A City Imperiled, a Nation Endangered

New York’s descent is a microcosm of the challenges facing the entire nation. Its’ repeated pattern of chaos under “progressive” rule, followed by revival when more rational administrations take hold, is an object lesson in how to, and how not to, govern effectively.

Bill de Blasio is an updated and even more radical version of another wholly failed leftist mayor, David Dinkins. In the early 1990’s, Dinkins served as the Big Apple’s chief executive. He was soft on those who rioted, created disorder, and committed crime. He presided over record high taxes. He dwelled on that which disunited his constituents, including, especially, his use of the phrase “Gorgeous Mosaic,” denoting groups which retained their identity instead of becoming culturally united as Americans, as opposed to the use of the more familiar “Melting Pot” which described the molding of disparate groups into a united citizenry.

Dinkins was more interested in spending on social service programs as a way of fighting poverty, rather than in expanding job opportunities through business growth.

The result was disastrous. Urban experts began calling New York the “Ungovernable City.” Crime soared. Businesses were discouraged.

Rudolph Giuliani ended Dinkins’ hope for a second term, and immediately began replacing progressive policies with rational government. He emphasized tough crime fighting, holding city agencies accountable, and fiscal discipline. He worked to encourage job-creating businesses.

The results were stunning. The “ungovernable city” became known as “The World’s Capital.” Businesses began moving into, not out of, town. Crime levels dropped to almost unprecedented lows.

It often affects the buy levitra online regencygrandenursing.com younger men between 15 to 49 ages. We naturally tend to depend on the cheap cialis online gynecology to improve ourselves and also our confidence level and self esteem. For such people the right mode of payment would be cash on delivery. buy generic cialis continue reading for more now Besides, Stem cells also own the ability of regenerating new kidney cells, which replaces necrotic kidney cells to repair kidney tissues. cialis uk sales

The lesson has been wholly lost on de Blasio, who is even further to the left than Dinkins. He concentrates on progressive ideological issues rather than actual governing. As a left-wing extremist, (he cheered on the USSR when it put combat equipment in Latin America) he sees businesses as oppressors, and not instruments of prosperity. He ignores vital administrative duties and prefers concentrating on almost anything rather than his actual responsibilities. De Blasio’s administration has made incompetence into an art form. Just one example: close to a billion dollars meant for mental health issues have gone missing. Both he and his health commissioner, Dr. Oxiris Barbot, ignored the onset of the COVID crisis, and called President Trump racist and xenophobic for the emphasizing the problem. As a result, NYC became the international epicenter of the pandemic.

De Blasio’s schools chancellor, Richard Carranza, is an ideologue who views the COVID crisis not as a problem but as an opportunity to push education further to the left. As noted in the New York Post: “…as tens of thousands of New Yorkers died around him, Carranza callously said: ‘Never waste a good crisis to transform a system. We see this as an opportunity to finally push and move and be very strategic in a very aggressive way what we know is the equity agenda for our kids.’”

Similar to the national Progressive trend, de Blasio has been at war with the NYPD since his initial candidacy. Time Magazine notes that New York’s current mayor has never been on friendly terms with New York’s finest. The strained relationship dates back to de Blasio’s campaign, when he pledged to reform the city’s stop-and-frisk practices, which the police credited for a decrease in crime.” Murders have soared, and New York has suffered more intense civil disorder than anytime since the 1960s.

The sharp drop in NYC’s fortunes and in its quality of life is directly due to the implementation of precisely the same policies that national progressives seek to enact nationwide. Having failed to learn from the consistent international failures of socialist regimes throughout the world, leftists have also chosen to ignore them when enacted within America’s own shores.

Photo: NYC’s failed Mayor Bill de Blasio

Quick Analysis

Part 3: AMERICA’S STRATEGIC POSTURE

We conclude our summary of the urgent recommendation of the Congressional Committee on the nation’s Strategic Posture NON-NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES The Commission recommends: The United States urgently deploy a more resilient space architecture and adopt a strategy that includes both offensive and defensive elements to ensure U.S. access to and operations in space. The United States and its Allies take steps to ensure they are at the cutting edge of emerging technologies – such as big data analytics, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) – to avoid strategic surprise and potentially enhance the U.S. strategic posture. The United States prioritize funding and accelerate long-range non-nuclear precision strike programs to meet the operational need and in greater quantities than currently planned. x America’s Strategic Posture The United States develop and field homeland IAMD that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China, and determine the capabilities needed to stay ahead of the North Korean threat.4 The Secretary of Defense direct research, development, test and evaluation into advanced IAMD capabilities leveraging all domains, including land, sea, air, and space. These activities should focus on sensor architectures, integrated command and control, interceptors, cruise and hypersonic missile defenses, and area or point defenses. The DOD should urgently pursue deployment of any capabilities that prove feasible. The Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments transfer operations and sustainment responsibility for missile defense to the appropriate Military Departments by 1 October 2024. This will allow the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to focus on research, development, prototyping and testing. ALLIES AND PARTNERS The Commission believes it is in the U.S. national interest to maintain, strengthen, and when appropriate, expand its network of alliances and partnerships. These relationships strengthen American security by deterring aggression regionally, before it can reach the U.S. homeland, while also enabling U.S. economic prosperity through access to international markets. Withdrawing from U.S. alliances and partnerships would directly benefit adversaries, invite aggression that the United States might later have to reverse, and ultimately decrease American, allied, and partner security and economic prosperity. Further, the Commission believes that our defense and the defense of the current international order is strengthened when Allies can directly contribute to the broader strategic posture, and the United States should seek to incorporate those contributions as much as possible. The Executive branch should recognize that any major change to U.S. strategic posture, policies, or capabilities will have great effect on Allies’ perceptions and their deterrence and assurance requirements. As a result, any changes should be predicated on meaningful consultations. RISK REDUCTION The Commission believes it is of paramount importance for the United States to work to reduce strategic risks. This involves activities and programs across the U.S. government, including in nonproliferation and arms control, as well as maintaining strong, viable, and resilient military forces. The Commission recommends that a strategy to address the two-nuclear-peer threat environment be a prerequisite for developing U.S. nuclear arms control limits for the 2027-2035 timeframe. The Commission recommends that once a strategy and its related force requirements are established, the U.S. government determine whether and how nuclear arms control limits continue to enhance U.S. security. The Commission recommends that the United States continue to explore nuclear arms control opportunities and conduct research into potential verification technologies in order to support or enable future negotiations in the U.S. national interest that seek to limit all nuclear weapon types, should the geopolitical environment change. Where formal nuclear arms control agreements are not possible, the Commission recommends pursuing nuclear risk reduction measures to increase predictability and reduce uncertainty and the chances for misperception and miscalculation. The 2009 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States reported that the United States was at “a moment of opportunity, . . .but also a moment of urgency” – because the security environment had improved and the threat of nuclear proliferation was the principal concern. Since 2009, the security environment has dramatically worsened and new existential threats have emerged. This Commission concludes that the United States now faces a highstakes challenge that requires urgent action. Nevertheless, the Commission has not seen the U.S. government demonstrate the urgency and creativity required to meet the challenge. Nothing other than synchronized steps taken by the Executive and Legislative Branches will craft the strategy and build the posture the nation requires. The challenges are unmistakable; the problems are urgent; the steps are needed now. Photo: An Air Force Global Strike Command unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test at Vandenberg Space Force Base (DoD)