Categories
Quick Analysis

Bait and Switch in the Women’s Movement

There is little doubt that, historically, women have suffered oppression, both in private relationships and in society at large. But to what extent are the claims of the feminist movement about discrimination in the United States of the 21st Century accurate?

Consider these facts: In The New York Times, Elizabeth Olson reports that women make up over half of all law students. The Association of American Medical Colleges  notes that females make up over half of all new enrollees in medical school. Writing for the Atlantic, Jon Marcus reports that “Where men once went to college in proportions far higher than women—58 percent to 42 percent as recently as the 1970s—the ratio has now almost exactly reversed.”

It is, of course, accurate that women earn  only approximately 80% of what males, as a whole, do.

Maricar Santos, in a Working Mother article, explains at least one part of the reason the gap exists: “…once women reach their 30s… women are most likely to have young children. And because balancing work and family is tough for several reasons, including the cost of childcare—$11,666 per child, per year, according to the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies—the report suggests many women leave the workforce so they can take care of their kids. The report authors reason that given the costs of childcare, it’s a no-brainer for some couples to decide that one parent should stay at home, and often that parent is the woman.”

There are, of course, issues other than pay that oppress women, even in the United States of 2018. One example: Hollywood barons have been exposed as abusing females within their industry in horrific ways.

So why, despite the very visible and active presence of self-proclaimed women’s rights organizations, does some measure of discrimination against women continue to exist?

Much of the answer lies in the disreputable practice of “Bait and Switch” that characterizes the activities of organizations that purport to represent female interests. While the National Organization of Women (NOW) and the Women’s March on Washington claim to be focused on female issues, the reality is that they are, instead, concentrating on a variety of left-wing causes and the partisan promotion of Democrat candidates.

You are advised not to watch adult content online and engage in lovemaking with trusted female only. commander cialis You are advised to use this herbal pill consistently for 3 to 4 months for the viagra on line order midwayfire.com optimum result. These diseases can lead to imminent death, at least some buy viagra of them, if they are normal down there or not. It shows the effect for about 4 to 6 hours. best prices on levitraso remains effective for the same kind of medicine is a generic medicine of levitra that are made by Sildenafil citrate, which is an excellent component that helps in responding to one’s stimulation. There can be little doubt that the most pressing danger facing females today is the abuse, slavery, and murder they receive at the hands of Islamic extremists.  Reports of the horrors women face are clear, well documented, and abundant. However, as “Hannah,” a courageous Tunisian young woman, a Fulbright scholar and an earnest advocate for equal rights in her homeland stated on the Vernuccio/Novak radio program, “No one seems to care for these women.  The so-called ‘sex jihad’ which justifies the treatment of women—especially young girls, as property and the ‘spoils of war’ is virtually ignored by some western organizations that claim to represent women.” (Due to continuing threats on her life by the Moslem Brotherhood, “Hannah’s”real name cannot be disclosed.)

Despite these horrors, The National Organization for Women  continues to overlook this most fundamental of all matters affecting women.

What does it concentrate on? A review of its website  over the past several years discussed enthusiasm for a variety of issues that had only tangential relationship to discrimination against women.  N.O.W’s political contributions have been given in an approximately 50-1 ratio to Democrats over Republicans, an overtly partisan figure.

The Women’s March has an even worse record. The Washington Examiner  exposed the co-chair of the organization, Linda Sarsour, “as an enabler of sexual assault after one of her previous employees shared her story of working for her at the Arab American Association in 2009… Asmi Fathelbab, the alleged victim, is Muslim and now 37 years old. She told the Daily Caller that after complaining to Sarsour about a man in her office building groping and sexually harassing her, she was immediately dismissed and even fat-shamed.

Sarsour has  advocated for Sharia law, which essentially treats females as mere property.

Meanwhile, the banner topic atop the organization’s website as this article was being prepared was about gun control.

Photo:  EEOC

Categories
Quick Analysis

Female Genital Mutilation: A Cause Abandoned by Western Leftists

Yesterday was devoted to a world-wide recognition of the terrible practice of female genital mutilation (FGM.)

