Categories
Quick Analysis

The Real Agenda Behind the Fake News Controversy

The concept of “fake news” should be obvious: reporting which is not based on facts. But in the absurd world of America’s biased media, “fake News” has been the term applied to reporting which challenges the prevailing political beliefs held by the “establishment” media.

Pamela Geller notes that “The left-wing elites…are in one of their fictional publicity campaigns that they masquerade as urgent news. Their latest terror is ‘fake news’ sites. The New York Times reported shortly after the election that Google and Facebook ‘have faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome.’ That was fake news in itself: fake news’ didn’t influence the presidential election’s outcome, all too real news about the wrong direction in which our nation was headed under Barack Obama did. Nevertheless, the Times said that ‘those companies responded by making it clear that they would not tolerate such misinformation by taking pointed aim at fake news sites’ revenue sources.’ If a blogger or news writer gets a story wrong, does that designate him or her, or his or her site, as ‘fake news’? If that’s the case, they’ll have to shut down the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, etc. They get things wrong all the time. Every article written about my colleagues, my work, or myself is fake. Most of what they wrote and didn’t write about the Orlando mass slaughter at the gay nightclub was disinformation and deception… is an end-run around the First Amendment, and it’s disastrous. It is indeed true that Facebook has too much power, but banning ‘fake news’ sites is hardly the solution. That’s Zuckerberg’s fix-it? It would be funny if it weren’t so Hitlerian. Facebook has too much power. Its news curators, mini-Goebbelians — are more frightening than Kafka’s antagonists.”

Adam H. Johnson, writing in The Nation  reports that “Over the past month, three separate lists of “fake news” websites—boosted and shared by major media outlets, journalists, and pundits—have gone viral, despite the fact that all three lists included legitimate outlets well within the mainstream…[the] blacklist included “WikiLeaks and the Drudge Report, as well as Clinton-critical left-wing websites…[and] libertarian venues.”… While many who legitimately think fake news is a problem … this story is a problem in search of evidence..”

With loss of self esteem and order viagra regencygrandenursing.com performance, irrespective of the people in an adverse way. Artificial preservatives and get viagra in canada substances may cause few negative results to your pet. You’ll find nonetheless many option on the dilemma, this post focuses on erectile dysfunction drugs evaluate so sufferers can handpick one of the most effective drug to provide back again individuals nights invested in cuddle with their partners. generic sales viagra This really is by far the easiest way of getting performance enhancing drugs. The most acknowledged sorts join generic cialis for sale, Kamagra, Penegra, Zenegra, Edegra and so on. Clearly, there is an agenda being pursued by those who claim to be concerned about news sites they label as fake.  Johnson notes: “Those wanting to proceed with plans to curate and monitor information online—a long held impulse of all governments—are using the specter of ‘fake news’ as a PR bludgeon to justify these broader efforts. On November 29, The Washington Post’s David Ignatius relayed that the US State Department was working on plans to protect ‘the truth,’ including floating the idea of a ‘global ombudsman for information.’ The troubling effects of such efforts, as anyone who’s operated outside the mainstream of acceptable political opinion will tell you, cannot be overstated. One reason so many blue-checkmark pundits reflexively share fake-news blacklists—despite them having numerous false positives—is because they, themselves, have never held an opinion that veers too far off the editorial page of The New York Times.”

The overt, biased agenda of media actors propagating the “fake news” concept is crystal clear.  As outlined by the Daily Caller: “A list of ‘fake news’ sites compiled by a liberal college professor — a list that was uncritically accepted and distributed by some liberal journalists — included top right-of-center sites like Independent Journal Review (IJR) and The Blaze alongside objectively fake sites. Left-leaning media organizations like the Los Angeles Times and New York magazine distributed the list to their readers. One website that the Washington Post labeled “fake news” — without providing a single piece of evidence — is threatening to sue the Post for defamation, after being included on a similar list. In an article last summer, liberal New York Magazine writer Brian Feldman tried to argue that “conservative news” and “fake news” are the same thing. That some liberal journalists are lumping in legitimate news organizations alongside objectively false sites while at the same time calling for censorship of fake news has lead to concerns that the crackdown on fake news sites — the actual influence of which remains unknown — will be used by liberals to censor their conservative competitors.”

The overwhelming impulse on the part of those in a position of authority–whether in government or those controlling major media sources-is to control what the public gets to know.  Labeling those who publish information that is embarrassing to those in power as purveyors of fake news is merely the latest excuse to exercise censorship.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Comedy and Satire vs. Serious Journalism

The concept of “fake news” has become a major topic in recent months.

There has always been an ample supply of reporting that is demonstrably reality-challenged. Supermarket tabloids breathlessly headline stories that strain credulity, discussing ridiculous topics about visitors from outer space, the whereabouts of Elvis, or other nonsense. Even in more respected sources, unsubstantiated articles devoid of provable facts have creeped into publications, defying journalistic ethics.

But there are two new aspects to the issue. One involves the increased frequency with which many, particularly young people, get their “news” from non-news sources, such as comedy shows. The second is using the pejorative label of “fake news” for articles that reveal facts that accurately contradict preconceived notions based on the ideology of those making the accusation.

Comedy and Satire vs. Real News

A Harvard Crimson analysis found that “Political satire outlets have risen in popularity considerably in recent years. In fact, Jon Stewart’s “The Daily Show” and “The Colbert Report” were the two most-watched late night talk shows among 18- to 49-year-olds in the first quarter of 2013. ‘The Onion’, a well-known satirical newspaper and website with a political section, started with modest beginnings and now boasts 7.5 million viewers monthly. This meteoric rise has led scholars and laymen alike to question the impact humorous news outlets have on politics… political satire chooses reports based on comedic value, which—instead of deviating from essential information… some have argued that political satire encourages cynicism, trivializes politics, and promotes a narrow point of view (stemming from the predominantly liberal leanings of most political satirists and comedians).

