Democrats have made it clear that they were bitterly disappointed by the results of the 2016 election. They have taken that disappointment to a level unprecedented in American politics, through antics including street violence, unsubstantiated charges of wrongdoing, extreme criticism propagated by a biased media, and investigations led by Clinton partisans.
In July, former CIA Director John Brennan, as noted by Zero Hedge urged federal officials to refuse to obey President Trump’s orders. In November, Leandra English, an Obama-era appointee appointee at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sued the White House to block it from placing its choice for an interim director for that agency. She is represented by Deepak Gupta, who has previously sued the Trump Administration.
In July 2010, Congress passed and President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB consolidates most Federal consumer financial protection authority in one place. It has been resoundingly criticized for being unconstitutionally structured. In 2016, a federal court ruled that its structure was, indeed, unconstitutional.
Leandra English, was questionably appointed to fill the role by former director Richard Cordray, a former assistant to radical Senator Elizabeth Warren. According to some sources, he chose to leave the Consumer Bureau early in order to run for governor of Ohio. On the other hand, President Trump appointed Mick Mulvaney, an attorney, former Congressman, and Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget to the position.
Warren was instrumental in creating the CFBP.
The main disadvantages of kidney transplant 1 Complications Infection: viagra soft tablets valsonindia.com renal transplant operation is a large vascular and genitourinary surgery, so after the operation, patient’s immunity will decline momentarily. What are the causes of male erectile dysfunction? Is a bacterial infection or a viral disease? Or http://valsonindia.com/about-us/research-development/ order levitra online is it a sexual disease as is evident from the name. Some people go to extremes with fasting, laxatives, enemas, colonics, diuretics, and best price vardenafil even exercise and begin to lose essential nutrients from their body. Best herbal remedies for premature ejaculation include carrots, almonds, pineapple, pomegranate, garlic, onion, beans, mushrooms, cereals, oats, eggs, purchase cialis from india walnuts, dark chocolates, bananas, avocados, asparagus, blueberries, etc. A Justice Department analysis confirms that the President has the authority to appoint an Acting Director until such time as the president nominates and the Senate confirms a new permanent director. Despite that, Leanadra English has filed a lawsuit at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, asserting that she is the “rightful director” because Cordray appointed her. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency is particularly worried that the Mulvaney will shake up the deeply partisan environment at the CFPB. According to Ronald Rubin writing in the National Reviewmanagement at the CFPB were completely devoted to the Democrat Party, more so than fulfilling the mission of their agency.
A Fox News report revealed that “The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is the most partisan agency in the federal government in terms of donations to candidates, according to campaign finance data. Employees at the CFPB, which was created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, contributed nearly $50,000 during the 2016 campaign with all of that money going to aid Hillary Clinton or her rival, the insurgent socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders. Agency employees made more than 300 donations during the campaign. Not one went to a Republican candidate.”
This whole dispute concerns more than just one questionably structured agency rife with partisanship. As noted by Reuters, “Rogue Twitter feeds voicing employee concerns at more than a dozen U.S. government agencies have been launched.”
Shortly after President Trump took office, the Washington Post reported that “The signs of popular dissent from President Trump’s opening volley of actions have been plain to see on the nation’s streets, at airports in the aftermath of his refugee and visa ban, and in the blizzard of outrage on social media. But there’s another level of resistance to the new president that is less visible and potentially more troublesome to the administration: a growing wave of opposition from the federal workers charged with implementing any new president’s agenda. Less than two weeks into Trump’s administration, federal workers are in regular consultation with recently departed Obama-era political appointees about what they can do to push back against the new president’s initiatives. Some federal employees have set up social media accounts to anonymously leak word of changes that Trump appointees are trying to make. And a few government workers are pushing back more openly.”
America is entering a strange new world, in which bureaucrats feel free to disregard the will of the electorate and run the nation as they see fit and for their own interest, and not for the taxpayers who pay their salaries.