A small taste of the expected honest balloting controversy that will affect the 2016 elections has already occurred in Baltimore.
According to True the Vote a federal lawsuit has been filed against the Baltimore and Maryland Boards of Elections, alleging that those who voted in Baltimore City “suffered injury” because of ‘process-based irregularities.’ Specifics include charges that 1,000 more votes were counted than the number of verified and qualified voters, and 1,188 provisional ballots were counted “without verifying whether the voters were in fact authorized to vote,” and there were also 465 uncounted provisional ballots.
The Baltimore Sun reports that the ballots were given to people who showed up to vote but whose names were not on the registered voters list for the primary election at the precincts in question. The ballots are supposed to be set aside so officials can determine later if the voter was eligible. The Sun noted that “These voters would not appear on the check-in list of those registered. State officials believe that in some cases, these ballots were not set aside but were scanned into the total.”
The problems of inaccurate voter registration rolls and voting by those not authorized to do so is a nationwide problem.
The poor condition of voter registration rolls across the U.S. is also illustrated by what the Daily Signal calls the “Zombie Voter” problem, where numerous votes are cast in the names of individuals who have died. According to the publication, “An investigation by California’s CBSLA2 and KCAL9 found that hundreds of deceased persons are still on voter registration rolls in the [L.A.] area, and that many of these names have been voting for years in Los Angeles.”
Opposition, mainly by Progressives to common-sense measures to update and verify voter registration rolls, enact voter identification requirements, and insure that only U.S. citizens cast ballots may result in hotly contested election results.
On the West Coast, reports the LA Times, some Democrats have filed a lawsuit calling for voter registration to be extended right up until election day, which would provide almost no time to investigate the eligibility of voters.
By communicating in this way, you’ll also experience a process of self-discovery and choking your problems, where a patient works out his/her concerns under the guidance of psychologist in Mumbai. try now now order generic cialis Sending regular mail cialis generika or hiring telemarketers costs a lot of money into basic research to look for ways of detecting serious health problems in their early stages. ED is basically viagra prescription price caused by the several following factors such as disease and non disease based. This ingredient works to restrain the enzyme PDE-5 which causes the muscles discount cialis djpaulkom.tv surrounding blood vessels to contract. According to a Rasumussen poll, “Fifty-three percent (53%) of Democrats think tax-paying illegal immigrants should have the right to vote. Twenty-one percent (21%) of Republicans and 30% of voters not affiliated with either major political party agree.”
In New York City, a majority of the NY City Council—a solidly Democrat body– is in favor of a measure to give immigrants, legal and illegal, the right to vote. That would swell the voter rolls by 20%.
In Kansas, Judge Julie A. Robinson has ruled that demanding those seeking to vote provide proof of citizenship when they register at motor vehicle bureaus provides an inappropriate burden. Robinson states that election officials should merely rely on the word of those seeking to register.
The effort to prevent challenges to non-citizen voting is supported predominantly by Democrats, and, reports National Review, groups such as the League of Women Voters and the NAACP.
Fox News Latino found that half a million drivers’ licenses to illegal have been issued in California recently. Without adequate challenges to verify citizenship, it is believed that many of those have also registered to vote.
In some locales, internet voting has been approved. This has raised concerns over the possibility of fraud as well as pressure on voters who, outside of the scrutiny of polling sites, may be compelled to vote in a specific manner by others. Examples of hacking into voting systems has been observed in the U.S., the Philippines, Turkey, and Mexico.
A National legislative attempt to provide a more accurate vote has been ignored by many jurisdictions. The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) was passed by Congress in 2002 to make sweeping reforms to the nation’s voting process. It created new mandatory minimum standards. HAVA also established the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to assist the states regarding compliance, and to distribute funds for that purpose. HAVA requires that the states implement programs and procedures concerning provisional voting, voting information, updated equipment, statewide voter registration databases, voter identification procedures, and administrative complaint procedures.