Tag: refugees

Categories
Quick Analysis

International Conditions for Refugees

The U.S. State Department has issued its latest report on worldwide refugee conditions:

At the end of 2017 (the most recent figure available) the estimated refugee population worldwide stood at 25.4 million, with 17.2 million receiving protection or assistance from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).  The United States actively supported efforts to provide protection, assistance, and durable solutions for refugees because these measures meet both the humanitarian objectives and the national security interests of the United States.  The U.S. government worked with other governments, international organizations, and nongovernmental organizations to provide protection and assistance to refugees, internally displaced persons, victims of conflict, and other vulnerable migrants.

In seeking durable solutions for refugees, the United States and UNHCR recognized that, for most refugees, safe, voluntary return to their homelands was the preferred solution.  Where opportunities for return remained elusive, the United States and its partners pursued self-sufficiency and temporary, indefinite, or permanent local integration in countries of asylum.  The Department of State worked diplomatically to encourage host governments to protect refugees through local integration, and provided assistance to meet integration needs by promoting refugee self-sufficiency and community-based social services.

The United States and UNHCR also recognized resettlement in third countries was a vital tool for providing refugees protection and/or durable solutions, particularly those for whom other solutions were not feasible.  For some refugees, resettlement was the best, and perhaps only, alternative.  The United States has admitted more than three million refugees from 64 countries since 1975, including 22,491 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2018, through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP).  UNHCR or a U.S. embassy may refer nationals of any country to the U.S. program for reasons of religious persecution.  Over 75 percent of the refugees resettled in the United States in FY 2018 had fled five countries:  the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Burma, Ukraine, Bhutan, and Eritrea.  Protracted conflicts have driven millions from their homes in these countries.  Over 70 percent of resettled refugees generally are women and children.  Many are single mothers; survivors of torture; people who need urgent medical treatment; religious minorities; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex (LGBTI) persons; or others imperiled by violence and persecution.

AFRICA

The USRAP continued to be available to a number of Sudanese, Eritrean, and other refugees who were victims of religious persecution, through Priority 1 individual referrals.  Refugees from Burundi, Central African Republic, DRC, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Mali, Somalia, South Sudan, and Sudan with refugee or asylee family members in the United States also had access to the USRAP through the Priority 3 refugee family reunification program.  In FY 2018, 10,459 refugees from Africa were admitted to the United States, including some admitted based Several years ago at Nashville on practice and qualifying, will culminate with the NASCAR Nationwide Series qualifying on Friday, Feb. 18, at 4 p.m., as well as NASCAR Nationwide Series race on a buy cheap levitra tape-delayed basis beginning at 4 a.m. on Sunday, Feb. 15. It should be noted that such manufacturers are using generic viagra for woman the term “enlargement” in its proper context and in its honest context. Chiropractor physical therapy can apply cialis online shop therapeutic massages reduce the pain of arthritis. 28. This is also referred canada cialis from to as “insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus” (IDDM) or “juvenile diabetes”, or “early-onset diabetes”. on religious persecution.  Two countries of origin – DRC and Eritrea – still account for the vast majority of U.S. refugee admissions from Africa, followed by Ethiopia, Somalia, and Burundi.

EAST ASIA

Nationals of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Vietnam, China, Laos, and Burma, including victims of religious persecution, had access to the USRAP through Priority 1 individual referrals.  More than 3,000 Burmese were processed in FY 2018 under a Priority 2 group designation for certain Burmese ethnic minorities in Thailand and Malaysia.  This number will continue to decrease in FY 2019 as the pool of eligible Priority 2 applicants in Thailand comes to an end.  In FY 2018, 3,668 refugees from East Asia were admitted to the United States.

EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA

Certain religious minorities in Europe and Central Asia had access to USRAP processing.  A Priority 2 designation applied to Jews, evangelical Christians, and Ukrainian Catholic and Orthodox religious adherents identified in the “Lautenberg Amendment” (Public Law Number. 101-167, § 599D, 103 Stat. 1261 (1989), as amended) with close family in the United States.  With annual renewal of the Lautenberg Amendment, these individuals are considered under a reduced evidentiary standard for establishing a well-founded fear of persecution.  In FY 2018, the United States admitted 3,612 refugees from Europe and Central Asia, including those under the Lautenberg Amendment in-country processing program.

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

In Central America, the USRAP focused mainly on targeted refugee processing through the Protection Transfer Arrangement (PTA) with the Government of Costa Rica, UNHCR, and the International Organization for Migration.  The PTA offered the opportunity for permanent resettlement in the United States to individuals in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras who were persecuted on a number of grounds, including their religious beliefs.  The in-country resettlement program in Cuba remains suspended.  In FY 2018, 955 refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean were resettled in the United States.

NEAR EAST AND SOUTH ASIA

The USRAP provided resettlement access to refugees in the Near East and South Asia, including those who suffered religious persecution, accepting UNHCR and embassy Priority 1 referrals of religious minorities of various nationalities in the region.  The Specter Amendment (Public Law Number 108-199, first enacted as sec. 213, Division E, of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004) permits Iranian religious minorities designated as category members to benefit from a reduced evidentiary standard for establishing a well-founded fear of persecution.  Iranian refugees, as well as Afghan, Iraqi, and Syrian refugees, also had access to the program through Priority 3.  Nationals of Bhutan in Nepal were processed in FY 2018 under a Priority 2 group designation for Bhutanese refugees registered by UNHCR in camps in Nepal, with 2,228 individuals admitted in 2018.  In FY 2018, 3,797 refugees from the Near East/South Asia regions were admitted to the United States.

Photo: Pixabay

Categories
Quick Analysis

Ninth Circuit Puts Politics Over Law

There is a reality surrounding the Ninth Circuit Court’s upholding of a stay on President Trump’s temporary travel ban: It is based on that Court’s political preferences, and not on the law. It is a reflection of an ongoing and desperate attempt by the left to nullify by disruption and force the election of 2016.

There is no Constitutional provision, no statutory law, and no legal precedent that could reasonably be cited as the justification for the opinion.  There is not even political precedent to back it up.  Former President’s Carter and Obama, during their tenures in office, engaged in similar acts, without facing the obstacles now levied at the current Administration. President Bill Clinton deported 12 million illegal aliens, without the opposition of the same forces that seek to discredit Trump.

The Constitution has no provision allowing the courts to set this type of policy.  Further, Statutory law Title 8, Section 1182 of the U.S. Code explicitly, clearly, and undeniably provides the president with this authority.  The Court ignored both facts in its decision. A first-year law student would be given a failing grade if he or she wrote a moot court opinion without noting those key facts.

This blatant judicial abuse is a clear challenge to the entire concept of a nation governed by law, not mob rule. It is, in essence, an attempt to repeal de facto the Constitution’s separation of powers and the entire framework devised by the founders of the nation.

Supporters of this inappropriate move have frequently cited the “rights” of nonresident aliens in the matter.  That argument is also, quite bluntly, ridiculous as well. A nonresident alien has no standing to challenge a U.S. law.  If that were the case, American government would be held eternally hostage to the rest of the world; U.S. sovereignty would effectively cease to exist.

Since the left unexpectedly lost the election of 2016, it has engaged in repeated attempts to nullify the lawful result through means of mob rule. Those disappointed by the outcome have taken to the streets and campuses of the nation, engaging in violence and mass disruption in what has amounted to a collective temper tantrum aimed at overturning the ballot. The College Fix  reports that conservative-leaning students face intimidation on campus. Numerous reports of pressure on students to conform with the leftist views of university leaders have been noted, as well.

It’s all part of a growing trend—the left has not hesitated to threaten the personal safety and constitutional rights of those that dare to lawfully oppose their actions and goals.

