News & features affiliated with the New York Analysis of Policy & Government

Category: Vernuccio-Novak Report

Latest Vernuccio-Novak Report

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 18, 2023

Listen to our latest radio broadcast HERE:

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 9, 2023

Listen to our latest broadcast HERE

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Broadcast

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date January 1, 2023

Listen to our latest radio broadcast HERE

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Broadcast

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date December 20, 2022

Listen to our latest radio program at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1W9xDZ5JPDkqOfhbRwAqnFthUUd43N8UU/view?ts=639a28c7

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date December 12, 2022

Listen to our latest radio program at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LaB7DspyAyh1FUHu2tVsPGDuyTJcLg4R/view?ts=6390ebd4

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date November 30, 2022

Listen to our latest radio program at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oNi2VoB-w5vlRb-dSs27kIvHs0UPBpEY/view?ts=6386879a

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Listen to Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date November 23, 2022

Listen to our latest radio program at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zDZsCGfxMBKA_Lo1fBlcdbwvtHTsLEgq/view?ts=637e8172

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date November 16, 2022

Listen to our latest radio program HERE https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xcr-OgIhHHtEZzmrl2KJFV3OwpKQNaT8/view?ts=63754c02

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date November 10, 2022

Listen to our latest radio broadcast HERE: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PqojHz99gpUFuNFx8Etp663HxVPjIutf/view?ts=636c05b3

Vernuccio-Novak Report

Our Latest Radio Program

Post author By Frank V. Vernuccio, Jr.
Post date November 1, 2022

Listen to our latest radio program HERE

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EWcR5agHhV1CWckErxlZfLHSFVH_yZ-u/view?ts=6362c3ab

Part 3: AMERICA’S STRATEGIC POSTURE

We conclude our summary of the urgent recommendation of the Congressional Committee on the nation’s Strategic Posture NON-NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES The Commission recommends: The United States urgently deploy a more resilient space architecture and adopt a strategy that includes both offensive and defensive elements to ensure U.S. access to and operations in space. The United States and its Allies take steps to ensure they are at the cutting edge of emerging technologies – such as big data analytics, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence (AI) – to avoid strategic surprise and potentially enhance the U.S. strategic posture. The United States prioritize funding and accelerate long-range non-nuclear precision strike programs to meet the operational need and in greater quantities than currently planned. x America’s Strategic Posture The United States develop and field homeland IAMD that can deter and defeat coercive attacks by Russia and China, and determine the capabilities needed to stay ahead of the North Korean threat.4 The Secretary of Defense direct research, development, test and evaluation into advanced IAMD capabilities leveraging all domains, including land, sea, air, and space. These activities should focus on sensor architectures, integrated command and control, interceptors, cruise and hypersonic missile defenses, and area or point defenses. The DOD should urgently pursue deployment of any capabilities that prove feasible. The Secretary of Defense and the Military Departments transfer operations and sustainment responsibility for missile defense to the appropriate Military Departments by 1 October 2024. This will allow the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) to focus on research, development, prototyping and testing. ALLIES AND PARTNERS The Commission believes it is in the U.S. national interest to maintain, strengthen, and when appropriate, expand its network of alliances and partnerships. These relationships strengthen American security by deterring aggression regionally, before it can reach the U.S. homeland, while also enabling U.S. economic prosperity through access to international markets. Withdrawing from U.S. alliances and partnerships would directly benefit adversaries, invite aggression that the United States might later have to reverse, and ultimately decrease American, allied, and partner security and economic prosperity. Further, the Commission believes that our defense and the defense of the current international order is strengthened when Allies can directly contribute to the broader strategic posture, and the United States should seek to incorporate those contributions as much as possible. The Executive branch should recognize that any major change to U.S. strategic posture, policies, or capabilities will have great effect on Allies’ perceptions and their deterrence and assurance requirements. As a result, any changes should be predicated on meaningful consultations. RISK REDUCTION The Commission believes it is of paramount importance for the United States to work to reduce strategic risks. This involves activities and programs across the U.S. government, including in nonproliferation and arms control, as well as maintaining strong, viable, and resilient military forces. The Commission recommends that a strategy to address the two-nuclear-peer threat environment be a prerequisite for developing U.S. nuclear arms control limits for the 2027-2035 timeframe. The Commission recommends that once a strategy and its related force requirements are established, the U.S. government determine whether and how nuclear arms control limits continue to enhance U.S. security. The Commission recommends that the United States continue to explore nuclear arms control opportunities and conduct research into potential verification technologies in order to support or enable future negotiations in the U.S. national interest that seek to limit all nuclear weapon types, should the geopolitical environment change. Where formal nuclear arms control agreements are not possible, the Commission recommends pursuing nuclear risk reduction measures to increase predictability and reduce uncertainty and the chances for misperception and miscalculation. The 2009 Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States reported that the United States was at “a moment of opportunity, . . .but also a moment of urgency” – because the security environment had improved and the threat of nuclear proliferation was the principal concern. Since 2009, the security environment has dramatically worsened and new existential threats have emerged. This Commission concludes that the United States now faces a highstakes challenge that requires urgent action. Nevertheless, the Commission has not seen the U.S. government demonstrate the urgency and creativity required to meet the challenge. Nothing other than synchronized steps taken by the Executive and Legislative Branches will craft the strategy and build the posture the nation requires. The challenges are unmistakable; the problems are urgent; the steps are needed now. Photo: An Air Force Global Strike Command unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test at Vandenberg Space Force Base (DoD)