Categories
Quick Analysis

Democrats Poised to Repeat Mistakes

The Democrats are considering a move that may provide their Republican rivals further success in the 2018 elections.

The Democrat National Committee (DNC) will name a new chair in March, who will strive to clean up the Party’s image after their drubbing in the 2016 election, which provided Republicans with solid control of the White House, both houses of Congress, and a significant majority of state governorships and legislatures. The new president will also name the new Supreme Court Justice, which will assure a more conservative-leaning Supreme Court.

In addition to losses at the ballot box, the last chair of the DNC, Florida’s Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, left in disgrace following revelations that she essentially tilted the primary process in favor of Hillary Clinton. Her successor, Donna Brazile, now serving as interim chair, also faces ethical issues following reports that she inappropriately alerted the Clinton campaign of presidential debate questions scheduled to be asked.

Rep. Keith Maurice Ellison, (D-Minnesota), was first elected in 2007. He serves as co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Ellison is a left-wing lawyer, a convert to Islam, with ties to the radical Nation of Islam. He is considered a leading candidate to serve as the next head of the Democrat National Committee. Former Maryland Governor Mike O’Malley, former DNC Chair Howard Dean, are also being considered, as is DNC Vice-Chair Ray Buckley, South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Jaime Harrison, ex- Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak, and Labor Secretary Tom Perez.  The new chair will not be named until March.

He has, notes Fox News, equated George W. Bush to Hitler, and called for the impeachment of former Vice President Dick Cheney. He refuses to answer faxes for “environmental reasons.” He has been associated with the anti-Semitic leanings of Farrakhan, And he has compared the 9/11 attacks as “America’s Reichstag fire,” a reference to the Nazi burning of the German government building which they blamed on their opponents, and used it as an excuse to round them up. A Washington Post article notes that Ellison “called affirmative action a ‘sneaky’ form of compensation for slavery, suggesting instead that white Americans pay reparations to blacks.

He later renounced some of his earlier positions when they became politically inconvenient.
This medication has been developed by the renowned cheap levitra pharmaceutical companies which manufacture the medication as indicated by the security safeguards can have antagonistic impact on the individual’s wellbeing as opposed to redressing the issue. Usual setback of flaccid organ This is a plus point which the users of cialis super active get. It has antioxidant properties to generic sildenafil 100mg nullify the effects of free radicals. That is completely not acceptable as one must see to it that they talk to their respective doctor before purchasing this medicine.You must not take any kind of risk because life is a precious gift from cialis viagra australia God and health is wealth.
Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have backed his candidacy. He is also said to have the support of top Senate Democrat Charles Schumer, the New York Senator who called for limiting the First Amendment, and outgoing Senate minority leader Harry Reid, who has drawn extensive criticism for his inflammatory statements about the character of the President-elect.

Democrat support for Ellison largely centers on his opposition to Clintons’ reliance on Wall Street donors, and his stated preference for concentrating more on the support of working and middle class voters.

While he may have correctly identified voter distrust of the big-money ties and the pay for play politics of the Clinton wing of his party, his emphasis on racial divides, climate extremism, class strife, his history of affiliation with religious bigotry and the progressive economic policies that have severely impacted working Americans doesn’t inspire confidence in his ability to lead Democrats to victory in 2018. The GOP may have gained support from its drive to fight voter fraud; Ellison has been an active and vocal opponent of good-government measures such as voter ID. As the military threat from the Russians, Chinese, North Koreans, and radical Islamists grows rapidly, he continues his call for large cuts in defense spending.

There continues to be an apparent disconnect between real-world issues and the Democrat leadership. Progressive policies, especially forcing lending institutions to provide loans to those incapable of repayment, caused the Great Recession of 2007-2008.  The Obama Administration’s leftist economics failed to provide the growth necessary for the U.S. economy to grow, or to provide financial health for the middle class. Its cuts to defense spending left America in the most precarious national security position since the end of WW2. Climate extremism, based on unproven statistics, endangered the success of family farms and helped continue the major drop in manufacturing and mining employment. Obamacare is collapsing under the weight of its own financial misconceptions. The voters, in several successive elections, have registered their distaste for the elitism of Progressive Democrats (best symbolized by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s statement that Americans would have to wait until the Affordable Care Act was passed before they see what was in it) which replaced top level politics and executive orders for honest public debate and open votes in Congress.

The Democrats appear poised to double down on the very traits that have caused them to become an increasingly dwindling part of government at both the federal and state levels.