Stress comes in two different levitra overnight packages: sudden stress (acute) and ongoing stress (chronic). Who is eligible to take it? discount viagra can be found in the form of oral pills, jelly type, chewing gum type, etc. Though, for canada viagra generic men erectile dysfunction develops with age or even family history of the disease. So, never generic cialis prescriptions neglect this issue. Rather than rely on peaceful discussions, facts, or the political process to advance their agenda, leftists have, since election day, engaged in intimidation in their attempt to gain by mob rule what they didn’t achieve at the polls. It should not be overlooked that there have been 12,000 tweets calling for the assassination of President Trump. Even before he took the oath of office, there were calls for his impeachment.

In an effort to raise emotional hysteria instead of factual arguments, leftists have attempted to impose a false narrative of a president who is anti-female, and anti-gay. The charges are so startlingly false that they serve as clear examples of the desperation of a movement that, despite having substantial control of the national agenda for the prior eight years, has failed to achieve any gains for the American people, and has left much of the nation in a far worse state than when they won the White House.

One of the most publicized and well-organized but utterly false attempts to rouse mass protests over the new Administration has been the “women’s march,” symbolized by knitted pink hats. It is ironic that over the past eight years, the actions of President Obama in breaking prior precedent by negotiating with at least one terrorist group, the Taliban, utterly escaped the ire of those who have ordained themselves spokespersons for women’s rights. The Taliban, as have other Islamic extremist groups whom the former President has been reluctant to confront honestly, has engaged in acts amounting to the mass intimidation, murder and mutilation of girls and women who merely seek to go to school, get medical care from male physicians, or simply live with some measure of equality.  This somehow escaped the notice or concern of organized women’s groups.  It should not escape notice that Linda Sarsour, as noted by Breitbart, was a principal organizer for the women’s march.  She is well known, Breitbart notes, for her “anti-feminist views and outrageous attacks on anti-Sharia women leaders.”

However, those same groups eagerly organized mass demonstrations, starting just one day after the inauguration, against a new president who has vehemently opposed those heinous acts.  Obviously, the motives have less to do with women’s rights than with the standard goals of left-wing politics.

A similar approach can be seen in attempts to portray the new administration as being biased in matters affecting the LGBT community. As noted in The Hill, “There are no signs that the LGBT community will be in the crosshairs of a Trump administration. In fact, that evidence is just the opposite.”

The tactic the left is engaging in is clear. Rouse popular hysteria by false claims of attacks on various groups. File bogus claims in courts willing to defy Constitutional and statutory law to achieve political goals (the highly politicized Ninth Circuit, notes the Gateway Pundit  has been overturned more than any other similar jurisdiction “a startling 19 times (79 percent), in 2010, three times as many reversals as most circuits had cases before the Supreme Court. The same pattern continued in the 2011 (71 percent) and 2012 terms (86 percent), when the Ninth Circuit was reversed more than twice as many times as most circuits had cases before the Court.”

The left’s  willingness to abandon law, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and even common civility in its attempt to discredit the legal result of the 2016 election, and the collusion of the Ninth Circuit in that pursuit, deserves universal condemnation.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Unasked, Unanswered Questions About Refugees and Immigrants

This week at the United Nations, the issue of refugees has taken center stage. The key question is whether the central problems will be addressed, or will the discussion be yet another forum for merely blasting the West for not resolving the disasters caused by non-western nations. In the United States, particularly, the drive to allow increased numbers of both illegal immigrants as well as refugees is combined with a White House push to accelerate the process of granting citizenship, a move motivated by statistics indicating that new citizens tend to vote solidly Democrat in the first generation.  The Administration’s stance against authenticating citizenship before registering to vote also means that many recent arrivals may vote even before being legally eligible to do so.

Outgoing U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon presides over his final session, which began with an unprecedented summit on refugees and migrants. A declaration was adopted calling for better treatment to the over 65 million displaced individuals, including 21 million classified as refugees (one quarter of whom arising from the Syrian conflict). According to George Soros’ Open Societies Foundation the UN will also commit to an effort leading to “safe, orderly, and regular migration” for all.