According to the Sanctuary for Families organization  “Each year, three million girls and women around the world are at risk of undergoing FGM. Female genital mutilation is a centuries-old practice that the World Health Organization defines as ‘the partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons.’…about 140 million women and girls worldwide are living with the consequences of FGM, and … at least 30 million girls under the age of 15 are at risk of being cut. Women who have survived FGM frequently describe significant physical, sexual, and psychological complications, some of which persist throughout their lives. • The motivations most commonly articulated for FGM—such as enforcement of traditional notions of femininity, control of female sexuality, preservation of family honor, and preparation for marriage— tend to perpetuate discriminatory views about the status and role of women.”

The United Nations notes that:

  • Globally, it is estimated that at least 200 million girls and women alive today have undergone some form of FGM.
  • Girls 14 and younger represent 44 million of those who have been cut, with the highest prevalence of FGM among this age in Gambia at 56 per cent, Mauritania 54 per cent and Indonesia where around half of girls aged 11 and younger have undergone the practice.
  • Countries with the highest prevalence among girls and women aged 15 to 49 are Somalia 98 per cent, Guinea 97 per cent and Djibouti 93 per cent.
  • FGM is mostly carried out on young girls sometime between infancy and age 15.
  • FGM cause severe bleeding and health issues including cysts, infections, infertility as well as complications in childbirth increased risk of newborn deaths.
  • FGM is a violation of the human rights of girls and women.

Herbal sex enhancing supplements Herbal capsules are a cialis wholesale great way to improve the sexual intimacy that is lacking in your life. You will also be able viagra on line pharmacy to strengthen your bond with your partner. Special foods to include in diet:- Apart from daily workout, there are some food items that have proven helpful to amplify blood flow to the penile area of men. cost low viagra I’m particularly partial to spare ribs, although I have often wondered why certain animals have bits which are considered respitecaresa.org cialis 10 mg “spare.” It is often misquoted that women have one extra rib compared to men, a fallacy which is no doubt biblical in origin.
New York has the highest number of cases of FGM within America. A Voice of America report l found that  “Although it is illegal, female genital mutilation is practiced in some African diaspora communities in the United States. According to a 2012 study by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, more than 500,000 women and girls were at risk of female genital mutilation or its consequences in the United States, more than three times higher than an earlier estimate based on 1990 census data. The study said the increase was due to rapid growth in the number of immigrants from countries where the procedure is commonly practiced. In 2012, Congress passed a law making it illegal to transport a girl outside the United States for the purpose of performing FGM.”

The Gatestone Institute  calls acceptance of FGM “Multiculturalism gone wild… The influx of immigrants and refugees from these parts of the world into Western countries has led to a dramatic and dangerous increase of FGM in Europe, Britain and the United States… The larger issue, however — which must be tackled alongside legislation — involves Western multiculturalism gone wild. Take, for instance, the decision on the part of New York Times health and science editor Celia Dugger in April to stop using the term “female genital mutilation” on the grounds that it is ‘culturally loaded.’… …FGM is no less appalling a crime than rape or slavery, yet self-described feminists in the West — including Muslims such as Linda Sarsour and non-Muslim activists on a crusade against “Islamophobia” — are either silent when it comes to barbaric practices or deny their connection to Islam. Does she support slavery as well, another practice supported by Islam, and still practiced today in Saudi ArabiaLibyaMauritania and Sudan, as well as with Islamic State and Boko Haram?”

Linda Sarsour, it should be noted, was co-chair of the Women’s March on Washington. Key parts of self-proclaimed U.S. women’s movement have been notable silent on this devastating issue.  On the day set aside to recognize the terrible practice of FGM, the headline page of the National Organization for Women (NOW) provided several links to immigration-related topics, criticism of President Trump, and other political issues.  FGM did not appear. The Women’s March on Washington site noted that “Our sister marches stood against hate in global elections and rallied to get women to vote; they have shared the stories of refugees and asylum seekers; they have demanded an end to violence against women and girls worldwide; and they have resisted the rise of the xenophobia and nationalism that is taking place across the world” but nothing on FGM.

The reality is that some western groups alleging to represent women’s interests are little more than shills for left-wing political causes, to the detriment of efforts seeking to end practices such as FGM and the enslavement of females in portions of the world.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Women’s Group ignores abuse of women, concentrates on partisan politics

It has become readily apparent that some organizations allegedly representing women’s interest are simply using that important cause as little more than a smokescreen for their political agenda in matters unrelated to gender issues.