A Pew Research study  found that a significant portion of Americans get their news from non-news sources, particularly comedy and entertainment television programs. Pew noted that in 2014, 10% overall got their news from the Colbert Report comedy program. Within that 10%, Younger males were “the most likely to use and trust The Colbert Report as a source of news about government and politics.” In the survey of online adults, according to Pew, nearly a quarter (22%) of 18- to 29- year-old males say they got news about politics and government from The Colbert Report in the previous week. That is more than twice that of 18- to 29- year-old women and significantly higher than any other age group. Also, these younger males are more likely to trust The Colbert Report as a source of political news; almost three-in-ten say that they trust it, more than any other age group.”
Advantages of Brachytherapy This procedure is minimally invasive and requires no prescription sildenafil very little time to complete. Most people experience this as feeling lethargic, moody, unica-web.com levitra without prescription or depressed without sugar. Apply 8 to 10 drops of this herbal oil and apply along the length of sexual activity Penile erection that is not firm levitra in india price enough to penetrate the vagina Inability to obtain a penile erection Develop abruptly morning erection or loss in interest in libido, then it is a psychological problem Reduced sexual desire Develops gradually and persistently, there is probably a physical cause;. Kamagra tablets are used to treat erectile dysfunction (impotence) in men, by increasing blood flow into the penis. *Vibrators – These are useful in urging lethargic penis into life. order viagra on line
The Report also found that Those with consistently liberal political views are the most likely to use and trust The Colbert Report.Roughly a quarter (26%) of consistent liberals reported getting news about government and politics from The Colbert Report in the previous week. That is far more than other ideological groups. In fact, a mere 1% of consistent conservatives say they get news from the show. The share of consistent liberals who get news from The Colbert Report is similar to that of The Huffington Post (29%) and CBS News (30%), but somewhat lower than its lead-in The Daily Show (34%), as well as a number of more traditional sources including NPR (53%) and CNN (52%). Trust follows the same pattern. About a third (36%) of consistent liberals trust The Colbert Report, more than any other ideological group.”

The Impact on the National Conversation

The impact on national politics, according to a recent review by the Boston Globe, is significant. The Globe calls it “The John Oliver Effect” – an influence on the national conversation that has been known to affect policy.

Joe Hale Cutbirth, writing in Columbia University’s Academic Commons,  notes “the blurring of lines between news and entertainment, public policy and popular culture, is not a new phenomenon. Yet, re cent concerns that journalism is being subsumed within the larger field of mass communication and competing with an increasingly diverse group of narratives that includes political satire are well-founded… When Time recently asked readers to identify “the most trusted newsperson in America,” Stewart was the runaway winner… It argues that they seek him out because the para-political talk he offers helps them connect with a larger community of like-minded fellows Early scholarship on the increasingly complex relationship between satire and traditional journalism has focused on the satirists and attempted to define their narratives as something more than comedy – some type of popular journalistic hybrid or emerging narrative that is a new form of journalism.…”

Comedy and satire have always been a part of the political conversation. They play a valuable role in highlighting absurdities and inconsistencies among leaders. However, there is a growing problem in that many if not most of the most popular comedians and satirists of the day tend to be less interested in pointing out hypocrisy than in promoting a particular point of view, generally skewing to the left, rendering them partisan participants in the political process rather than objective critics and observers of that process.

Tomorrow: The Fake News Debate

Categories
Quick Analysis

Electoral Vote Doesn’t Stop Protests

The Electoral College vote has been cast with the expected result, but the bitterness that highlighted the 2016 presidential contest, pitting the left vs. both the center and conservatives will go on. The unprecedented attempts to delegitimize the ballot, even including death threats to members of the electoral college, (see, for example The Hill’s description of the threats to a young Michigan elector)  indicate an unfortunate turn in U.S.  politics.

The results as this article went to press indicated that Trump received 304 electoral votes, with only 270 needed to win. Clinton had 224. NBC news reported that “Anti-Trump protesters descended on state capitols throughout the U.S. in a last-ditch effort to persuade so-called ‘faithless electors’ in states Trump won to change their vote. Many of the Republicans casting ballots said they were inundated with calls and emails urging them to dump Trump… Only one Republican elector, Christopher Suprun of Texas, publicly pledged not to vote for Trump despite his state heavily favoring the president-elect last month. One other Texas elector also abandoned Trump in the final vote.”

While political and policy disagreements never vanish following elections, the broad post-campaign efforts, many organized and funded by leftist leaders, are unique.

The sides not only argue about specific topics; they disagree about the rules of their competition. As marriage counsellors note, learning how to fight is essential to preserving a relationship—in this case, living under the same government.

Not accepting the results of a fair election, using paid agitators to produce demonstrations some of which turned into violent riots, initiating groundless calls for recounts, and casting aspersions on the president-elect violate long-standing traditions that helped preserve the peaceful transition of power in America.

The debate is no longer centered over approaches to specific issues, such as how to spend federal dollars, or which foreign treaty to sign.  The new conflict is far more fundamental.  Centrists and Conservatives seek to preserve a free-market oriented economy and Constitutional practices; over the past eight years of the Obama Administration,  leftists expanded their perception that Constitutional rules and restrictions could be severely bent, and that a more regulated economy was preferable.
What women can do? cialis 40 mg A woman can help by her man get over erectile problems by her love and patience. So you should need to go for viagra sildenafil buy uk. It causes cialis 10mg reduced lubrication and arousal problems. Some people choose products, which increase their heart rate cheap super viagra and this, will pose a huge risk to their health.
While centrists and conservatives tend to concentrate on specific issues, such as middle-class unemployment, over-taxation, crime, national security, etc., their progressive counterparts advance a broader agenda, which President Obama called the “fundamental transformation” of America.

As the New York Analysis of Policy and Government previously noted, actual political campaigns constitute just one battleground for progressives.  Academia and entertainment, which those in the center and right tend not to emphasize as forums for political debate, are a major avenue for the advancement of leftist agendas. This increasingly outrages parents who do not wish to see their tax or tuition dollars being used to advance causes they disagree with, and tire of having to monitor television, movie and music programming for messages that trouble them.

The tenor of the political battle has changed radically.  In the mid part of the 20th Century, a common refrain heard was “I totally disagree with everything you say, but I would fight for your right to say it.” During the past several years, the American left has increasingly sought to deprive their opponents of a forum.  When conservatives complained of news bias on the part of the major television networks and newspapers, they invested heavily in talk radio, specialized opinion journals, Fox News, and internet sites.  Angry over the success of those alternatives, progressives have repeatedly sought to enact various forms of censorship.

Despite the seeming finality of the campaign following the electoral college vote, more unprecedented disorder is on the horizon. The Hollywood Reporter quotes activists/entertainer Michael Moore on plans to disrupt the inauguration:

If by some awful happenstance Trump shows up to be sworn in on January 20th, I will be there helping lead the national protest and non-violently disrupting the Inauguration of a man no one other than the electoral college elected — and I’ll also be doing my own thing as a private citizen (activities I won’t disclose now)… This impending disaster requires everyone to get involved now — all hands on deck! This is not a drill!”