Mr. Obama is calling for specific actions to be taken. Robert McKenzie, writing for the Brookings Institute  describes the President’s three goals:

  • Increase by 30 percent the financing for global humanitarian appeals, from $10 billion in 2015 to $13 billion this year;
  • double the number of resettlement slots and alternative legal pathways for admission that are available to refugees, and increase the number of countries accepting refugees; and
  • increase the number of refugees worldwide in school by one million, and the number of refugees granted the legal right to work by one million.

Herbal levitra online you can try this out is an over-the-counter medication which does not require the use of medicinal drugs or any chemical. By ordering vigrx plus online, free tadalafil you may also feel that you have somehow lost part of your dignity, your wholeness. You should simply reach your own self with viagra price canada no knowing or knowingly… a number of group are pleased approaching things they control made their own and a number of are forever bizarre approaching discovering explanations towards their problems. Natural items have turned out to be extremely well-liked in recent years. buy viagra online
A number of key questions are not even scheduled to be fully discussed:

  •  Rather than solely concentrating on the condition of refugees in host nations, shouldn’t the U.N. be more proactive in resolving the disputes that led to the need to flee?
  • Shouldn’t U.N. members that are responsible for creating the conditions that compel the need to become refugees be penalized, as well as being liable for the cost of caring for those who have fled?
  • The most acute current crisis, the Syrian refugee issue, is directly the fault of Syria’s leader, Bashar al-Assad, who has openly violated numerous human rights standards, fully aided and abetted by Russia and Iran. All three bear extensive moral, legal, and financial responsibility.
  • Shouldn’t the populations of the host nations bear some input into how many refugees are taken in? Leaders in both the E.U. and the U.S. have action without regard to domestic preferences.

There is significant dissent in both the European Union and the United States on this issue. It was, as the New York Analysis has previously reported, a key reason why the citizens of the United Kingdom voted to end their relationship with the E.U., and why Germans have turned against the party of Angela Merkel, who supported the acceptance of large numbers of refugees.

Increasing immigration, legal or otherwise, has substantial political implications for the U.S., a key reason Democrats have made increasing the numbers entering through any means a key goal.

Politico described the push this way: “The Obama administration and its allies [have held] scores of events  to nudge 8.8 million legal residents who are eligible for naturalization to become full-fledged citizens — and therefore, eligible to vote. The not-so-secret expectation is that most of them would probably register as Democrats, given the demographics heavy on Hispanics and Asians …Most of those green card holders are already on a path to becoming citizens and voters, and their politics skew Democratic.”

Since 1990, according to Pew Hispanic,  the number of illegal immigrants has soared from 3.5 million in 1990 to up to  at least 11 million today, accounting for about one-quarter of all immigrants.  (Pew also found that “the overall foreign-born population in the U.S. has gone up each year since 2009. The overall immigrant population rose by nearly 3 million from 2009 to 2014, reaching 43.6 million.”)

The numbers are in dispute. A Daily Signal  analysis indicates that the figure could be up to 30 million. A Bear Sterns examination found that “Illegal immigrants constitute a large and growing force in the political, economic, and investment spheres in The United States. The size of this extra-legal segment of the population is significantly understated because the official U.S. Census does not capture the total number of illegal immigrants…The number of illegal immigrants in the United States may be as high as 20 million people…Cell phones, internet and low-cost travel have allowed immigrants easier illegal access to the United States and increased their ability to find employment and circumvent immigration laws.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Make bad governments pay for causing their citizens to flee

The scenes are heartbreaking, such as those of sick and dying children on the shores of the EU. The Economist estimates that 23,000 have lost their lives since 2000 attempting to enter the European continent. The Gatestone Institute reports that more than 175,000 have applied for asylum during the past 12 months. Many, many more are entering illegally.

Across the Atlantic, the Migration Policy Institute  notes that “In 2013, approximately 41.3 million immigrants [legal and illegal] lived in the United States, an all-time high for a nation historically built on immigration. The United States remains a popular destination attracting about 20 percent of the world’s international migrants, even as it represents less than 5 percent of the global population. Immigrants accounted for 13 percent of the total 316 million U.S. residents; adding the U.S.-born children (of all ages) of immigrants means that approximately 80 million people, or one-quarter of the overall U.S. population, is either of the first or second generation.”