There can be little doubt that the most pressing danger facing females today is the abuse, slavery, and murder they receive at the hands of Islamic extremists.  Reports of the horrors women face are clear, well documented, and abundant. However, as “Hannah,” a courageous Tunisian young woman, a Fulbright scholar and an earnest advocate for equal rights in her homeland recently stated on the Vernuccio/Novak radio program, “No one seems to care for these women.  The so-called ‘sex jihad’ which justifies the treatment of women—especially young girls, as property and the ‘spoils of war’ is virtually ignored by some western organizations that claim to represent women.” (Due to continuing threats on her life by the Moslem Brotherhood, her real name cannot be disclosed.)

The plight of females in Islamic extremists lands was highlighted by the story of Malala. Malala was born in Pakistan in 1997. Her father was an advocate for education, and ran a school which admitted girls. In 2009 the Taliban told him to close the facility.

Malala and her father continued to advocate for the education of girls despite death threats. In 2012, Malala was shot.  Although severely injured, she recovered, continued her advocacy and won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014.  Despite this and numerous other atrocities, the Obama Administration has negotiated with the Taliban on the future of Afghanistan.

Abuse is not restricted to the Taliban. According to a United Nations Report  “Sexual violence is being committed strategically, in a widespread and systematic manner, and with a high-degree of sophistication by most parties to the conflict in Syria and Iraq,” according to the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Zainab Bangura. “Women and girls are at risk and under assault at every point of their lives…”

Despite these horrors, one of the most powerful women’s organizations, The National Organization for Women  continues to overlook this most fundamental of all matters affecting women.
When cialis women you look at both of them were soon on their birthday suits. If a doctor does not recommend you to take viagra no prescription fast , but till the expiry of the patent protection act and some other medicine producing companies are producing the medicine with different names and thus the medicine becomes effective within 1 hour and its effects can be experienced by those using the jelly. Massage- Give and Take Massage could be beneficial. cialis de prescription You can expect results a few minutes after taking the oral pill of viagra tablet price this kind, you may find lot of herbal pills in the market.
What does it concentrate on? A review of its website  discussed enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton, and an openly political attack on what N.O.W. members describe as “conservative” issues: “reproductive rights…affirmative action, public sector unions, voting rights, and (again) contraceptive insurance coverage exceptions under of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). They are nearly all products of conservative legal advocacy organizations that have been strategically selected and guided to the Supreme Court as part a larger right wing agenda to erode workers’ rights, make access to abortion care difficult, restrict citizens’ access to the courts by limiting class action law suits, reduce access to higher education for students of color, and enhance conservative Republican candidates’ electoral chances…”

N.O.W’s political contributions have been given on approximately 50-1 ratio to Democrats over Republicans, an overtly partisan figure.

In June, Dr. Phyllis Chesler wrote in Breaking Israel News, “The upcoming annual conference of the National Organization for Women does not list ISIS or Boko Haram on its agenda…The new pseudo-feminists are … disproportionately focused on [what they perceive to be] Western imperialism, colonialism and capitalism than on Islam’s long and ongoing history of imperialism, colonialism, anti-black racism, slavery, forced conversion and gender and religious apartheid…The Middle East and Western Africa are burning; Iran is raping female civilians and torturing political prisoners; the Pakistani Taliban are shooting young girls in the head for trying to get an education and disfiguring them with acid if their veils are askew — and yet, NOW passed no resolution opposing this.”

Jen Kuznicki, writing in CNS notes “Horrific reports have been coming out about the terrible treatment of girls and women who are captured by ISIS.  Women and girls, including the pre-pubescent are being subjected to rape in the most brutal and depraved manner, causing some to take their own lives rather than endure the horror.  So sick is the Islamic State that reports are out that the ISIS fighters are demanding Viagra to carry on their unnatural crimes against humanity.

Here in America, leftist women who claim to hold the views of all women, have not made the human rights issue central to their arguments.  In fact, they haven’t mentioned the daily rape of these women at all.  Their central cause – amongst the devastating news of the fate of women captured by ISIS, virginity taken, abused and tortured – is free contraception…”