Categories
Quick Analysis

Europe’s Leaders Place Their Personal Careers Above Their Nation, Part 2

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government concludes its report on why Europe’s leaders aren’t responding to the terrorism devastating their nations.

The Pew Research Center notes that Muslims are younger than other Europeans. “In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.”

A Spectator analysis of Christopher Deliso’s study, Migration, Terrorism, and the Future of a Divided Europe emphasizes that his examination didn’t indicate that the massive migration was spontaneous or the result of disruption in Islamic homelands.

“By the end of 2015, 1.1 million migrants and refugees arrived in Europe by sea… little about the war in Syria had changed to explain this mad increase in volume. Rather, [Turkey’s autocratic leader] Erdogan used migration to extract concessions from the EU: By March 2016, desperate to make him turn off the spigot, the EU gifted Turkey with 3 billion euro for refugee hosting expenses and visa-free travel for Turkish citizens.” In addition, Deliso also reports that globalists “trumpeted the human rights of asylum seekers over the security of borders; lobbied the United Nations, European Union, and U.S. Government to see the world his way; and financed a legion of pro-migration NGOs, think tanks, academics, and activists to facilitate this movement.”

Criminal organizations also played a role. “Human trafficking, weapons and drug smuggling, antiquities theft, and document fraud were all exponentially mobilized to facilitate and finance illegal transit. Criminal revenue from migrant smuggling in 2015, to and within the EU, was an estimated 3-6 billion euros according to Europol. Corrupt diplomats got in on the act: The author interviewed the former employee of an Athens-based, Muslim-majority embassy who said the consulate sold passports to migrants for 1,000 euros each.”

Islamic sources are not shy about their ultimate goal.  Their aim, which has been an historical constant for millennia, is not assimilation into Europe’s mainstream; it is the eventual control of the continent.

As CBN outlines:
It’s like one of the many you see around the Read More Here levitra prescription mouths of long-term smokers, or on grumpy people who express their displeasure by frequently pursing their lips. Whilst the penis is flaccid it will appear to be cialis canada generico on the edge all the time. The use of illegal medicines levitra generika appalachianmagazine.com affect the sexual power in men. The complications that are experienced during health disorders can be removed in the course of time in the laboratories in developing medication to cure erectile dysfunction. buy levitra is a medicine which is approved by FDA for the safe use by men.
“the Persians invaded Europe in an attempt to conquer the Greeks in the fifth century B.C…After Mohammed’s death in 632, the new Muslim caliph, Abu Bakr, launched Islam into almost 1,500 years of continual imperialist, colonialist, bloody conquest and subjugation of others through invasion and war, a role Islam continues to this very day….The Muslim wars of imperialist conquest have been launched for almost 1,500 years against hundreds of nations, over millions of square miles (significantly larger than the British Empire at its peak). The lust for Muslim imperialist conquest stretched from southern France to the Philippines, from Austria to Nigeria, and from central Asia to New Guinea.”

The new wave of invasion is different from the military strategy of the past. It is based, instead, on Europe’s declining native population, in contrast with the high fertility rate of the global Islamic population. A report by Italy’s Machiavelli Political and Strategic Study Center notes: “Europe and Italy face.. unprecedented…migratory flows. This is primarily due to the concomitance of European demographic decline (from 22% of the world’s population in 1950 to 7% in 2050) and African demographic explosion (from 9% to 25% of the world’s population over a hundred years). In 2065 the share of first and second generation immigrants in Italy could exceed 40% of the total population. In addition, there is greater homogeneity of immigration: the first ten nationalities account for 64% of total immigrants today, while in the 1970s only 13%. All this does not deviate from what is happening in several Western European countries. By 2065 in Great Britain, the British ethnicity should lose the absolute majority in their own country. Today in Germany, children under 5 are 36% immigrant children, suggesting a major change in the next generation’s ethnic composition. This ethno-demographic revival of the European population, and in particular Italy, must be part of the ongoing debate on migration policies.”

Serious discussions about changes in Europe’s incautious immigration policy have been virtually ignored by continental governments. Why?

The answer may rest with the internal politics of the continent.  Since the end of the Second World War, Western European politicians have depended on providing substantial social welfare benefits to their voters. Much of their ability to provide these costly programs depended on a growing population.