Categories
Quick Analysis

China’s Space Threat, Part 2

Our analysis of China’s military intentions in space concludes today. 

At a recent Congressional Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Subcommittee on Space hearing  Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) reported that “Unlike the United States, China does not have distinct military and civilian space programs. The Chinese military is functionally in charge of all space activities[and]… has demonstrated a strong disregard for interests of other countries in outer space through its anti-satellite tests…When China launched its first person into space in 2003, it caught the world’s attention. Over the years, our focus has waned and now China’s accomplishments in space have become common-place. We cannot ignore Chinese achievements and become complacent…If the United States fails to reassert its leadership, China’s rise may undermine U.S. plans to transfer low-earth orbit habitation and human spaceflight from a government activity to a sustainable economic activity undertaken by the private sector.”

Space Subcommittee Chairman Brian Babin (R-Texas) criticized the Obama Administration’s record:

 “President George W. Bush sought to revitalize our nation’s space program by challenging NASA to return to the Moon and then chart a course for Mars. Steady advances were made towards those goals with strong Congressional support for the Constellation Program. NASA made solid progress towards the development of the Ares 1 and Ares 5 vehicles. The Commercial Cargo program was initiated and the International Space Station neared completion.

“All of that success came to a screeching halt when President Obama was sworn in. His FY2010 budget request slashed well over a billion dollars from the exploration budget…President Obama cancelled Constellation in its next budget request, redirected even more money to Earth Science to support its radical political agenda, and guaranteed dependence on Russia for access to space for an extended period of time.

“So what does this have to do with China? Well, this vacuum of leadership has led not only to extended dependence on Russia for access to space, but also facilitated the ascendance of China as a leading spacefaring nation. China has capitalized on this administration’s weakness by offering partnerships with other nations on missions, like a return to the Moon, which the U.S. chose to walk away from.
There is no denying why people buy viagra pills for women is due to the best ever effects that it gives to a person. Let’s know about these generic formulas and their ordine cialis on line http://www.learningworksca.org/resources/in-the-news/ assistance to treat men’s common sexual disorder. Type 1 diabetes is caused due to the deficiency of folic acid or vitamin B12. viagra usa mastercard There are tablets, jellies sildenafil 100mg tablets and soft, dissolvable tablets.
“Rather than charting a bold course that inspires the international community to engage with us, the Obama administration has alienated historic allies and potential partners alike. Only because of Congress is NASA building deep space exploration capabilities. Unfortunately, the administration refuses to let NASA show any detailed plans for a “Journey to Mars” beyond a PowerPoint chart. China, on the other hand, has demonstrated a willingness to answer calls for collaboration with open arms…They have already placed astronauts in orbit five times, launched a space station, and placed a rover on the Moon. They have announced plans for a larger space station, a first-of-akind mission to the far side of the Moon, and potentially a manned mission to the Moon in the 2030s.

“The administration’s abdication of leadership in space exploration has significant consequences. If we do not lead, someone else will. Leadership in space means security, technological prowess, and innovation. Our future prosperity depends on our leadership in space. If we do not lead, we will not set the terms and condition for those who follow. When the U.S. explores and embarks on adventures of discovery, we take with us our ideologies and principles…The Obama administration has already told the Europeans that that they are not interested in their Moon Village proposal. They’ve tried to walk away from their commitments to the Germans on SOFIA and actually abandoned ExoMars…China also threatens our nation’s cyber security. Couple that with their irresponsible antisatellite tests, and one is hardpressed to find a reason to reward their behavior with increased cooperation. We may not be in a space race with China. We may not even be competing with China in space, but the strategic choices we make clearly impact China’s space capabilities – something that we should all pay attention to given that China’s civil space activities are inseparable from their military…”

Mark A. Stokes, Executive Director of the Project 2049 Institute which analyses Asian-Pacific issues, testified The evolving capacity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to leverage space assets presents a number of challenges for the United States, allies, and friends in the AsiaPacific region…The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is gradually developing a capacity to project military power vertically into space and horizontally beyond its immediate periphery…… The PLA appears to be investing resources into ground-based radar systems capable of providing queuing quality data for engaging targets in space. The PLA also has invested in electronic countermeasure technologies that could degrade an adversary’s satellite communications, navigation satellite signals, or SAR satellites operating within line of sight of an emitter. Overview of Military Space Organization and Requirements Guided by the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee Political Bureau, the Central Military Commission (CMC) and State Council establish national space and counterspace requirements.

According to Dean Cheng Senior Research Fellow for Chinese Political and Security, China’s National Security Law passed in 2015, states that outer space is a “commanding height” in the international strategic competition. “In the newest edition of Science of Military Strategy, a chapter is devoted to discussing military conflict in the space and cyber (as well as nuclear) domains, where it is noted that the importance of space has grown significantly.”

James A. Lewis, speaking for the Center for Strategic and International Studies,  stressed that “The U.S. and China are in a quiet competition for military advantage in … Space has been an area of disinterest by American leaders and this helps to explain the disconnect between exploration and strategic goals and why in any discussion of a space race, the U.S. appears to be lagging.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

China’s Space Threat

The New York Analysis of Policy and Government begins a two-part look into China’s growing threat in space. 

China’s growing prowess in space technology is posing a growing threat to the United States. The U.S. Defense Department notes that in addition to the development of directed energy weapons and satellite jammers, China has developed anti-satellite capabilities.

Testifying before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission in 2015, Kevin Pollpeter of the University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation stated: “Based on their analysis of U.S. military operations, Chinese military researchers view space as a critical component in making the PLA into a force capable of winning “informatized” wars and recognize the role space plays in the collection and transmittal of information and the need to deny those capabilities to an adversary. Indeed, nearly every Chinese source describes space as the “ultimate high ground,” leading many Chinese analysts to assess that space warfare is inevitable. Because of the preeminence of the space battlefield, analysts writing on space argue that it will become the center of gravity in future wars and one that must be seized and controlled. In fact, these analysts argue that the first condition for seizing the initiative is to achieve space supremacy.”

