite the many non-western concepts of Sharia Law (including the violation of female rights) the Left does not dare assault the practice of Islam, and doing so would run afoul of the Left’s affinity to the Islamic belief in subjugation. That leaves the Jews, history’s most frequent target.
By attacking Judaism and Jews, who have maintained an independent identity despite centuries of diaspora and discrimination, Leftist/Progressives vent their outrage that anyone, or any group, dares to maintain a conscience or, indeed, a life, that refuses to kneel at the all-powerful altar of big government. They do so despite the clear lessons of history that such a practice—whether expressed in places such as Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, Castro’s Cuba or in the towns and cities occupied by ISIS—is always an attack on humanity itself.