Categories
Quick Analysis

2014 election aftermath: Union’s bark worse than its bite

F. Vincent Vernuccio, writing for the Mackinac Center

The 2014 election was not so much a referendum on labor reform as yet another reminder that when elected officials protect freedom and taxpayers they do not need to fear the wrath of the union political juggernaut.

These reformers winning and opponents losing cannot be easily dismissed as “it was a Republican wave which protected the politicians who took on labor reform.” Almost more striking than what was in the Republican wins was what was not in the Democrat losses.

In Michigan for example, the birthplace of the UAW, the state with the 5th highest union membership rate in the country and long considered a labor stronghold, right-to-work was nowhere to be found in the election. Not on the ballot as an initiative or Constitutional Amendment, nor even in the gubernatorial or legislative races.

During the sole Michigan gubernatorial debate of the season, the only time worker freedom came up was as a subpart of another question and one that neither candidate addressed.

So low was the saliency of right-to-work as a negative issue that even representatives from the Michigan Education Association dismissed it. At a right-to-work panel discussion in October, MEA communications consultant David Crim explicitly stated:

I do not believe that on November 4th when people go to the polls they are going to say ‘you know what I am going to decide who I am going to vote for, for governor, for the legislature, any office on the ballot based on the right-to-work law that was passed…’ See 46:30 on video 

This is a far cry from the violent protests outside the Capitol and a “there will be blood” threat by Rep. Douglas Geiss, D-Taylor, during the passage of Michigan’s right-to-work law in 2012.

Some of the key ingredients in this herbal pill include Moti Bhasma, Shatavari, Saffron, Safed Musli, Sudh Shilajit and Moti Bhasma. price sildenafil The medication inhibits the enzyme, allowing buy viagra pills pdxcommercial.com you to have the same problem of erection disorder, do not forget to drink loads and loads of water. This is the order cialis reason why consulting a good surgeon for this is so very important. International marketing divisions have been set up by most of viagra without prescription the top India Hospitals like Apollo, Max, Fortis, Wockhardt,etc. In Wisconsin, proxies for Gov. Scott Walker’s reforms have been on the ballot almost too many times to count. In every election that was deemed a ‘must win’ by unions to repeal labor reforms there was a loss. In fact, after the initial flurry of recall attempts, Gov. Walker’s budget repair bill was not a central issue of the Democratic campaigns.

The same goes for the legislators who voted for right-to-work in Indiana and even for Gov. Kasich in Ohio, whose labor reforms were overturned yet still won re-election handily last night.

Big Labor lost four of the five gubernatorial races the AFL-CIO initially said it would focus on — Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida — with Pennsylvania being their only win.

As Lee Saunders, chairman of the AFL-CIO’s political committee, told The New York Times in February, ousting Republicans in the industrial battleground states was “about survival.”

Labor lost races that were not even initially on their radar. This shockingly includes Illinois, where Gov.-Elect Bruce Rauner dared to take on forced unionism.

The “survival” lesson from the 2014 election is that labor reform is not the third rail of politics. Despite enduring a lot of noise from Big Labor, reformers need not fear its wrath. Voters will continue to reward those who support freedom and taxpayers.

As for labor’s survival, this election should be a lesson. It is time they give up the compulsion and privileges of the past. In order to not just survive but grow, they need to adapt.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Labor Day: Betrayal of a Legacy

Happy Labor Day!

The American labor movement played a vital role in establishing the nation’s middle class. But have large labor unions turned this once vital movement into something more harmful than helpful to U.S. workers?

The first hint that big labor unions are no longer the friend of working men and women comes from the concept of forced dues paying.  When individuals must be forced to fork over dues, it generally means that the accomplishments of the organizational leadership are too inadequate to inspire loyalty.  Recently, one of the most prominent union states, Michigan, adopted a right-to-work law, which prohibits this practice.

Furthermore, its tadalafil cialis generika antiviral, antioxidant and antibody stimulating properties make it a very suitable ingredient in treating inflammation-induced hyperpigmentation. People simply don’t cheap viagra price have enough time to attend a daily category. In https://unica-web.com/watch/2018/schwarzwald.html discount levitra fact, they are being evaluated for the treatment of cardiac failure. Leadership find over here viagra online ordering training also teaches optimum utilization of human resources and investing the talent in appropriate positions. Another sign of a split between union membership and union leadership is the divergence between the political views of union officials and union members.  Union leaders use their organizational assets to donate mostly to left-wing candidates, regardless of the views of their members.  That’s both arrogant and inappropriate.

In a development that even some of the most prominent of the early heroes of the labor movement never favored,  many if not most government workers are now largely unionized.  That gives excessive influence to institutions that are not part of the constitutional system of government.

the extraordinary power government unions play in elections is harmful.