The New York Times reported on the dilemma several years ago: “Europeans have boasted about their social model, with its generous vacations and early retirements…But all over Europe governments with big budgets, falling tax revenues and aging populations are experiencing rising deficits, with more bad news ahead. With low growth, low birthrates and longer life expectancies, Europe can no longer afford its comfortable lifestyle…”

European leaders, frightened of confronting their voters with the news that those financially unrealistic benefits are longer affordable, chose instead to replenish the diminishing young population with migrants from the Middle East and Africa. Their gamble that the new arrivals would assimilate has proven a failure.  By refusing to admit their error, they have placed their own careers (and comfortable life styles) above the very future of their nation, their culture, and their civilization itself.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Europe’s Leaders Place Their Personal Careers Above Their Nation

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government reveals why Europe’s leaders aren’t responding to the terrorism devastating their nations.

The devastating attacks in Spain, (According to WRAL, “The Islamic State group claimed responsibility, saying in a statement on its Aamaq news agency that the attack was carried out by ‘soldiers of the Islamic State.”) are horrific, but not novel.  The Guardian  notes that “Europe has endured seven acts of vehicle terrorism in the past year.” The targeted killings of females in Finland, wide-scale rapes in Germany and Sweden, the near-constant assaults in Paris, the murders near Parliament in the United Kingdom, indeed, the constant wave of terror  are the works of Muslim extremists.

Britain’s Mirror newspaper quotes Nigel Farage,  who believes “there’s an ‘obvious’ link between ‘uncontrolled immigration’ and terrorism in the wake of the Barcelona attack…” According to Farage, “The link is obvious isn’t it. Anyone that doesn’t recognise that link is simply in denial. We are told if you pick out and identify a problem in any religious group, that is a bad thing to do…The truth of it is we have two problems. The first is we have Muslim communities living in Western European cities who are separated off from the rest of the community. They are doing badly at school, badly at work, you know they really are, and pray in many, many ways to an extremist ideology. So that’s a problem of a total lack of integration in our cities.”

Pew Research notes that “…Recent killings in Paris as well as the arrival of hundreds of thousands of mostly Muslim refugees in Europe have drawn renewed attention to the continent’s Muslim population. In many European countries, including France, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, concerns about growing Muslim communities have led to calls for restrictions on immigration… Muslims are younger than other Europeans. In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.”

As it is an online course you can achat viagra pfizer start personal driving course for aspiring students. We all know that higher blood sugar level tends to narrowed vessels and the arteries leading generico levitra on line blood flow an extremely difficult task. The frame of reference is typically individuals cialis buy uk in and out of these alcohol is very common. Stress is said to be the main reason for a person to be facing cipla tadalafil 10mg depression. A Gatestone Institute report  quotes some of the voices that are speaking out on the issue. The Archbishop of Strasbourg states: “Muslim believers know very well that their fertility is such today, that they call it… the Great Replacement. They tell you in a very calm, very positive way: One day all this, all this will be ours…” Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán “warned against a ‘Muslimized Europe”.

National Review  weighs in on the issue: “EU bureaucrats should hear the message loud and clear: Muslim migration waves are a pressing problem, and the public is fed up. The European Union announced this week that it would begin proceedings to punish Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic for their refusal to accept refugees and migrants under a 2015 scheme the E.U. commission created…The conflict between the EU and these three nations of the Visegrád Group is not just about the authority the EU can arrogate to itself when facing an emergency (one largely of its own making), but about the character of European government and society in the future. It is hard not to conclude that the dissenting countries are correct to dissent. Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia had voted against the 2015 agreement. Poland’s government had supported it then, but a subsequent election saw a new party come into power that rejected the scheme.”

Adrian Michaels, reporting for The Telegraph  stressed that  “Britain and the…European Union are ignoring a demographic time bomb: a recent rush into the EU by migrants, including millions of Muslims, will change the continent beyond recognition over the next two decades, and almost no policy-makers are talking about it. The numbers are startling. Only 3.2 per cent of Spain’s population was foreign-born in 1998. In 2007 it was 13.4 per cent. Europe’s Muslim population has more than doubled in the past 30 years and will have doubled again by 2015. In Brussels, the top seven baby boys’ names recently were Mohamed, Adam, Rayan, Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine and Hamza… EU officials admit that these issues are not receiving the attention they deserve… It could have a critical impact on foreign policy: a study was submitted to the US Air Force on how America’s relationship with Europe might evolve.”

The Report concludes tomorrow.