The Guardian reported that there is growing concern about China’s intentions in space and its growing abilities. According to Stuart Clark, the launch of Aolong 1 (Roaming Dragon)” raised eyebrows, and stoked fears in some quarters that the civilian space programme is just a front for more covert operations. Aolong 1 has a robotic arm that can grab another satellite and guide it to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere. Officially, it is to remove space debris from orbit but it could also be used as a weapon, bringing down a rival’s satellite.Although this is true of any space debris removal system, doubts remain because China does not have an unblemished record in anti-satellite weaponry. In 2007, the Chinese shot down one of their own orbiting spacecraft in what was probably a thinly veiled warning to America.”

CNBC notes that “the Asian colossus is investing in anti-satellite technologies that would destroy or disable space-based assets in the event of conflict. Considering the fact that the U.S. relies upon satellites for a lot of its intelligence collection and communication, it’s a worrisome trend. And it is exacerbating tensions with U.S. defense officials and security analysts concerned by China’s focus on enhancing its military capabilities in space.
Anybody could pfizer viagra online face this disorder. In the condition of gastro-esophageal reflux a person may https://regencygrandenursing.com/post-acute-sub-acute-care/stroke-rehabilitation buy generic levitra feel that food is trapped behind the breastbone which may cause pain in the chest. When you hear a loud sound at all times bear in mind: your company’re undoubtedly unaided within the levitra uk regencygrandenursing.com world. This price variation deceives customers and don’t let viagra sample free them to trust other drug stores.
Popular Science outlines that that “This past year, [China] had 19 successful space launches—the second-highest number behind Russia’s 26, and ahead of America’s 18…[China is]  redefining what space means—militarily, economically, and politically—in the 21st century. There are plans for heavy-lift rockets, manned space stations, and one of the world’s largest satellite-imaging and -navigation networks. Meanwhile the U.S.—particularly where human spaceflight is concerned—is hardly moving at all. ‘I don’t worry about China suddenly leapfrogging us,’ says James Lewis, a director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a D.C. think tank. ‘I worry about us being distracted and waking up to realize that they have a much more powerful position in space.”

A National Interest examination stated that “There are few areas where China is really competitive with the United States: high-speed computing, perhaps (China owns the world’s fastest computer), high-speed rail, enormous dam projects. Many of these “competitions” are mostly symbolic, but it is in outer space where Beijing is not only catching up quickly, but is on the verge of leaving the US space program – once the gold standard – in its wake… There is… one area where the indigenous Chinese defense and aerospace really does shine, and that is its space sector.

The Washington Free Beacon  reports that a Dong Neng-3 anti-satellite missile may soon be launched.

The Report concludes tomorrow. 

Categories
Quick Analysis

Venezuela’s Descent

The socialist government of Venezuela endured yet another self-imposed embarrassment this month when its foreign minister, Delcy Rodriguez, pushed through a cordon of police in an unsuccessful attempt to attend a Mercosur meeting which had already suspended her nation from participation due to its extreme economic mismanagement.( Mercosur is a sub-regional association, formed in 1991, to increase trade and diplomatic relations. It consists of Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and, until December 1, 2016, Venezuela.)

Venezuela’s once promising economy was essentially destroyed by its hard-left government, despite the vast oil wealth possessed by the nation, calling to mind the adage that if a socialist government took over a desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand.

Joan Grillo, writing for Time Magazine notes that Venezuela “was once the richest country in Latin America. Now it’s falling apart…in a country that sits atop the world’s largest known petroleum reserves, hungry citizens wait on their assigned day for whatever the stores might stock: with luck, corn flour to make arepas, and on a really good day, shampoo.” Soap and toilet paper are items so scarce that they have become coveted commodities.

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI)  notes thatAs of the end of 2015, Venezuela’s proven oil reserves (301 billion barrels) were nearly 13% greater than oil reserves in Saudi Arabia (267 billion barrels) and about 5.5 times greater than America’s (55 billion barrels). Despite having more oil reserves than Saudi Arabia, and in fact more proven oil reserves than any country in the world (8 times more than the US), oil-rich Venezuela’s economy is imploding and collapsing under the crippling burden of socialism, and economic conditions there have deteriorated so dramatically that they probably now qualify as the “economic apocalypse” that some left-leaning economists were predicting just a few years ago would never happen in Venezuela.”

The socialist regime ignored all financial common sense and both squandered its energy wealth while simultaneously suppressing other economic endeavors. Now, following a dip in energy prices and the harsh restriction of other financial activities, Venezuela finds itself enduring major food shortages. Its citizens are seeking to find nourishment by traveling to Brazil, but the Venezuelan currency has become close to worthless. AEI found that there have been incidents of zoo animals being slaughtered for food. Students are reportedly fainting in class from malnutrition. Food lines are eight hours long. In further evidence of nightmarish conditions, there has been a significant increase in the number of women getting sterilized, because there is neither food nor funds to provide for children, and standard birth control has become unavailable.
The key to any successful relationship is communication: discount viagra be it personal or professional. Booster next page buy cialis in australia capsule not only cures erectile dysfunction but improves the quality of erections, increases sex drive and virility. If the patient has been suffering from cardio problems, high blood pressure, etc. he must not opt for such medicinal treatments since the ingredients of such drug purchase levitra medications & also know about their adverse reactions. Check supplies generico levitra on line purchase at store on hand, and the site’s delivery information.
In addition to severe shortages of food and birth control, The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)   found that  that “Severe…medicine shortages, soaring crime rates, and a government crackdown on the opposition have sparked widespread protests. The country’s economy was expected to contract 10.1 percent this year, up from 5.7 percent in 2015, making it the worst performer among economies tracked by the World Bank. Inflation hovered around 720 percent, and as many as 76 percent of Venezuelans live below the poverty line, up from 52 percent of the population in 2014, according to a recent study.”

CFR quotes Harvard economist Ricardo Hausman’s analysis of what went wrong. Venezuela’s socialist leadership “did not use the massive oil price boom between 2004 and 2013 to put money aside for a rainy day,” and instead  “used the boom to expropriate large swaths of the economy, impose draconian foreign currency and price controls, and to subsidize imports. All this weakened the economy and made the country more dependent on imports, which Venezuelans can no longer afford.”

