The Center for Security Policy has released a letter signed by key national security personnel denouncing the Obama administration’s conduct of nuclear talks with Iran and what they describe as “the seriously defective deal likely to emerge from them.”
The signatories emphasize that the United States and its Western allies have already surrendered too much to Iran. They express concern that the White House will provide even more concessions. All of these give-aways have not deterred Iran from reaching its goal of becoming a nuclear weapons state.
Iran’s advanced space and rocketry programs provide that nation with the means to soon be able to launch weapons of mass destruction at any target on Earth.
Key problems with the potential agreement identified in the open letter include:
- The deal will effectively concede to Iran the “right” to enrich uranium and allow Iran to continue uranium enrichment.
- It will permit Iran to install new, still more advanced centrifuges and to retain its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium.
- It will not require Iran to disassemble existing centrifuges, its underground Fordow enrichment facility or its plutonium-producing Arak heavy water reactor now under construction.
- A key constitutional issue has also been raised. President Obama’s has no intention of allowing the U.S. Congress any say in the potential deal, or his plan to unilaterally suspend mandated U.S. sanctions against Iran once a final accord is reached.
Such problems arise when the blood does levitra pill not pass to the penile organ in a sufficient quantity. Loss of desire or negative libido The painful physical intimacy for women is based on dryness, lacking lubrication or slow lubrication in libido related areas. tadalafil india pharmacy This type of therapy is effective in treating problems with back pain, generic cialis for sale body aches, etc. Our entire stock canada tadalafil 10mg of machines is fully bonded, licensed, and insured.
Iran is already defying a key premise of this year’s nuclear talks and prerequisite for any future deal – namely, that the regime in Tehran would cooperate fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The signatories note estimates by three leading Washington think tanks that Iran will retain its presently assessed capability of producing weapons-grade nuclear fuel in as little as four-to-six weeks from a decision to do so.
Iran has failed to live up to its commitments, and there is no evidence that it will abide by any future obligations in the comprehensive agreement that the Obama administration is trying to finalize by November 24. There is no reason to expect that the Tehran regime will abide by the potential accord or cooperate with efforts to monitor future compliance.
–TEXT OF LETTER–
November 14, 2014
United States Capitol
East Capitol St. NE & First St. SE
Washington, DC 20004
Dear Speaker Boehner, Senator Reid, Senator McConnell, and Representative Pelosi:
We are writing to urge that the United States Congress take immediate action to repudiate the current nuclear talks with Iran and any agreement they may produce. We urge Congress to pass legislation to this effect that also prevents the Administration from waiving sanctions or moving forward with any executive agreements to conclude a nuclear agreement with Iran without full Congressional review. We are calling on Congress to take this action because we believe the United States and its Western allies have already given away too much to Iran in these negotiations and that any agreement that emerges as a result will be a threat to our interests, allies and security.
Examples of the problems with the emerging deal abound: We have effectively conceded to Iran the “right” to enrich uranium. The United States has offered one-sided concessions allowing Iran to continue uranium enrichment, install new, more advanced centrifuges, and retain its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium. The United States is not requiring Iran to disassemble centrifuges, its underground Fordow enrichment facility or its plutonium-producing Arak heavy water reactor now under construction U.S. diplomats recently offered new concessions which will allow Iran to operate up to 6,000 uranium centrifuges.
We believe these concessions put American and international security at risk because they will do virtually nothing to stop, or even to substantially delay, Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. Estimates by the American Enterprise Institute, the Institute for Science and International Security, and the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center on how fast Iran could make enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuclear bomb using reactor-grade uranium currently range from four to six weeks. According to Harvard University’s Belfer Center, Iran could make up to seven nuclear bombs from its current stockpile of low-enriched uranium (after further, possibly undetectable enrichment).
In exchange for the above concessions, the Obama administration has asked for very minor accommodations by Tehran. The end result will not reduce the number of nuclear bombs it can currently construct. In fact, it would only delay the time for Iran to produce enough weapons-grade fuel for its first bomb by as little as two weeks.
In addition to our grave concerns about U.S. concessions to Iran during this year’s nuclear talks, we also are alarmed that Tehran has defied a central premise of the negotiations: full cooperation with the IAEA and answering all outstanding questions about whether its nuclear program is truly peaceful.
