Categories
Quick Analysis

Media, Politicians Ignore Nuclear Threats

Distressingly absent from the media discourse is the very real, very significant threat arising from the dramatic increase in nuclear weapons occurring in Russia, China and North Korea.

The American press, and far too many American politicians, ignore major developments in atomic weaponry in hostile nations.  International sources have been raising alarm bells. Russia and North Korea have actually bragged about their unprecedented growth in weapons of mass destruction.

Moscow has indeed not been shy about its fearsome new weapons, included in an over $700 billion spending hike designed by the Kremlin to make its armed forces the most powerful on the planet.

One particular weapon has been, appropriately, a missile termed “Satan-2” (or RS-28) by western sources and Sarmat by Russia. It will have extraordinary capabilities, and be capable of carrying a sufficient number of warheads to wipe a nation the size of France off the face of the map in a single launch.

According to Global Security, “The new missile will reportedly be capable of carrying a payload of up to 10 tons on any trajectory. This means an attack on a target could be made from any direction, i.e. RS-28 could start from Russia and fly in the direction of Antarctica, make a circumterrestrial flight and hit targets on the other side of the planet from an unexpected direction.”

Russia’s RT news service recently reported that a successful ICBM launch, testing a hypersonic cruise vehicle, recently took place. The exercise tested a warhead to be placed on the new missile.

North Korea joins Russia in new ICBM developments. The Stratfor research organization  notes that “After announcing that it would cut communications with the United States, North Korea launched three missiles (two Scuds and a No Dong) last week….Pyongyang’s byungjin policy, which places equal emphasis on nuclear weapons and economic development, is more than just posturing…The United States has said it will not recognize North Korea’s nuclear capabilities. But choosing not to recognize a reality is not a starting point for a viable strategy…”
Previously only old men were found to be suffering with the impotence because of the unhealthy lifestyle we are living. canadian viagra prices learn this here now Ayurvedic pills especially formulated for erectile dysfunction such as Booster viagra free pill capsule and Mast Mood oil. It is a powerful symbol of divinity on Earth that is believed to restore and mouthsofthesouth.com purchase levitra online enhance normal well-being within an individual. http://mouthsofthesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/MOTS12-1-1-Clubreath.pdf levitra online canada They use a range of treatments such as Electrical acupuncture, ear acupuncture, vitamin point injection along with herbal medicines to improve your vision.
Perhaps the most underrated nuclear threat is that coming from China. Writing for the National Interest,  Zachery Keck reports that “China’s acquisition of a MIRVed capability is one of the most dangerous nuclear weapons developments that no one is talking about. MIRVed missiles carry payloads of several nuclear warheads each capable of being directed at a different set of targets. They are considered extremely destabilizing to the strategic balance primarily because they place a premium on striking first and create a “use em or lose em” nuclear mentality.”

There’s more to be concerned about when it comes to China. Numerous sources have reported about the research performed at Georgetown University, led by Professor Philip Kaber, indicating that Beijing may have up to 3,000 missiles hidden in thousands of miles of tunnels. The threat came to light following an earthquake in the Sichuan region.

Despite all of these tangible threats, the Obama Administration continues to push for further unilateral reductions in America’s nuclear deterrent and unilateral limitations on how the weapons would be used.

The Free Beacon reports that, in addition to the unilateral reductions,  the “White House plans for a radical shift in U.S. nuclear policy came under fire from the military leaders who voiced concerns to Congress … Strategic Command chief Adm. Cecil Haney warned that the policy shift could undermine global stability in deterring growing nuclear threats posed by Russia, China, and North Korea.

One of the contentious issues being floated by some within the Obama White House is not funding modernizing the increasingly obsolete U.S. nuclear arsenal.

The Free Beacon notes that “Disarmament activists, including some officials in the White House, are seeking new anti-nuclear executive action before Obama leaves office, the Washington Post reported July 10. Options discussed among senior administration officials include adopting the no-first-use policy and circumventing Senate ratification of a nuclear test ban treaty by seeking a U.N. resolution on the treaty. There also have been internal discussions in government indicating the president may seek to extend the New START arms treaty with Russia to 2026 and seek to cut deployed warheads from the treaty level of 1,550 to less than 1,000.”