CFR notes that “Limits on what producers could charge for goods led many manufacturers in the country to reduce production. As of 2015, 1,200 private enterprises in Venezuela had been nationalized, which, experts say, has further diminished productivity. Infant mortality in hospitals increased from 0.02 percent in 2012 to 2 percent in 2015, according to a government report. Venezuela’s shortages have spilled over to the health sector, and the Venezuelan Pharmaceutical Federation reported in April that 80 percent of basic medicines were unavailable. Infant mortality in hospitals increased from 0.02 percent in 2012 to 2 percent in 2015, according to a government report. Local health NGOs say Venezuela is vastly underreporting cases of the Zika virus, the mosquito-borne illness that has been linked to birth defects. Malaria and dengue fever are also reportedly on the rise, increasing pressure on the frail health system…87 percent of the population says it does not have enough money to buy sufficient food, according to a local university. The Caracas-based Workers’ Center for Documentation and Social Analysis reported in April 2016 that, adjusted for inflation, a monthly food basket cost more than sixteen times the monthly minimum wage. Violent crime is also high, and many point to the economic downturn as a cause. According to the government, the homicide rate in 2015 was 58 per 100,000. Independent groups say it could be more than 50 percent higher. Caracas, with 119 homicides per 100,000, is the most world’s most violent city outside of a warzone. (The U.S. rate, by comparison, is 5 per 100,000.)”

Cuba, Latin America’s most well-known socialist regime, frequently blamed the U.S. embargo for its problems, despite the reality that it was its addiction to left-wing economic practices that caused its dilemma.  Venezuela has no such excuse, exposing the inherent problem of socialist economics.

Categories
Quick Analysis

Bipartisan Support Enacts CURES Act

It is exceedingly rare for important legislation to gain broad bipartisan support. The 21st Century Cures Act , introduced by Rep. Fred Upton (R-Michigan) in 2015, is an exception. The measure, introduced by a Republican, was signed into law by President Obama yesterday.

It provides for a NIH and Cures Innovation Fund for for biomedical research, including high-risk, high-reward research and research conducted by early stage investigators, and allows the development and implementation  of a strategic plan for biomedical research.

The House of Representatives’ Energy and Commerce Committee  summarizes the new law:

“THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT [is] An innovation game-changer, a once-in-a-generation, transformational opportunity to change the way we treat disease. The House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate HELP Committee have engaged in a public, nonpartisan conversation with patients, researchers, innovators, and health care providers about what steps can be taken to expedite the discovery, development, and delivery of new treatments and cures and maintain America’s global status as the leader in biomedical innovation. The 21st Century Cures Act (“Cures”) is the product of that conversation.

“The National Institutes of Health will get $4.8 billion in new funding that is fully offset. These dollars will help advance the Precision Medicine Initiative to drive research into the genetic, lifestyle and environmental variations of disease ($1.5 billion); bolster Vice President Biden’s “Cancer Moonshot” to speed research ($1.8 billion); and invest in the BRAIN initiative to improve our understanding of diseases like Alzheimer’s.

“The pace of scientific advancement over the past two decades, including the mapping of the human genome, has been impressive. Translating these discoveries into new FDA-approved treatments, however, has proven difficult. Cures will advance new therapies for patients by:

  • Modernizing clinical trials and the means by which safety and efficacy data is accumulated and analyzed.
  • Putting patients at the heart of the regulatory review process. • Supporting broader, more collaborative development, qualification, and utilization of biomarkers, which help assess how a therapy is working, and on whom, earlier in the process.
  • Streamlining regulations and provides more clarity and consistency for innovators developing health software and mobile medical apps, combination products, vaccines, and regenerative medicine therapies.
  • Incentivizing the development of drugs for pediatric diseases and medical countermeasures, and empower FDA to utilize flexible approaches in reviewing medical devices that represent breakthrough technologies.
  • Providing FDA with $500 million for regulatory modernization and give the agency the ability to recruit and retain the best and brightest scientists, doctors, and engineers.

The generic medicine is cost effective and the good news is that the chemists have successfully come up with effective drugs like Kamagra and Dapoxetine in order to stay ahead in the competition that actually involves numerous online viagra sales france vendors, varied tools like keywords optimization, back links etc have been incorporated. levitra is actually the key. It offers effective cure for early discharge, low semen volume and tadalafil super active erectile dysfunction. The patient may have to urinate through a strainer to catch any seeds that may be passed along with the urine. sildenafil rx To help such males who feel shy because discount cialis india of their mental disorders like stress, depression, anxiety etc.
“The development of new drugs and devices is meaningless unless they are delivered to the right patients at the right time. Cures will help improve delivery by:

  • ensuring electronic health record systems are interoperable for seamless patient care and help fully realize the benefits of a learning health care system.
  • Improving education for health care providers and help facilitate seniors’ access to the latest medical technology.

“Our work to advance meaningful mental health reforms has been a multi-year, multi-Congress effort. The mental health reforms included in the revised 21st Century Cures Act are based largely on H.R. 2646, the Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act, authored by Rep. Tim Murphy (R-PA), which passed the House in July by a vote of 422-2. This legislative effort represents the most significant reforms to the mental health system in more than a decade. These landmark reforms will:

  • Create a new Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use to replace the Administrator at SAMHSA and coordinate mental health programs across the federal government.
  • Establish the National Mental Health and Substance Use Policy Lab to drive evidencebased grant making within SAMHSA.
  • Direct the Secretary of HHS to undertake guidance to clarify when communication can take place under HIPAA to help ensure communication among providers, families, and patients to improve mental health treatment.
  • Improve mental health care for children with serious emotional disturbance, or adults with serious mental illness, through targeted authorizations and reauthorizations, including expansion of Assisted Outpatient Treatment.
  • Strengthen the nation’s mental health workforce.”

Vice President Biden, who lost his son Beau to cancer, was particularly gratified at the enactment of the CURES legislation.   He noted:

“[It’s] personal for me and for millions of Americans: The 21st Century Cures Act invests $1.8 billion to help us end cancer as we know it. For over a year, I’ve been leading our National Cancer Moonshot to fundamentally change the culture of our fight against cancer and inject a sense of urgency into it. This bill goes a long way to help us — investing in promising new therapies, enhancing prevention and detection efforts in every community regardless of zip code, and bringing us closer to the day when there are vaccines for all kinds of cancer, just as we have them for measles or mumps.

“While I was presiding in the Senate, my colleagues from both sides of the aisle renamed the section of this bill on cancer research for my son, Beau, who lost his battle with brain cancer, but like countless Americans who lost their own battles, inspires us to do everything we can for the loved ones we can save. My thanks goes out to the bipartisan leadership — Democrats and Republicans in the House and the Senate — who ensured that this important bill became law. Without this true bipartisan support, this piece of legislation, which will help millions of Americans, would not have been possible.”