According to a September 5, 2014 IAEA report, Iran continues to refuse to resolve “outstanding issues over possible military dimensions of its nuclear program.” We also note that an October 31, 2014 New York Times report which revealed that, “Iran had stopped answering the agency’s questions about suspected past efforts to design the components of a bomb.”
We believe that, since Iran has failed to cooperate fully with the IAEA either during the nuclear negotiations or, indeed, ever since its accession to the Nonproliferation Treaty there is negligible likelihood that its cooperation with the IAEA will improve after a final agreement is signed.
Iran’s strategy in the nuclear talks is crystal clear: offer minimal and inconsequential concessions and limited transparency on its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of Western sanctions. Iran’s negotiating strategy has included a refusal to dismantle nuclear facilities and demands for an increased uranium enrichment capacity. As long as this is Iran’s purpose, we believe an agreement that will result in the actual and permanent termination of the Iranian nuclear weapons program is impossible.
Given Iran’s long record of covert nuclear activities with weapons applications and its continuing refusal to cooperate with the IAEA and answer outstanding questions about its nuclear program, we believe the responsibility rests with Tehran to resolve all outstanding issues before any final agreement eviscerates the only remaining leverage we have: the still-extant U.S. and international sanctions. Further, we believe that the United States must demonstrate resolve in demanding the Iranian regime verifiably dismantle any facilities that could permit progress towards a deliverable nuclear weapons capability.
To make matters worse, recent press reports indicate that President Obama plans to deny the U.S. Congress any say in the forthcoming nuclear agreement with Iran, and that he intends unilaterally to suspend U.S. sanctions against Iran once a final accord is reached.
Surely, there will be wide, bipartisan agreement on both sides of Capitol Hill that it would be a grave mistake to go forward with any nuclear deal with Iran without the express support of the U.S. Congress. The legislative branch knows that, once the current sanctions regime against Iran by the United States and counterpart sanctions imposed by the Europeans disappear, it will be difficult – if not as a practical matter, impossible – to reestablish them, even if Iran does not live up to its obligations.
It is, therefore, time for Congress to act. By making clear that the legislative branch does not support the agreement now being finalized, there is a chance of preventing a bad deal from being concluded with far-reaching and negative consequences. The talks with Iran have drifted so far from reality, and our minimum requirements, that they are certain to produce a bad deal that cannot be salvaged.
America’s allies in the region, especially Israel and Saudi Arabia, are rightly alarmed at the prospect that Iran is being enabled to go nuclear by the U.S. and the rest of the P-5 plus 1. Among other possible responses could be a decision by the Saudis to develop their own nuclear weapons program, or simply buy one or more nuclear weapons from another state, setting off a spiral of further proliferation likely to make the region even more unstable and dangerous.
We therefore respectfully call on Congress to adopt legislation to repudiate the nuclear agreement now taking shape. We urge you and your colleagues to insist that a coherent, realistic and firm U.S. policy be adopted instead, one aimed at actually preventing the Iranian regime from realizing its nuclear weapons ambitions. This should require, at a minimum, that there be no further easing of sanctions or further talks with Iran until Tehran complies with all UN Security Council resolutions related to its nuclear program, fully cooperates with the IAEA, and provides truthful answers to all outstanding questions about its nuclear program.
Sincerely,
Hon. Peter Hoekstra
Former Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Lieutenant General William G. Boykin, U.S. Army (Ret.)
Former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
Admiral James A. Lyons, U.S. Navy (Ret.)
Former Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet
Hon. Michelle Van Cleave
Former National Counterintelligence Executive
Hon. Paula DeSutter
Former Assistant Secretary of State for Verification and Compliance
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.
Former Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acting)
Jack David
Hudson Institute Senior Fellow and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
David Wurmser
Former Senior Adviser to Vice President Cheney and Founder, Delphi Global Analysis Group
Rich Lowry
Editor, National Review
Daniel Pipes
President, Middle East Forum
Lt. Col. Ralph Peters
U.S. Army (Ret)
Michael Rubin
Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
Sarah Stern
Founder and President, Endowment for Middle East Truth
Daniel Pollak
Co-Director, Government Relations, Zionist Organization of America
Yleem Poblete
Former Staff Director, House Foreign Affairs Committee
Clare M. Lopez
Former CIA Officer
Frederick Fleitz
Former CIA Officer