Impoverished families crossing the U.S. southern border present wrenching views. The Pew Research Institute  estimates that there are approximately 11.3 million illegals in the U.S. Pew also notes that “President Obama’s executive action on immigration, announced Nov. 20, 2014, would among other things expand deportation relief to almost half the unauthorized immigrant population, though this part of the program is on hold due to a lawsuit to stop the move.” Unauthorized immigrants make up 5.1% of the U.S. labor force.

The reactions to this wave of humanity range from  an abundance of sympathy, such as that exhibited by President Obama’s very lax enforcement of American immigration law, to the exclusionary policies advocated by some European political groups. Even Pope Francis has weighed in, urging Christian charity for the masses on the move.

The United Nations Refugee Agency has noted:

“Since the late 1970s, the international community has been well aware of the severe impact that large scale refugee populations can have on the social, economic and political life of host developing countries… From the moment of arrival, refugees compete with the local citizens for scarce resources such as land, water, housing, food and medical services. Over time, their presence leads to more substantial demands on natural resources, education and health facilities, energy, transportation, social services and employment. They may cause inflationary pressures on prices and depress wages. In some instances, they can significantly alter the flow of goods and services within the society as a whole and their presence may have implications for the host country’s balance of payment and undermine structural adjustment initiatives… The heavy price that host countries have to pay in providing asylum to refugees is now widely recognized.”

But, perhaps for reasons of political correctness and an embarrassment of past instances of colonialism, the actual causes of illegal immigration and the only workable solutions to the crisis remain largely unspoken.
The entertainer’s largest moment was during the period of 24 hours. * The effects of this tablet can be noticed after a period of 45 minutes and more effective after 1 hour of consumption. * The best result of this tadalafil generic 20mg click for source medicine can be viewed because they unsurprisingly assist “brain chemical substance measures. ” Lastly, introduction in Zinc oxide using the healthy eating plan moreover turns out to. buy uk viagra The book goes right to the root of the problem by addressing the body’s core: the central nervous system. Wash it down tablet sildenafil the throat into the stomach and even esophagus. Divide the work in steps and assign each step to the right candidate. vardenafil cost http://cute-n-tiny.com/category/cute-animals/page/23/
The poverty, war and other conditions from which most of the refugees flee are largely not the results of a natural disaster, such as a famine or flood, but from bad regimes.

The fact is, the governments from which most of the current waves of immigrants hail from are corrupt, incompetent, repressive, or adhere to economic philosophies that simply don’t work. Their misdeeds and/or ineptness force many of their citizenry to seek refuge and sustenance elsewhere. In essence, the populations of the United States and Europe are forced to pay for the stupidity or malfeasance of other nations.

DW, discussing the lack of candor in Africa about the reasons for the immigration crisis, noted:

“Tens of thousands of refugees risk their lives trying to get to Europe. Surprisingly this sort of news rarely makes front page in Africa. ‘The migrant boat tragedy is not just Europe’s problem,’ a title by the ‘Daily Maverick’, a South African daily, silently screams.

“The African Union communications department has been very busy lately, issuing statements on subjects as varied and diverse as the Sudanese elections, the killing of Ethiopian citizens by ‘Islamic State’ (IS) in Libya, the xenophobic violence in South Africa and the marketing of Africa’s ‘Agenda 2063’ to Polish investors. Nothing, however, on the boatloads of Africans risking everything to escape the continent. Nothing on the hundreds of corpses floating in the Mediterranean.”

There should be an international discussion on placing penalties and sanctions on governments that create the conditions that cause many of their citizens to flee. While some may claim that this constitutes interference in the internal affairs of the nations affected, it is appropriate, pragmatic and, indeed, humanitarian to eliminate, at the source, the conditions which give rise to the necessity of mass immigration.