Categories
Quick Analysis

Update on NATO

NATO’s role has been revitalized by Russia’s arms buildup, its aggression against Crimea and Ukraine, and its threatening moves towards eastern Europe. During the brief period between the fall of the USSR and Vladimir Putin’s return to an expansionist stance, NATO became a key player in the fight against terror.

Speaking at the organization’s recent Parliamentary Assembly  session in November, the organization’s Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg, addressed the main concerns and status of the defensive alliance, which will gain an additional member this spring when Montenegro is expected to join.

According to Stoltenberg, defense spending continues to be a key issue. He noted that it has been his “main focus” since assuming his leadership post. He remains concerned that some NATO members are spending less than 2% of their annual budgets on defense. “After years of sliding defence spending, we have seen a shift. At our Wales’ Summit in 2014, Allies committed to spend 2% of GDP on defence within a decade. That commitment is already bearing fruit. In 2015, we stopped the defence cuts and we saw a spending increase across Europe and Canada. I expect further increase of 3% for European Allies and Canada this year. So we are moving in the right direction but we still have a long way to go [the] 2% target really matters.”

NATO is increasing its defensive presence in the eastern part of the Alliance, including the deployment of four multinational battalions to the Baltic States and Poland. Earlier this year, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States each committed to lead one of those battalions. The alliance is taking steps to strengthen its presence in the Black Sea region. A Romanian-led multinational brigade will be formed. Work continues on additional defensive measures in the air and at sea, even as the organization seeks additional dialogue with Moscow. Stoltenberg emphasized that NATO is “constantly looking into what more we can do with Ukraine to strengthen our partnership…”  He met with President Poroshenko to implement a “substantial package” to increase cooperation.

Treating Sexual viagra soft pills Disorders in Men with SCI SCI may affect the sexual desire, which bring them seldom feeling unconcerned in sex performance. Although almost all men encounter ED at some point, they could be isolated incidents caused due to excess alcohol consumption, stress or performance anxiety. midwayfire.com sildenafil cipla Facts about cialis price cialis price Chief constituents of Musli Kaunch capsules are kaunch, semal musli, Musli Sya, Safed Musli, Ashwagandha, Bala and Gokhru. This is because, when midwayfire.com viagra on line you complete or perform some part of your life that makes you satisfied physically or mentally, then you love to do it. The situation in the Mediterranean remains serious. In response, NATO recently launched a new maritime security operation entitled “ Sea Guardian” to help protect the safety and the security of one of the world’s busiest bodies of water.  NATO ships, submarines and maritime patrol aircraft will perform core activities like surveillance, counter-terrorism and capacity-building of regional navies. NATO is supporting the European Union’s (EU) Operation Sophia with information sharing and logistical support. (‘Operation Sophia’ engages in boarding and seizing on the high seas vessels suspected of being used for human smuggling and trafficking. This follows a first phase of intelligence gathering on smuggling networks and is intended to precede operations due to take place within the territorial waters of Libya as well as coercive actions against the smugglers – including on Libyan soil.)

According to the Secretary General, “NATO-EU cooperation is now closer than it has ever been,” particularly in countering hybrid threats, enhancing cyber security and coordinating exercises.

Stoltenberg addressed the ongoing discussions about the creation of a European army. He noted “The message is that this is not about creating an alternative to NATO, but this is about strengthening the European pillar inside NATO. …The only thing we have to avoid is that when Europe starts to strengthen its defences it is done in a way which is complimentary to NATO, not competing with NATO… Let me also add that, this is in one way obvious, because we have to remember that especially after Brexit, EU is important but, compared to the rest of NATO, especially when you take into account United States, of course NATO has capabilities and strength which is not covered by the European Union. Eighty percent of NATO’s defence spending will come from non-EU allies after Brexit, eighty percent and three out of four battalions which we are going to deploy to the eastern part of the alliance, to the Baltic countries and Poland, will be led by non-EU allies. So it goes in a way of the United Kingdom, after Brexit, Canada and the United States. So I think it’s obvious that we cannot decouple European security from North America and we cannot decouple the security of the European Union members from the rest of Europe…”

Turning to NATO’s largest member, the United States, Stoltenberg said: “I welcome the incoming Administration in Washington… I look forward to working with President-elect Donald Trump. The partnership between Europe and the United States has been rock-solid for almost 70 years. A partnership that has always received bi-partisan support in the United States. And better burden-sharing will make the transatlantic bond even stronger.  I had the pleasure of speaking to President-elect Donald Trump…and he expressed very strong support for the NATO alliance and he expressed a strong commitment on continued strong NATO or US support for the NATO alliance and US support for the security of Europe and collective defence. So, I look forward to work with him and I’m absolutely certain that also with the new Administration, we will have an Administration in the United States which is absolutely committed to the NATO alliance and he also stated, as he has stated in the election campaign, that he will strengthen further US defence capabilities and increase defence spending. But, of course, he also pointed out during the election campaign and in the phone call he and I had on Friday, the importance of increased defence spending among European allies, and that’s something I absolutely…understand…we have decided, we have pledged, that we will stop the cuts and increase and aim at two percent within the decade…”

Categories
NY Analysis

America’s Defense Crisis

Following eight years of reduced budgetary support for the U.S. military, at a time when threats have increased dramatically from Russia, China, Iran, North Korea and terrorists, the ability of the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines to defend the nation has reached a near-crisis level.

The warning signs have been apparent for some time. In 2015, General Martin Dempsey, who was serving as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for the U.S. military, noted that funding for the armed forces was at the “lower ragged edge” of what was necessary to keep the nation safe. The latest assessments of American strength confirm that the ability of the nation to protect itself is only marginal. Even more troubling, according to another report, is that the infrastructure necessary to rebuild the military to a more acceptable level is itself below par.

The Defense Budget

At the start of 2016r, Senator John McCain   displayed consternation at the inadequate budget proposed by President Obama.  “…the Senate Armed Services Committee received testimony from the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper who said that he cannot recall a more diverse array of challenges and crises in his more than fifty years of service to the nation…at a time when U.S. military deployments are increasing to confront growing global threats, the President’s budget request is actually less, in real dollars, than what Congress enacted last year…rather than request an increase in defense spending that reflects what our military really needs, the President’s request [will cut] important defense needs – cutting 15,000 current Army soldiers and 4,000 sailors, reducing major modernization programs, and proposing a pay increase for service members much lower than what is needed to compete with private sector wages.”

Contrary to popular misconception, the U.S. defense budget, notes the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, is a relatively small percentage of the federal budget, and a minor part of America’s GDP. “…the FY 2017 Department of Defense budget [prepared as instructed by the Obama White House] … would be 3 percent of GDP, and 14.2 percent of overall federal spending. Overall, the share of defense spending as a percentage of GDP has declined steadily since the end of the Korean War. What makes the Obama drawdown of the Pentagon unique is that, unlike the aftermath of prior wars or the Cold War, the potential threat to the U.S. is rising, not diminishing.”

“Woefully Inadequate”

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) describes the state of U.S. defenses as “a force-planning construct that is woefully inadequate for the global and everyday demands of wartime and peacetime… Gone is any plan that foresees conflict taking longer than one year in duration or any contingency with a whiff of stability operations, long-term counterinsurgency or counter-insurrection, or nation building of the type seen in Iraq and Afghanistan… After six years of budget cuts and operational shifts, hard choices have in many cases turned into stupid or bad ones. Fewer resources and the lack of bipartisan consensus in favor of a strong defense have forced commanders and planners across services to accept previously unthinkable risks as they pick and choose which portions of the national defense strategy to implement… Unmentioned is that the risk to the force grows each passing year. It is now at crisis levels and promises unnecessarily longer wars, higher numbers of wounded or killed in action, and outright potential for mission failure.”

Defense One  notes that it’s not just manpower and hardware that’s the problem. America is losing its lead in technology as well.  “The Pentagon is worried that rivals are developing their capabilities faster than the U.S. is rolling out new ones. The edge is shrinking.”

The Heritage Foundation’s report on U.S. military strength presents a worrisome picture of an understrength military. “The common theme across the services and the U.S. nuclear enterprise is one of force degradation resulting from many years of underinvestment, poor execution of modernization programs, and the negative effects of budget sequestration (cuts in funding) on readiness and capacity. While the military has been heavily engaged in operations, primarily in the Middle East but elsewhere as well, since September 11, 2001, experience is both ephemeral and context-sensitive. Valuable combat experience is lost over time as the service members who individually gained experience leave the force, and it maintains direct relevance only for future operations of a similar type (e.g., counterinsurgency operations in Iraq are fundamentally different from major conventional operations against a state like Iran or China). Thus, although the current Joint Force is experienced in some types of operations, it is still aged and shrinking in its capacity for operations.”

The Heritage Foundation and American Enterprise Institute analyses of each branch of the military reveals the following deficiencies:

Army: The U.S. Army should have 50 brigade combat teams (BCTs); Currently, it has only 32.   The force is rated as weak in capacity, readiness, and marginal in capability.“The Army has continued to trade end strength and modernization for improved readiness for current operations. However, accepting risks in these areas has enabled the Army to keep only one-third of its force at acceptable levels of readiness, and even for units deployed abroad, the Army has had to increase its reliance on contracted support to meet maintenance requirements. Budget cuts have affected combat units disproportionately: A 16 percent reduction in total end strength has led to a 32 percent reduction in the number of brigade combat teams and similar reductions in the number of combat aviation brigades. In summary, the Army is smaller, older, and weaker, a condition that is unlikely to change in the near future.”

What would this mean in the event of a major conflict? According to AEI “…a recent RAND war game found that U.S. European Command could not prevent Russian occupation of Baltic capitals within three days, leaving follow-on forces to fight through the Russian Kaliningrad exclave, which bristles with weapons and troops.”

Navy: The U.S. Navy should have 346 surface combatants; currently, it has only 273, and only one-third of those are considered mission-capable.  The force is rated as weak in capability, and marginal in capacity and readiness. “While the Navy is maintaining a moderate global presence, it has little ability to surge to meet wartime demands. Deferred maintenance has kept ships at sea but is also beginning to affect the Navy’s ability to deploy. With scores of ‘weak’ in capability (due largely to old platforms and troubled modernization programs) and ‘marginal’ in capacity, the Navy is currently just able to meet operational requirements. Continuing budget shortfalls in its shipbuilding account will hinder the Navy’s ability to improve its situation, both materially and quantitatively, for the next several years.

It’s an ongoing debate, most people are scared to admit that they might be suffering from this medical condition, then you will experience swelling, pain or burning during cialis generika 5mg urination Persistent need to urinate at night Blood in urine diminished pigmentation of the skin failure of bone mineral concreteness Fluid preservation Bleeding gums Rectal bleeding eminent triglyceride levels Seizures Decreased night apparition harsh skin retorts Citizens sensitive to isotretinoin can. If you want the on-site support, you need to call generico cialis on line the qualified technician and schedule a visit. These natural ingredients they contained work as free cialis sample http://deeprootsmag.org/2018/04/15/knockout-punch/ a diuretic which helps increase urination. Cheap Sildamax provides buy vardenafil levitra http://deeprootsmag.org/2013/05/14/sun-unleashes-spectacular-solar-eruption/ the good treatment of erectile dysfunction in men. According to AEI combatant commanders have only 62 percent of the attack submarines they need. It also is short of fighter planes. One example: Defense One  reports “The U.S. Navy says it needs about 30 new Super Hornets, but it has only funded two in the Pentagon’s 2017 war budget. It has listed 14 planes as “unfunded priorities” and money would be needed for an additional 14 planes in 2018.”

Air Force: The U.S. Air Force requires 1,200 fighter/ground-attack aircraft, but has only 1,113, many of which are overaged. The force is rated as marginal in capability and readiness, but strong in capacity. “the USAF’s accumulating shortage of pilots (700) and maintenance personnel (4,000) has begun to affect its ability to generate combat power. The Air Force … lack of ability to fly and maintain its tactical aircraft, especially in a high-tempo/threat combat environment, means that its usable inventory of such aircraft is actually much smaller. This reduced ability is a result of funding deficiencies that also result in a lack of spare parts, fewer flying hours, and compromised modernization programs.”

According to AEI, budget contractions have resulted in the current Air Force’s dubious honor of being the smallest and oldest in its history…as F-15/F-16 retirements outpace F-35 production. Another recent RAND war game showed it would require more fighter air wings than the Air Force currently fields in total to defeat a surge of Chinese aircraft over Taiwan.

Marine Corps: The USMC needs 36 battalions; it has only 24. It’s rated as weak in capacity marginal in capability and readiness. “The Corps continues to deal with readiness challenges driven by the combined effects of high operational tempo and low levels of funding. At times during 2016, less than one-third of its F/A-18s, a little more than a quarter of its heavy-lift helicopters, and only 43 percent of its overall aviation fleet were available for operational employment. Pilots not already in a deployed status were getting less than half of needed flight hours. The Corps’ modernization programs are generally in good shape, but it will take several years for the new equipment to be produced and fielded…the Corps has only two-thirds of the combat units that it actually needs, especially when accounting for expanded requirements that include cyber units and more crisis-response forces.”

The Nuclear Deterrent: [As the New York Analysis of Policy and Government has previously noted, Russia, for the first time in history, leads the world in nuclear weaponry.] The American nuclear arsenal is rated as weak in warhead modernization, delivery system modernization, and nuclear weapons complex, and marginal in readiness  and lab talent  It is only ranked strong in warhead surety and delivery reliability.  “Modernization, testing, and investment in intellectual and talent underpinnings continue to be the chief problems facing America’s nuclear enterprise. Delivery platforms are good, but the force depends on a very limited set of weapons (in number of designs) and models that are quite old, in stark contrast to the aggressive programs of competitor states. Of growing concern is the “marginal” score for ‘Allied Assurance’ at a time when Russia has rattled its nuclear saber in a number of recent provocative exercises; China has been more aggressive in militarily pressing its claims to the South and East China Seas; North Korea is heavily investing in a submarine-launched ballistic missile capability; and Iran has achieved a nuclear deal with the West that effectively preserves its nuclear capabilities development program for the foreseeable future.”

Russia has a larger nuclear capability than the U.S. China has more submarines and will soon have a larger navy. Both nations pose key threats to the U.S. Air Force, Notes the American Enterprise Institute. (AEI).  “…the [U.S.] Air Force has weakened relative to its adversaries. As China and Russia produce and export advanced air defense and counter-stealth systems alongside fifth-generation stealth fighters, the [U.S.] Air Force treads water, buying small numbers of F-35s while spending ever-larger sums on keeping F-15s and F-16s operational – though those aircraft cannot survive on the first-day front lines of modern air combat…Simply put, the armed forces are not large enough, modern enough and ready enough to meet today’s or tomorrow’s mission requirements. This is the outcome not only of fewer dollars, but of the reduced purchasing power of those investments, rising unbudgeted costs for politically difficult reforms continuously deferred, and a now-absent bipartisan consensus on U.S. national security that existed for generations.

In prior times of military crisis, the once-mighty U.S. industrial infrastructure was capable of rapidly turning out new ships, tanks, and aircraft. According to the Alliance for American Manufacturing, (AAM) that may no longer be the case. “U.S. national security is at-risk due to our military’s reliance on foreign nations for the raw materials, parts, and products used to defend the American people…With the closing of factories across the United States and the mass exodus of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China and other nations over the past 30 years, the United States’ critically important defense industrial base has deteriorated dramatically. As a result, the United States now relies heavily on imports to keep our armed forces equipped and ready. Compounding this rising reliance on foreign suppliers, the United States also depends increasingly on foreign financing arrangements. In addition, the United States is not mining enough of the critical metals and other raw materials needed to produce important weapons systems and military supplies. These products include the night-vision devices (made with a rare earth element) that enabled Navy SEALs to hunt down Osama bin Laden. Consequently, the health of the United States’ defense industrial base—and our national security—is in jeopardy. We are vulnerable to major disruptions in foreign supplies that could make it impossible for U.S. warriors, warships, tanks, aircraft, and missiles to operate effectively.”

One example cited by AAM: “The United States is completely dependent on a single Chinese company for the chemical needed to produce the solid rocket fuel used to propel HELLFIRE missiles. As current U.S. supplies diminish, our military will be reliant on the Chinese supplier to provide this critical chemical—butanetriol—in the quantities needed to maintain this missile system. HELLFIRE missiles are a widely used, reliable, and effective weapon launched from attack helicopters and unmanned drones. They are a critical component in America’s arsenal.”

The reduction in defense preparedness has been a factor in the continuing shortage of middle-income level jobs. The cuts continue to defense-related employment continues. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that “Boeing Co. said [on Nov.15 that] it would cut another 500 jobs over the next four years from its defense and space business by shrinking work at its Huntington Beach facility in California and closing two smaller plants in Texas and Virginia…Boeing’s defense arm has cut thousands of jobs over the past five years, a faster pace than reductions at a commercial airplane arm that have climbed in recent months as it faced tougher competition from Airbus Group SE.”

National Review summarized the condition of the U.S. military by quoting U.S. service chiefs at budgetary hearings earlier this year: “General Ray Odierno, the Army chief of staff at the time, reported that ‘readiness has been degraded to its lowest level in 20 years. . . . Today we only have 33 percent of our brigades ready to the extent we would expect them to be if asked to fight.’ The chief of naval operations at the time, Admiral Jonathan Greenert, said, ‘Our contingency response force, that’s what’s on call from the United States, is one-third of what it should be and what it needs to be.’ The Air Force chief of staff, General Mark Welsh, said that if his airplanes were cars, ‘we currently have twelve fleets — twelve fleets of airplanes that qualify for antique license plates in the state of Virginia. We must modernize our Air Force.”

President-elect Trump has pledged to increase the U.S. military and modernize the nuclear arsenal. According to the Washington Post “Trump’s win is good news for the defense industry, especially when coupled with Republican majorities in the House and Senate,’ said Loren Thompson, a defense consultant who advises many of the nation’s top-tier contractors.”

Categories
Announcements

Hans von Spakovsky, Herb London on Vernuccio/Novak

Hans von Spakovsky will discuss First Amendment issues, and Herb In some men the problem is so acute order generic cialis you can check here that it leads to erectile malfunction. Precautions A woman and a normal functioning man must levitra 20 mg cute-n-tiny.com stay away from this medicine. A lot of times one type of therapy can indeed take the best care on line cialis http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/happy-new-years-eve/ of the condition. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment can increase the chances of low blood pressure or heart attack. cheap viagra 4. London will examine U.S-China relations on the next Vernuccio-Novak Report.